logo
Israel's Failed Plot to Stop Pakistan's Nuclear Bomb

Israel's Failed Plot to Stop Pakistan's Nuclear Bomb

Gulf Insider26-06-2025
Former CIA Director George Tenet thought him 'at least as dangerous as Osama bin Laden' and former Mossad Chief Shabtai Shavit regretted not killing him. But to almost 250 million Pakistanis, Abdul Qadeer Khan – the godfather of Pakistan's nuclear programme – is a legend and national hero.
The nuclear scientist, who was born in 1936 and died in 2021 aged 85, was more responsible than anyone else for the South Asian nation developing a nuclear bomb. He ran a sophisticated and clandestine international network assisting Iran, Libya and North Korea with their nuclear programs. One of those nations, North Korea, ended up getting the coveted military status symbol. Israel – itself a nuclear power, although it has never admitted it – allegedly used assassination attempts and threats to try and stop Pakistan from going nuclear.
In the 1980s Israel even formulated a plan to bomb Pakistan's nuclear site with Indian assistance – a scheme that the Indian government eventually backed out of.
AQ Khan, as he is commonly remembered by Pakistanis, believed that by building a nuclear bomb he had saved his country from foreign threats, especially its nuclear-armed neighbor India.
Today many of his fellow citizens agree.
'Why not an Islamic bomb?'
Pakistan first decided to build a bomb after its larger neighbor had done so. On 18 May 1974 India tested its first nuclear weapon, which it codenamed Smiling Buddha. Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto immediately vowed to develop nuclear weapons for his own country.
'We will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own,' he said. There was, he declared, 'a Christian bomb, a Jewish bomb and now a Hindu bomb. Why not an Islamic bomb?'
Born during British rule of the Indian subcontinent, AQ Khan completed a science degree at Karachi University in 1960 before studying metallurgical engineering in Berlin. He also went on to study in the Netherlands and Belgium. By 1974 Khan was working for a subcontractor of a major nuclear fuel company, Urenco, in Amsterdam.
The company supplied enriched uranium nuclear fuel for European nuclear reactors. Khan had access to top secret areas of the Urenco facility and blueprints of the world's best centrifuges, which enriched natural uranium and turned it into bomb fuel.
In January 1976 he made a sudden and mysterious departure from the Netherlands, saying he had been made 'an offer I can't refuse in Pakistan'. Khan was later accused of having stolen a blueprint for uranium centrifuges, which can turn uranium into weapons-grade fuel, from the Netherlands.
That July he set up a research laboratory in Rawalpindi which produced enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. For a few years the operation proceeded in secret. Dummy companies imported the components Khan needed to build an enrichment program, the official story being that they were going towards a new textile mill.
While there is significant evidence indicating that Pakistan's military establishment was supporting Khan's work, civilian governments were generally kept in the dark, with the exception of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (who had proposed the initiative).
Even the late prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's daughter, was not told a word about the programe by her generals. She only found out about it in 1989 by accident – in Tehran.
Iranian President Rafsanjani asked her whether they could reaffirm the two countries' agreement on 'special defense matters'.
'What exactly are you talking about, Mr President?' asked Bhutto, confused. 'Nuclear technology, Madam Prime Minister, nuclear technology,' replied the Iranian president. Bhutto was stunned.
Assassination attempts and threats
In June 1979, the operation was exposed by the magazine 8 Days. There was an international uproar. Israel protested to the Dutch, who ordered an inquiry. A Dutch court convicted Khan in 1983 for attempted espionage (the conviction was later overturned on a technicality). But work on the nuclear program continued.
By 1986, Khan was confident Pakistan had the capability to produce nuclear weapons.
His motivation was in large part ideological: 'I want to question the holier-than-thou attitude of the Americans and British,' he said. 'Are these bastards God-appointed guardians of the world?'
There were serious efforts to sabotage the program, including a series of assassination attempts widely understood to have been the work of Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad.
Executives at European companies doing business with Khan found themselves targeted. A letter bomb was sent to one in West Germany – he escaped but his dog was killed. Another bombing targeted a senior executive of Swiss company Cora Engineering, which worked on Pakistan's nuclear program.
Historians, including Adrian Levy, Catherine Scott-Clark and Adrian Hanni, have argued that the Mossad used threats and assassination attempts in a failed campaign to prevent Pakistan from building the bomb. Siegfried Schertler, the owner of one company, told Swiss Federal Police that Mossad agents phoned him and his salesmen repeatedly.
He said he was approached by an employee of the Israeli embassy in Germany, a man named David, who told him to stop 'these businesses' regarding nuclear weapons. The Israelis 'didn't want a Muslim country to have the bomb', according to Feroz Khan, a former official in Pakistan's nuclear weapons program.
In the early 1980s Israel proposed to India that the two collaborate to bomb and destroy Pakistan's nuclear facility at Kahuta in Pakistan's Rawalpindi district.
Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi approved the strike. A plan developed for Israeli F-16s and F-15s to take off from the Jamnagar airbase in India's Gujarat and launch strikes on the facility. But Gandhi later backed out and the plan was shelved.
In 1987, when her son Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister, the Indian army chief Lieutenant General Krishnaswami Sundarji tried to start a war with Pakistan so India could bomb the nuclear facility at Kahuta.
He sent half a million troops to the Pakistani border for military drills, along with hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles – an extraordinary provocation. But this attempt at triggering hostilities failed after the Indian prime minister, who had not been properly briefed on Sundarji's plan, instigated a deescalation with Pakistan.
Despite Indian and Israeli opposition, both the US and China covertly helped Pakistan. China provided the Pakistanis with enriched uranium, tritium and even scientists. Meanwhile, American support came because Pakistan was an important Cold War ally.
US President Jimmy Carter cut aid to Pakistan in April 1979 in response to Pakistan's program being exposed, but then reversed the decision months later when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan: America would need the help of neighboring Pakistan.
In the 1980s, the US covertly gave Pakistani nuclear scientists technical training and turned a blind eye to its program. But everything changed with the end of the Cold War.
In October 1990 the US halted economic and military aid to Pakistan in protest against the nuclear program. Pakistan then said it would stop developing nuclear weapons. AQ Khan later revealed, though, that the production of highly enriched uranium secretly continued.
The seventh nuclear power
On 11 May 1998 India tested its nuclear warheads. Pakistan then successfully tested its own in the Balochistan desert later that month. The US responded by sanctioning both India and Pakistan.Pakistan had become the world's seventh nuclear power.
And Khan was a national hero. He was driven around in motorcades as large as the prime minister's and was guarded by army commandos. Streets, schools and multiple cricket teams were named after him. He wasn't known for playing down his achievements.
'Who made the atom bomb? I made it,' Khan declared on national television. 'Who made the missiles? I made them for you.' But Khan had also organized another, particularly daring, operation.
From the mid-1980s onwards, he ran an international nuclear network which sent technology and designs to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
He would order double the number of parts the Pakistani nuclear program required and then secretly sell the excess on.
In the 1980s the Iranian government – despite Ayatollah Khomeini's opposition to the bomb on the grounds that it was Islamically prohibited – approached Pakistan's military dictator, General Zia-ul-Haq, for help. Between 1986 and 2001, Pakistan gave Iran key components needed to make a bomb, although these tended to be secondhand – Khan kept the most advanced technology for Pakistan.
The Mossad had Khan under surveillance as he travelled around the Middle East in the 1980s and 1990s, but failed to work out what the scientist was doing.
Then-Mossad chief Shavit later said that if he had realised Khan's intentions, he would have considered ordering Khan to be assassinated to 'change the course of history'.
Gaddafi exposes the operation
In the end, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi blew Khan's operation in 2003 while attempting to win support from the US. Gaddafi disclosed to the CIA and MI6 that Khan was building nuclear sites for his government – some of which were disguised as chicken farms.
The CIA siezed machinery bound for Libya as it was being smuggled through the Suez Canal. Investigators found weapons blueprints in bags from an Islamabad dry cleaner.
When the operation was exposed, the Americans were horrified. 'It was an astounding transformation when you think about it, something we've never seen before,' a senior American official told the New York Times.
'First, [Khan] exploits a fragmented market and develops a quite advanced nuclear arsenal. 'Then he throws the switch, reverses the flow and figures out how to sell the whole kit, right down to the bomb designs, to some of the world's worst governments.'
In 2004 Khan confessed to running the nuclear proliferation network, saying he had provided Iran, Libya and North Korea with nuclear technology.
In February, he appeared on television and insisted he had acted alone, with no support from the Pakistani government, which then swiftly pardoned him.
President Musharraf called him 'my hero'. However, reportedly under US pressure, he placed Khan under effective house arrest in Islamabad until 2009. Later AQ Khan said that he 'saved the country for the first time when I made Pakistan a nuclear nation and saved it again when I confessed and took the whole blame on myself'.
He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2006 but recovered after surgery. Enormously wealthy, in his later years, Khan funded a community centre in Islamabad and spent his time feeding monkeys. Those who knew him said Khan firmly believed what he had done was right.
He wanted to stand up to the west and give nuclear technology to non-western, particularly Muslim, nations. 'He also said that giving technology to a Muslim country was not a crime,' one anonymous acquaintance recalled.
When Khan died of Covid in 2021, he was hailed as a 'national icon' by then-Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. And that is how he is still widely remembered today in Pakistan.
'[The] nation should be rest assured Pakistan is a safe atomic power,' the nuclear scientist had declared in 2019. 'No one can cast an evil eye on it.'
Also read: Iran-Israel Conflict: US President Donald Trump Receives Nobel Peace Prize Nomination For Ceasefire Deal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump Hellbent On Derailing India's Rise As A Great Power
Is Trump Hellbent On Derailing India's Rise As A Great Power

Gulf Insider

time17 hours ago

  • Gulf Insider

Is Trump Hellbent On Derailing India's Rise As A Great Power

Trump raged against India on Wednesday in a series of posts announcing his 25% tariff on its exports on the pretext of its trade barriers and close ties with Russia. He then announced an oil deal with Pakistan and predicted that 'maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!' His final post described India's economy as 'dead' and claimed that 'We have done very little business with India' despite it being the fastest-growing major economy in the world and bilateral trade amounting to nearly $130 billion in 2024. India's Ministry of Commerce & Industry calmly responded to Trump's tariff announcement by reaffirming its commitment to talks and declaring that the state 'will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest', which likely infuriated him since he probably expected Modi to anxiously call him. The favorable trade deal that he clinched with Japan last week and the totally lopsided one with the EU that followed emboldened him into playing hardball with India upon thinking that it'll fall into line too. The US wants India to open its agricultural and dairy markets, stop its massive import of discounted Russian oil, and rapidly diversify away from Russian military equipment. Complying with the first demand would be disastrous for the 46% of the Indian workforce employed in these industries, however, while the second would risk decelerating its economic growth and the third would make its security dependent on the US. The end result would therefore derail India's rise as a Great Power and turn it into a US vassal. Trump is hellbent on doing precisely that, which is the continuation of Biden's policy, as explained below: * 13 December 2022: 'Will The US Sell India Out To China To Sweeten The Deal For A Sino-American New Détente?' * 14 May 2025: 'There Might Be A Method To The Madness Of Trump Unexpectedly Damaging Indo-US Ties' * 16 May 2025: 'Trump's Desired Return To Bagram Airbase Could Reshape South Asian Geopolitics' * 7 June 2025: 'The US Is Once Again Trying To Subordinate India' * 13 July 2025: 'The US-Pakistani Rapprochement Could Have Far-Reaching Geostrategic Consequences' These analyses will now be summarized for the reader's convenience and placed in the current context. In brief, India's Russian-assisted rise as a Great Power hastens the coming of tri–multipolarity that'll in turn help midwife complex multipolarity, which would greatly reduce the likelihood of ever restoring US-led unipolarity or the short-lived period of informal Sino-US bi-multipolarity ('G2'/'Chimerica'). Russia's special operation and the West's reaction to it revolutionized International Relations and created the opportunity for India to make up for lost time in becoming a Great Power with truly global influence. The US responded to these developments by attempting to subordinate India via election meddling, infowars, and dual geopolitical pivots to Bangladesh (whose prior long-serving leader it helped depose) and Pakistan to pile on the pressure in pursuit of this goal or to contain India if it still refuses to concede. Complementary elements of this pressure campaign include political support for Delhi-designated 'Khalistani' separatists-terrorists and spring 2023's violent ethno-religious unrest in Manipur. If Trump's tariffs don't coerce India into becoming a US vassal, which the US would then exploit to coerce concessions from China in advance of its ultimate goal of restoring unipolarity, then he might settle for letting China subordinate India instead as part of the 'G2'/'Chimerica' scenario. Either way, he doesn't expect India's rise as a Great Power to continue due to the zero-sum dilemma in which the tariffs were meant to place it between becoming the US' or China's vassal, but India might still surprise everyone.

Calls Grow For Nationwide Islamic Education In German Schools
Calls Grow For Nationwide Islamic Education In German Schools

Gulf Insider

timea day ago

  • Gulf Insider

Calls Grow For Nationwide Islamic Education In German Schools

Germany's Association for Education and Training (VBE) has called for the introduction of comprehensive Islamic religious education in schools across the country, arguing that Muslim students should be offered the same opportunities as their Christian peers. 'We are committed to ensuring that all believers can talk about their faith within schools and receive relevant information about their religion and other religions,' said VBE Federal Chairman Gerhard Brand in comments to the RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland (RND). He urged political leaders to ensure that schools are equipped with the necessary personnel and materials, and that programs are implemented quickly and expanded over time. Islamic religious education is currently regulated at the state level, resulting in significant variation. In North Rhine-Westphalia, Islamic religious education is already offered in schools, while in Bavaria, a state-run Islamic studies course is available as an alternative to ethics. However, the Bavarian model does not include cooperation with Islamic religious communities. According to estimates, around 5.5 million Muslims live in Germany, and at least 580,000 were attending school as of 2020. Yet only around 81,000 students are currently enrolled in Islamic religious education programs. Advocates say that expanding access to these classes is essential for integration and for protecting students from extremist influences. The Turkish Community in Germany also welcomed the initiative but warned of political and structural hurdles. 'Islamic religious education is a must — just like Catholic and Protestant religious education,' said the group's chairman, Gökay Sofuoglu. He called for educational standards to be aligned at a national level, while acknowledging the constitutional limits imposed by Germany's federal system. 'We would need a nationwide Islamic cooperation partner. Unfortunately, that isn't in sight at the moment,' he said. Sofuoglu stressed that while the state must remain secular, it has a duty to ensure fair and equal treatment of religious communities. 'I don't know how this could be regulated nationwide,' he added. Stefan Düll, president of the German Teachers' Association, told the RND that 'religious education in public schools, taught by teachers trained and state-certified in Germany, can provide a counterbalance to fundamentalist attitudes — mediated by the family or by fundamentalist preachers online.' The debate over Islamic education is not just reserved for Germany. As the Muslim population across Europe grows, both support for and opposition to Islamic teachings have risen in multiple European nations. In April of this year, Remix News reported how, for the first time, Muslim students had become the largest religious group in Vienna's schools, underlining the incredible demographic transformation taking place in the Austrian city. According to data obtained from the office of Bettina Emmerling, the city councilor responsible for education, Muslims now account for 41.2 percent of all students, while Christian students fell to 34.5 percent. The trend is only growing, and is accompanied by rising problems, including violence in schools, anti-Semitism, and contempt for women. 'Islam is changing our society in ways we do not want,' warned Christian Klar, a Viennese school principal, last October. He expressed concern over the 'rapid Islamization' of Austrian schools, alongside rising violence and anti-Semitic incidents. In January, it was reported that approximately 200 schools across the Spanish autonomous community of Andalusia now teach Islam as part of their curriculum, following the disclosure of official figures after a parliamentary request by the local Vox party. The inquiry submitted by Vox Andalusia sparked political debate over the extent to which the curriculum is being catered to immigrants and the scope of influence a rising Islamic community now has on institutions across the region.

Indian Embassy holds Open House; announces 79th Independence Day flag-hoisting
Indian Embassy holds Open House; announces 79th Independence Day flag-hoisting

Daily Tribune

timea day ago

  • Daily Tribune

Indian Embassy holds Open House; announces 79th Independence Day flag-hoisting

The Indian Embassy in Bahrain held an Open House yesterday, chaired by Ambassador H.E. Mr. Vinod Kurian Jacob, with the participation of the Embassy's Community Welfare and Consular teams, as well as panel lawyers. Over 40 Indian nationals attended the session, which was conducted in English, Hindi, Tamil, and Malayalam. During the event, the Ambassador announced that all consular services — including passport, visa, attestation, and other miscellaneous services — will now be available at the newly inaugurated Indian Consular Application Centre (ICAC) located in Bahrain Mall. He added that a nominal service charge of 180 fils would apply in addition to the Government of India fee, and that facilitation services such as form filling, photocopying, photography, SMS alerts, and courier delivery would be offered free of cost. In a gesture of community support, the Embassy recently facilitated the repatriation of a stretcher-bound patient and extended assistance to a stranded family of four by arranging air tickets and travel documents. Several distressed nationals were also provided with temporary boarding and lodging through the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF). The Ambassador also invited members of the Indian community to attend the 79th Independence Day flag-hoisting ceremony at the Embassy premises on 15 August 2025. He extended his thanks to Bahrain Keraleeya Samajam for supporting the Embassy's yoga programme, which runs twice weekly at their venue. The Ambassador expressed gratitude to Bahraini authorities — particularly the Ministry of Labour, LMRA and Immigration — for their swift responses on consular and welfare matters. He also acknowledged the contributions of the Embassy's legal panel, Indian community organisations, and volunteers for their dedication to supporting distressed members of the diaspora. Most issues raised at the previous Open House have been resolved, while pending matters from this session will be followed up promptly, officials confirmed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store