Was Jesus Really Wrapped in the Shroud of Turin? 3D Study Says Probably Not
Cicero Moraes, a 3D designer specializing in digital 3D facial reconstruction, has joined the contentious debate by using computer models to simulate two scenarios: draping a sheet of fabric (the same size as the Shroud of Turin) on a 3D human and one on a low-relief depiction of a human to compare their imprints, or contact patterns. Low-reliefs, also known as bas-reliefs, are carvings in which the figures emerge only slightly from their backgrounds. In other words, Moraes wanted to see whether the figure on the Shroud of Turin corresponds more closely to the imprint of a human body or a bas-relief.
'The results demonstrate that the contact pattern generated by the low-relief model is more compatible with the Shroud's image, showing less anatomical distortion and greater fidelity to the observed contours, while the projection of a 3D body results in a significantly distorted image,' Moraes wrote in a study published late last month in the journal Archaeometry. Moraes is the sole author. Simply put, 'the Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body, supporting hypotheses of its origin as a medieval work of art.'
The study paid particular attention to the 'Agamemnon Mask effect.' The effect sees the contact pattern of fabric draped over volume, like a body, appear distorted and bloated once flattened or pulled taut. The name comes from the famous Agamemnon Mask, a 3,500-year-old gold death mask Heinrich Schliemann (the amateur archaeologist best known for 'discovering' the city of Troy) unearthed in Greece and misidentified as belonging to the Homeric hero Agamemnon.
The full-face mask, which represents the face of the deceased, appears strangely wide for the same reason that the imprint of a human face in fabric would also appear wide once flattened. The real Shroud of Turin does not display the Agamemnon Mask effect.
On the other hand, 'the printed image, generated from the contact regions in low relief, shows high compatibility with that present on the Shroud of Turin, significantly corresponding to its contours, even considering a not entirely flat base,' Moraes explained in the study.
This conclusion supports the theory that the Shroud was not wrapped around a real human (or divine) body. Instead, it may have been an artistic representation, he suggested, potentially related to funerary practices.
'This work not only offers another perspective on the origin of the Shroud of Turin's image but also highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries,' he concludes, 'intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
2 Reasons We Feel Better When Others Are Worse Off — By A Psychologist
Most of us have a natural tendency to compare ourselves to others. This can be explained by social comparison theory, developed by psychologist Leon Festinger, which suggests that we determine our self-worth by comparing ourselves to others. When others experience setbacks, we may experience a range of emotions in response, from empathy to pity to even joy at their misfortune. While feeling happy about someone else's pain may sound strange, it's not as uncommon as you might think. This stems from our tendency for 'downward social comparison.' When we compare downward — i.e., to someone worse off — we often feel better about our own lives. It's a subtle, sometimes unconscious coping mechanism, especially in moments of self-doubt. The emotional experience of pleasure in response to another's misfortune is called Schadenfreude, a German word that combines Schaden, which means 'damage,' and Freude, which means 'joy.' Schadenfreude often occurs in competitive environments. For instance, you may feel happy when an employee who cozies up to your boss performs poorly and gets berated by them. This is because people have an inherent need to feel better about themselves and often acquire a better self-image by comparing themselves to others who may be less fortunate. Consequently, people who feel their self-worth is threatened are more likely to feel Schadenfreude. Here are two key reasons why you may be feeling happy about somebody else's suffering: 1. Schadenfreude May Boost Self-esteem In Competitive Scenarios Why do we feel a sense of guilty pleasure at someone's downfall? In a 2017 study published in the European Journal of Social Psychology, researchers sought to answer this question. They tested whether Schadenfreude met any of these four basic psychological needs: the need for self-esteem, control, belongingness and a meaningful existence. Researchers conducted four experiments, all of which pointed to similar outcomes: Schadenfreude does meet our basic need to reaffirm our social standing through comparisons, especially when we compare ourselves to a rival we're envious of. In the first study, participants were asked to imagine being in a job interview, which was also being attended by their primary university competitor. They were told that only one would get the position. In the competitive scenario, participants felt more schadenfreude and need satisfaction than in non-competitive circumstances. Researchers found that they felt more in charge, experienced higher self-esteem and felt a greater sense of belonging. In another situation, they were asked to recall a real-time scenario when their competitor failed. Once again, researchers found that more schadenfreude led to increased feelings of self-esteem, a greater sense of personal control and a stronger perception of meaning in life. Seeing someone else fail or struggle can shield us from feelings of inadequacy, at least for the time being. When life feels out of control, seeing others in similar or worse positions makes our own experiences feel less like personal failures and more like part of a shared human messiness. This is especially true in more competitive scenarios. We all want to believe we're doing 'okay' in life. If someone else is doing worse than us, it affirms that we're not falling behind. 2. Schadenfreude May Reaffirm Your Belief In A Just World Interestingly, another 2013 study published in the Australian Journal of Psychology found a link between schadenfreude and beliefs in a 'just' world. When people's belief in a just world was threatened, they felt more pleasure when someone else suffered a misfortune. For example, they might laugh more at a story where someone 'gets what they deserve.' This may be because they want to restore their belief that the world is fair. When someone holds such beliefs, they're more likely to think that good things happen to good people, while misfortune finds those who deserve it. If they can't help the victim, they might instead blame the victim or believe the person deserved it. This way, they get to justify the misfortune that befell them. However, this does not always indicate that the victim is deserving of punishment or that they are responsible for the outcome. Does Schadenfreude Make You A Bad Person? Schadenfreude doesn't automatically make you a terrible human being. The practice of downward comparison may feel cruel, but that is not always the intention. These reactions often happen without our conscious awareness, and you may have tried to push these thoughts away, knowing it wasn't right. This sense of awareness and moral grounding is what differentiates you from someone that deliberately wants to watch others fail. However, if you find yourself constantly hoping for someone else's downfall and actively trying to put them in compromising situations, that may be worrisome. Instead of trying to eliminate the instinct entirely, try to notice it but avoid giving it too much power. Otherwise, it may make you complacent and feel less motivated to improve because you think 'at least, I'm not that bad.' If you must compare, try to shift your mindset to lateral or upward comparisons that inspire change. Try to put in effort to grow. Look at people doing 'better' than you and learn from them. If seeing others do better than you makes you feel like you're 'not enough' or that you haven't 'achieved enough,' try comparing yourself to those only one or two steps ahead of you. That way, you can realistically map out your progress. You may also want to mark your progress against your past self. Self-comparison allows you to see how far you've come and where you want to go from here, but like any form of comparison, it's a double-edged sword that can make you spiral about your flaws. The healthiest approach is to learn to accept yourself right where you are, without any sense of comparison, viewing your journey in this life as strictly your own. When you begin to embrace the feeling of being and having 'enough,' you naturally stop engaging in self-destructive behaviors or trying to bring others down. Do you often take pleasure in others' misfortune to make yourself feel better? Take this science-backed test to find out: The Schadenfreude Scale
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
75,000 years old: Europe's oldest Arctic animal community discovered in Norway cave
The bones of a vast community of 46 animals in a 75,000-year-old cave in Norway have provided a stunning and rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world. Researchers only recently discovered and explored Arne Ovamgrotta, but the ancient cave has held a significant collection of animal bones for 75,000 years. Researchers confirmed the finding of 46 different types of animals, hinting at the existence of a large community banding together to weather the cold. Their remains represent the oldest example of an animal community in the European Arctic during this warmer period of the Ice Age and provide an unprecedented first look at a community struggling, if not failing to survive, climate change. According to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the study authors believe the newly discovered bones will feed conservation efforts today by helping researchers understand 'resilience and extinction risk in the present.' These animals didn't survive the Ice Age According to study author Dr. Sam Walker of Bournemouth University and the University of Oslo, this 'rare snapshot of a vanished Arctic world' included an impressive, if not astonishing, assemblage of bones. Among the animals were polar bears, walruses, bowhead whales, Atlantic puffins, common eiders, rock ptarmigans, and Atlantic cod. Additionally, as per a press release, they found collared lemmings, which no one had ever uncovered in Scandavia previously, a species now extinct in Europe. The massive number communicated to researchers that temperatures had increased significantly enough 75,000 years ago to allow these animals passage to the cave. Reindeer, porpoise, and freshwater fish bones further told researchers that rivers and lakes returned to this area. 'The cave has now revealed a diverse mix of animals in a coastal environment representing both the marine and the terrestrial environment,' according to a press release. A picture of this region on Earth became clearer than ever as remains over 10,000 years old are a rare find. This underexplored period during the Ice Age saw the melting of ice, which was enough to support a struggling community of animals. Warnings for our future DNA testing found that these animals did not survive when temperatures dropped back to bone-chilling and fatal degrees. Harsh sheets of ice returned to the region, preventing any possibility of migrating elsewhere, as per Popsci. 'This highlights how cold-adapted species struggle to adapt to major climatic events. This has a direct link to the challenges they are facing in the Arctic today as the climate warms at a rapid pace,' said Dr Walker. 'The habitats these animals in the region live in today are much more fractured than 75,000 years ago, so it is even harder for animal populations to move and adapt,' Dr. Walker continued. 'It is also important to note that this was a shift to a colder, not a period of warming, that we are facing today,' senior author Professor Boessenkool says. 'And these are cold-adapted species – so if they struggled to cope with colder periods in the past, it will be even harder for these species to adapt to a warming climate,' she concludes in a press release. Read the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Paper Finds Something Very Weird About the Shroud of Turin
The mysterious Shroud of Turin, which is believed by many Christians to have laid atop Jesus Christ's body after his crucifixion, may be even stranger than we previously thought. In a new study published in the journal Archaeometry, Brazilian 3D designer Cicero Moraes lends credence to the theory that the shroud was a work of art rather than a genuine death shroud — and per the new paper, it may not have laid atop a human at all. Using three types of 3D modeling tools — MakeHuman, Blender, and CloudCompare — Moraes found that the contours of any "body" that would have imprinted upon the shroud is very unlikely to have been human. Instead, he believes, more likely it would have belonged to a statue. Comparing models of a "low-relief" statue versus an actual human body in those programs, the 3D designer found that his modeling of the statue with a cloth laid over it produced an outline that appeared much more like the shroud we know today, a statement about the new research explains. The modeling from a "3D body," as Moraes calls it, resulted in a "significantly distorted image." If Moraes' findings hold up, they'll add to a lengthy recent canon of academic in-fighting about the origins of the shroud, which is still considered by some Catholics and researchers to be authentic — which is to say, they believe it was the death shroud of Christ himself. Over the past 35 years, researchers have clashed over the age of the Shroud of Turin after a 1989 radiocarbon dating test found that small pieces from the ancient cloth appear to be from the 14th century CE, long after Jesus died. After American chemist Raymond Rogers suggested in 2005 that the piece of the shroud taken for the 1989 tests may have been patched on centuries after its initial creation, scientists finally put that theory to the test in 2022. That year, Italian researchers found, using an X-ray dating method, that a single strand from the shroud was actually from the first century CE — much closer to Christ's era than the 14th. With no real way to definitively disprove that the shroud covered Christ, other scientists, including Moraes, have suggested that it may have been created as a piece of art meant to represent Jesus. In 2018, for example, researchers from Italy and the United Kingdom posited that the "blood" patterns on the face of the shroud appeared to be "totally unrealistic" for a man lying flat on his back, suggesting they were added after the cloth was created for artistic effect. Unlike some of his peers, Moraes is offering no theories about the date of the shroud. Instead, he approaches the mysteries it presents with academic reverence and excitement. "This work not only offers another perspective on the origin of the Shroud of Turin's image," the 3D modeler said in his statement, "but also highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries, intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers." More on religious mysteries: The Catholic Church Reportedly Called in an Exorcist to Deal With "Yeti Cult" Running Bizarre Blood Rituals at Archdiocese of Denver
