Out of all big releases in first half of 2025, which Tamil movie did not manage to meet your expectations?
Out of all the top releases in the first half of 2025, which one did not manage to meet your expectations?
Top releases from Tamil cinema in the first half of 2025
The first major release in Tamil cinema in the first half of 2025 was the Ajith Kumar starrer Vidaamuyarchi. The action thriller film directed by Magizh Thirumeni featured the story of a husband and wife heading for divorce.
As the couple travels to her parents' home, they are met by a gang of kidnappers who trick and nab the wife. Despite being in a failed marriage, the husband must save her before it's too late.
The movie, which was based on the American film Breakdown, had Trisha Krishnan as the co-lead with Arjun Sarja playing the main antagonist. Despite being a long-delayed and hyped venture, the movie did not manage to fare well at the box office.
However, in April 2025, Ajith Kumar hit the big screens once again with the Adhik Ravichandran directorial Good Bad Ugly, an action comedy flick which was a massive hit at the big screens.
Apart from the Ajith Kumar starrers, the initial months of 2025 saw Chiyaan Vikram hitting the theaters with Veera Dheera Sooran - Part 2. The first installment of the planned franchise featured the actor as an unapologetic husband who would go to any lengths to protect his family.
Following the mentioned movies, Tamil cinema saw a major release with Suriya starrer Retro. The romantic actioner by Karthik Subbaraj had Pooja Hegde as the female lead, which left the audience having polarizing opinions.
Finally, two of the major films that made their way to the big screens were Kamal Haasan starrer Thug Life and Dhanush's Kuberaa.
Which movie left you unsatisfied the most?
As Rajinikanth starrer Coolie and Sivakarthikeyan's Madharasi are releasing in the latter half of 2025, we'll have to wait and see if they manage to become successful at the theaters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
Southern cinema still sizzles with age-old glamour
At an age when stars of the earlier era were either sent packing or decided to move away from the limelight to foray into politics, in sharp contrast, the modern day 60 - and beyond matinee idols in south India still seem to be in great demand. Across the country, Amitabh Bachchan at 82 may not be the 'one-man industry' he was four decades back but he has enough on his plate to make him rise and shine on a daily basis. His juniors, who began a few years later in the distant peninsula have done much better. They still command huge salaries, have the best banners tying up with them on a consistent basis, dabble in all genres – from sci-fi to socio-political dramas – and have young heroines, as old as their daughters, jive with them in dream locations across the world. Herogiri for them thus is a permanent occupation, one surmises. From the most popular Kamal-Rajini duo in Tamil cinema, Mohanlal- Mammootty in Malayalam, the lone ranger Shivaraj Kumar in Kannada to the quartet of Chiranjeevi- Venkatesh-Nagarjuna and Balakrishna in mana Telugu states, none seems to be wanting to stay away from the greasepaint and glamour of moviedom. Even as in the last 15 years, these stars touched the senior citizen status but continued to churn out their staple fare for their fans, spread across three generations. The box-office response may not have always been kind as also the reactions of the hyperactive social media, which has captured the central spot in determining how the initial weekend of the film's performance, post-release would pan out. Yet, all these heroes are fighting fit to stay in the race with their younger counterparts, who have had to share their directors and tech teams with them, not to speak of the glamour girls, who don't mind being labelled an old man's girl by the cheeky new gen. Huge budgets running into hundreds of crores are avowedly invested in shaping up the celluloid creations of these titans, who still retain maximum screen space and the best of the scenes to keep their fans as excited as ever. Rather brazenly many of them justify the ordinary storylines their films are made of, even going to the extent of making their ventures as multi-starrers, to further derisk the project and keep the production houses this arrangement has suited only these 10-odd vintage heroes of southern cinema. The directors with whom they had given many blockbusters earlier are not given such comfortable timelines to stay the course in cinema if their films bomb at the box-office. The recent examples of directors like showman Shankar and methodical Mani Ratnam, who overestimated their potential and delivered massive duds featuring these stars is a case in point. Even if it is a derated, diluted version of their carefully- crafted onscreen persona, these heroes seem content staying in that ecosystem hardly venturing out to try experimental or experiential cinema. With the total chain of business, dreaming of profit from these movies, like satellite channels, digital media and the ever-growing chain of multiplexes, these legends are cogs in the giant wheel of entertainment and nothing else. The box-office is still their El Dorado, for sure.
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A YouTuber kicks up a stink over a flatulent 'reaction' video
'Reaction' clips are a staple of the online world. After one person makes a viral video, others film themselves responding to it, riffing on the original with commentary, quips or funny expressions. Derivative as they may sound, such videos are big business: Khaby Lame, the most followed person on TikTok, uses the reaction format in most of his clips, which have been liked 2.5bn times. PREMIUM On June 19th Ethan Klein, an American YouTuber and podcaster sued three streamers who had broadcast lengthy reactions to one of his videos.(Pixabay) Now the genre faces a legal challenge. On June 19th Ethan Klein, an American YouTuber and podcaster sued three streamers who had broadcast lengthy reactions to one of his videos. Mr Klein alleges that they reproduced so much of his work, and added so little of their own, that it amounted to copyright infringement. One defendant is accused of adding little more to Mr Klein's video than 'loud gastral intestinal emissions'. The question of how much you may borrow from another's work long predates the internet. America's courts established the concept of 'fair use' in 1841, when they ruled against an author who had copied 353 pages from a 12-volume biography of George Washington. The fair-use test, which takes into account questions such as whether the market for the original work has been harmed and whether the new work is truly transformative, has since been applied to everything from music sampling to computer programming. Reaction videos won some protection from a case in 2017—in which, curiously, the same Mr Klein featured as a defendant. Matt Hosseinzadeh, another YouTuber, had sued Mr Klein and his wife for reproducing (and ridiculing) a video in which the plaintiff used his parkour skills to woo a woman. The judge ruled that the Kleins' video did not infringe Mr Hosseinzadeh's copyright because it constituted critical commentary and did not function as a substitute for the original. But, the judge added, 'The court is not ruling here that all 'reaction videos' constitute fair use,' noting that some are 'more akin to a group viewing session without commentary'. That is roughly the charge that Mr Klein levels at the streamers. He claims that the three women—who broadcast on Twitch, a live-streaming site, under the names Denims, Kaceytron and Frogan—provided such minimal commentary that their work was not transformative. Denims allegedly said nothing during 70 of the 100 minutes of Mr Klein's video that she aired; Kaceytron spent much of the time smoking marijuana; Frogan left the video playing while she went to the toilet. What's more, Mr Klein claims, they deliberately tried to harm the market for his own work. Denims told viewers they should consider subscribing to her channel if they 'enjoyed not giving any views to that terrible video'. There is bad blood between the parties, who are on opposing sides of various online arguments, including about the Arab-Israeli conflict. The streamers say that Mr Klein has in the past encouraged reactions to his videos. They consider the claim a harassment campaign against them because of their opinions. Mr Klein denies this, but has said that he produced the original video to tempt serial copyright-infringers to react. Denims says that she intends to fight the case. All three women have set up fundraising campaigns online in anticipation of their legal costs. Creators are watching the case with interest. A decision in Mr Klein's favour would force makers of reaction videos to think about what they are bringing to the material. If commentary like hers 'doesn't constitute fair use', Denims warns, 'then virtually every participant in this media space…could be claimed a copyright infringer and effectively sued into silence.' Streamers who add little to the source material may nonetheless struggle to convince a judge that their output is truly transformative, writes Aaron Moss, a lawyer and the author of Copyright Lately, a blog. 'If your entire contribution to someone else's video is a toke, a cough and a trip to the fridge, you might not be a commentator. You might just be a very chill copyright infringer.' Get the latest headlines from US news and global updates from Pakistan, UK, Bangladesh, and Russia get all the latest headlines in one place with including Vance Luther Boelteron Hindustan Times.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Ritu Varma charting her own path
Tell us about Devika and Danny. I've been wanting to do a web series for quite a while but was waiting for something truly unique. While I've worked on anthologies, short films, and mini-series in Telugu and Tamil, I wanted to commit to a full-fledged web series. When this script came my way, I instantly connected with it; the honesty and freshness really stood out. The story revolves around a girl from a small town, born into a conservative Brahmin family. She's grown up in a very sheltered environment and is quite timid and hesitant, always used to others making decisions for her. Her life changes dramatically when she encounters Danny, a ghost. What unfolds is a story of self-discovery, hope, companionship, and the triumph of good over evil. While we were shooting, I had a feeling the audience would like it. But the overwhelming response from friends and family binge-watching it has been so heartwarming. It's a sweet, simple story that seems to have struck a chord with many. What drew you to this project, especially since it's your first web series? For me, the story is always the hero. And my character was beautifully written. What I really loved was the transformation arc; people are used to seeing me in strong, independent roles and as characters who have it all figured out. But here, I play an innocent, naive girl, someone who steps out of her comfort zone and rediscovers herself. That contrast is what really excited me.
