'Urgent' bans on abusive childcare workers to take up to 12 months, says attorney-general
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said child abusers were "clearly shopping around" to exploit gaps in Australia's patchwork police check system for the sector.
She said creating a system to make sure workers "banned in one" state were "banned in all" would be the immediate and urgent concern of Friday's meeting of ministers.
But she conceded it may not be in place for another 12 months.
"It's a long time when you consider the fact of the fragmentation we have here, the complex IT systems that need to be done, but also different states have different laws and regulations here," Ms Rowland told the ABC.
The nation's attorneys-general will meet on Friday, a month after revelations of another case of alleged widespread child abuse by a Melbourne childcare worker.
Joshua Dale Brown faces more than 70 offences linked to a childcare centre in Point Cook, in Melbourne's south-west.
Ms Rowland said Australians would be startled to learn that Australia's police check systems, which operate at a state level, do not have measures to ensure that if a childcare worker is banned in one state the ban automatically extends to every state.
She said establishing information sharing to fix that would be today's "urgent" priority".
"I would like to think this is something that is certainly capable of being done within certainly the next 12 months," Ms Rowland said.
"If we can have a better sense of that following today's meeting, that would be a good thing.
A National Working With Children Check system was one of the key recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse, made a decade ago.
Ms Rowland acknowledged that change had not happened "quickly enough" due to a patchwork federal system where responsibilities sat with different ministers, IT systems were not compatible, funding sources differed and states each had different information standards.
But she said Labor had begun work on changes last term in the wake of charges against Australia's worst paedophile, Ashley Paul Griffith, in 2022.
Ms Rowland said a dedicated unit had been established within her department to ensure outcomes were met.
Attorneys-general will also consider near-term changes to establish continuous monitoring and sharing capabilities at Friday's meeting, as well as longer term measures to lift the bar for workers to be excluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
16 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab
Earlier this week, we published a story about the Federal Government's intention to introduce a road user charge (RUC) for electric vehicle (EV) owners. A per-kilometre tax to replace the fuel excise revenue lost as more Australians switch to electric vehicles. The proposal encouraged more than 2000 readers to comment. What followed was a passionate public policy debate, part stand-up comedy and a masterclass in Australian scepticism. While the conversation is divided, a large majority of readers believe EV drivers should contribute to road maintenance. But many also say the policy must be fair, transparent and apply equally across all vehicle types. 'Tax the trucks, not the Teslas,' one reader wrote, summing up a sentiment that hundreds of readers agreed with. Another, HelpMeOverHere, accused the government of double standards: 'A mining truck the size of a suburban street guzzles thousands of litres a week and gets all the fuel tax refunded.' The 'free ride' is over Many of our readers argue it's simply time for EV owners to pay their way. They believe that EV owners are currently getting a 'free ride' by avoiding the fuel excise, which raises more than $15 billion annually. 'There is not one solitary argument that supports the notion that EV drivers should be able to use the roads and not contribute to their upkeep. Not one,' nonedeplume said. Stephen argued: 'EV manufacturers are upset that the free ride is coming to an end and the EV drivers will have to pay to use the road like everyone else.' But others saw it less as fairness, more as the government's latest 'gotcha' tax. 'It's always the proletariat that has to pay for incompetent government,' Walker Texas Ranger said. 'Just another tax to prevent us from moving up in the world.' Some readers proposed replacing the fuel excise entirely with a universal RUC. 'Why don't we scrap the fuel excise and then just apply a RUC to all road users - that would then be fair to ALL road users regardless of what type of fuel (petrol, diesel, EV, hybrid),' Gaynor said. The trucking elephant in the room A big chunk of outrage was over Australia's heavy freight industry. Many said heavy vehicles are the 'culprits' and should pay more, given their impact on infrastructure. Fair enough. Infrastructure Australia data shows that one five-axle truck causes the same road wear as 2900 cars. The actual ratio varies depending on factors like axle weight and road construction, but a truck's damage is often cited as being much higher than 2900. Currently, heavy vehicles pay a RUC of 32.4 cents per litre, set to rise 6 per cent annually until 2025-2026. They also pay the federal fuel excise, now around 51-52 cents per litre - but operators can claim back the difference through fuel tax credits, reducing their net cost by about 20 cents per litre. 'Trucks are the issue,' Grande_choice said. 'All those regional roads are getting slammed by trucks but not EVs.' Rural drivers fear being slugged harder Polestar Australia's managing director Scott Maynard said a one-size-fits-all approach could unfairly hit regional drivers who travel long distances for essential services. According to Australians tend to drive longer distances for essentials and often live further out because property is more affordable. 'People in regional areas generally are poorer and drive more distances to get from A to B,' BobtheBuilder said. 'Hence why the CEO (Scott Maynard) makes the point that they will be discriminated against.' Reader Vicki agreed: 'I'm rural and 75km from my nearest town, doctor, supermarket…city EV owners with public transport will cost them nothing, and rural/regional drivers big money. When the policy debate turned into a comedy set In between the policy arguments came some memorable one-liners that had me chuckling hard. 'If it can't be eaten or plucked, it will be taxed.' 'The word of the day is fungible.' 'I'm just going to wait until a hamster-powered car comes out.' 'How about we bring in a tax on breathing?' The green glow-up….or greenwash? Some readers went straight for the environmental jugular. 'It's time the idealists wake up to the fact that electric cars aren't better for the environment…they will never pay off the carbon footprint cost of making the batteries,' Mark wrote. But Adam added, 'battery disposal facilities are already at 90+ per cent recyclability…the 'cut even' point for emissions is approx 37,000km.' Trusting the government…like trusting a cheating ex Underlying much of the conversation was the distrust of the government. Even commenters who back the idea of EVs paying said they didn't trust Canberra to use the money for roads. 'For FY23-24 the fuel excise raised $15b while [the] government only spent $10bn on roads,' Bryn wrote. 'When is it enough?' 'It's just revenue raising,' Jeff said. 'Once they have you hooked, they tax you.' The road ahead So the consensus? Most readers agree that EV drivers should pay and contribute. But it's simple, they want it to be fair. If the government can deliver that, they might just win people over. But if not, they'll be left with a few angry Australians.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Top leader': Rumours swirl about Rolls-Royce crash
The Chinese community has flocked to the case of a young woman who was allegedly drunk when she crashed her $1 million Rolls-Royce, as rumours swirl that she is related to a high-ranking official in China. About 100 Chinese Australians crowded into the John Madison Tower at Sydney's Downing Centre on Friday morning, hoping to catch a glimpse of 23-year-old Lanlan Yang. Only a fraction of them were able to get inside courtroom 15B, where Yang briefly appeared via videolink wearing her characteristic bucket hat and a sleek black suit. Her lawyer, Mr Yu, said she was not in a position to enter a plea because 'the police have indicated there will be additional charges'. The case was adjourned to September 26, with Yang's bail to continue. The young woman's case relates to a head-on crash between her Rolls-Royce SUV and a Mercedes that was being driven by George Plassaras, a chauffeur to radio host Kyle Sandilands, early on the morning of July 26. Mr Plassaras received horrific injuries, breaking his spine, ribs, both hips and both femurs in the crash on New South Head Road in Rose Bay. Yang was uninjured and returned a positive result during a roadside breath test, police allege. She has been bailed to her penthouse apartment in Sydney's east, where she owns a second Rolls-Royce, while the case moves through the courts. Chinese Australians are following the case with interest - curious about who Yang is and the source of her lavish wealth. 'Lots of Chinese leaders have their wealth stored in foreign countries,' Chinjing Jin told outside the court room. 'Her family might be in China's politburo or standing committee, but at this point it's still hearsay.' 'All Chinese Australians and even American Chinese care about this case,' said Tony Zhou, another court attendee. 'The question we focus on is, which top leader's granddaughter or great-granddaughter she is? In China many top families' offspring immigrate to Australia. 'We believe her family background is at least politburo member, maybe standing committee member - this is why we all focus on the news. 'Some of us are supporting the democratic movement in China and we want to destroy communism, so this case is important to us.' It was also rumoured that Yang's father was involved with an Australian iron ore mine, Mr Zhou said. Yang has been charged with causing bodily harm by misconduct, in charge of motor vehicle and refuse or fail to submit to breath analysis. Her bail conditions include that she not drive a car or leave her penthouse between the hours of 8pm to 6am. Registration data for her Rolls-Royce Cullinan showed it was a 2025 model, which can retail for more than $1 million. The car was insured at the time, although Yang may not be able to get coverage if drink driving is found to be the cause of the crash. If found guilty, she may also be ordered to pay Mr Plassaras' medical and vehicle costs. After the crash she was filmed being escorted from the scene in a luxury outfit that appeared to include Chanel shoes, a Chanel two-piece and a Miu Miu bucket hat, possibly totalling $5,000.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
August 31 protests vowing to ‘take our country back' have no place in Australia, leading ministers say
So-called Australia First protests being planned across capital cities in Australia have 'no place,' with Minister for Multicultural Affairs Anne Aly vowing that multicultural Aussies 'will not be intimidated'. Flyers for rallies saying 'it's time to take our country back', 'defend our culture' and 'stop mass migration now' have gone viral on social media. A website linked to the march suggests events will be held in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, Canberra and Adelaide. It says: 'Australia is changing in ways most of us never agreed to. People are waking up to a country they barely recognise. Endless migration, weak leadership, and political cowardice have brought us here, and it's time to put a stop to it.' The event is being promoted by far-right users on social media and much of the rhetoric on the March for Australia site is anti-migrant, claiming 'mass migration has torn at the bonds that held our communities together'. Dr Aly, who was born in Egypt before immigrating to Australia at just two years old, said movements grounded in racism had 'no place in modern Australia'. She told NewsWire: 'Multiculturalism is an integral and valued part of our national identity. 'We stand with all Australians, no matter where they were born, against those who seek to divide us and who seek to intimidate migrant communities. We will not be intimidated. 'This brand of far-right activism grounded in racism and ethnocentrism has no place in modern Australia.' Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the Rally For Australia was un-Australian. 'There is no place in our country for people who seek to divide and undermine our social cohesion,' he said. 'We stand with modern Australia against these rallies - nothing could be less Australian.' More than eight million people living in Australia at the time of the last census were born overseas, but the proportion of those born overseas was 31.5 per cent, less than the 32.4 per cent recorded in 1891, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. While locations for the protests have yet to be shared, the protests are being promoted through social media. In lengthy posts shared through the March for Australia Instagram page, organisers have rejected associations with the alt-right 'National Socialist Network, White Australia, or Thomas Sewell Uncensored,' adding that organisers come from a 'diverse range of political backgrounds'.
