Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab
A per-kilometre tax to replace the fuel excise revenue lost as more Australians switch to electric vehicles.
The proposal encouraged more than 2000 readers to comment.
What followed was a passionate public policy debate, part stand-up comedy and a masterclass in Australian scepticism.
While the conversation is divided, a large majority of readers believe EV drivers should contribute to road maintenance. But many also say the policy must be fair, transparent and apply equally across all vehicle types.
'Tax the trucks, not the Teslas,' one reader wrote, summing up a sentiment that hundreds of readers agreed with.
Another, HelpMeOverHere, accused the government of double standards:
'A mining truck the size of a suburban street guzzles thousands of litres a week and gets all the fuel tax refunded.'
The 'free ride' is over
Many of our readers argue it's simply time for EV owners to pay their way.
They believe that EV owners are currently getting a 'free ride' by avoiding the fuel excise, which raises more than $15 billion annually.
'There is not one solitary argument that supports the notion that EV drivers should be able to use the roads and not contribute to their upkeep. Not one,' nonedeplume said.
Stephen argued: 'EV manufacturers are upset that the free ride is coming to an end and the EV drivers will have to pay to use the road like everyone else.'
But others saw it less as fairness, more as the government's latest 'gotcha' tax.
'It's always the proletariat that has to pay for incompetent government,' Walker Texas Ranger said.
'Just another tax to prevent us from moving up in the world.'
Some readers proposed replacing the fuel excise entirely with a universal RUC.
'Why don't we scrap the fuel excise and then just apply a RUC to all road users - that would then be fair to ALL road users regardless of what type of fuel (petrol, diesel, EV, hybrid),' Gaynor said.
The trucking elephant in the room
A big chunk of outrage was over Australia's heavy freight industry.
Many said heavy vehicles are the 'culprits' and should pay more, given their impact on infrastructure.
Fair enough.
Infrastructure Australia data shows that one five-axle truck causes the same road wear as 2900 cars.
The actual ratio varies depending on factors like axle weight and road construction, but a truck's damage is often cited as being much higher than 2900.
Currently, heavy vehicles pay a RUC of 32.4 cents per litre, set to rise 6 per cent annually until 2025-2026.
They also pay the federal fuel excise, now around 51-52 cents per litre - but operators can claim back the difference through fuel tax credits, reducing their net cost by about 20 cents per litre.
'Trucks are the issue,' Grande_choice said.
'All those regional roads are getting slammed by trucks but not EVs.'
Rural drivers fear being slugged harder
Polestar Australia's managing director Scott Maynard said a one-size-fits-all approach could unfairly hit regional drivers who travel long distances for essential services.
According to property.com.au, Australians tend to drive longer distances for essentials and often live further out because property is more affordable.
'People in regional areas generally are poorer and drive more distances to get from A to B,' BobtheBuilder said.
'Hence why the CEO (Scott Maynard) makes the point that they will be discriminated against.'
Reader Vicki agreed: 'I'm rural and 75km from my nearest town, doctor, supermarket…city EV owners with public transport will cost them nothing, and rural/regional drivers big money.
When the policy debate turned into a comedy set
In between the policy arguments came some memorable one-liners that had me chuckling hard.
'If it can't be eaten or plucked, it will be taxed.'
'The word of the day is fungible.'
'I'm just going to wait until a hamster-powered car comes out.'
'How about we bring in a tax on breathing?'
The green glow-up….or greenwash?
Some readers went straight for the environmental jugular.
'It's time the idealists wake up to the fact that electric cars aren't better for the environment…they will never pay off the carbon footprint cost of making the batteries,' Mark wrote.
But Adam added, 'battery disposal facilities are already at 90+ per cent recyclability…the 'cut even' point for emissions is approx 37,000km.'
Trusting the government…like trusting a cheating ex
Underlying much of the conversation was the distrust of the government.
Even commenters who back the idea of EVs paying said they didn't trust Canberra to use the money for roads.
'For FY23-24 the fuel excise raised $15b while [the] government only spent $10bn on roads,' Bryn wrote.
'When is it enough?'
'It's just revenue raising,' Jeff said.
'Once they have you hooked, they tax you.'
The road ahead
So the consensus? Most readers agree that EV drivers should pay and contribute.
But it's simple, they want it to be fair.
If the government can deliver that, they might just win people over.
But if not, they'll be left with a few angry Australians.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says ‘not surprising' Australia's birthrate has slowed but rejects bringing back baby bonus
Jim Chalmers says it's 'not surprising' Australia's birth rate has slowed given the 'financial pressures' on families, however, he has rejected calls to bring back the Costello-era $3000 baby bonus in favour of 'better, more enduring ways to support parents'. The comments come ahead of Labor's highly anticipated Economic Reform Roundtable, which will bring business and unions groups to Canberra for three days of intensive discussions on how to lift Australia's sluggish productivity rate. 'It's not surprising that the birth rate has slowed given the pressures on people, including financial pressures,' he told NewsWire. 'We want to make it easier for them to make that choice. If they want to have more kids, we want to make it easier for them to do that, and that's what motivates a lot of our changes.' However, as Australia struggles to boost the economy, and in turn raise wages and living standards, it's also contending with a sluggish birth rate of 1.5 births per woman, which is under the 2.1 figure needed to sustain population growth. Boosting productivity was also essential to ensuring that Australia's ageing population could weather economic headwinds, the Treasurer said. 'Now, the reason why the productivity challenge is important to this is because our society is ageing, and over time, there will be fewer workers for every person who's retired,' he said. 'We need to make sure that our economy is as productive as it can be, as strong as it can be to withstand that demographic change, which is going to be big and consequential.' Mr Chalmers also spurned calls from former Liberal prime minister John Howard to resurrect the $3000 baby bonus cash incentive bought in by his treasurer Peter Costello in 2004. The Queenslander's parliamentary colleagues have advocated for other measures to spur a baby boom, including Nationals senator Matt Canavan's proposed $100,000 loans for first-time parents to buy their first home. Parliament's maverick father of the house Bob Katter also proposed incoming splitting for parents so they paid less overall tax. For example, a household where two parents earn a combined income of $150,000 pays about $10,000 less tax than a household with a single worker pulling in $150,000. Instead, Mr Chalmers said Labor's supports were 'more enduring,' pointing to policies like guaranteeing three days of subsidised child care for families earning less than $533,280, increasing paid parental leave to 25 weeks, and paying super on government-funded parental leave to tackle the gender superannuation gap. 'That policy from a couple of decades ago was a one-off payment, and we found ways to support parents which is meaningful and enduring, not one off. That's the main difference,' he said. 'Our political opponents … haven't said how they would fund that, how they would pay for that, whereas we've been carefully budgeting all this help for parents in our budgets and providing that in an ongoing way. 'We're always in the market for ideas about ways to support families. We've got all this cost-of-living help rolling out, (like) all the childcare changes. All of that, I think, demonstrate a willingness on our part to support families (in making) decisions about whether they want to have kids or have more kids.' Mr Chalmers says the 'generational anxiety' plaguing Australia youth simultaneously contending with rising house prices and inflation will also be a touchstone ahead of the economic reform roundtable, which at one point was called the productivity roundtable before it was quietly changed. He concedes productivity can 'sound like a cold lifeless piece of economic jargon' but explains the metric is 'about efficiency' and 'about how we make our economy stronger to deliver for more people so that they can earn more and get ahead and be better off'. Generational equality has also fuelled some of the roundtable's more controversial submissions, including the Australian Council of Trade Unions' call to limit negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions on just one property by the next five years, and teal Wentworth MP Allegra Spender's overhaul of the tax system that she says is overly reliant on income taxes. The ACTU has also reiterated calls for a four-day work week, while the Productivity Commission irked business bodies with calls for a new 5 per cent cash flow tax and a road user charge to ensure EV drivers, who skip the fuel excise, also contribute to road upgrades. How to best handle the opportunities posed by artificial intelligence, while mitigating the risks and job losses, will also be debated on day two; however, Mr Chalmers is quietly optimistic. 'I think one of the big challenges, broadly, but especially for young people, is how they adapt and adopt technology, so a big focus will be how do we skill people up to use artificial intelligence so that it's it works for them, not against them, particularly in the workplace,' he said. Mr Chalmers will use talks to create consensus on what he says is the 'most transformative influence on our economy and our lifetime', and while he doesn't want to pre-empt decisions, education settings and regulation will likely be immediate action points once talks end on Thursday. '(AI) has to change the way we think about skills and capabilities, and I'll work closely with colleagues in the education portfolios, the industry portfolio and elsewhere to make sure that we've got the settings right,' he said. 'Whether it's regulation, whether it's education, in a whole bunch of areas, governments have to catch up and keep up with the accelerating pace of technological change.'
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Why every Australian is losing $3600 a year as a result of Australia's failure to tackle productivity
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has put a price tag on Australia's failure to make big productivity gains in the last decade warning it is costing every Australian thousands of dollars in lost wages. Ahead of the Albanese Government's economic roundtable set to kick off in Canberra next week, the government is laying out the problem it insists is a major focus of its second term: productivity. And the cost of that failure to boost productivity is having a real impact on Australians' ability to secure a pay rise and businesses' ability to turn a profit. It's a factor in why it's harder to buy a family home, pay for the groceries at the shops and why it takes too long to build infrastructure and build new homes. In simple terms, productivity means producing more goods and services from the same inputs – using new skills or technologies such as artificial intelligence or by coming up with more effective ways to work. But Australia's productivity gains have stalled, leading some workers and businesses to feel they are going backwards. New data prepared by the Albanese Government claims the productivity slowdown under the Coalition government is costing Australians as much as $3600 a year in lost income. 'The wasted decade under the Coalition is costing Australians dearly,'' Treasurer Jim Chalmers told 'This big drop in productivity growth has hit Australians in the hip pocket. 'Our predecessors ignored the warning signs and people are paying the price for it. 'We don't intend to waste the next decade like our predecessors wasted the last. 'We don't pretend it will be easy and it certainly won't be quick, but we've got a big and broad agenda aimed at tackling this productivity challenge and we're keen to add to it where we responsibly can.' The arithmetic on the $3600 cost is based on the idea that productivity was growing at 2 per cent per annum when the Coalition came to office but just 0.1 per cent per annum in the year before Covid-19 hit. According to the Albanese Government, if productivity had grown at 1.5 per cent - as forecast in the Budget - instead of 0.9 per cent in the six years prior to Covid, the level of real and nominal GDP would have been 3.6 per cent higher at the start of the pandemic. Even allowing for the volatility since then, the Treasurer argues that the 3.6 per cent shift in the level of nominal GDP is equivalent to around $3600 in lost income per capita in 2023-24. Dr Chalmers said the figures underlined why the Albanese Government was determined to talk about solutions. 'This is about setting the next generation of Australians up for success long after the next election cycle,'' he said. 'It's about higher wages, higher living standards and a better future for our children and grandchildren.' Business leaders have suggested one way forward is reduced regulation and lower tax. Unions have suggested a four day working week, negative gearing reforms and changes to capital gains tax. Lower pay rises, weaker consumer spending, softer business profits and declining living standards is the problem the government wants to tackle. The Treasurer has previously suggested that the productivity debate has 'focused too narrowly on one or two issues', and that the task now is 'broadening that focus out'. 'The challenge, however, is immense. Our productivity growth over the past decade was the worst in 60 years,'' Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black said. 'And yet, with all shoulders to the wheel, and agreement on what can and must be done, we believe Australia is capable of much more over the next decade. 'Here's how: First and foremost, we need to deliver our major projects and endeavours faster. It's not acceptable that building a renewable energy project in Australia can take more than two years of approvals before shovels are in the ground. 'Countries that get there faster will deliver better and more outcomes for their citizens, and that's why we're determined to work constructively with the government on implementing federal project approvals and reforms that get it right for both the environment and for business.'
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Tweedledee and Tweedledum': Albanese and Wong are ‘putting stress' on Australia-US alliance
Sky News host Steve Price discusses Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong's 'slack-jawed' approach to Palestinian recognition and how this move has put stress on the Australia-US alliance. 'I am referring to the slack-jawed way our leader has decided to reward the terror group Hamas with the decision to recognise a Palestinian state with a visit to the UN,' Mr Price said. 'One can only wonder at the tone of the phone calls between other left-leaning leaders like France's Macron and the UK's Starmer in the lead-up to this. 'So, here we have Tweedledee and Tweedledum, Albo and Wong, courting votes from the Harbour Bridge march … and the Greens putting stress on the US alliance to support a fanciful notion that no one … in the Middle East thinks is ever going to happen.'
