New Paper Finds Something Very Weird About the Shroud of Turin
In a new study published in the journal Archaeometry, Brazilian 3D designer Cicero Moraes lends credence to the theory that the shroud was a work of art rather than a genuine death shroud — and per the new paper, it may not have laid atop a human at all.
Using three types of 3D modeling tools — MakeHuman, Blender, and CloudCompare — Moraes found that the contours of any "body" that would have imprinted upon the shroud is very unlikely to have been human. Instead, he believes, more likely it would have belonged to a statue.
Comparing models of a "low-relief" statue versus an actual human body in those programs, the 3D designer found that his modeling of the statue with a cloth laid over it produced an outline that appeared much more like the shroud we know today, a statement about the new research explains. The modeling from a "3D body," as Moraes calls it, resulted in a "significantly distorted image."
If Moraes' findings hold up, they'll add to a lengthy recent canon of academic in-fighting about the origins of the shroud, which is still considered by some Catholics and researchers to be authentic — which is to say, they believe it was the death shroud of Christ himself.
Over the past 35 years, researchers have clashed over the age of the Shroud of Turin after a 1989 radiocarbon dating test found that small pieces from the ancient cloth appear to be from the 14th century CE, long after Jesus died. After American chemist Raymond Rogers suggested in 2005 that the piece of the shroud taken for the 1989 tests may have been patched on centuries after its initial creation, scientists finally put that theory to the test in 2022. That year, Italian researchers found, using an X-ray dating method, that a single strand from the shroud was actually from the first century CE — much closer to Christ's era than the 14th.
With no real way to definitively disprove that the shroud covered Christ, other scientists, including Moraes, have suggested that it may have been created as a piece of art meant to represent Jesus. In 2018, for example, researchers from Italy and the United Kingdom posited that the "blood" patterns on the face of the shroud appeared to be "totally unrealistic" for a man lying flat on his back, suggesting they were added after the cloth was created for artistic effect.
Unlike some of his peers, Moraes is offering no theories about the date of the shroud. Instead, he approaches the mysteries it presents with academic reverence and excitement.
"This work not only offers another perspective on the origin of the Shroud of Turin's image," the 3D modeler said in his statement, "but also highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries, intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers."
More on religious mysteries: The Catholic Church Reportedly Called in an Exorcist to Deal With "Yeti Cult" Running Bizarre Blood Rituals at Archdiocese of Denver
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
9 hours ago
- Gizmodo
After Mount Vesuvius Demolished Pompeii, People Returned to Live Among the Ruins
In 79 CE, Mount Vesuvius erupted in what would become one of humanity's most infamous ancient tragedies. Tens of centuries later, archaeologists eagerly dug through the ash and pumice to rediscover the buried Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum in all their preserved glory. In their eagerness, however, they may have missed an important layer of history. While working in the Insula meridionalis—the southern quarter of Pompeii's ancient urban center—archaeologists uncovered evidence confirming the hypothesis that, after 79 CE, people returned to live among Pompeii's ruins for hundreds of years. The team's findings, which they describe in a study published this week in Pompeii's excavation's E-Journal, shed light on events that have long lived in the shadow of better-studied history. 'The epochal episode of the destruction of the city in 79 AD has monopolized memory,' Gabriel Zuchtriegel, director general of Pompeii's archaeological park and co-author of the study, said in a park statement. 'In the enthusiasm of reaching the levels of '79, with wonderfully preserved frescoes and still-intact furnishings, the faint traces of the site's reoccupation were literally removed and often swept away without any documentation.' Not all survivors of that terrible day would have had the means to start over somewhere else. According to the researchers, this could explain why some may have returned to the destroyed city, whose upper levels were still visible above the ashes. Soon enough, vegetation would have also grown back. The returning former residents may have also been joined by other people 'with nothing to lose,' according to the statement. After all, there were riches to be found among the ashes and victims' bodies. As such, life returned to Pompeii. People lived among the ruins of the buildings' upper floors, using the former ground floors as cellars and caves to set up fireplaces, ovens, and mills. Archaeological evidence suggests that the new community was likely a precarious settlement without the usual ancient Roman infrastructure and services. Nonetheless, the settlement lasted until the 5th century CE. Another devastating volcanic eruption may have played a role in the city's final abandonment. 'Thanks to the new excavations, the picture is now clearer: post-79 Pompeii re-emerges,' Zuchtriegel explains. 'Instead of a city, [it's] a precarious and grey agglomeration, a kind of camp, a favela among the still-recognizable ruins of the Pompeii of old.' Footprints Reveal Ancient Escape From Vesuvius—1,800 Years Before Pompeii's Destruction Emperor Tito had actually tasked two ex-consuls with promoting the re-founding of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Needless to say, the mission was a failure. 'In these cases, we archaeologists feel like psychologists of memory buried in the earth: we bring out the parts removed from history,' concluded Zuchtriegel. 'This phenomenon should lead us to a broader reflection on the archaeological unconscious, on everything that is removed or obliterated or remains hidden, in the shadow of other apparently more important things.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
New Paper Finds Something Very Weird About the Shroud of Turin
The mysterious Shroud of Turin, which is believed by many Christians to have laid atop Jesus Christ's body after his crucifixion, may be even stranger than we previously thought. In a new study published in the journal Archaeometry, Brazilian 3D designer Cicero Moraes lends credence to the theory that the shroud was a work of art rather than a genuine death shroud — and per the new paper, it may not have laid atop a human at all. Using three types of 3D modeling tools — MakeHuman, Blender, and CloudCompare — Moraes found that the contours of any "body" that would have imprinted upon the shroud is very unlikely to have been human. Instead, he believes, more likely it would have belonged to a statue. Comparing models of a "low-relief" statue versus an actual human body in those programs, the 3D designer found that his modeling of the statue with a cloth laid over it produced an outline that appeared much more like the shroud we know today, a statement about the new research explains. The modeling from a "3D body," as Moraes calls it, resulted in a "significantly distorted image." If Moraes' findings hold up, they'll add to a lengthy recent canon of academic in-fighting about the origins of the shroud, which is still considered by some Catholics and researchers to be authentic — which is to say, they believe it was the death shroud of Christ himself. Over the past 35 years, researchers have clashed over the age of the Shroud of Turin after a 1989 radiocarbon dating test found that small pieces from the ancient cloth appear to be from the 14th century CE, long after Jesus died. After American chemist Raymond Rogers suggested in 2005 that the piece of the shroud taken for the 1989 tests may have been patched on centuries after its initial creation, scientists finally put that theory to the test in 2022. That year, Italian researchers found, using an X-ray dating method, that a single strand from the shroud was actually from the first century CE — much closer to Christ's era than the 14th. With no real way to definitively disprove that the shroud covered Christ, other scientists, including Moraes, have suggested that it may have been created as a piece of art meant to represent Jesus. In 2018, for example, researchers from Italy and the United Kingdom posited that the "blood" patterns on the face of the shroud appeared to be "totally unrealistic" for a man lying flat on his back, suggesting they were added after the cloth was created for artistic effect. Unlike some of his peers, Moraes is offering no theories about the date of the shroud. Instead, he approaches the mysteries it presents with academic reverence and excitement. "This work not only offers another perspective on the origin of the Shroud of Turin's image," the 3D modeler said in his statement, "but also highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries, intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers." More on religious mysteries: The Catholic Church Reportedly Called in an Exorcist to Deal With "Yeti Cult" Running Bizarre Blood Rituals at Archdiocese of Denver
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human
The Shroud of Turin is shrouded in mystery. Viewed as a holy relic for centuries, this artifact is not what it looks like, according to yet another study. The old linen cloth and its faint spectral image of a man, which resembles traditional depictions of Jesus, were first documented in France in 1354, and yet to this day, no one knows who the imprint depicts, or how it was made. Some Christians believe this is the very sheet that wrapped around the body of Jesus Christ after he died (although the Catholic Church neither endorses nor rejects the idea). Skeptics believe it is either a work of art or a forgery. Though the controversial relic bears the faint impression of a naked adult male with long hair and a beard, Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cícero Moraes argues the image is not the likeness of a real human. Related: Moraes' work supports a hypothesis, first put forward in 1978, which argues that the Shroud's image is art. Under this hypothesis, the image was probably made by placing a sheet on top of a low-relief sculpture, slightly raised from the background. Then, the linen was rubbed with pigment or browned somehow. Moraes is a self-taught specialist in historical facial reconstruction, which means he's adept at comparing 2D and 3D imagery. When he first took a look at the rigid and straight shapes of the Shroud's body, he found it somewhat incompatible with real anatomy. The deformation of the cloth didn't look as though it had been wrapped around an actual human body. Instead, Moraes thought it might be a painting on the fabric, or a low-relief print. To test that idea, he recreated both options. Using open-source, free software, Moraes compared how a sheet that was wrapped around a 3D model of a human body would look compared to a sheet laid on top of a low relief sculpture. In the case of the 3D model representing an authentic human body, the imprint of the figure looked wider and more stretched out than the Holy Shroud when the sheet was laid flat. This is called the Agamemnon Mask effect, because of a gold funerary mask from Ancient Greece that was first moulded to a face and then rolled flat. It shows slightly distorted features as a result. "The printed image, generated from the contact regions in low relief, shows high compatibility with that present on the Shroud of Turin, significantly corresponding to its contours, even considering a not-entirely flat base," concludes Moraes. His analysis of the shroud provides evidence that this is not an impression of anybody (let alone Jesus Christ), while avoiding a recent academic debate on the artifact's age. Some carbon dating attempts indicate that the shroud was made in Medieval times, but a recent controversial study dates it closer to the first century AD. Like Moraes, other researchers have noticed the shroud is not structurally deformed as would be expected by a 3D body. But the details are very faint and heated academic debates continue over how exactly the image was made. "Using the free and open-source tools described, anyone with such knowledge can recreate the fabric dynamics and contact mapping simulations, exploring the presented scenarios," says Moraes. This work, Moraes concludes, "highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries, intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers." The study was published in Archaeometry. Related News Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study Playing Video Games Has an Unexpected Effect on Kids' IQ, Study Discovers This 17th-Century Aristocrat Had a Clever Secret For Keeping Her Teeth
