Trump-Putin Rapprochement Casts a Shadow Over Europe… UN Resolutions Outline the Ukrainian Settlement / Netanyahu's Syria Plan Looms Over the Region… Gaza Agreement Wavers Amid Calls for Extension
The political editor wrote
U.S. President Donald Trump has forced Europe and Ukraine into a new reality by opening up to Russian President Vladimir Putin and laying the groundwork for an initial agreement on Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron's visit to Washington and his remarks alongside Trump underscored Europe's limited ability to act independently from the U.S., despite earlier bold rhetoric from European leaders. Meanwhile, recent UN resolutions reflected a growing focus on ending the war as soon as possible, omitting the usual preconditions, such as condemning Russia or demanding a full withdrawal from Ukrainian territories. While Moscow declined to comment on the U.S.-Ukraine metals deal that Trump seeks to recoup American financial aid to Kyiv, Trump stated that he does not believe Putin would oppose a European role in providing security guarantees for Ukraine after the war.
In the region, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statements on Syria and his plan to establish a security zone spanning the southern provinces of Damascus, Quneitra, Sweida, and Daraa have drawn significant attention. His proposal includes a special status for Sweida and the Druze community, from which laborers have already begun to be recruited for work in the occupied Golan Heights. Announcing this plan at a military officers' graduation ceremony, Netanyahu delivered a direct challenge to Syria's new government, which had anticipated U.S. support in curbing Israeli provocations. However, the plan presents an even greater challenge to Turkey and Qatar, both of which back the Syrian Salvation Government linked to Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham. American signals suggest that a Syrian-Israeli peace agreement recognising Israel's annexation of the Golan and granting additional security privileges could facilitate sanctions relief, without which, European financial leniencies would have little practical impact. This places Syria's new government, along with Turkey and Qatar, in a dilemma: either accept Israel's conditions and face popular backlash for capitulating to the occupation, thereby legitimising a new wave of national resistance against the occupation. It would also reposition the previous regime as a patriotic alternative – one that the new government would lack if it were to comply with occupation demands in exchange for sanctions relief.
Alternatively, maintaining the status quo that existed under the previous regime, marked by sanctions and possibly even harsher living conditions, would weaken the government's ability to project sovereignty, especially if it fails to prevent the occupation from reaching the outskirts of Damascus. Meanwhile, Turkey, a powerful Islamic state, now shares a border with occupied Palestine yet does nothing.
In Lebanon, the town of Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in the south witnessed the funeral of Hezbollah's former Secretary-General, the martyred Sayyed Hashem Safi Al-Din. Today, Hezbollah will receive condolences for its two fallen leaders, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and Sayyed Hashem Safi Al-Din. Meanwhile, Lebanon's government faces a parliamentary confidence vote today and tomorrow, where the first session is expected to be dominated by political speeches addressing the broader national situation, particularly Lebanon's stance on the Israeli occupation, Resolution 1701, and the resistance, in light of the events of the war and its aftermath, culminating in the funeral of Sayyed Nasrallah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
8 hours ago
- LBCI
Strike talk as leverage: What's driving Israel's messaging on Iran?
Report by Amal Shehadeh, English adaptation by Mariella Succar Despite an agreement with Washington not to strike Iran, Israel continues to promote the need for such an attack, particularly amid Tehran's insistence on continuing uranium enrichment. Israeli concerns will be discussed in Washington by Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Mossad Director David Barnea, who are set to meet with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff ahead of the sixth round of talks with the Iranians, scheduled for Sunday. Despite security and military officials expecting the Israeli delegation to fail in persuading Donald Trump of the need to launch a strike on Iran, sources familiar with the phone call between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the two leaders are aligned — each for his reasons — in promoting the possibility of such an attack. Trump continues to signal the potential for military action, hoping Iran will back down from its demands and move negotiations forward. Netanyahu, meanwhile, amplifies threats of a strike to serve domestic political purposes, aiming to prevent the collapse of his government. In both cases, all reports indicate that Israel cannot carry out such an attack without U.S. approval. An Israeli report reveals that any strike on Iran would require reaching facilities buried dozens of meters deep in solid rock, while the weaponry currently available to Tel Aviv can only achieve minimal damage — whether in terms of bomb effectiveness or aircraft capability. This has made the reality of the threat increasingly transparent, amid two possible scenarios: If Netanyahu's government falls following a potential Knesset collapse — should ultra-Orthodox parties succeed in their political battle — Israel's priorities, already shifting toward early elections, could be reshaped. If Netanyahu survives the vote, securing his political standing, the Iranian file may recede from the top of his agenda.
LBCI
8 hours ago
- LBCI
US Treasury chief says extension of tariff relief possible for some
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday that an extended pause on higher tariff rates is possible for some countries as a deadline approaches for dozens of economies to face steeper levies. "It will be up to President (Donald) Trump, but I believe that if someone is negotiating in good faith, that an extension will be possible," Bessent told lawmakers. Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs on most trading partners in April but halted higher rates on many countries until early July, pending ongoing negotiations. AFP
LBCI
8 hours ago
- LBCI
Le Drian returns to Beirut, revives French role in Lebanon's crisis
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Mariella Succar France — often referred to as Lebanon's 'tender mother' — has renewed its diplomatic engagement in the country through the return of presidential envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian. One of Le Drian's most notable meetings took place away from the media spotlight with Mohammad Raad, head of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, Loyalty to the Resistance. According to information obtained by LBCI, the talks were described as positive. During the meeting, Raad emphasized that the key to stability in Lebanon lies in halting Israeli attacks and ensuring a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory — goals that require strong international pressure, particularly from guarantor countries such as France and the United States. On the issue of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), Raad affirmed that Hezbollah supports the extension of the peacekeeping mission under the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 — a position aligned with the stance of Lebanon's three top officials. While Le Drian heard Hezbollah's views, he, in turn, stressed the importance of advancing reforms — particularly the banking restructuring law and legislation addressing the financial gap. According to sources, he received support for moving forward on these key reforms. Le Drian also discussed these issues — along with the question of ensuring the state's exclusive control over arms — in meetings with several Lebanese political figures, including MPs Michel Douaihy and Fouad Makhzoumi, Free Patriotic Movement leader Gebran Bassil, Kataeb Party leader Samy Gemayel, and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. But the broader question remains: What real and effective role can France play in Lebanon? And is it capable of easing pressure from Saudi Arabia and the United States, both of which place Hezbollah's disarmament at the forefront of their demands? What can be said is that Paris appears to be trying to revive the reform agenda, which has taken a backseat to the issue of weapons. Whether France will succeed in this effort remains to be seen. France's role may be more impactful when it comes to the extension of UNIFIL's mandate in southern Lebanon. In addition to being a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, France also holds the role of "penholder" — responsible for drafting Council resolutions and statements, including those related to Lebanon. Since Le Drian's last visit to Beirut, France has managed to reopen discussions on UNIFIL ahead of the renewal deadline in late August — a renewal that this year coincides with a rise in tensions and incidents involving the international force. In the end, France — through Le Drian — appears once again not only to be offering assistance to Lebanon, but also working to reinforce its presence and role on the Lebanese stage.
