Khamenei says Trump 'exaggerated' impact of US strikes on nuclear sites
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said US President Donald Trump "exaggerated" the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, in his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel took hold.
In a statement and a televised speech carried by state media, he hailed his country's "victory" over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the United States, while claiming that Washington had been dealt a "slap" after striking Iranian nuclear sites.
Mr Khamenei's remarks come two days after a ceasefire ended a 12-day war between Iran and Israel, the foes' deadliest and most destructive confrontation in history.
It also follows a stinging row in the United States over the actual extent of the damage inflicted by American strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites during the conflict.
"The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Mr Khamenei said.
The United States "has gained nothing from this war," he said, adding that American strikes "did nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear facilities.
"The Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America," he said, a reference to Iran's missile launch targeting the largest US base in the Middle East.
"I want to congratulate the great Iranian nation... for its victory over the fallacious Zionist regime," he added, claiming that Israel had "almost collapsed" because of Iran's strikes.
Both Iran and Israel had already claimed they won, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a "historic victory" for Israel.
US defence
In the United States, leaked intelligence this week opened up a Pandora's box of accusations and counter-claims over the extent of the damage caused by the strikes.
Later today, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is due to offer a fresh assessment of the attacks.
After waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since June 13, the United States bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities.
An initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strikes did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear programme was set back only months at most.
Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400kg of enriched uranium - which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country.
The US administration has hit back furiously, with Mr Trump saying the attack "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain, and that it had set the programme back by "decades".
Mr Trump said that Mr Hegseth, whom he dubbed "war" secretary, would hold a news conference today to "fight for the dignity of our great American pilots".
CIA chief John Ratcliffe said in a statement yesterday that "several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years".
The Israeli military said it had delivered a "significant" blow to Iran's nuclear sites but that it was "still early" to fully assess the damage.
Mr Netanyahu announced that "we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project".
"And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt," he said.
Nuclear talks?
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Al Jazeera that "nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure".
After the war derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, Mr Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope "for a comprehensive peace agreement".
Mr Trump told reporters that Israel and Iran were "both tired, exhausted", before going on to say that talks were planned with Iran next week.
"We may sign an agreement. I don't know," he added.
Iran has systematically denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its "legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy.
It has also said it was willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington.
The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said.
Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Spain's leader sticks by decision to break with Nato on defence spending
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez walked away from this week's Nato summit with an opt-out from spending more on defence as well as fresh threats of tariffs from US President Donald Trump. On Thursday, the progressive Spanish leader stuck by his decision to break with Nato allies and responded to Mr Trump's comments by pointing out that the European Commission — and not Spain — was who decided the bloc's trade policy. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez (Omar Havana/AP) 'What is clear is that trade policy is a policy directed from here, from Brussels,' Mr Sanchez said. 'Spain is an open country. It is a country that is friendly to its friends, and we consider the United States a friend of Spain.' At the military alliance's summit on Wednesday, members agreed to raise their defence spending to 5% of GDP. But Mr Sanchez secured a last-minute exemption, saying that Spain will only spend up to 2.1%, which he called 'sufficient and realistic'. Mr Trump criticised the country after the summit, saying Spain wanted 'a little bit of a free ride,' and that it would 'have to pay it back to us on trade' through higher tariffs. How Mr Sanchez's gamble could play out was up for debate on Thursday. 'It is not always easy to interpret exactly what Mr Trump means,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters at an EU summit. 'How he wants to impose import tariffs on Spain separately is a mystery to everyone. Could this perhaps concern specific products from Spain? We will have to wait and see.' Spain's move on the international stage comes at a complex moment for Mr Sanchez at home as corruption cases involving his inner circle have ensnared his Socialist party and resulted in louder calls — even from some left-wing allies — to announce early elections. So far, Mr Sanchez has refused. 'To Trump's theatre, Mr Sanchez responds with something similar,' said Montserrat Nebrera, political analyst and professor of constitutional law at the International University of Catalonia. 'Domestic problems are piling up, and this resistance to meeting the arbitrary 5% target also seeks to wink at his partners most critical of defence spending.' Spain is Nato's lowest spender, with just 1.28% of its GDP spent on defence (Omar Havana/AP) Spain was Nato's lowest spender last year, according to the alliance's estimates, spending around 1.28% of its GDP on defence expenditure. In April, Mr Sanchez announced that the country would reach 2% this year, for which he was criticised by some left-wing allies. On Thursday, Antonio Garamendi, president of the Spanish Confederation of Business Organisations, criticised Mr Sanchez for the spending opt-out. 'We have to stick with our allies and not going along with the other Europeans is an error, and even more so if that increases the chance we will be punished,' Mr Garamendi said. While Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries, it could still be targeted by tariffs that hit its most vulnerable industries, Mr Garamendi said. He specifically pointed to Spanish steel, cars and olive oil sectors. 'There are industries that can be impacted, and that has to concern us,' he added.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
The Tánaiste has published the outline of the Occupied Territories Bill - here's what's in it
TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS yesterday published a broad outline of the updated Occupied Territories Bill as he endeavours to soon include services amongst prohibited trade activity. Ireland is the only EU country seeking to pass legislation sanctioning trade with businesses located in Palestinian land that is under the military control of Israel since its declaration of independence in 1967 – otherwise known as the Occupied Territories. These territories include the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights in southwest Syria. Israeli settlements in the territories are illegal under international law, as laid out in Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court which stipulates that the transfer by a state of its own citizens into the land of another territory is illegal. This has been happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – particularly in the West Bank – for decades. A map of modern Israel showing the Occupied Territories of Palestine (marked by grey and white stripes) United Nations United Nations The Occupied Territories Bill was first introduced by Independent Senator Francis Black in 2018 and proposed making it an offence 'for a person to import or sell goods or services originating in an occupied territory or to extract resources from an occupied territory in certain circumstances'. The slightly amended bill proposed now by the Tánaiste, and formally known as the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill, would make it a crime under the Customs Act 2015 to import goods into Ireland that originate in Israeli settlements built over what is legally recognised as Palestinian land. Advertisement New homes being constructed in the West Bank After the Israeli government approved the expansion of Jewish settlements. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo However, services such as tourism and IT are as of yet excluded in the latest draft of the legislation. An estimated 700,000 Israeli settlers currently live in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which were seized by Israel in during the Six Day War in 1967. At present, Ireland is Israel's second largest trading partner after the US, purchasing €2.9 billion of its total exports, according to data from the Central Statistics Office. What will be included in the Bill? In its current form, the Bill only applies to goods imported from the Occupied Territories. The broad outline published by the Tánaiste yesterday breaks down the proposed terminology. Goods – materials and products, animate or inanimate. Material – indicates ingredients or component parts used to manufacture a good. Product – the good being manufactured, even if intended for use in a later manufacturing process. Importation - the act of bringing goods into the State from outside of the State (as per the Customs Act 2015). Israeli settlement - a city, village or industrial zone located in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. Parties found to be importing goods that are subject to prohibition under the Bill will be subject to punishment as outlined in Section 14(1) of the Customs Act. Will services be included? The Government has faced backlash for not including services in its recent outline of banned imports, with Labour accusing the Taoiseach of instead publishing a 'retreat'. Micheál Martin has commented on the difficulty of incorporating services into the Bill, stating that it is 'genuinely more complex than goods transferring' due to issues over defining where the service originates. However, Simon Harris has vowed to seek their inclusion in an enhanced version of the Bill due to go before an Oireachtas committee for examination. 'Let's not forget one thing before we get into the detail of the legislation, there isn't another country in the European Union that you can visit today and ask a government minister about their Bill to ban trade and the detail of it, because they don't have one,' Harris said. He is also understood to be looking for a second opinion from the Attorney General on the legalities surrounding the inclusion of services before passing it through to the pre-legislative stage. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
No known intelligence Iran moved uranium before US attack
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has said that he is unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from American strikes over the weekend. US military bombers targeted three nuclear facilities, using more than a dozen bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Mr Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. US President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defence secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything. "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of (the) facility," he wrote on social media, without providing evidence. Several experts cautioned this week that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes. They also said that the country could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, US and United Nations nuclear inspectors. The experts noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source said on Sunday that most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack. The Financial Times, citing European capitals, reported that Iran's uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at Fordow. Mr Hegseth's comments denying such claims came at a news conference where he also accused the media of downplaying the success of the US strikes following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. He said the analysis was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing that Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged and would take years to rebuild. Mr Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful". His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East. The 86-year-old claimed victory over Israel after 12 days of war and promised that Iran would not surrender despite President Trump's calls. "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Mr Khamenei said. The US "has gained nothing from this war," he said, adding that the strikes "did nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear facilities. "The Islamic republic won and, in retaliation, dealt a severe slap to the face of America" - a reference to Iran's missile launch on Qatar targeting the largest US base in the Middle East. "I want to congratulate the great Iranian nation ... for its victory over the fallacious Zionist regime," Mr Khamenei added, claiming that Israel had "almost collapsed" because of his country's strikes. Both Iran and Israel had already claimed they won, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a "historic victory" for Israel. During the news conference, Mr Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias. "It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," the defence secretary said. "There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he said. President Trump praised the event on his Truth Social platform, describing it as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!" On X, Mr Hegseth thanked Mr Trump for his praise. During the news conference, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker similar to the ones struck in Iran. He declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. Gen Caine denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes. He also said that he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice. "I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," Gen Caine said.
