What does the end of the penny mean? Here's what experts are saying
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Penny production in US to end, Treasury Department says
After 233 years, the U.S. this month will officially end penny production, according to statements from the Treasury Department.
Penny for your thoughts? Or maybe they are worth a nickel now that the Treasury Department is following President Donald Trump's suggestion to stop making pennies.
Last month, the Treasury Department placed its last order of blanks – flat metal discs to make pennies – in a move set into motion by President Donald Trump in February. He argues that the coin costs more than 3 cents to produce (actually 3.69 cents, according to the U.S. Mint).
Now that we know it's curtains for the coin, many questions arise. What does the demise of the penny mean for consumers and collectors? Could the last pennies be valuable? Here's what we know.
MIA Money: $1.7 trillion sits in lost and forgotten 401(k) accounts. Is one of them yours?
Will pennies be more valuable if the US stops making them?
Doubtful. The U.S. Mint made about 3.2 billion pennies in 2024, according to its annual report, so there will be billions of 2025 pennies available. "There's nothing, statistically, that says they should become valuable," John Feigenbaum, publisher of rare coin price guide Greysheet and executive director of the Professional Numismatists Guild (PNG), a nonprofit organization composed of many of the nation's rare coin experts, told USA TODAY.
The coin's legacy could be akin to the 1976 bicentennial quarter, Feigenbaum said. "Everybody, at the time, was hoarding them (and) you couldn't find bicentennial quarters in change. Now people have plastic bags full of them and they're still worth 25 cents," he added.
However, the 2025 pennies could have an alternative value as an entry point to collectors. "This would surely spike demand … in other Lincoln pennies, like the ones that go all the way back to 1909," Feigenbaum said, adding that the Lincoln penny, which first featured the 16th president in that year, has had "quite a run."
Parents could get a Lincoln penny coin collecting book – options include those from Whitman Publishing, which also publishes Greysheet – and talk to their children about "American history, and who this Lincoln guy is and what would the different designs be all about," Feigenbaum said.
Should I horde 2025 pennies?
Not if you are hoping for them to be valuable. Just as there has been misleading hype about the value of some Lincoln wheat pennies, there may be misinformation about the increased value of 2025 pennies.
That's nonsense, Feigenbaum said. They are "not going to be" more valuable, according to Feigenbaum, who said he favored getting rid of the penny.
Maybe it's a good time to take all those coins gathering dust in a cup or piggy bank to the bank or a Coinstar machine. The average home has $60-$90 in coins at home, according to the Federal Reserve.
Are your old pennies worth millions?: Experts say you shouldn't bank on it
Getting rid of pennies. Will it save the US money?
Maybe. Not making pennies will nix out the more than $179 million it costs taxpayers to make them, based on figures from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the department formerly connected to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
The U.S. Mint estimates that not making pennies will save $56 million in material costs, with additional savings from better and more efficient production, CNBC reported.
'For every penny that the United States government prints, we're actually losing money. So, it's a net cost to the federal government,' said Raymond Robertson, director of the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics and Public Policy at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University, in a news release.
But the lack of pennies likely means more reliance on nickels, which cost even more to produce – 13.78 cents, the U.S. Mint says.
If the U.S. Mint makes more nickels, "It actually is going to increase costs for the government,' Robertson said. 'So, it's really not clear how much cost savings the government will realize by eliminating the penny," he added.
One of the bills (H.R. 1270) introduced in the House of Representatives (technically, Congress holds the power to eliminate a currency) also proposes getting rid of the nickel, too.
What will the demise of the penny mean to prices?
There is no time frame for prices to be set in five-cent increments – a move to change all those prices ending in 49 or 99 cents to the nearest five cents due to lack of pennies – but they will likely eventually, said Bill Maurer, dean of the School of Social Sciences at the University of California, Irvine, and director of UCI's Institute for Money, Technology and Financial Inclusion.
When there are not enough pennies for stores and other retailers to make change, businesses will need to round up or down, the Treasury Department said, according to The Wall Street Journal.
For the time being, merchants can keep prices as they are, but the 18% to 20% of Americans who rely on cash could eventually pay a rounded-up price, based on 5-cent increments. "If someone comes to you with cash, you round up, right? So if you're kind of doubly screwed if you're poorer," Maurer told USA TODAY.
Other countries that have eliminated low-denomination coins – Australia, Canada and New Zealand, among them – have resulted in differing outcomes, with some prices rounding up and some down, according to Money.com.
As the move to eliminate coin and paper currency continues, a publicly-accessible digital payment system will be needed so that consumers of all income levels can participate, Maurer said.
But the loss of physical currency removes a redundancy in the monetary system that's invaluable during disasters and emergencies, according to Maurer. "The more dependent on cashless methods of payment we become, the more risk we place ourselves when there are emergencies or disasters, because you need a well-functioning cash system," he continued.
Contributing: Fernando Cervantes, Daniel de Visé and Melina Khan.
Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY's Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com
What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Investing In Pet Benefits Can Help Companies Win The Talent War
Cerys Goodall is the Founder and Principal at The Goods and advisor to Vetster. There are currently five generations in the workforce, which makes it nearly impossible to find benefits that appeal to all. Benefits like childcare assistance typically resonate with Gen-X, but for the growing number of Millennials and Gen-Z choosing not to have kids, these family-centric benefits offer little to no value to an increasing portion of the workforce. As HR teams look for universally resonant benefits, one overlooked area can offer a cross-generational appeal: pet care. According to recent research, 66% of American households own a pet. Given that over half of a company's workforce is likely to fall into this category of pet ownership, HR teams can leverage this to offer financial and wellness benefits that appeal to a wider range of employees. Easing Financial Burdens With rising veterinary costs and unstable economic times, many people are struggling to cover unexpected pet expenses, which I've found makes employer support in this area especially appreciated. A recent study by our company found that Gen-X and Gen-Z would both happily spend nearly $6,000 if it meant providing life-saving care to their pet, but the resources available to them to fund the expense vary widely, from Gen-X tapping their savings to Gen-Z selling their car or crowdfunding. Everyday pet expenses can add up quickly, even without factoring in emergency care situations that pop up. In our same study, pet parents who work from home reported saving an estimated $215 per month on pet care. Offering pet benefits is a remote-friendly option that can not only support employee well-being but also ease the financial pressures of modern pet ownership that all generations face. Supporting Mental Health Initiatives as simple and common as implementing a work-from-home model allow employees to spend more time with their pets, which can also help reduce anxiety. In fact, 51% of pet owners who work from home reported reduced stress levels, and 42% claimed they are "less worried about their pet's well-being." When in-office days are required, consider allowing your employees to bring pets into the office. This can offer similar emotional benefits, helping employees feel more supported and relaxed throughout the workday. Coworkers who don't have pets can reap the benefits, too, as we found that 73% of employees report having reduced stress when there are pets in the office. These mental health benefits can resonate across a multigenerational workforce, whether it's Gen-Z employees managing early-career stress, Millennials balancing young families or Boomers navigating caregiving roles. Implementing Pet Benefits Knowing that more than three in five employees (registration required) would consider leaving their job for a new role that offers more robust benefits and potentially lower pay, there is pressure on HR teams to find a benefits solution that appeals to everyone, regardless of demographic. Moreover, according to a OnePoll survey of 1,800 pet-owning employees (done on behalf of our company), 60% of pet parents "would consider leaving their job if it conflicted with their ability to care for their pet," and almost 10% already have. If you want to begin offering benefits for pet owners in your workforce, consider options like stipends for veterinary care, access to pet insurance and pet-friendly office spaces. While it is not possible to please everyone, tailoring benefits to the pet owners can be an effective way to create a balanced benefits option that provides both financial and mental health support. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?


Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Popular Fast Food Chain to Close Dozens of Locations: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Noodles & Company is set to close up to 32 of its restaurants across the United States by the end of 2025, the restaurant chain announced on Wednesday. The Colorado-based chain said in its 2025 second-quarter financial results that it will shutter between 28 and 32 company-owned restaurants this year and will open two sites. It comes as the company reported nationwide comparable restaurant sales growth, but a net loss and tighter liquidity. Newsweek reached out to Noodles & Company for comment via email outside of regular working hours. Why It Matters The expected 2025 closures represent around a 7 percent reduction in the company's footprint. The chain, which has been running since 1995, has around 400 restaurants across the U.S., according to the company. Several other American restaurant chains, including Denny's, Applebee's, TGI Fridays and Red Lobster, have also closed dozens of branches or filed for bankruptcy within the last year. Stock image of pasta. Stock image of pasta. GDA/AP What To Know Noodles & Company reported on Wednesday that comparable restaurant sales increased 1.5 percent overall in the second quarter, including a 1.5 percent increase at company-owned restaurants and a 1.6 percent increase at franchised sites. But total revenue decreased in the second quarter by 0.7 percent to $127.4 million. Net losses also stood at $17.6 million, compared to a loss of $13.6 million in the second quarter of 2024. As of July 1, the company had $2.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and outstanding debt of $108.3 million. In the second quarter, the company closed six company-owned restaurants and two franchise restaurants, but opened one new company-owned site. The restaurant closures come amid an attempted turnaround at the company, which included an overhaul of its menu in March. What People Are Saying Drew Madsen, Noodles & Company chief executive officer, said in a statement: "We are encouraged to have delivered positive comparable restaurant sales of 1.5 percent in the second quarter despite a challenging consumer environment that has led to heightened discounting and promotional activity across the industry. Our sales and traffic moderated after the initial successful rollout of our new menu due to the strong value-conscious climate as well as slower guest adoption of the upgrades made to some of our historic menu items. "We have been moving decisively to address these factors, particularly around guest value perception. Our new Delicious Duos value-focused platform, that launched at the beginning of August, is off to a great start. Comparable restaurant sales have increased to an average of positive five percent over the past two weeks, demonstrating that our value-focused initiatives are resonating with guests." Mike Hynes, Noodles & Company chief financial officer, said in a conference call on Wednesday, according to Restaurant Business Magazine: "We're very pleased with the results from closing under-performing restaurants. The closures have removed restaurants with negative cash flow from our system, and post closure, we've seen nearby Noodles restaurants experience an increase in sales and profits." What Happens Next Madsen is stepping down as the company's CEO this month and will be succeeded by Joe Christina, who will oversee the ongoing restaurant closures and openings this year.


Atlantic
2 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Trades National Security for a Deal With China
After making a show of getting tough on China, President Donald Trump desperately needs a trade agreement to prove that his disruptive tactics get results. This week, the United States and China agreed to extend their negotiations, avoiding—for now—another round of tariffs that would have hurt business between the world's two largest economies. But the president's newfound willingness to allow the export of vital AI chips to China indicates that an eventual deal could imperil American interests. Eager for a pact, Trump may give up more than he receives. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden prohibited the export of advanced AI chips to China. Just four months ago, Trump expanded those restrictions. This week, though, Trump confirmed the details of an unusual arrangement effectively reversing that move: The American companies Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices will be allowed to sell certain chips to Chinese firms if the companies give the U.S. government a 15 percent cut of the revenue from these sales. In essence, Trump sold exemptions to technology-export controls that many experts consider crucial to protecting American security. In a letter last month, Matt Pottinger, who was Trump's deputy national security adviser during the president's first term, and 19 other policy professionals urged the administration not to allow the sale of Nvidia's H20 chip to China, calling the decision a 'strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence.' Derek Thompson: The disturbing rise of MAGA Maoism Trump may see the arrangement not as a national-security issue but as a business deal: There's a lot of money to be made selling chips to China, and now the U.S. government will materially benefit. But Trump must also realize that he's made a concession to Chinese President Xi Jinping. Beijing has persistently demanded that Washington remove U.S. export controls on advanced chips, and Xi personally pressed Biden for relief without success. Trump justified his flip-flop by arguing that the H20 chip is not among Nvidia's most high-powered products. He's right about that, but it's far from outdated. Chinese companies crave the H20 to help them deploy AI services. Indeed, the demand for the H20 appears to have alarmed Chinese authorities, who would prefer that local companies use homemade alternatives. Even as Beijing fights the U.S. restrictions, officials have tried slowing the rush by signaling in state media that the Nvidia chip is unsafe. Although Chinese designers have developed a similar chip, they are unable to produce enough, also due to U.S. restrictions that prevent them from using the top chip manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Trump has left the door open to further concessions. Because China's tech industry still can't match Nvidia's AI chips, Beijing is likely to prod Trump to ease restrictions on more advanced semiconductors. Rather than firmly committing to export controls, Trump suggested on Monday that he would be open to permitting Nvidia to sell China downgraded versions of its most powerful chips. Xi has every reason to ask for more. Trump's desire for a deal gives Chinese leaders leverage. And given Trump's pattern of sudden policy reversals, he has likely left an impression that anything could be on the table. Beijing is clearly all in on the negotiations. According to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the Chinese government sent 75 officials to the most recent round of talks, in Stockholm in late July, compared with his own skeleton crew of 15. 'Xi now feels more emboldened to probe for a wider range of potential concessions, not only economic but also security concessions,' Ali Wyne, an expert on U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group, told me. Wyne fears this could lead to a 'lopsided bargain' in China's favor. Thomas Wright: Trump wasted no time derailing his own AI plan Xi has already gained on his top-priority issue: Taiwan. He urged Trump to approach Taiwan 'with prudence' during a phone conversation in June, according to the Chinese government's official summary. Washington then reportedly canceled meetings with Taiwan's defense minister, a step that surely pleased Beijing, which strives to isolate the island's government. The Trump administration also appears to have discouraged Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making stopovers in U.S. cities while en route to Latin America for diplomatic visits. Xi has done little in exchange. Beijing's most significant goodwill gesture was a June decision to restrict the sale of two chemicals that are used to make the illegal fentanyl circulating on American streets, an issue of utmost importance to the Trump team. But Beijing's action on curtailing the fentanyl trade will likely remain conditional on Trump's good behavior. Trump recently called on Xi in a social-media post to buy more U.S.-grown soybeans—which would be great for some American farmers, but is hardly an even swap for China's access to high-tech chips. Meanwhile, Xi has deftly created and deployed levers of pressure. Amid the escalating trade war in April, Beijing imposed controls on the export to the U.S. of rare-earth metals—an industry that China dominates—and then used their easing as a negotiating tool. In the end, Xi may not get all he wants. But he is winning just by talking. China's leaders have apparently learned that they can distract Trump from more strategic issues by haggling with him over tariff rates and soybean sales. The desire for a deal has so consumed the Trump team that any grander strategy to contend with China's growing power seems to have gotten lost. Last week, Trump imposed high tariffs on India in an attempt to compel New Delhi to curtail purchases of Russian oil—angering a potential partner in the global competition with China. Friendlier relations with China are certainly better than open hostility. The question has always been: At what cost? Trump may eventually seal a trade deal with China that benefits him, but not necessarily the nation.