
Chinese President Xi Jinping could attend ASEAN Summit in October, joining Trump and other leaders: Anwar
Speaking at an ASEAN Day ceremony in Cyberjaya, Anwar said at least four world leaders were expected at the summit, set for Oct 26 to 28 in Malaysia.
'We look forward to welcoming the heads of government of ASEAN and dialogue partners, including US President Donald Trump and I believe Chinese President Xi Jinping,' Anwar said, as quoted by local news outlet The Star.
Anwar, who represents Malaysia as the current chair of the regional bloc, also said he has received 'positive indications' regarding the attendance of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Both countries are among ASEAN's sectoral dialogue partners.
'Securing their presence is only the first step,' he said, as quoted by local media.
'The greater test is to ensure that they leave Malaysia and ASEAN feeling their time was well spent. We must ensure that their visit yields results of lasting value. The eyes of the world will be upon us. We must therefore rise to the occasion.'
If both Xi and Trump attend, it would raise the prospect of a highly anticipated meeting between the two leaders in Southeast Asia, amid strained Sino-US ties over trade, technology and security.
The most recent in-person meeting between Xi and Trump took place in Osaka in 2019 during the G20 Summit. The last time Xi met a sitting US president in person was in November 2024, when he met then-US President Joe Biden at the APEC Summit in Peru.
Anwar had earlier announced on Jul 31 that Trump would attend the ASEAN summit. He said Trump had confirmed his attendance in a phone call.
According to local media, Anwar had extended invitations to both Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang to attend the ASEAN Summit during his official visit to China last November.
Meanwhile, Chinese authorities have not commented on Xi's potential attendance at the regional summit, and state media have not reported on it.
Following Anwar's remarks on Friday, Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan later told reporters that Xi's participation was still a 'possibility', reported local news site The Sun.
The last time a Chinese president attended an ASEAN-related summit in person was in 1997, when Jiang Zemin attended the first China-ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur.
Xi's most recent participation in an ASEAN-related event was in 2021, when he virtually attended and chaired an ASEAN-China special summit to mark the 30th anniversary of bilateral dialogue relations.
China typically sends its premier to attend ASEAN-related meetings, a point analysts previously noted to CNA.
This year, Li participated in the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Summit in May. He also attended the East Asia Summit held on the sidelines of the ASEAN Summit in Vientiane, Laos, last October.
Meanwhile, Trump has attended only one ASEAN summit - in 2017, during his first term as president from 2017 to 2021. The last time a US president personally attended the ASEAN Summit was in 2022, when Joe Biden travelled to Phnom Penh when Cambodia was the bloc's chair.
Then-US Vice President Kamala Harris attended in 2023, followed by then-US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2024.
In his remarks on Friday, Anwar described the upcoming ASEAN Summit as the regional grouping's 'largest and most high-profile gathering of world leaders to date', according to local news platform New Straits Times.
Economic relations through intra-ASEAN trade and investments are among the key issues that will be discussed by the 10-member bloc and dialogue partners during the summit, Anwar said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
America is undermining its soft power in sports
US President Donald Trump during an executive order signing ceremony in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. NEW YORK – The pre-teen boys who play for Venezuela's Cardenales Little League are on their way to the upcoming Little League World Series. Credit is due to their talent and diligence – and an exemption from President Donald Trump's travel ban personally granted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week. Unfortunately, before this special waiver, their participation was far from guaranteed. In July, a different Venezuelan Little League team, Cacique Mara, was denied US visas and a chance to play in a different event in South Carolina. The harsh, differential treatment of two youth teams is a new phenomenon in American sports. For decades, the US was recognized for its openness to international athletes and competition. Sports generated goodwill, as well as diplomatic, cultural and economic benefits, making it a US soft power. Now, the unwillingness to welcome athletes from everywhere is eroding it. For as long as Americans have played organized sports, foreigners have been on the team. Major League Baseball has profited from immigrant talent since the 1870s, for example. But it was only during the middle decades of the 20th century that athletes began migrating to the US in large numbers for the express purpose of training and playing a sport. These days, we are accustomed to seeing foreign-born players competing in – and dominating – top leagues, such as the National Basketball Association. Lesser-known, but just as important, is the growth of athletes at the amateur and semi-professional level. Consider college sports. During the 1999-2000 academic year, 3,589 international athletes comprised 2.4% of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's top-tier Division I athletes; by 2023-24, that number had ballooned to 13,198 or 7%. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Life Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Several factors draw them. First, there's the money. American sports have more of it than any other country. The big salaries paid at the professional level are an obvious attraction. But so, too, are the opportunities at the collegiate and youth levels. Thanks to media rights revenue, for example, US colleges and universities fund scholarships, facilities and coaching at a scale and quality unavailable anywhere else in the world. Overseas athletes aren't just attracted to superior gym facilities, of course. Sticking with basketball as an example, long before aspiring European players have ever heard of an NCAA Final Four, they've likely fallen for an American basketball culture that represents freedom and self-expression. At a time when America's image abroad totters, Steph Curry and his 3-point shooting skills remain popular everywhere. What government, anywhere, doesn't wish that its values could be similarly embraced by global youth culture? Saudi Arabia's recent, expensive embrace of sports as public diplomacy (sportswashing, in the eyes of many) is just one example of a country trying to emulate American success and co-opt some of the narrative. Money alone can't buy American soft power success. A country also needs values that it can sell, and a government willing to make the effort. For example, since 2002, the US State Department has hosted a Sports Diplomacy Division intended to foster cultural exchanges and open up countries to American businesses along the way. Shaquille O'Neal, Ken Griffey Jr., and Cal Ripken Jr. have been among its most prominent envoys, presumably to the benefit of the NBA, MLB and their media partners. Meanwhile, a cultivated image of openness has long been matched by an immigration policy that welcomes individuals with extraordinary abilities, including athletes. If someone wants to come to the US to compete, train and earn, that person has been, for the most part, welcome in recent decades. The country's role as host for major international competitions – such as the FIFA World Cup (in 1994 and 2026) and multiple Olympic games (with Los Angeles on tap for 2028) – strengthens this perception and serves as a platform for promoting American soft power. Trump's travel bans and immigration policies, ostensibly created to preserve national security, undermine those efforts. Though not targeted specifically at athletes, they are already casualties. In June, the State Department denied visas to members of Senegal's national women's basketball team, who were planning a US training camp, and Cuba's national women's volleyball team, who were intending to compete in a tournament in Puerto Rico. But players visiting the US temporarily – say, for a tournament or training camp – aren't the only ones who are experiencing a different kind of welcome, either. Foreign-born athletes who plan to enroll in colleges and universities this fall experienced significant visa delays and uncertainties this spring. Most issues in the latter category were eventually resolved, but the message both at home and abroad was unmistakable: It's your passport–not your talent or determination–that decides whether you get to play. Athletes lose out. The US loses more. In the increasingly intense battle for global loyalties, Americans need ambassadors and events that showcase their best values and culture. Sports do that, and the US shouldn't willingly squander its lead. BLOOMBERG


AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Ukraine's future cannot be decided without Ukrainians, France's Macron says, World News
PUBLISHED ON August 10, 2025 4:42 AM PARIS - French President Emmanuel Macron said in a social media post on X that the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without the Ukrainians. US President Donald Trump will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, Trump said on Friday (Aug 8). The deal is expected to involve land concessions, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy rejected earlier Saturday. [[nid:721046]]

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Xi looks to tighten grip after scandals shake China's military elite
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Internal turbulence is testing President Xi Jinping's effort to build a military that is loyal, modern, combat-ready and fully under his control. TAIPEI, Taiwan – Outwardly, China's military has never been stronger. Its naval ships venture farther across the oceans. Its nuclear force grows by about 100 warheads every year. Its military flights around Taiwan are increasingly frequent and intimidating. Every few months, China unveils new weapons, like a prototype stealth fighter or newfangled landing barges. Internally, though, China's military is experiencing its most serious leadership disarray in years. Three of the seven seats on the Central Military Commission – the Communist Party council that controls the armed forces – appear to be vacant after members were arrested or simply disappeared. That internal turbulence is testing President Xi Jinping's effort, going back more than a decade, to build a military that is loyal, modern, combat-ready and fully under his control. Mr Xi has set a 2027 target for modernising the People's Liberation Army, or PLA, and also – according to some US officials – for gaining the ability to invade Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its territory. The current wave of investigations and removals has reached some commanders handpicked by Mr Xi, suggesting recurrent problems in a system that he has tried for years to clean up. In the first years after Mr Xi came to power in 2012, he launched an intense campaign to clean up corruption in the military and impose tighter control, culminating in a big reorganisation. 'When Xi Jinping sees his own men making mistakes, he is likely to be especially furious,' Associate Professor Joseph Torigian at American University who has studied Chinese leaders' relations with the military, said of Mr Xi. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Asia Manila struggles to keep a lasting hawker culture, casts eyes on how Asian nations lifted street food 'Control over the military is so existential. It's inherently explosive. That's why any sense of stepping out of line has to be crushed.' The most jarring absence in the military leadership is that of General He Weidong, the second most-senior career officer on the Central Military Commission. He has disappeared from official public events and mentions – an unexplained absence that suggests he, too, is in trouble and may be under investigation. Another top commander, Admiral Miao Hua , who oversaw political work in the military, was placed under investigation in 2024 for unspecified 'serious violations of discipline', a phrase that often refers to corruption or disloyalty. He was among around two dozen, if not more, senior PLA officers and executives in the armaments industry who have been investigated since 2023, according to a recent tally by the Jamestown Foundation. Both men had risen unusually quickly under Mr Xi's patronage. While Chinese officials are vulnerable to investigations for corruption or disloyalty even in the best of times, for him to lose them both reveals an uncommon degree of top-level upheaval. 'The purges may have affected the working of the bureaucracy. It can also create a broader skepticism about the readiness of the Chinese military within the leadership,' said Dr Ely Ratner, who had been an assistant secretary of defence in the Biden administration. Mr Xi's ultimate fears for the Chinese military come from questions of battlefield preparedness, and anxieties that commanders could drift away from absolute loyalty to him and the party. Mr Xi may seek a fourth term as leader of the Communist Party in 2027, and he will need to replace retiring or purged commanders with a new cohort whose devotion to him is beyond question. Recent official statements point to a renewed drive to reinforce ideological control. The Central Military Commission issued new rules in July aimed at 'fully eliminating toxic influences, and restoring the image and authority of political officers.' A series of front-page commentaries in the Liberation Army Daily – the main newspaper of the Chinese military – urged PLA political officers to observe absolute loyalty. Since Mao Zedong's era, the military has served not only as a fighting force but also as a lever of political control for Chinese leaders, as their ultimate protection against potential rivals or popular uprisings. In internal speeches to the military throughout the earlier years in his rule, Mr Xi praised the army for standing by party leaders during the 1989 military crackdown on pro-democracy protests, according to a volume of his speeches to the military published in 2019. There are no signs that the recent turbulence in the military amounts to concerted defiance of Mr Xi. But even relatively few cases of corruption or mismanagement could erode the trust between Mr Xi and his commanders, said Dr Joel Wuthnow, a senior research fellow at the National Defence University in Washington who studies China's military. Mr Xi is the only civilian party leader who sits on the Central Military Commission, which ensures his singular power over the military. That also means that he cannot turn to other civilian officials to help him. 'Xi would have to rely on commanders to develop options and implement them based on a huge amount of information and technical skills,' Dr Wuthnow said. 'If he's unable to verify that those people are honest, professional and competent, then I think his appetite for war goes down because: How can he be sure of the outcome?' The purges are likely to disrupt coordination, weaken confidence in commanders and prompt Beijing to be more wary of considering an amphibious assault on Taiwan, Professor M. Taylor Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote recently in Foreign Affairs. 'The high intensity kinds of operations that would be involved in an invasion of Taiwan, or a blockade of Taiwan – pretty much anything that would happen under the shadow of US involvement – I think will be impacted for a period of time by these problems,' Prof Fravel said in a telephone interview. But the need to act strongly in a crisis against foes might override any doubts about combat readiness, Prof Fravel said. If Mr Xi felt that a war on Taiwan was necessary, he would most likely not hesitate to send his armed forces into battle, whatever the gaps in the top command, Prof Fravel said. NYTIMES