Bodybuilding icon Ronnie Coleman can no longer walk
The bodybuilding icon's physical decline has devastated his legion of fans around the world — and now the saddest video of all has dropped.
One week after thanking his 13-year-old daughter for saving his life from a 'serious medical condition', footage shows Coleman is no longer able to walk.
It is the tragic sight millions around the world have dreaded seeing after the American's hit 2018 Netflix documentary showed his life was always going to end in tragedy.
One video shared on X shows Coleman needing help to walk up stairs during a recent public appearance.
The viral clip, which shows the agony he experiences moving his body, has broken the hearts of the 61-year-old's supporters.
The eight-time Mr Olympia champion was hospitalised three weeks' ago and was suddenly forced to call off an international speaking tour, his family confirmed in a message shared on Instagram.
Coleman provided a scary update on social media last week when confirming to his 12 million Instagram followers he almost died while battling sepsis as a result of an infection in his bloodstream.
After treating his sepsis symptoms, doctors found an underlying health issue that required further treatment.
He underwent successful heart surgery on July 10.
The bodybuilding king showed his positive outlook has not been shaken despite needing to be transferred to a specialised medical facility to treat his condition.
Looking nothing like the freak of nature he once was, Coleman shared a video last week, saying: 'This was a tough one y'all and this sepsis infection almost took your boy out.
'It was by the grace of god that I'm still here with you all.'
The once-hulking-specimen went on to say: 'Man, let me tell you, these past few weeks have been some of the toughest of my life.
'Your boy was hit with sepsis and it nearly killed me. Had it not been for my 13-year-old daughter, I probably would have.'
In another video, Coleman said: 'Couple weeks back, I was in the hospital fighting for my life — sepsis hit me out of nowhere.
'Started from a little infection and next thing I know, my whole body was shutting down. It was by the grace of god that my 13 year old daughter knew to act fast and call 911.'
Even now Coleman still refuses to give up his weightlifting addiction and has still never said publicly he regrets what he did to his body during his bodybuilding career.
He won 26 International Fitness and Bodybuilding titles and was inducted into the International Sports Hall of Fame in 2016.
That doesn't nearly do justice to his achievements in putting bodybuilding competitions on the global stage.
There are some details about his career — and his 150kg frame — that are simply mind-blowing.
Joe Rogan said during an interview with Coleman in 2020 that he wasn't sure if Coleman was human.
UFC commentator Rogan could barely believe what he was hearing when Coleman said on his podcast his body fat percentage was as low as 0.33 per cent.
To put that into perspective, most people strutting around with body fat lower than 10 per cent are seriously shredded. Ten per cent body fat is something even most elite athletes would be jealous off.
So for Coleman to be 0.33 per cent is completely alien.
No wonder the man was able to develop 61cm arms and a 150cm chest. His iconic 800-pound bench press was off the charts.
Coleman revolutionised the sport by maintaining the symmetry and composition of the sport's best while blowing them away with his incredible size.
The bodybuilder said he was at his heaviest in competition during his seventh Mr Olympia win, when he tipped the scales at 135kg, but he got up towards 150kg during the 'off-season'.
Coleman may have been winning but there's such a thing as being too big, even in the bodybuilding world. His coaches, and even contest judges, told him he needed to slim down, so he dropped to 125kg before being dethroned by Jay Cutler in 2006.
But Coleman is a far cry from the man mountain who used to flex for a living. Now he can barely walk without excruciating pain.
Bulking up the way he did came with serious health problems later in life. Coleman has suffered serious back issues, had both hips replaced and endured multiple surgeries.
His physical decline was brutally captured in his 2018 Netflix documentary titled Ronnie Coleman: The King. The film can only be described as difficult to watch.
He carries crutches with him at all times in order to stay mobile.
He uses five 30mg oxycodone tablets per day to treat chronic pain.
As shown in the Netflix doco, Coleman had so many operations after his career that surgeons needed to cut through the front of his body to perform one of his many spinal surgeries.
Doctors were forced to temporarily remove his intestines during the procedure because there's too much scar tissue in his back.
'The pain is a nine or a 10 (out of 10),' Coleman says. 'I've been in pain for so long now I'm just used to it.'
His life is by no means a complete disaster. He is happily married with four children and started a supplement company that now turns over north of 15 million dollars every year and allows him to travel the globe attending bodybuilding events.
Cutler summed it all up with one comment made to Netflix producers.
'I feel sorry that it happened but I don't think Ronnie feels bad about it because he did what he had to do to be the greatest bodybuilder of all time,' the former Mr Olympia said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 days ago
- SBS Australia
The big biosecurity question at the centre of Australia's US beef move
The federal government has lifted a ban on beef imports from the United States, expanding access to products sourced from Canada and Mexico. It's a move some experts say risks Australia's biosecurity and may be politically motivated. Although the US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, any cattle raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. Now, following a decade-long science-based review, that restriction is gone. But some question whether Australia's strict biosecurity laws are being used for political gain, with the government facing questions over whether the move was made to appease US President Donald Trump. Biosecurity concerns One key concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently allow beef from disease-affected regions to enter Australia. But the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry said the new changes follow the introduction of more robust movement controls in the US in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for better tracing of cattle through the supply chain. Professor Michael Ward, a veterinary public health expert at the University of Sydney, said the decision opens Australia up to more risk because disease traceability in North America is "not quite as strong" as in Europe. Australia allows imports of beef products from a limited number of European countries. "You can potentially have cattle coming from lower disease status areas caught up in what gets exported, and then trying to work out where it's come from, that becomes really difficult," he said. "You can't really [separate those markets] in the US because it's such a bigger market and it's integrated … If a cow is moved to the US and it's there for three months, is it then an American cow? "You're basically increasing the pool of potentially risky animals, and that then flows into the risk assessment." The main risks associated with beef imports are the introduction of diseases such as mad cow disease and foot and mouth disease. Both the US and Mexico are free from both diseases. Canada is free of foot and mouth disease, but has had some cases of mad cow disease in the past. Ward said it's not "reasonable to believe all three countries have the same risk". "They're different systems, different countries, different raising conditions, different administrations. As you increase the number of countries, you're going to increase the risk." A spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture said the review was the culmination of "a decade of science and risk-based import assessment and evaluation … to make sure Australia's robust biosecurity measures are upheld". They added that the government would "not compromise on our enviable biosecurity status or our food standards, ever". Is biosecurity being used as a bargaining tool? Some believe the change could help Australia negotiate a better trade deal with the US — particularly on tariffs. As part of his sweeping global tariffs, Trump introduced a baseline 10 per cent tariff on many Australian goods in April. "[Australians] ban American beef," Trump said at the time. "Yet, we imported [US]$3 billion ($4.5 billion) of Australian beef from them just last year alone … They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers." Nationals leader David Littleproud has accused the Albanese government of using the beef industry to appease Trump as it continues to pursue a broader tariff exemption. "It looks as though it's [biosecurity] been traded away to appease Donald Trump," Littleproud said on ABC's Radio National on Thursday. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to "stand up ... and explain" to Australia's beef farmers that the government hasn't "watered down" biosecurity. Ward is also concerned the government is "playing off" biosecurity protections to secure a better deal. "It seems like a trade-driven decision," he said. He warned that the short-term economic gain from lifting tariffs could pale in comparison to the potential cost of a disease outbreak. "It's a huge concern — once you have introduced a disease — foot and mouth disease, for example — years and years and millions of dollars are spent trying to control that," he said. "That short-term gain — if it is tariff-driven — whether what the benefit of that is compared to a long-term disease scenario, it just doesn't add up. You really have to think about the long-term." Trade Minister Don Farrell has denied any link between the decision and pressure from the US. "There's nothing suspicious about this," he told Sky News. "If we want to export our beef overseas, then we have to accept that other countries will want to import their beef into Australia." "We're not going to allow our biosecurity rules to be impacted by the trade issues." How has the industry responded? Some industry groups say they support science-based decision-making but expressed frustration over the lack of transparency. "Science must remain the cornerstone of technical market access decisions," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan said in a statement. "This progress on the US's access request demonstrates Australia's consistency in applying internationally recognised standards, which is vital to the long-term sustainability of our sector." The National Farmers Federation (NFF) said the decision needed to come "separate from any tariff negotiations". "The NFF's been clear that the revised request from the US needed to undergo the standard, science-based assessment to protect our biosecurity, and should be dealt with separate from any tariff negotiations," the organisation said in a statement. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans said the announcement came without proper consultation. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. 'This science-based process has been, and always should be, conducted completely independently of any international trade negotiations," he added. Ward said that without seeing the final risk assessment, it's hard to judge whether the safeguards are sufficient. "It's a bit surprising," he said. "I would have thought if it's good science, you publicise it." SBS News has contacted Agriculture Minister Julie Collins for comment. With additional reporting from AAP.
SBS Australia
2 days ago
- SBS Australia
Report Reveals Ongoing Stigma for Chronic Pain Sufferers
LISTEN TO SBS Indonesian 24/07/2025 04:16 English A new report that surveyed 5,000 Australians found that Australians living with chronic pain continue to suffer stigma. The study by Chronic Pain Australia found 74 per cent felt ignored or ignored; and 48 per cent experienced prejudice from healthcare professionals. It found almost three-quarters of chronic pain sufferers experience mental health problems as a result of the pain they experience. Nearly two-thirds were unable to work and were in financial difficulties. Listen to SBS Indonesian every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday at 3pm. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram , and don't miss our podcasts .
ABC News
3 days ago
- ABC News
Here's what nutrition and diet experts say about green powders
If you believe the ads and social media posts, starting your day with a green powder or greens supplement will help your health and wellbeing. Often shown as part of a picture-perfect morning routine, they might seem like the answer to lacklustre veggie consumption. But, are they actually worth taking? And are there any downsides to them? Here's what a dietician and a nutritionist say. There is a huge variety of green powders available — and a big variation in prices. 100 grams of green powder can cost $12 at the supermarket or about $45 at a beauty and skincare store. Some products spruik that they help you meet your daily intake of healthy greens, that they're a fibre source to help keep you regular, and terms like superfood and super greens also come up. Food and nutrition scientist Emma Beckett, based in Newcastle/Awabakal, says these types of products have become more prominent and there's a lot of variation between products and the way they're marketed. Dr Beckett thinks convenience is part of what makes green powders attractive. There's also a marketing element, she says, with labels spruiking health claims and benefits. "You can't do that with fresh wholefoods, there's nowhere to put a label on an actual bunch of broccoli or a cup of brussels sprouts." Green powders aren't necessary, according to Stephanie Partridge, an accredited practising dietician and associate professor at the University of Sydney, on Gadigal land. "My first impression when I see these kind of products is thinking this is just another thing that we don't need," she says. Dr Partridge says green powders usually contain some vitamins and minerals and a little fibre, "but it doesn't replace a healthy balanced diet". "If you can have a healthy meal, you'll likely get all of the vitamins and minerals that you would from a powder, and then if you repeat that across the day and you'll also be satiated for longer." Green powders are generally made with freeze-dried fruits and vegetables, but Dr Patridge says when they are processed and broken down, some of their benefits are lost. While a green powder may offer a couple of grams of fibre per serving, she says an apple or pear instead could make up 6 grams (the recommended daily intake for adults is 25 to 30 grams). Because these powders are "refined and processed plant matter", Dr Beckett says it's hard to say whether they count towards the five serves of veggies a day target. "People are probably buying these thinking a scoop is equivalent to a veggie and it definitely is not." But, she says they are also "a tool that's better than no vegetables' and our diets don't have to be perfect. Dr Beckett suggests it's helpful to think of these supplements as an addition rather than a replacement for anything. She says they could be useful for people with a low appetite, a very restrictive diet or for those who are travelling. For those not eating vegetables to start with, Dr Beckett says adding a powder could be beneficial. If choosing between products, Dr Beckett says to "look for the majority ingredient being actual vegetable powder, with actual recognisable vegetables listed". Green powders can also "have quite strong flavours", so if you are trying to "hide" veggies in food using these supplements could change the flavour, Dr Beckett says. Dr Partridge says green powders could help people incorporate or improve their intake of vitamins and minerals, but they're "ideally used under professional guidance". Some vitamins and minerals can interact with medications, "particularly fat-soluble vitamins that can be stored in our liver might have interactions with some medications."She also recommends consulting a GP or healthcare professional if you're planning a pregnancy, pregnant or breastfeeding and considering introducing a greens powder — or giving it to your child. Dr Beckett says "allergens are another reason to look at the labels" especially if you have allergies. She says potential risks include soy, gluten, fish and shellfish. Dr Partridge says green powders sold and purchased in Australia reputably are regulated by Therapeutic Goods Administration as either food or medicine. "That said, there is always some potential risk of contamination, especially for products purchased online from unverified sources or from overseas." Dr Beckett says while these powders are convenient and have some benefits, they're not going to help you feel full and satisfied like a vegetable. "Try eating vegetables in the way that you'd like them rather than eating them in the perfect form," she recommends. She also suggests pureeing or mashing vegetables and incorporating them into a dish that way if you're trying to "hide" them. Dr Beckett's favourite tip is adding extra veggies to something you already cook and enjoy. "Take the bolognese you're already making and add some carrot, or take the tacos you're already making and grate in some mushrooms." Dr Partridge says if you're time poor and need something you can consume quickly, a smoothie could be a good alternative. "You can easily add a good handful of spinach", along with other fruits and vegetables you might prefer the taste of, she says. This is general information only. For personal advice, you should see a qualified medical practitioner.
