Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation.
That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III.
More: From no-deal to Putin's deal? A flummoxing summit, a Trump flip
Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House.
Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with."
The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin.
Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement.
More: Trump to meet Zelenskyy at White House after Putin summit in Alaska
Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater'
After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in the region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe.
"The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty."
But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies.
"Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy--it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks.
Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries
Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, but without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers.
Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past.
Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made.
"The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions."
In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit with some, such as French President Emmanuel Macron noting Russia's "tendency not to honor" peace agreements in the past.
"I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why is the Royal Opera House allowing a Russian singer back on stage?
Anna Netrebko's return to Covent Garden was always going to be contentious. The Russian soprano, 53, was pictured in 2014 bringing gifts to Russian-armed separatists in Crimea. Two years earlier, she put her name to a list endorsing Putin for president. Until February 2022, she was a Kremlin puppet who did as she was told, either by Putin's office or by her mentor, the powerful conductor Valery Gergiev. They summoned, she sang. Everything changed when Russian planes bombed Kyiv and Putin bragged of winning the war within weeks. Netrebko, who lives in Vienna on an Austrian passport, kept her head down until, seeing her dates being cancelled, she emerged after five weeks with a statement that disowned the war, but not Putin's responsibility for it. In her words: 'I expressly condemn the war against Ukraine and my thoughts are with the victims of this war and their families.' It was too little, much too late. Her record label and management agency disowned her. New York's Metropolitan Opera tore up several years' worth of contracts. Other stages – chiefly in Austria and Italy – broke the general boycott, but Netrebko was now a political hot potato whose every appearance generated scattered demonstrations and the wrong kind of attention. So why has Covent Garden now brought her back to sing Tosca next month, followed by Turandot later in the season and the rare privilege of an 'intimate' main-stage recital next June? It looks like massive human error all over again at the introspective and increasingly accident-prone opera house. Last month, the Royal Opera director Oliver Mears tried and comically failed to take down a Palestine flag waved by a rebellious extra during curtain calls. The CEO Sir Alex Beard followed up by cancelling a co-production with Israeli Opera, belatedly claiming this had nothing to do with pressure from pro-Palestine agitators, just a matter of staff safety. This week a battery of British MPs and pro-Ukraine culturati have published a letter in the Guardian, challenging the Royal Ballet and Opera to sack Netrebko – a 'defining choice' they say 'between status and responsibility, between profit and values, between silence and conscience.' Tough call. Mears, with some prescience, specified at the season announcement that Netrebko's return was not his decision, or Beard's but the specific request of the incoming music director Jakub Hrusa. No executive was to blame. This was art for art's sake, right? But the new Tosca production for which Netrebko was engaged is directed by Mears himself. It is an opera of torture, attempted date-rape, murder and suicide which works best with a big name in the title role. There is no bigger name than Anna Netrebko, even if her voice is fraying in middle-age and her audience is fragmented by the Ukraine conflict. British audiences surely have a right to hear her one last time is part of the thinking behind her engagement. Or have we all got it wrong? Are we victimising an important artist for her country's crimes, a single mother who is raising a neurodiverse child and needs the validation of her talent just to put bread on the table and maintain self-belief. It is hard not to feel some sympathy for Anna Netrebko who, for all her faults, has been an epic interpreter of Italian operas great and gruesome. When I last saw her at La Scala in Andrea Chenier, she was a force of nature that held the house in an iron grip. When she exited stage left, the tension dropped with her. Such magnetism is in the class of Callas and Sutherland, of Sonya Yoncheva and Asmik Grigoryan, a species that demands to be protected. Perhaps Netrebko needs to be embraced for what she does best, rather than what she signed. On the other hand, she did herself so few favours in her glory years that no colleagues protested her dismissal. She is presently suing the Met for defamation and discrimination on grounds of national origin, hardly the best way to rehabilitate herself in the opera profession. Where that leaves Covent Garden is damned if they let her sing, sued if they don't. Between now and Tosca on September 11 objections will mount, demonstrators will shout and Mears will struggle to justify opening a season with so costly and unnecessary a distraction. Netrebko cannot be blamed for that. This is more to do with what our last fully-functioning opera house ought to be offering the nation in these deprived and demented times.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Trump-Europe summit: Everything we know so far
US president Donald Trump is set to welcome European leaders – including his Ukrainian counterpart – to the White House to discuss the ongoing war with Russia. Following Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin's summit in Alaska on Friday, in which no ceasefire was reached, the 'coalition of the willing' have rallied around Ukraine and strengthened their calls for a solution. However there has been praise for the US, which agreed with Putin to security guarantees for Volodymyr Zelensky's country, allowing the US to provide Ukraine with Nato-like 'robust security guarantees'. The coalition of the willing met virtually on Sunday in a meeting chaired by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron. Several European leaders including Sir Keir are joining Mr Zelensky for his meeting with Trump tomorrow, not long after a disastrous White House meeting after which the Ukrainian president was told to leave and the two leaders descending into a shouting match. Mr Zelensky says he will once again push for a trilateral meeting between himself, Trump and Putin after he was excluded from the Alaska summit. The White House has released the official timetable for the day ahead. European leaders will arrive there at about 5pm BST (12pm EST). An hour later, Mr Zelensky will be greeted by Trump before they head into a bilateral meeting at about 6.15pm (1.15pm EST). Another hour later, Trump is set to greet the other European leaders for a photo call, and then at about 8pm (3pm EST) the multilateral meeting between Trump and all European leaders will begin. It's not yet known how long that meeting could last. The short answer to this is no: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin left the summit in Anchorage, Alaska, without reaching an agreement for the end of the war in Ukraine. Putin claimed the pair had come to an 'understanding' on the conflict, but Trump told reporters afterwards 'there's no deal until there's a deal'. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there,' he added. After their almost three-hour meeting, both presidents delivered a joint statement before leaving without taking questions. Later, Trump spoke to Fox News and suggested it could be 'up to Zelensky' to make peace with Russia. When asked what advice he'd give the Ukrainian president, he said: 'Make the deal… it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done.' He added that European nations 'have to get involved a little bit, but it's up to president Zelensky' and warned 'Russia's a very big power'. Despite touting himself as a peacemaker and a dealmaker, it seems Trump fell short at this meeting – as neither leader mentioned the word 'ceasefire' during their historic joint news briefing. More Trending Trump and Putin on Friday said they agreed on several points but did not disclose them, and the two acted almost like old friends in the so-called press conference. The coalition of the willing is a group of 33 countries, spearheaded by the UK and France, who have pledged strengthened support for Ukraine as it defends its territory against Russia. The countries have also pledged to be part of a peacekeeping force which could potentially be deployed on Ukrainian territory – but only if a ceasefire agreement is signed. Its aim is to facilitate peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, mediated by the US, by building up security guarantees to ensure any peace deal reached is long-lasting. The countries that have joined the coalition of the willing are: United Kingdom Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Romania Slovenia Spain Sweden Turkey Ukraine Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: The secret letter Melania wrote Putin MORE: Putin's 'shaky' legs after Trump summit reignite health conspiracy theories MORE: Revealed: What Trump said to Putin that the cameras didn't catch
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Oil prices climb after US adviser says India's Russian crude buying has to stop
SINGAPORE, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose on Monday after White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said India's purchases of Russian crude were funding Moscow's war in Ukraine and had to stop. Brent crude futures rose 30 cents, or 0.46%, to $66.15 a barrel by 0629 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $63.19 a barrel, up 39 cents, or 0.62%. Navarro said in an opinion piece published in the Financial Times that if India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the United States, it needs to start acting like one. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said. The market's swift rebound after Navarro's comments highlights how fragile sentiment is. Any sign of Washington tightening its stance on India's Russian oil purchases reintroduces a risk premium, said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at brokerage Phillip Nova. "The U.S. adviser's sharp words on India's Russian crude imports, paired with postponed trade talks, revive concerns that energy flows remain hostage to trade and diplomatic frictions, even as peace prospects in Ukraine brighten," Priyanka added. Oil prices fell during early Asia trading after U.S. President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. Trump will meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders on Monday as the U.S. president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years. "The status quo remains largely intact for now," RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft said in a note, adding that Moscow would not walk back territorial demands while Ukraine and some European leaders would balk at the land-for-peace deal. On Friday, Trump said he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks", cooling concerns about a disruption in Russian supply. China, the world's biggest oil importer, is the largest buyer of Russian oil, followed by India. Investors are also watching for clues from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's comments at this week's Jackson Hole meeting regarding the path of interest rate cuts that could boost stocks to further records. "It's likely he will remain noncommittal and data-dependent, especially with one more payroll and Consumer Price Index (CPI) report before the September 17 FOMC meeting," IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said in a note.
