logo
Bob Vylan and Kneecap face criminal probe as BBC Glastonbury coverage criticised

Bob Vylan and Kneecap face criminal probe as BBC Glastonbury coverage criticised

Rhyl Journala day ago
The BBC also expressed regret at not pulling its livestream of Bob Vylan's 'unacceptable' set, with the Culture Secretary claiming the issue should have been foreseeable and constituted 'a problem of leadership' for the broadcaster.
Bobby Vylan, one half of the British rap punk duo, led crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage on Saturday in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)'.
In their own set on the stage directly afterwards, Irish rap trio Kneecap similarly led chants of 'Free Palestine' while member Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who appeared in court earlier this month charged with a terror offence, wore a keffiyeh during the performance.
Fellow member JJ O Dochartaigh also wore a T-shirt that said: 'We are all Palestine Action' in reference to the soon-to-be-banned campaign group.
Avon and Somerset Police said they had launched a probe on Monday into both performances at the festival after reviewing video footage and audio recordings, with a senior detective appointed to lead it.
A police spokesman said: 'This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our inquiries are at an early stage.
'The investigation will be evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes.'
US deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau announced that Bob Vylan's US visas had been revoked due to 'their hateful tirade at Glastonbury', with the duo scheduled to tour in Chicago, Brooklyn and Philadelphia in October.
The BBC has faced strong criticism for continuing to livestream their performance on iPlayer with on-screen warnings about discriminatory language, leading to broadcasting regulator Ofcom saying it was 'very concerned' by the decision.
In a statement on Monday, the BBC said: 'Millions of people tuned in to enjoy Glastonbury this weekend across the BBC's output but one performance within our livestreams included comments that were deeply offensive.
'The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence.
'The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves.
'We welcome Glastonbury's condemnation of the performance.
'The performance was part of a livestream of the West Holts stage on BBC iPlayer.
'The judgment on Saturday to issue a warning on screen while streaming online was in line with our editorial guidelines.
'In addition, we took the decision not to make the performance available on demand.
'The team were dealing with a live situation, but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance.
'We regret this did not happen.'
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the Government was 'exasperated' with the 'lack of account from the leadership' at the BBC during a statement to the Commons on Monday.
Addressing a point from Jim Allister, TUV MP for North Antrim, that the livestream was 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast', Ms Nandy said: 'He will know that this Government supports the BBC.
'We believe it is an important institution.
'That is why we are so disappointed that this has happened, why we have been so exasperated with the lack of account from the leadership, not just about this, but about a previous Gaza documentary and a number of other issues as well.
'The BBC is one of the most important institutions in our country, and that is the reason why it is held to the highest of standards.'
Ms Nandy said the incident had raised 'very, very serious questions at the highest levels of the BBC about the operational oversight and the way in which editorial standards are understood', adding that she wanted to see 'rapid action' from the broadcaster.
Glastonbury Festival itself also condemned Bob Vylan's chants, saying it was 'appalled' by what was said on stage.
A statement on Instagram said: 'Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.'
Bob Vylan, who formed in Ipswich in 2017, have released four albums addressing issues to do with racism, masculinity and class.
Bobby Vylan's real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, 34, according to reports.
In a statement posted to Instagram, Vylan said: 'Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place.
'As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us.'
Kneecap have been in the headlines after member O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence.
In reference to his bandmate's upcoming court date, Naoise O Caireallain told Glastonbury they would 'start a riot outside the courts', before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Not inspired by the Glastonbury headliners? These 6 acts blew me away
Not inspired by the Glastonbury headliners? These 6 acts blew me away

Metro

time38 minutes ago

  • Metro

Not inspired by the Glastonbury headliners? These 6 acts blew me away

Glastonbury headliners are always the talk of the town – but there's so much more to the beloved Worthy Farm music festival. Away from the celebrity sightings and fallouts over particular sets, there have been some stellar performances across the weekend. With hotly anticipated acts like Charli XCX, Olivia Rodrigo, The 1975 and yes even our mysterious Patchwork (which turned out to be none other than Pulp), 2025 was bursting with talent. The weekend finished with a bang as The Prodigy provided festival goers with 90s Big Beat goodness in tribute to their late, legendary frontman Keith Flint. This year even saw a dramatic last minute replacement for Deftones in the form of Skepta, who brought in massive crowds despite just five hours' notice. While the headliners might bring in the biggest crowds – be it a Pyramid performer or the likes of Scissor Sisters on Woodsies – here are our picks for the six acts that will make 2025 go down in history. Walking onto the Park Stage with a group singers dressed as nuns is a sight to behold but Self Esteem is way more than just visuals. Her Friday set, nestled between Biffy Clyro and the headliners, drew a sizeable crowd and for good reason. This is a pop star on the brink of superstardom. Rebecca Taylor, better known as Self Esteem, effortlessly switches between dance numbers like 69 and self love anthems like Focus is Power and Cheers to Me. Her backing vocalists give a choral element to the performance, elevating the entire set above your average pop princess. Her genre-defying third album, A Complicated Woman, was released in April to critical acclaim so don't be surprised if you see more and more from Self Esteem soon. She has an honesty to her lyrics and a twinkle of mischief in her eye; like a British Renee Rapp. You can tell Rebecca has so much more to give and in a few years could be headlining – watch this space. The return of Rizzle Kicks after almost a decade away was met with thunderous applause from the Other Stage audience. Jordan Stephens and Harley Alexander-Sulé defined British summer music in the 00s and 2010s but have been on a nine year hiatus. There's an infectious joy about Rizzle Kicks' music that embodies summer, particularly for those who were teenagers when their original albums dropped. Every single track is a crowd pleaser from opening song Lost Generation to When I Was A Youngster. Their music just screams fun, honestly, who else would bring out a combination of iconic DJ Fatboy Slim, rising star Rachel Chinouriri, and their own parents. Yep, Jordan's mum ran on stage with a Palestine flag while Harley's dad was revealed to be in the band. Chaos and summertime vibes, what more could you want from this beloved duo? Very few artists could shut down Woodsies at 11.30am but that's the power of Lorde. Even fewer could hold that crowd as they sang their brand new album, released that day , in its entirety. Lorde, real name Ella Yelich-O'Connor, is a bit of a myth herself thanks to her reclusive tendencies and quirky personality. Shape shifting slightly for each album, with Virgin marking an era of 'freedom' for the star as she sheds gender conformity. Her onstage presence is hypnotic, moving between awkward and sexy with ease. Her vocals are equally as mesmerising, suiting this new album in a way that some of her older tracks haven't (looking at you Solar Power). One of 2025's many not-so-secret sets, Lorde's appearance was one of the most hotly anticipated of Glastonbury. While fans may have seen her popping up recently, this marked her first gig since XXX and pressure was on. the nature of a large stage secret set marks you for icon status immediately but a secret set that marks your return and album roll out after four years away. Now that's historic. Smug fans will mention this for years to come and we can't blame them (did we mention we were there too?). It's been a few days now but Glastonbury and the world are both still recovering from the emotional reaction to seeing Lewis Capaldi return to the stage. In 2023, Lewis was helped to the finish line of his emotional set by the crowd, as his battle with Tourette's became a difficult one at Worthy Farm on the occasion. That set turned out to be one of the last that the Someone You Loved singer would perform for the next two years, making his grand return over the weekend. Another not so secret set, Lewis joked about everyone knowing that it would be him taking that Saturday slot. On stage for 30 minutes, the Hold Me While You Wait hitmaker made of point of 'finishing what he started' before launching into new single Survive. Tears were shed by both viewers and Lewis alike throughout the set, but Survive broke anyone who wasn't already in floods. Where better to mark your return than the very stage you last walked off. The crowd welcomed him back with open arms, belting his lyrics back to him. This time he didn't need Glastonbury to help him, but the crowd was there regardless. A real triumph. Kaiser Chiefs sparked outrage with those watching at home as they were not broadcast live on the BBC. But at Worthy Farm it was hard to miss the I Predict A Riot hitmakers on stage. Getting Glasto-goers up on Saturday morning after a late night is no easy task but at midday, Kaiser Chiefs pulled in a crowd usually reserved for the likes of legends or headliners. Everyone was singing along to the lyrics to hits such as Ruby (with note perfect 'ahahahahahahh's from the crowd). Even those walking past or sitting in the shade, away from the crowd were singing along to those classic tracks. What better way to kick off your Saturday, even if it's bit loud for the hangovers. Next stop, headlining – or at least getting on TV next time! Doechii The Tampa, Florida rapper and singer has caused quite the stir over the last 12 months, and she crowned her recent successes with another stellar live set to rival her already legendary NPR Tiny Desk slot. Weezer The American veteran rockers were on a Glastonbury stage for the first time in 1995 and they brought a wholesome hits collection with them, playing their California power pop songs to a sun-kissed crowd on the Saturday. Denzel Curry The US rapper's star has risen considerably over the last decade and he made sure to bring the noise and energy with his set at Worthy Farm, racing through a collection of his best work his with typical rapid-fire rap delivery. St. Vincent The Oklahoma-born singer-songwriter and guitarist extraordinaire brought her guitar-wielding weirdness to Glastonbury over the weekend, confirming once again that she's always one to watch if her name pops up on a festival bill. Royel Otis The duo from Bondi Beach, Australia performed a string of their upbeat surfer tunes on Sunday, as well as their covers of Murder on the Dancefloor and Linger, which were just as captivating as the first time they went viral with them. The Prodigy 90s dance heads reckon The Prodigy paid perfect tribute to their late frontman Keith Flint. An electrifying and exciting set on the Other Stage closed the weekend and had fans at Worthy Farm and at home with their hands in the air. Madalitso Band This Malawian duo deserve a nod simply for playing the most unique instrument at the entire Glastonbury Festival in 2025: a single-string bass known as a babatoni, which underpins their sweet East African folk tunes. Pulp famously headlined Glastonbury Festival 30 years ago with just 10 days notice – this was after original headliners The Stone Roses had to pull out thanks to an injury in the band. A lot of time has passed since then, and Pulp aren't interested in pretending it hasn't – frontman Jarvis Cocker is older in the face and older in the voice, but beautifully so. The Sheffield pop rockers launched into a fine collection of their biggest hits of the 1990s after being unveiled as the secret surprise act Patchwork, despite multiple denials. Opening with Sorted for E's & Wizz and then launching into Disco 2000, Jarvis didn't ignore the fact that a song that was once about the future is now set 25 years in the past – and applied the same gravitas and pathos to his entire performance. More Trending He was so approachable with the crowd and so eager to catch up with old friends that he had to be told he was running out of time after chatting between almost every song. Keyboardist Candida Jones continued to amaze as well, providing incredible work on her assortment of synths and keyboards despite having to manage her rheumatoid arthritis on the day. Catch up with Glastonbury Festival 2025 on BBC iPlayer. Article co-written with Robert Oliver and Pierra Willix. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Bob Vylan claim they're being 'targeted' in new statement after Glastonbury IDF controversy MORE: BBC addresses fury after legendary band's final ever show wasn't filmed at Glastonbury MORE: 80s music icon almost cancelled long-overdue Glastonbury debut over hearing fears

Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers Review – In the shadow of terror
Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers Review – In the shadow of terror

The Review Geek

time40 minutes ago

  • The Review Geek

Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers Review – In the shadow of terror

Season 1 Episode Guide Episode 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode 4 On 7th July 2005, London was forever changed by an unthinkable act of terror. Four co-ordinated suicide attacks were carried out by Islamist terrorists, targeting commuters travelling on London's public transport during the morning rush hour. Three bombs were detonated on the London Underground within 50 seconds of each other, and then just under an hour later, another bomb exploded on a bus in Tavistock Square. Panic and confusion rippled across the capital, fuelling fear and deepening the mistrust that had taken root after 9/11. With security and intelligence forces scrambling for answers, what followed was Britain's largest criminal investigation, determined to find those responsible for radicalizing those suicide bombers before they struck again. The first episode outlines the timeline for these attacks and what happened in excruciating detail, including some very revealing eyewitness accounts from those who were there on the trains and buses. Episode 2 then turns to the investigation toward identifying these four men and exactly who they were – and why they did this. Police are a lot more central in this chapter, with the investigation crescendoing into finding a strange brown substance in a suspicious house which – as one investigator so aptly puts it – 'smelt a lot like sh*t'. Episode 3 then jumps forward to the incidents on 21st July. Four more bombers are out on the prowl but this time, the police are ready. This leads into an operation seemingly targeting one of the bombers, all the while marching ever-closer to a tragedy that can only be regarded as a colossal mistake. The fourth and final chapter then looks deeper at the aftermath of this incident, specifically honing in on police ineptitude, alongside tracking down the escaped bombers before it's too late. It's here where we see the influences behind the bombers themselves, intermingled around the British spirit of 'keeping calm and carrying on' while also calling out the injustices from trigger-happy police. The interviews are well delivered and pretty balanced, although there's no illusion over where the blame lies. The Prime Minister at the time, Tony Blair, lends his voice here, and it's clear from some of the difficult statements he gives (and the way he squirms a bit in his seat) that he knows the responsibility is ultimately levelled at his shoulders. There's a continued theme here of miscommunication from the police during these later episodes, something echoed by whistle-blowers – including one of the officers who pulled the trigger. His appearance is notable obscured here (which is probably for the best). However, the show also balances this condemnation out with a sharp reminder that this was the first ever suicide bombing in Britain. As the rules changed and the learning curve steepened, the documentary also highlights the sheer dedication of officers on the front lines. Seeing some of these later operations take place, including a collective effort not to kill any of the bombers, is a reminder of how essential the police actually are, but this is certainly not a documentary for the fainthearted. There is a lot of raw, intimate footage here, including recreations of the bombings, head-cams from investigators stepping onboard the destroyed trains, and boots-on-the-ground operations to catch the bombers. None of this is done in a way that feels exploitative though. Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers is a really solid documentary. It's a haunting, sharply told expose that doesn't shy away from the messiness of truth—or the complexity of justice in the shadow of terror.

McGregor continues appeal without fresh evidence
McGregor continues appeal without fresh evidence

Powys County Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

McGregor continues appeal without fresh evidence

Conor McGregor's legal team has withdrawn a bid to introduce fresh evidence in his appeal against a decision in a civil case in which a woman accused him of raping her. The Irish mixed martial arts fighter's lawyers are instead arguing that the jury heard an inadmissible line of questioning about his co-operation with gardai into their investigation of an incident at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018. Former hairdresser Nikita Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor over the matter in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel. During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand. After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found McGregor civilly liable for assault. Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, was awarded 248,603.60 euro (about £206,000) in damages. She lost her case against another man, James Lawrence, who she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel. McGregor was ordered by a judge to pay Ms Hand 100,000 euro (£85,000) of the damages and 200,000 euro (£170,000) of an expected 1.3 million euro (£1.1 million) in legal costs before the appeal. He has since sought an appeal which was initially expected to include new evidence. On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal in Dublin heard that McGregor would no longer be relying on additional evidence that had not been given to the initial trial for his appeal. That evidence was reported to relate to two neighbours of Ms Hand who had alleged they had seen her be assaulted by a former partner. However, McGregor's legal team said that after receiving new applications relating to the evidence to be given by pathologist Professor Jack Crane, they could no longer sustain that ground of appeal. John Gordon, SC, for Ms Hand, said it was 'frankly not appropriate' for the ground to be withdrawn on that basis, adding he had only been told of the development 10 minutes earlier. He objected to the withdrawal of the ground and argued he should still be allowed to cross-examine the neighbours. He said his client had been 'put through the wringer yet again' and that the court should not permit the appellant to 'waltz in here and then they can walk away from this'. Mr Gordon said there could potentially be matters relating to perjury arising out of the developments. Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, alongside Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, questioned how further submissions relating to Prof Crane could lead to the withdrawal of the appeal matter on the neighbours' evidence. Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, said he was applying to withdraw the matter on a 'holistic view' of the whole case and after taking instructions. The court heard it was 'unsatisfactory' that the development was being brought to the court at a late stage, but Ms Justice Kennedy permitted the withdrawing of the ground. Following the withdrawal of that application, Remy Farrell, SC, also for McGregor, advanced the remaining four grounds of the appeal – largely relating to the right to silence and 'no comment' answers to questions during garda interviews. He raised the issue of the cross-examination of McGregor during the original trial by Mr Gordon. He said an 'enormous amount of no comment material' had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end. Mr Farrell said that Mr Gordon had raised more than 100 'no comment' answers given by McGregor while being interviewed by gardai on the basis that it related to a position put forward by the fighter that he had been fully co-operative with gardai. Mr Farrell said this was allowed to proceed by the trial judge, with Mr Justice Alexander Owens telling Mr Gordon multiple times to get to that specific purpose of that line of questioning. However, putting forward the appeal, McGregor's counsel said this did not occur – and was in itself based on an 'entirely incorrect' paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said. Mr Farrell said his client had said that he had made a comment about wanting to 'show everything' and 'get everything correct' in seeking out the 'best advice' from his solicitors – rather than saying he had been fully co-operative with gardai. He said it was 'manifestly wrong' and 'blatantly incorrect' for Mr Justice Owens to tell the jury the questioning was allowed as McGregor had raised his status as someone trying to sort out matters with the guards as best he can. Mr Farrell argued that the line of questioning was 'wholly impermissible' and was inviting someone to draw an inference that there was 'no smoke without fire' when invoking the right to silence. McGregor's counsel said the judge appeared to have 'somewhat lost control of the issue' and instead later told the jury during the charge that it could still be allowed for the different purpose of understanding background material to McGregor's answers and understanding the sequence of interviews and statements. Mr Farrell said there had been 'various vague circling' around a suggestion of whether McGregor had been co-operative or not, but it had at no point been put to him that he had been untruthful in his answers. He said the handling of the no-comment answers meant a retrial may be appropriate. Ray Boland SC, for Ms Hand, said it was clear from a holistic consideration of McGregor's evidence that he was putting forward that he wanted to be as co-operative as possible with the investigation. He argued that it was ambiguous and possible to interpret an answer that he wanted to 'show everything' that this related to gardai rather than to solicitors, and that it was 'obvious' that Mr Gordon had cross-examined him about his co-operation with the investigation. He argued, therefore, that while the judge may have got some of the details wrong, it was appropriate for the line of questioning on the no-comment answers to be admissible. For example, he said his lack of co-operation was evidenced by how he had not handed over his phone while Ms Hand had done so. He reiterated that the judge had made it abundantly clear the jury could not draw adverse inferences from the no-comment answers. He said Mr McGregor had expressed a want to put every shred of evidence before the court. However, he said McGregor had only been 'middling co-operative' rather than fully co-operative with gardai. He said the purpose of the questioning had been followed through on, even if it was subtle or inferential. A small group of supporters stood outside the court on Tuesday morning with a banner reading 'We stand with Nikita Hand', including Socialist Party TD Ruth Coppinger and campaigner Natasha O'Brien. Ms O'Brien was among some of the crowd to enter the court to express well wishes to Ms Hand. The proceedings, including Mr Lawrence's appeal against a decision not to be awarded costs, continue on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store