logo
New rules for commuting as people say it puts them off going to office

New rules for commuting as people say it puts them off going to office

Commuters who sneeze and cough without covering their faces have been named as among the bad habits that fellow passengers hate most. Talking loudly on the phone, playing loud music and putting feet on seats were other bad habits that most annoy fellow passengers, according to the survey.
Research by tombola asked what annoys people when travelling to and from work and whether this plays a part in them wanting to be in the office. Chewing loudly and not respecting someone's personal space by sitting next to them when there are other seats are other examples of poor etiquette that gets up workers' noses.
The number one gripe is people speaking loudly on the phone, with almost half (42%) of working Brits regarding this as the most infuriating thing that can happen on a commute. The second big no-no, at 39%, is when people play music out loud, a trend also known among younger generations as 'bare beating'.
The third cardinal commuting sin for more than a third (34%) of people is when folk sneeze or cough without covering their face.
Other poor etiquette includes people having their feet on the seats (29%), chewing loudly (24%) and anti-social behaviour (22%)
With the average commute to work taking 27 minutes, there's plenty of time to experience this frustrating behaviour. More than half (51%) of all British commuters will experience a pet peeve at least once a week. A further quarter (24%) claiming they must endure them on multiple occasions a week.
Around a third (31%) of commuting Brits would react by merely sitting there in silence, but simmering silently with anger. However, one in ten (10%), who aren't as relaxed, say they would confront the person demanding an explanation for their poor behaviour.
Putting the shoe on the other foot, a shocking one in five (20%) questioned admitted to committing one of these pet peeves themselves while on their way to work. British working habits are constantly evolving to adapt to the changing demands of work-life pressures.
The survey revealed that only 7% of working Brits have never commuted to work, meaning the majority will be exposed to these grumbles at some point in their career. But since Covid, most working Brits have adopted a 'hybrid' policy, with a quarter (25%) saying they commute less than once a week.
For those who do commute, half (50%) say they take the train, with the average train journey taking 63 minutes. More than a third of commuters (36%) say they take other forms of rail such as the tube or tram to get to work, while one in ten (10%) spend at least £50 a week commuting by car.
Those working in agriculture are the biggest offenders of commuting pet peeves, with three in five (59%) saying they have committed a pet peeve, much greater than the national average of one in five (20%). On the other hand, retail workers are the most unlikely to commit a commuting pet peeve, with around one in nine (11%) claiming they have.
According to the study, marketing professionals experience these the least, with two-thirds claiming they commute less than once a week, less than any other industry. Laura Akano, Etiquette Expert at Polished Manners, said: "When travelling to work it's important to remember that public transport is a shared space - not an extension of your own home.
"Good etiquette goes a long way to ensure a smoother, more pleasant journey for everyone. Some of the golden rules of etiquette when using public transport are to avoid sitting on priority seats, always have your ticket ready and keep your bags and feet off the seats.
"Don't bring or eat food with strong smells, as the smell will linger and make the environment uncomfortable for other passengers, and if eating food try to do it as respectfully as possible. If someone is being inconsiderate on your commute, make sure to use discretion.
"It's okay to politely ask someone to move their bag if it's on a seat but for more serious issues it's safer to alert staff members. If possible, move to another carriage or wait for the next transport to arrive.
"Poor commuting etiquette can have a bigger impact than people realise - it can leave passengers feeling stressed, irritable or emotionally drained. For some, if the experience is so unpleasant, they will begin to avoid public transport altogether to protect their general wellbeing, fostering a 'work from home' culture."
Samantha Wilcox, Organic Manager at tombola, said: "Our research focuses on the everyday frustrations of commuting, shining a light on some of the nation's biggest pet peeves. Your morning sets the tone for the entire day and the commute to work can significantly influence how the rest of the day unfolds.
"By highlighting what British workers find frustrating, we're hoping to make it a more pleasant journey for everyone, with a healthy dose of humour thrown in. Because, let's face it, commuting could do with a bit more politeness here and there."
UK'S TOP 10 BIGGEST COMMUTING PET PEEVES
1. Speaking loudly on the phone - 42%
2. Playing music out loud - 39%
3. Sneezing/coughing without covering your face - 34%
4. Feet on seats - 29%
5. Eating/chewing loudly - 24%
6. Anti-social behaviour - 22%
7. Sitting next to someone even when there are other seats available (lack of personal space) - 20%
8. Leaving rubbish behind - 18%
9. Not waiting in turn - 17%
10. Eating pungent food - 14%
TOP FIVE 'OFFENDING INDUSTRIES' OF COMMUTER PET PEEVES
1. Agriculture - 59%
2. Tech - 34%
3. Art - 33%
4. Construction - 31%
5. Food - 27%
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades
Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades

Powys County Times

time4 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Students will want universities to ‘understand context' over grades

School and college leavers will want universities to 'respect and understand' that they faced a 'significant' programme to deflate their GCSE grades following Covid-19, the Ucas chief has said. Jo Saxton, chief executive of the university admissions service, suggested that fewer students who are receiving their post-16 qualification results this summer met the entry requirements for A-level courses two years ago when grading was returned to pre-pandemic levels in England. Dr Saxton, who was chief regulator of England's exams regulator Ofqual from 2021 until 2023, has suggested that there could be 'higher' attainment across this year's A-level cohort as a result. Her comments come as students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their A-level and Level 3 BTec results on Thursday, with many finding out if they have secured a university place. Last year, more than a quarter (27.8%) of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at the University of Buckingham, has suggested that a higher percentage of UK A-level entries awarded top grades – compared with before the pandemic – could become the 'new normal' this summer. During a webinar hosted by the Higher Education Policy Institute think tank, Dr Saxton said: 'This cohort are the first to sit their Level 3 qualifications where they had the pre-pandemic standard reinstated on their GCSEs. 'I think that's just such an important backdrop for this whole cycle, just remembering this is that cohort, that there was a significant national programme to deflate their grades.' Dr Saxton, who was in charge at Ofqual when A-level and GCSE exams were reinstated in England following the pandemic, said she 'lost a lot of sleep' over the action to tackle grade inflation. But she suggested that teenagers told her that they wanted their exams back and they wanted their results to 'carry value'. Dr Saxton said: 'I think they will really be looking to those universities to respect and understand the context in which they've come through.' She said the return to pre-pandemic grading in 2023 meant 'fewer students than in recent years actually met the entry criteria that most schools and colleges would set for progression into A-level subjects'. Provisional exam entries data for England shows that A-level entries decreased by 0.4% from 825,355 last summer to 821,875 this summer, despite a 3.8% increase in the size of the 18-year-old population. Speaking just a few days before students receive their exam results, Dr Saxton added: 'It probably means that there's fractionally higher prior attainment across the cohort. This is me speculating as a former chief regulator.' Dr Saxton said clearing is no longer perceived as a 'bargain basement' for those who are not successful on A-level results day. Clearing is available to students who do not meet the conditions of their offer on A-level results day, as well as those who did not receive any offers. But prospective students who have changed their mind about what or where they wish to study, and also those who have applied outside the normal application window, can also use clearing. On Tuesday, the Ucas chief said: 'Clearing maybe was perceived as a bargain basement – it was for the people who had been unsuccessful. 'But that is definitely not how current applicants perceive it. 'For current applicants it's the mechanism by which they change their mind.' Nearly 22,700 courses with vacancies for undergraduate students living in England were available on the Ucas clearing site as of Wednesday last week – eight days before results day, a PA news agency analysis showed. A sample of 129 of the UK's largest higher education providers showed 17 of the 24 elite Russell Group universities had more than 3,600 courses with vacancies for English residents on clearing. Dr Saxton added: 'It is about students trusting their instincts and going back to their curated playlists, the favourites that they researched, that they've probably visited. 'They're not blindfolded throwing a dart at a dartboard.' Earlier this week, the Education Secretary said 'far too many young' white working-class British students do not get the exam results that they need to allow them to continue on to university. Bridget Phillipson told PA that the Post-16 White Paper and the Schools White Paper, which are both due in the autumn, will focus on turning around these 'thorny and generational challenges'. Dr Saxton said she would like the Government to look at regional disparities in access to and participation in higher education – such as the 'London advantage'. She said: 'More people in all parts of the country should get to benefit from higher education.'

The best portable neck and handheld fans, tested: six expert picks to keep you cool
The best portable neck and handheld fans, tested: six expert picks to keep you cool

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The best portable neck and handheld fans, tested: six expert picks to keep you cool

Most people were hoping we wouldn't see a repeat of June and July's heatwaves this year, according to a recent YouGov survey of 5,148 British adults. Well, another one is already upon us. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. Thanks to the climate crisis, we know that things are hotting up year on year, and while we can hide in air-conditioned shops and offices, our homes can get uncomfortably – sometimes dangerously – hot. And we also have to go outside – or worse, voluntarily pack ourselves like sweaty sardines on dangerously hot public transport. On those occasions, a portable fan can make all the difference between manageable discomfort and indulging in an inadvisable quantity of ice-cream. Which one should you buy? I've spent the past few weeks testing handheld and neck fans from the likes of John Lewis, Dunelm and Bush, assessing them for power, noise, battery life and portability. Here's what I've found. Best handheld fan overall: John Lewis handheld and foldable fan Best budget handheld fan:Fine Elements folding rechargeable mini travel fan Best for power:Diveblues Jetforce Best neck fan: Jialexin three-speed neck fan I've been testing consumer technology for more than a decade now, including electric toothbrushes and water flossers for the Filter. Yet, without wanting to shatter the illusion that this makes me uniquely qualified for the task, portable fans are among the easiest things to test. There's little subjectivity involved, as you can measure power, noise, weight and battery life. All you really need is a working hypothalamus and fingers that can manoeuvre buttons – which I have. You also need hot weather, of course, but the Great British Summer has been, if anything, a little too accommodating in that regard. It also helps that my PC can turn my tiny office into an overheated sauna in 20 minutes. Each of the 13 fans I tested was assessed for measures that can be objectively tested. Power was not only measured by active use, but via a dedicated digital anemometer to measure wind speed at the highest and lowest supported speeds. More power equals more volume, so I used a sound measurement app held 15cm from the source to assess the decibel level at high, medium and low speeds. I timed how long it took each fan to empty its battery at the lowest and highest speeds (a test my three cats hated even more than I did, due to the constant noise for hours at a time), and popped each one on the scale to get an idea of portability. I also assessed them for more subjective things. Is the fan nice to hold? Can it be folded for increased portability or hands-free use? Does it look visually appealing? Finally, there's the biggie: price. With portable fans costing between £3 and £100, there's a huge range of options. It's simplistic to suggest that a higher cost automatically equals a better experience, though there is naturally a correlation. Nonetheless, I'm more forgiving of odd quirks in cheap fans than I would be in more expensive ones. There's also the sticky issue of repairability, and the growing waste problem of fast tech. Tough-to-replace lithium-ion batteries were present in all but two of the fans tested, which is far from ideal. With that in mind, I kept an eye on build quality too, hoping to endorse fans that will have a long and productive life before they need to be disposed of (electrical recycling, please – you can find a local spot here). After testing, the fans were either returned to the manufacturer or donated to charity. Here are the six best portable fans from my tests. It may not look that special, but John Lewis's offering is a well-made product at a reasonable price that doesn't put a blade wrong. The handle is a good size for a comfortable grip, and the sage colour my review unit came in is rather stylish. You can also get it in white, light blue or an eye-searing orange if you prefer. Why we love itLooks and build quality aside, the fan provides what you need without fuss. It has three power settings, putting out between 2.5 and 3.7 metres a second (m/s) of wind speed, and the 10cm head covers your whole face at a sensible distance without needing constant adjustment. I measured a peak volume of 62.4dB, which isn't the lowest, but is still quieter than some of the chunkier fans at their lowest levels. The battery lasted more than four hours on its highest setting, which should be sufficient for most journeys, and it can be charged up via a USB-C cable when it's empty. Pleasingly, the handle can also be folded down to make it a handy desktop fan with or without a cable attached. It works well, as long as you have space to keep it close enough to be refreshing. It's a shame that … at 25cm, it's a little on the tall side. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.5-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 51.1-62.4dBTested battery life: maximum, 4hrs 11mins; minimum, 9hrs 37minsMeasured weight: 181g Cheap and cheerful, this folding fan may feel a little rough around the edges, but it gets the job done. It's not the cheapest fan I tested, but it proved superior to Dunelm's £3 offering (which dropped to a barely noticeable 0.5m/s power as the AA batteries drained) and beat Superdrug's £5 fan on battery life (a disappointing 45 minutes at maximum and two hours on minimum). Why we love itIt's flimsy, but the fan delivers the basics pretty well. It has three speeds, giving between 2.6 and 3.7m/s of wind speed, while the battery lasted six hours at the lowest setting, and just short of three at its highest. It's a touch noisier than the John Lewis model, maxing out at 64.8dB, but it's more travel-friendly, folding in half for portability and weighing 48g lighter. That folding hinge means you can also use it as a desk fan, if you like, and there's even a small flashlight on the bottom for looking around in the dark (though it's easy to leave this on by mistake). It's a shame that … the build quality isn't all that, with some rough plastic moulding. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.6-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 54.3-64.8dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 50mins; minimum, 6hrsMeasured weight: 133g If you want power for a reasonable price, then the Jetforce is the answer. Even at its lowest of five speeds, it narrowly betters the speeds of the two fans above by hitting a breezy 3.8m/s. Why we love itA refreshing breeze even at the lowest settings, but when you're really struggling with the heat, crank it up all the way to level five, and it hits a massive 6.6m/s. In truth, you likely won't need to max it out, and that's just as well because the noise levels really pick up on the higher settings. Starting at an already noisy 66dB, put it all the way up to level five, and it reaches 74.3dB, about the level of a vacuum cleaner – a vacuum cleaner uncomfortably close to your ears. It'll also hit the battery hard: at level 1, you can eke out nearly 11-and-a-half hours, but that drops to 2hrs 37mins on max. Still, if you can cope with the noise or routinely wear headphones, it's a nice option to have in really hot weather. Plus, the flexible head means you can use it as a desk fan, and it has an attachable lanyard so it can be worn around the neck, blasting air upwards. It's a shame that … it gets noisy fast. Power levels: 5Measured air speed: 3.8-6.6m/sMeasured volume: 66-74.3dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 37mins; minimum, 11hrs 25minsMeasured weight: 184g Sign up to The Filter Get the best shopping advice from the Filter team straight to your inbox. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. after newsletter promotion Want something hands-free to keep you cool? A fan worn around the neck does that, while targeting the body's thermoregulation centre, which can, in theory, make you feel cooler. The Jialexin three-speed neck fan certainly delivered that, if you can cope with fans running so close to your ears. Why we love itIt really does make you feel cooler, even if the fans don't appear to be more powerful when compared with regular handheld fans. My anemometer test revealed seemingly low speeds of 1.7 to 2.2m/s, but there are more air sources and, as a result, the cooling effect felt more consistent and less disruptive than a jet of constant air to the face. The downside of this, however, is the noise. While the measured volume of 52 to 64.1dB doesn't sound too bad – around the sound of a busy office – having it this close to your ears for an extended period is tiring, and you do feel a sense of calm when it's switched off again. That said, if you're wearing headphones, it becomes a non-issue. This neck fan is extremely comfortable to wear, and it's more flexible than solid plastic ones, so you can shape it around your neck for more comfortable cooling. That, for me, makes it stand out from its competitors. It's a shame that … by design, neck fans have to be quite close to your ears. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 1.7-2.2m/sMeasured volume range: 52-64.1dBTested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 19mins; minimum, 8hrsMeasured weight: 291g Best for: a multi-function fan If you've got money to burn, then the JisuLife handheld fan Ultra2 is both ridiculously powerful and extremely versatile. Starting with the power, it has 100 different speeds, ranging from 2.8m/s all the way up to 9.8m/s at full blast, with 98 increments in between. The battery is impressive too, lasting well over a day at the lowest speed – though this did drop to 1hr 34mins when running at full blast. I was secretly quite pleased about that, as the 88.8dB volume (similar to a hairdryer) wasn't a particularly fun time for my ears, even from a decent distance away. In truth, that kind of power is uncomfortably like staring down a wind tunnel anyway, and the lower settings are considerably easier on the ears: 59.5dB at level 1, rising to 79.1dB at 50. The high price of entry is made a little easier to swallow, though, since the Ultra 2 brings a few extra features for the money. There are a couple of adapters in the box to turn the fan into an air cushion inflater pump or to help kickstart campfires by pushing in more air. A powerful torch on the back can flick between different lighting modes, including a flashing one to attract attention in an emergency. For those of us allergic to camping, there are more sedate indoor uses. One of the adapters is a dust cleaner, which has removed an unspeakable amount of gunk from my keyboard, and the USB-C charging port is two way, meaning you can steal some of the 9,000mAh battery for your other devices too. It didn't make the final cut because … you could buy 15 Fine Elements fans for the Jisulife's RRP of £95. Power levels: 100; measured air speed: 2.8-9.8m/s; measured volume: 59.5-88.8dB; tested battery life: maximum, 1hr 34mins; minimum, 26hrs 49mins; measured weight: 294g Best for: peace and quiet Take it from someone who's listened to the incessant hum of fans for weeks now: the noise can become grating. If keeping sound to a minimum is your priority, then this VonHaus 3-in-1 fan might be the one for you. At its lowest setting, it registered just 41dB – less than the sound of a fridge humming. At that volume, you're looking at a limited power of 2.7m/s, of course, but you can increase that to 4.3m/s over five incrementally louder settings if you need something more. It's worth noting that by the time you hit maximum, the volume reaches 61.9dB – more comparable with the other fans on test. Overall, it's a well-designed fan: comfortable in the hand, with a stand to put it upright on your desk, including a phone holder at the base if you want to watch something over the fan's whisper. You can even use it as a makeshift neck fan with the detachable lanyard, and the head pointed upwards. This isn't a direct substitute for a neck fan, as it's still aimed at the face, but it's a nice added use case all the same. It didn't make the final cut because … the smaller head doesn't cover quite as much of the face as other models. Power levels: 5; measured air speed: 2.7-4.3m/s; measured volume: 41-61.9dB; tested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 45mins; minimum, 13hrs 20mins; measured weight: 129g Look out for fans with different uses. While the traditional way to use a handheld fan is, of course, in the hand, some models can double as desktop fans, either by folding in half or with a bundled stand. Some even come with a lanyard attachment so they can be worn hands-free around the neck. While power might seem like the key feature, remember this is always a trade-off. Higher fan speeds will make you feel nominally cooler, but will come at the expense of battery life and more subtle noise levels. Neck fans have two advantages over regular handheld fans. The first is that they're entirely hands-free, meaning you can wear them without temporarily losing the use of a hand in the process. The second advantage is that as they target the neck, there's evidence to suggest they may make you feel cooler overall. This is because the thermoregulation centre is at the base of the brain, so a neck fan may make you feel cooler than a regular handheld one, even if your actual body temperature isn't dropping all that much. The downside to this is that the positioning directly below your ears can be a little tiring, given the constant volume (although this is a problem that's easily sidestepped with a pair of headphones). Alan Martin is a writer who has been putting products – including phones, gaming devices and wearables – through their paces for more than a decade. He is constantly tripping over product boxes

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store