logo
Teachers going on strike over pupils acting like ‘feral cats'

Teachers going on strike over pupils acting like ‘feral cats'

Times25-05-2025
For ten years, Jorge Pashler loved being a science teacher at a comprehensive school in a deprived suburb of Ipswich not far from where he grew up.
But the Cambridge University graduate is reluctantly leaving Westbourne Academy for another school in July following persistent abusive and disruptive behaviour from pupils.
'You get quite a few classes where the respectful relationship that existed in the past has broken down. As much as you disliked your teacher, you would still call them Sir and you wouldn't swear at them,' Pashler, 32, said. 'You feel like you put a lot of effort in and there are some amazing kids here, but you go home and you feel a bit rubbish. I've had enough of going home and feeling sad.'
Last week, he and 50 colleagues at Westbourne Academy took the unusual step of going on strike over pupils' poor behaviour, which included swearing at teachers, throwing chairs, posting offensive videos of staff on social media, making homophobic and sexist comments, and disrupting lessons.
On Monday teachers at a school in Liverpool also started strike action because of 'dangerous pupil behaviour'. In January, teachers at a school in Scotland threatened to walk out, saying they regularly faced swearing and violence. Staff at a school in Wales went on strike for two days last October.
A survey of 5,800 teachers across the country last month found that more than 80 per cent say pupil behaviour has worsened in the past year. Twenty per cent have been hit or punched by pupils and 25 per cent suffer verbal abuse several times a week, the union NASUWT found.
The problems at Westbourne Academy, a co-educational secondary school, first emerged two years ago.
It has 1,063 pupils, a third of whom come from disadvantaged backgrounds, and its GCSE pass rate for English and maths was 54 per cent in 2023, lower than the national average of 65 per cent.
The flat-roofed, red-brick school is surrounded by small, semi-detached houses in the residential area of Whitehouse, one of the most disadvantaged parts of Ipswich, where Year 6 obesity, school exclusions, depression and in-work poverty are prevalent, according to the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation. In Ipswich, lone-parent households and unemployment are higher than the national average.
Every day, 40 pupils across all year groups run around the grounds, skipping lessons, banging on doors and dragging other children out of classrooms.
'They are just wandering around like feral cats and disrupting everyone else's learning,' Katherine Moore, a union representative from NASUWT, said outside the Westbourne Academy picket line on Wednesday.
'I was talking to a [teaching assistant] and there was some personal abuse about the colour of her hair, other [students] were being derogatory about LGBT people,' added Moore, who visited the school last Friday to plan for the strike and was greeted with pupils screaming in the corridor. 'The teachers told me that happens every day,' she said.
The situation has deteriorated over the past 18 months, forcing unions to open talks with executives at the Academy Transformation Trust, which runs the school and 21 others across the country.
After improvements failed to materialise, NASUWT and the National Education Union (NEU) announced strike action in April. Fifty of about 70 staff members were on strike for two days last week, according to the unions, forcing classes to be cancelled for students in Year 7, 8 and 9. Senior pupils still attended to sit exams.
Further strike action has been paused after the Academy Transformation Trust appointed a new vice-principal and promised new measures, including pastoral care, to tackle troublesome students.
'I love being a teacher and I love this place. I didn't want to [strike],' said Helen Feakes, 52, who has taught science at Westbourne Academy for 15 years.
But the problems, including regular verbal abuse, left her with no choice. Last week, students posted offensive videos on TikTok of Feakes and other teachers, criticising their appearance.
Feakes and Pashler believe mobile phones and social media are partly to blame for the breakdown in behaviour. 'You ask [the students] what they are doing tonight and they say 'scroll TikTok',' Pashler said. 'You do see a rise in sexism and over the past ten years words that were buried in the past have started to come back again.
'Kids weren't really homophobic but that's coming up a lot now. It's bizarre because when I first joined it felt like the opposite, everyone was defending that, but now it has tribalised out.'
While Pashler regularly stops classes to challenge pupils on their offensive comments, he faces an uphill battle. 'I don't think what we do for an hour a day, over a week, can change what people experience five hours a night on TikTok,' he said.
Covid lockdowns and poverty are two other factors behind the crisis, Pashler said. During a recent school trip camping in Scotland, he arranged for the students to go to Pizza Express. It was the first time the majority of them had been to a restaurant or a motorway service station.
'There's not really those opportunities, so the kids do not leave home. They do not see that there's a world outside the streets of Ipswich,' Pashler said.
In Merseyside, teachers at the Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts (LIPA) School were also on strike last week. Some pupils have been verbally and physically aggressive, including shoving pregnant members of staff, while misogynistic and homophobic remarks are common.
The school has 595 pupils, a third of whom come from disadvantaged homes. It was set up by Sir Paul McCartney as a performing arts school in 1996 and more recently has been expanded into a primary and secondary school, both in the city centre.
Bryan McConnell, 38, a union rep who is assisting the LIPA teachers in their dispute, said that online content — from social media to podcasts and Andrew Tate videos — had 'desensitised' young teenagers, especially boys, to offensive views. 'It's become more acceptable for younger age groups to have those views,' McConnell said.
McConnell, a physics teacher at another school in Merseyside, said the wider collapse of trust in society was fuelling problems at schools across the country.
'Since Covid and the rise of conspiracy theories, that respect and listening to authority seems to have diminished massively,' he said. 'Kids are copying what they see from their parents and if those parents have lost respect for society — whether it is the government or the police — then that feeds into what the kids think.'
McConnell said some schools had reported a rise in aggressive behaviour from parents at the school gates, with some having to enforce antisocial behaviour orders. 'We have completely lost, from a teaching point of view, that respect that we used to have from parents,' he added.
Others clearly feel the same. Teachers at the 1,000-pupil Ysgol Nantgwyn in Tonypandy, south Wales, walked out for two days last October. And in January staff at Kirkintilloch High School in East Dunbartonshire pledged to do the same, claiming that pupils faced 'no consequences' for abuse and violent behaviour.
Back in Ipswich, parents are widely supportive of the teachers' decision to strike, although some have expressed frustration at how a minority of pupils have been able to affect the education of the majority of well-behaved children.
For Pashler, the decision to leave Westbourne Academy is bittersweet. 'I love being a teacher, it's just not nice at the moment,' he said.
• Parents want phone ban in schools to improve classroom behaviour
A spokeswoman for the Academy Transformation Trust said: 'We take the wellbeing of our staff very seriously, and we fully support their desire to teach in disruption-free classrooms. The majority of pupils at Westbourne behave well, are respectful and want to learn. But we acknowledge there is a small but significant minority whose behaviour does not yet meet our high expectations. We are actively addressing this.'
A Department for Education spokeswoman said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we are committed to turning the tide on poor behaviour, breaking down barriers to opportunity and ensuring every child can achieve and thrive.
'Our new attendance and behaviour hubs will directly target the schools with the highest need as well as providing wider support for schools in all corners of the country, and an additional 900,000 pupils will have access to support from mental health support teams by April 2026.
'But we know there is more to do and are looking closely at how we can go further to support teachers and drive high and rising school standards for all our children.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police investigate as traffic vigilante CyclingMikey flings bike in front of car travelling through no entry zone
Police investigate as traffic vigilante CyclingMikey flings bike in front of car travelling through no entry zone

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police investigate as traffic vigilante CyclingMikey flings bike in front of car travelling through no entry zone

This is the moment a vigilante cyclist flings his bike in front of a car in an attempt to stop it driving through a no entry zone. Michael van Erp, otherwise known by his online persona Cycling Mikey, was filmed by an onlooker on Sunday (10 August) attempting to stop a Fiat 500 driver trying to bypass roadworks the wrong way on Paddenswick Road in Hammersmith. Footage shows a confrontation between the pair before the driver accelerates, with van Erp pushing his bike in front of the vehicle in an effort to stop it and the resulting crash scattering his possessions into the road. A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said they have been made aware of the footage and are investigating.

What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?
What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?

The consequences of being arrested for expressing support for Palestine Action could be 'life-changing', one of those detained during Saturday's protests, Sir Jonathon Porritt, has admitted. While the former government adviser said that he had carefully deliberated over a decision to take part, the road ahead for the more than 500 people arrested on Saturday involves possible criminal charges, court cases and convictions. Ultimately, custodial sentences of as much as 14 years could be imposed. Those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail to appear at a police station at a future date. The police will be sending case files to the Crown Prosecution Service, as it has already done in the case of at least 26 others who were arrested at previous protests in support of Palestine Action. All those arrested have now been released under police bail, with the main condition being not to attend any future demonstrations aiming to overwhelm the criminal justice system in protest at the proscription of Palestine Action by the British government. They will be asked how they plead and if it is not guilty they can elect for a trial before a magistrate or, more likely, a district judge. The majority of the 522 people arrested in Parliament Square – in most cases after displaying pieces of cardboard saying 'I opposed genocide, I support Palestine Action' – were detained under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This is the 'lower level' part of the act, which means those who are charged will be tried in a magistrates court rather than a crown court. Some have been charged under the more serious section 12, which means they could seek to have their case heard in front of a jury of their peers at a crown court. The prosecution could also seek to have the trial heard there. Defend Our Juries, the organising group behind the protest, has said it won't be recommending what people do, as they have already participated 'at huge personal cost' but it will be 'providing the information'. There is a scenario in which court trials do not happen, if the co-founder of Palestine Action is successful in a legal challenge against the home secretary's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Given that most those arrested on Saturday will be investigated under section 13 of the terrorism act, they could well walk free from court. They face a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment or a fine of up to £5,000 or both, while magistrates will also take into account factors such as good character. More than half of those arrested on Saturday were also aged 60 or over. Those arrested under the more serious section 12 of the Terrorism Act face a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison if convicted. However, such individuals could end up being tried before a jury in a crown court. In recent cases under section 13, people charged with supporting Hamas, including displaying pictures of hang gliders such as those used in the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, were given absolute or conditional discharges. Will a jury drawn from their peers be more likely to sympathise with those arrested on Saturday? Those involved in organising the protest are confident that the British public is on the same page as them. The impact of such a conviction would be felt in everything from employment to travel. Many of those arrested are retired and, while they do not have a job to lose, the possibility of being unable to get a visa to go abroad might weigh. However, the consequences are starker for others arrested on Saturday including health workers and doctors. There was an organised 'health block' of 13 medical professionals – including an obstetrician and gynaecologist, three other working doctors, a number of nurses, and retired doctors. Alice Clack, a senior obstetrician and gynaecologist in the NHS, said: 'If doctors are charged with a crime we have to self-report to the GMC [General Medical Council], who then have a look at the crime in question and decide whether to refer it to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service. 'Then, someone could expect to be suspended or they could be erased from the register. That is the possibility.' As for seeking future employment, recent legislation largely reduced the period of time during which those convicted of most crimes must declare a conviction. However, while it reduced the period of time during which an individual must declare a conviction, it does not apply to terrorist offences – which never become spent.

Praising a female colleague's ‘conservative' attire is a ‘slur'
Praising a female colleague's ‘conservative' attire is a ‘slur'

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Praising a female colleague's ‘conservative' attire is a ‘slur'

Telling a female colleague that they dress in a 'conservative' way could be heard as 'a slur', a tribunal has ruled. A male employee who makes such a remark is guilty of 'objectifying' his colleagues who could regard it as 'less than complimentary', an employment judge said. The ruling came in the case of Jessie Danquah, a business consultant at Shell, who was sacked after 'bullying' colleague Naima Masud. He then sued his employer for discrimination on the basis that he held a 'philosophical belief in modesty'. Judge Adam Leith, dismissing his claim, said it was 'objectively inappropriate' of him to state at a work event that his colleague was 'conservative' compared with others there 'who have their boobs out'. It could have been interpreted by Ms Masud to mean 'frumpy' or other 'less than complimentary' adjectives, he said. The tribunal in Croydon, south-east London, heard that Mr Danquah was employed in April 2022 as a £26,000-a-year business consultant for FDM Group, a business support services supplier. In August of that year he was sent on a placement to Shell, where Ms Masud worked. In September he went to a work event organised by Shell at Bar Elba, a cocktail bar in Waterloo, central London, where he made alleged comments to Ms Masud including: 'I didn't expect people like you to be out that late.' The tribunal heard that when asked what he meant, Mr Danquah replied: 'Muslim girls'. He also 'repeatedly called Ms Masud 'conservative' during the night, in reference to her personality and her hijab'. Mr Danquah said the 'conservative' remark was intended to affirm his belief that 'she carried herself modestly'. Comments were 'inappropriate' A few days after this incident, Ms Masud told Mr Danquah that she thought his behaviour had been 'unprofessional' and that his comments about her being conservative were 'inappropriate'. Ms Masud reported the remarks to HR and when Mr Danquah found out he offered to 'voluntarily suspend' his work, and was formally suspended later in September. Mr Danquah apologised for the 'conservative' remark but said it was 'objectively true' and not meant to 'demean her'. After it was decided that his placement at Shell would not continue, Mr Danquah sent an email to Ms Masud threatening to sue her for defamation. In November 2022, he attended a disciplinary meeting which found that the email amounted to 'gross misconduct'. He was subsequently fired from FDM Group over this and several other instances of misconduct. Mr Danquah was told that his 'conservative' comment was a breach of the company's 'bullying and harassment policy and was associated with Ms Masud's sex, religion and belief'. He sued FDM for race, sex and belief discrimination claiming that he held a 'philosophical belief in modesty'. Dismissing his claims, Judge Leith said: 'Based on the evidence before us, we are not satisfied that [Mr Danquah] genuinely held the belief he professed to believe at the relevant times.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store