logo
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says ‘not surprising' Australia's birthrate has slowed but rejects bringing back baby bonus

Treasurer Jim Chalmers says ‘not surprising' Australia's birthrate has slowed but rejects bringing back baby bonus

News.com.au3 days ago
Jim Chalmers says it's 'not surprising' Australia's birth rate has slowed given the 'financial pressures' on families, however, he has rejected calls to bring back the Costello-era $3000 baby bonus in favour of 'better, more enduring ways to support parents'.
The comments come ahead of Labor's highly anticipated Economic Reform Roundtable, which will bring business and unions groups to Canberra for three days of intensive discussions on how to lift Australia's sluggish productivity rate.
'It's not surprising that the birth rate has slowed given the pressures on people, including financial pressures,' he told NewsWire.
'We want to make it easier for them to make that choice. If they want to have more kids, we want to make it easier for them to do that, and that's what motivates a lot of our changes.'
However, as Australia struggles to boost the economy, and in turn raise wages and living standards, it's also contending with a sluggish birth rate of 1.5 births per woman, which is under the 2.1 figure needed to sustain population growth.
Boosting productivity was also essential to ensuring that Australia's ageing population could weather economic headwinds, the Treasurer said.
'Now, the reason why the productivity challenge is important to this is because our society is ageing, and over time, there will be fewer workers for every person who's retired,' he said.
'We need to make sure that our economy is as productive as it can be, as strong as it can be to withstand that demographic change, which is going to be big and consequential.'
Mr Chalmers also spurned calls from former Liberal prime minister John Howard to resurrect the $3000 baby bonus cash incentive bought in by his treasurer Peter Costello in 2004.
The Queenslander's parliamentary colleagues have advocated for other measures to spur a baby boom, including Nationals senator Matt Canavan's proposed $100,000 loans for first-time parents to buy their first home.
Parliament's maverick father of the house Bob Katter also proposed incoming splitting for parents so they paid less overall tax.
For example, a household where two parents earn a combined income of $150,000 pays about $10,000 less tax than a household with a single worker pulling in $150,000.
Instead, Mr Chalmers said Labor's supports were 'more enduring,' pointing to policies like guaranteeing three days of subsidised child care for families earning less than $533,280, increasing paid parental leave to 25 weeks, and paying super on government-funded parental leave to tackle the gender superannuation gap.
'That policy from a couple of decades ago was a one-off payment, and we found ways to support parents which is meaningful and enduring, not one off. That's the main difference,' he said.
'Our political opponents … haven't said how they would fund that, how they would pay for that, whereas we've been carefully budgeting all this help for parents in our budgets and providing that in an ongoing way.
'We're always in the market for ideas about ways to support families. We've got all this cost-of-living help rolling out, (like) all the childcare changes. All of that, I think, demonstrate a willingness on our part to support families (in making) decisions about whether they want to have kids or have more kids.'
Mr Chalmers says the 'generational anxiety' plaguing Australia youth simultaneously contending with rising house prices and inflation will also be a touchstone ahead of the economic reform roundtable, which at one point was called the productivity roundtable before it was quietly changed.
He concedes productivity can 'sound like a cold lifeless piece of economic jargon' but explains the metric is 'about efficiency' and 'about how we make our economy stronger to deliver for more people so that they can earn more and get ahead and be better off'.
Generational equality has also fuelled some of the roundtable's more controversial submissions, including the Australian Council of Trade Unions' call to limit negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions on just one property by the next five years, and teal Wentworth MP Allegra Spender's overhaul of the tax system that she says is overly reliant on income taxes.
The ACTU has also reiterated calls for a four-day work week, while the Productivity Commission irked business bodies with calls for a new 5 per cent cash flow tax and a road user charge to ensure EV drivers, who skip the fuel excise, also contribute to road upgrades.
How to best handle the opportunities posed by artificial intelligence, while mitigating the risks and job losses, will also be debated on day two; however, Mr Chalmers is quietly optimistic.
'I think one of the big challenges, broadly, but especially for young people, is how they adapt and adopt technology, so a big focus will be how do we skill people up to use artificial intelligence so that it's it works for them, not against them, particularly in the workplace,' he said.
Mr Chalmers will use talks to create consensus on what he says is the 'most transformative influence on our economy and our lifetime', and while he doesn't want to pre-empt decisions, education settings and regulation will likely be immediate action points once talks end on Thursday.
'(AI) has to change the way we think about skills and capabilities, and I'll work closely with colleagues in the education portfolios, the industry portfolio and elsewhere to make sure that we've got the settings right,' he said.
'Whether it's regulation, whether it's education, in a whole bunch of areas, governments have to catch up and keep up with the accelerating pace of technological change.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the economic reform roundtable and what will it achieve?
What is the economic reform roundtable and what will it achieve?

SBS Australia

time27 minutes ago

  • SBS Australia

What is the economic reform roundtable and what will it achieve?

Around 30 leaders from business, unions and civil society will convene in Canberra on Tuesday for three days of discussion and debate about the country's economic future. The summit, first announced in June, is a key part of the government's strategy to build national consensus around economic reform. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has said that the ideas discussed at the roundtable will inform "the next three budgets and beyond". A number of topical and controversial ideas for reform are on the table, including major tax reform, deregulating artificial intelligence and a four-day work week. So what can we expect from the roundtable, and what might it achieve? Treasurer Jim Chalmers speaks to the media ahead of his three-day economic reform roundtable. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas What is the point of the roundtable? When Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the summit in June, he said the aim was to "build the broadest possible base of support for further economic reform". It addresses a need for long-term economic reform, in particular to improve Australia's sluggish productivity — a key determinant of our standard of living. After the RBA's announcement, Chalmers told reporters that "productivity is the most serious economic challenge that we have in our economy". Who will be there? The roundtable is organised around three main themes: - Productivity (Wednesday) - Budget sustainability and tax reform (Thursday) On the invitation list is a diverse assembly of around 30 leaders from the business community, the union movement and civil society who will attend alongside economists, policy experts and heads of key government agencies. Some of the sectors represented at the roundtable include banking, universities, mining and superannuation. RBA governor Michele Bullock will deliver a presentation at the three-day economic roundtable. Source: AAP / Dan Himbrechts Presentations will be delivered by RBA governor Michele Bullock, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood and Grattan Institute CEO Dr Aruna Sathanapally among others. The government says a further 900 submissions from experts, industry leaders and individuals will also inform the outcome of the roundtable. What are some of the big ideas up for discussion? Housing is a high priority on the government's agenda, with leaked documents seen by the ABC suggesting the government may be considering deregulation to boost housing supply. These changes could include pausing the National Construction Code and reforming the Environment Protection and Biodiversity (EPBC) Act in order to speed up development approvals. Artificial Intelligence is also proving to be a hot topic, with the Productivity Commission leading calls to reduce regulation of AI to boost productivity. This has been met with resistance from unions and creative bodies who are calling for greater protection of workers and intellectual property against the risks of AI. Multiple proposals for tax reform can be expected . Independent MP Kate Chaney is calling for an increase to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) to 15 per cent, combined with an annual offset payment of $3,300 to individuals. Meanwhile, the Productivity Commission is arguing for a lowered corporate income tax rate for small and medium-sized businesses, which it says will boost investment. What are the concerns with it? The leaked Treasury advice published by the ABC last week raised concerns that the outcomes of the economic roundtable may have been determined before the roundtable began. This led Opposition treasury spokesperson Ted O'Brien, who is attending the roundtable, to warn the summit had been "engineered to rubberstamp" Labor policy and could become a "privileged talkfest". In response, Albanese told reporters that they were "awaiting the forum, and ideas will then come through normal government processes. That's how good policy happens". Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has defended the purpose of the economic roundtable, arguing that its role is to generate ideas that will inform economic policy. Source: AAP / Dean Lewins A spokesperson for Chalmers said the government is not "pre-empting ideas" but "preparing for them as you would expect". Nonetheless, the government has already confirmed it won't be implementing all the ideas brought forward to the roundtable. What we won't see Chalmers has already poured cold water on the ACTU's bid for a four-day work week. Last week, he told The Conversation "it's not something we've been kind of working up or considering". Instead, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has signalled a focus on working from home. Albanese also downplayed the prospect of major tax reform when speaking to reporters last Thursday. "The only tax policy we're implementing is the one we took to the election." Outside Parliament House on Monday morning, Chalmers said that while the roundtable presents a number of challenges, he is optimistic about Australia's appetite for economic reform. "I am realistic but optimistic that we can make progress together. I don't believe we will solve every challenge in our economy in three days. This is about three days to inform the next three budgets and beyond and I am really looking forward to that."

Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation
Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation

Australia can't fix productivity without confronting its innovation hesitation. As the nation launches another national conversation on productivity at Jim Chalmers' roundtable this week, one can't help but notice what's missing. The usual policy levers – tax reform, regulation, infrastructure – are all there. But innovation, long the lifeblood of productivity, is treated as a hopeful byproduct of policy rather than a foundation that needs fostering. This is evident in the Productivity Commission's 21-page white paper, Growth Mindset: How to boost Australia's productivity, which outlines the five proposed productivity inquiries. Terms such as innovation, innovator, innovative are mentioned just six times. In the subsequent interim report on Creating a more dynamic and resilient economy, innovation is positioned as an obvious, almost expected, consequence of the structural reforms, without reference to the necessary educational and cultural reform needed to harness the confidence and mindset to innovate. We can't regulate our way to innovation. Policies enable it, but the Australian people will ultimately be the innovators. Until we prioritise how Australians think about and experience innovation in daily life, reforms will miss their full impact. Loading So why do we too often struggle to innovate? Having taught creativity and innovation for many years at the Stanford and now at Harvard Innovation Labs, I have observed that stagnating individual and societal innovation is often the result of a set of myths and cognitive norms that perpetuate a cautious and risk-averse approach. There are three primary forms of innovation hesitation. We've probably all experienced at least one of these, either at home or in our workplaces. The first is 'innovation mythology'. This is the myth that innovation is only for individual geniuses like Steve Jobs or Elon Musk in world-changing eureka moments. However, innovation is just as likely to come from minor, incremental improvements made by everyday people. There are, in fact, very few singular eureka moments in innovation, and it is often a much more collaborative endeavour than a solitary one. Next is the creativity gap, a false belief that creativity is a rare gift for special people, and that not everyone can be creative. It often resembles impostor syndrome, where people hold themselves back from contributing valuable ideas or participating in initiatives.

Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation
Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation

Australia can't fix productivity without confronting its innovation hesitation. As the nation launches another national conversation on productivity at Jim Chalmers' roundtable this week, one can't help but notice what's missing. The usual policy levers – tax reform, regulation, infrastructure – are all there. But innovation, long the lifeblood of productivity, is treated as a hopeful byproduct of policy rather than a foundation that needs fostering. This is evident in the Productivity Commission's 21-page white paper, Growth Mindset: How to boost Australia's productivity, which outlines the five proposed productivity inquiries. Terms such as innovation, innovator, innovative are mentioned just six times. In the subsequent interim report on Creating a more dynamic and resilient economy, innovation is positioned as an obvious, almost expected, consequence of the structural reforms, without reference to the necessary educational and cultural reform needed to harness the confidence and mindset to innovate. We can't regulate our way to innovation. Policies enable it, but the Australian people will ultimately be the innovators. Until we prioritise how Australians think about and experience innovation in daily life, reforms will miss their full impact. Loading So why do we too often struggle to innovate? Having taught creativity and innovation for many years at the Stanford and now at Harvard Innovation Labs, I have observed that stagnating individual and societal innovation is often the result of a set of myths and cognitive norms that perpetuate a cautious and risk-averse approach. There are three primary forms of innovation hesitation. We've probably all experienced at least one of these, either at home or in our workplaces. The first is 'innovation mythology'. This is the myth that innovation is only for individual geniuses like Steve Jobs or Elon Musk in world-changing eureka moments. However, innovation is just as likely to come from minor, incremental improvements made by everyday people. There are, in fact, very few singular eureka moments in innovation, and it is often a much more collaborative endeavour than a solitary one. Next is the creativity gap, a false belief that creativity is a rare gift for special people, and that not everyone can be creative. It often resembles impostor syndrome, where people hold themselves back from contributing valuable ideas or participating in initiatives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store