logo
Torry Raac: 'They decided our fate while scrolling on their phones'

Torry Raac: 'They decided our fate while scrolling on their phones'

Torry couple George and Sheila McDonald should be spending their retirement enjoying holidays and a well-earned rest. Instead, both of them, at almost 70 years old, are attending protests and fearing for their future.
The couple – through no fault of their own – are trapped by Raac.
'It's just not fair. We've worked all our lives and didn't imagine spending our retirement going through this.'
This, as George mentions, is the uncertainty of living in a house now designated for demolition due to the discovery of unstable Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (Raac) in their roof.
Bought from Aberdeen City Council under the right-to-buy scheme, it's just one of 504 homes to be razed to the ground.
But unlike the 366 social housing properties, now largely vacated, George and Sheila's home is one of 138 houses privately owned.
Former oil and gas worker George is Torry born and bred. He married Sheila, recently retired from her role in His Majesty's Theatre box office, 51 years ago.
They've lived in their three-bed Pentland Crescent home for almost 40 years.
Their children were raised in that home. They've built lifelong friendships from that home.
And due to the presence of the dangerous concrete in their home, Aberdeen City Council now wants to buy it back at a reduced price so a huge swathe of Balnagask can be cleared of its Raac-riddled properties.
'I wish I'd never retired,' Sheila says.
'We have the financial worry hanging over us, but then the less I have to do the more the thought of what's going to happen to us eats me up.'
Though George likes to keep himself busy walking his daughter's dog, the toll of the situation – now a year on for Aberdeen residents – is evident.
'Sheila's blood pressure is up. It's the first thing you think about every day,' he says.
'It's not easy, but we'll not be making it easy for the council either. We'll be riding this out as long as it takes.
'We've spent a lot of money on our house, we won't be giving it away at a fraction of the price it's worth.'
The McDonalds, like the other private homeowners, were invited by ACC to enter into a voluntary process to have their homes valued.
George and Sheila's immaculately decorated home has a beautifully cultivated back garden, and a view to the harbour from their 'upside down hen house'.
Though a cohort of residents voted to 'freeze out' the local authority, a few homeowners took part in the process and shared their results.
'Some of the valuations we've heard of have been anything but fair,' Sheila adds.
In February, we reported owners of flats being offered as little as £20,000 for their homes and family homes for as little as £68,000.
The Torry Community Raac Campaign said some offers they knew of were between £35,000 and £55,000 less than what homes were valued at before the news broke of Raac in the properties.
'We heard of someone in a similar house to ours getting 60-something for theirs. What would be do with that?
'Where are we going to go in Aberdeen for that?
'Well I'll tell you what, I want be moving into a flat. And I certainly won't be paying rent to Aberdeen City Council for the privilege,' Sheila added.
For George, it's the injustice of the situation – and a perceived lack of care – that most upsets him.
'There's been no compassion or empathy throughout this whole process,' says George.
'I was at the council meeting when they decided to vote in favour of demolition.
'I sat in the public gallery and watched a room full of people decide whether or not we would be losing our homes and our futures.
'And do you know what? I was sickened.
'They decided our fate while scrolling on their phones and eating chocolates.'
George and Sheila will join fellow homeowners at a private meeting of the Torry Community Raac Campaign this weekend, to decide on next steps as a group.
Since their last meeting, Raac has been discovered in Stirling, and 900 homes in Dundee are also now deemed unsafe.
'We just want fair prices or like-for-like houses. That's only fair,' added Sheila. 'Some council tenants have been given brand new houses while the homeowners could be penniless, living who knows where. How can that be right?'
Councillor Christian Allard, co-leader of Aberdeen City Council, and elected member for Torry and Ferryhill, said: 'Meetings are all day and people will have a drink and something to eat from time to time.
'The work of Councillors doesn't stop during meetings.
'I do have to respond to a lot of urgent Council business during meetings and also, we do use our laptop, iPad or phone to get any information we need to better participate to debates.
'All 45 elected Councillors are very much aware of the huge issue that is RAAC for the residents of Torry.'
Join our Trapped by Raac campaign to support the homeowners.
Click this image to sign this petition to the UK Government:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Petition launched against proposed changes to Helensburgh Fire Station staffing levels
Petition launched against proposed changes to Helensburgh Fire Station staffing levels

Daily Record

time2 days ago

  • Daily Record

Petition launched against proposed changes to Helensburgh Fire Station staffing levels

Plans by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service would see Helensburgh's full-time facility switch to a "day crewing" model. A petition has been launched against proposals to change staffing levels at Helensburgh Fire Station. ‌ The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) Service Delivery Review is reviewing a proposal that could see the full-time station in Helensburgh adopt a "day crewing" system, meaning crews would be based at the station only from 8am to 6pm. ‌ Under the new model, on-call crews would then respond to emergencies during the night. ‌ Dumbarton MSP Jackie Baillie has launched an online petition to challenge the proposed changes, calling on locals to express their opinions and pushing for a re-think of the plans. She has also expressed safety concerns due to the proximity of Faslane Naval Base and RNAD Coulport. The Labour MSP for Dumbarton, who is also the Deputy Leader of Scottish Labour, has teamed up with local fire service staff to ensure community voices are heard. ‌ Ms Baillie staffed a stall at Helensburgh's Market in the Square on Saturday, where she briefed residents about the potential changes and encouraged them to support her petition. ‌ She expressed her worries, saying: "I have real concerns over these cuts and what it would mean for Helensburgh and Lomond residents should they go ahead. "The SFRS have admitted that an increase in response times can be expected outwith core dayshift hours. "It's unacceptable to place residents at increased risk and I'm opposed to these plans." ‌ Currently, Helensburgh operates two fire engines, one manned by full-time firefighters and the other by an on-call team. The station currently operates with a full-time crew of five firefighters, primed for immediate response. ‌ They are bolstered by an on-call appliance, manned by 10 personnel equipped with pagers, ready to respond to emergencies. The status of the second on-call appliance will remain unchanged. Ms Baillie is also behind a leaflet campaign, encouraging community members to voice their opinions. ‌ SFRS chiefs have arranged a public meeting to discuss the proposals, scheduled at the Victoria Halls on Tuesday, August 26, at 6pm. In June, Area Commander Joe McKay, the Local Senior Officer for Argyll and Bute, told the Lennox: "We are currently in the midst of a service delivery review, which aims to ensure that our resources – our staff, stations and appliances – are matched to operational risk and demand across Scotland. "We also must address urgent property issues including stations affected by Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC), which includes Helensburgh Community Fire Station." ‌ He added: "Helensburgh is one of a number of change options that have been recommended to progress to public consultation, which is launching later this month. "Any permanent changes to our station footprint or how we deliver our services will only come after the public consultation process and a final decision has been made by the SFRS Board." To view Ms Baillie's petition, click here.

Even I see the point of prenups these days
Even I see the point of prenups these days

Times

time4 days ago

  • Times

Even I see the point of prenups these days

As summer weddings roll by, does the thought of prenuptial contracts reassure or disgust you? It may depend on your generation, but their rising popularity certainly reflects a change in the idea of marriage. Even 20 years ago most of us associated 'prenups' with American billionaires, Hollywood stars with chronically unsettled emotions or George Clooney getting gloriously suckered in the Coen brothers' Intolerable Cruelty. But ideals erode: four years ago the Marriage Foundation estimated that one in five couples in the UK sign prenups, and a YouGov survey finds more than 60 per cent liking the idea. Inquiries to law firms reflect the change and so, cautiously, does the law itself: since a 2009 Supreme Court ruling, a contract between a couple ring-fencing their separate assets can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings. • Why are couples who meet online more likely to fall out of love? And last year Sir Robert Buckland KC wrote here that it's already time to make prenups fully enforceable. As Boris Johnson's lord chancellor he knows the turf, having introduced no-fault divorce. He calls prenups a 'wise and practical choice'. It's worth discussing, though traditional spirits may wince. Ancient vows echo down the centuries: 'For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, till death us do part.' The bride's promise to obey, of course, got shuffled out of the service in the 1920s, though Princess Elizabeth endearingly opted to say it to Philip Mountbatten in 1947. But even harder to find in use is one magnificent 16th-century promise that bridegrooms made: 'With all my worldly goods, I thee endow.' Women never said it, since it was pretty much implied for centuries that we'd hand everything over, unless protected by some upper-crust web of trusts or entails. But now, even in church weddings, that majestic phrase is nearly gone, enduring only if you choose the 1559 Book of Common Prayer. Otherwise it's Alternative Services: Series One (as used by the Prince of Wales) which more cautiously says: 'All my worldly goods with thee I share.' Still more commonly in our age of self-analysis and identity-pride, each just says: 'All that I am I give to you.' In the Catholic service there's no mention of money-sharing. Yet there is an ancient, haunting bravery about that lordly promise to 'endow' every penny of your wealth on the beloved. The word suggests permanent, irrecoverable; an almost monastic plunge of dedication. It certainly contrasts with the fashion for writing your own florid vows, like 'You are my sunrise and sunset, the dream I have dreamt all my life'; 'I promise to never lose our spark' or — apparently quite popular — the Backstreet Boys-style 'You are my fire, my one desire'. None of these specifically implies endowing any assets. • Inside Picasso's studios: the secrets of the places where he lived and loved Tracking the phrase, I hit upon Mumsnet. Here, in a very modern take, is a young woman worriedly unsure whether, during her register office wedding, she somehow accidentally 'endowed' her chap with a right to half the £10,000 she got by selling a possession from her single days. Was it, she asks, written in law? Because if so, 'I'm just uncomfortable with the idea of not having control of my stuff!'. Someone else asks if selling her clothes on eBay entitles him to half the dibs. The discussion continues sensibly enough, with talk of fairness and joint accounts and pensions in divorce. But the uncomfortable lack of clarity, and frequent depressing stories of rough divorces, began to change my mind about prenups. And, as one commenter sapiently observed, by marrying in the UK you're sort of signing one anyway: it's just that if you do separate it'll be the courts, not you, deciding who gets what. And — aside from the obvious need for child support — who wants strange lawyers running your life? It is easy to mock prenup absurdities, American or domestic. One law firm, conceivably tongue in cheek, suggests terms that couples might include. Like at what age you can each retire, the frequency of family visits, restricted screen time, sexual action or stipulations on future weight (one comedian jokes that there are two stone of her man which she certainly never married). Another suggested stipulation was to dictate 'how long either party is expected to wait before dating somebody else if they separate'. • Alison Steadman: 'My secret? A few gins and tonic in the evening' Most of these are enough to make any onlooker turn down the wedding invitation and bin the gift list; few firms would even draft them and no court admits their validity. But it could be that if they became fully enforceable, as Buckland suggests, only rational and financial ones would be written. And money does matter when more than four out of ten marriages break up. We have an inexcusably wide wealth gap; a twistedly absurd housing market makes it worse. Prenups are very tempting if one party has built up assets: it's middle-aged couples who still inquire most about prenups because implicitly 'endowing' half a business or property feels risky. Our intergenerational wealth gap is an even bigger driver of worry. Homeowner parents who donated a deposit on a first flat or might leave a small fortune within a decade or so may flinch and murmur about a prenup if their child's whirlwind romance looks like a gambler, drinker or reckless investor. Some might make paying for the wedding conditional on such a precaution, since only the wealthiest can afford the complexity of setting up trusts. It's all fuel for sad long-term rifts. But maybe if prenups do become the norm, like insurance or fire extinguishers, and were known to be fully enforceable, it might all feel less creepy. Maybe it's time. But, sigh! It's not romantic …

I felt I'd failed as a parent thanks to the gloating mums of high-achieving children - while mine aren't following a conventional path, says ROSIE GREEN. Then I had a striking realisation...
I felt I'd failed as a parent thanks to the gloating mums of high-achieving children - while mine aren't following a conventional path, says ROSIE GREEN. Then I had a striking realisation...

Daily Mail​

time6 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

I felt I'd failed as a parent thanks to the gloating mums of high-achieving children - while mine aren't following a conventional path, says ROSIE GREEN. Then I had a striking realisation...

Graduations, exam results, sports days… it's been a summer of competitive parenting and it's given me a bad case of inadequate-itis. My condition is triggered by WhatsApp messages like this from an old college 'friend', Becca*. 'So George has been predicted four A*s! We've pivoted to Oxbridge but are considering Ivy League options, too. He has a summer trip planned to build a school for underprivileged kids in Kenya (Just Giving link to follow) but, poor lamb, it's tricky factoring in his internship at Slaughter And May. What are your kiddiwinks up to?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store