US equity funds see hefty outflows on Israel-Iran conflict
June 20 (Reuters) - U.S. equity funds logged the largest weekly outflow in three months in the week through June 18 as intensifying Israel-Iran tensions and persistent concerns over the economic impact of elevated U.S. tariffs drove investors to reduce risk exposure.
According to LSEG Lipper data, investors exited U.S. equity funds of $18.43 billion during the week, posting the largest weekly net figure since March 19.
As a week-old air war between Israel and Iran intensified, the White House on Thursday said President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the war.
Investors ditched a robust $19.38 billion worth of large-cap equity funds - the largest weekly net figure since March 19. The small-cap and mid-cap segments also witnessed approximately $2.4 billion and $1.5 billion worth of net withdrawals.
U.S. sectoral funds, however, were popular for a fourth straight week, drawing in roughly $855 million in net inflows.
The tech and industrial sectors secured a noteworthy $1.85 billion and $445 million, respectively, in net purchases, while the financial sector lost a significant $1.22 billion in net selling.
U.S. bond fund inflows, meanwhile, dropped to a seven-week low of $2.79 billion during the week.
The short-to-intermediate investment-grade funds, and short-to-intermediate government and treasury funds segments received just $642 million and $616 million, respectively, compared with approximately $2.37 billion and $1.02 billion worth of weekly net purchases in the prior week.
Demand for mortgage funds was, however, at a five-week high as these funds attracted weekly net inflows of $566 million.
Money market funds were meanwhile out of luck for a second successive week with weekly disposals worth a net of $7.75 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court upholds law on suing Palestinian authorities over attacks
WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court upheld on Friday a statute passed by Congress to facilitate lawsuits against Palestinian authorities by Americans killed or injured in attacks abroad as plaintiffs pursue monetary damages for violence years ago in Israel and the West Bank. The 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court's decision that the 2019 law, the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, violated the rights of the Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization to due process under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. government and a group of American victims and their families had appealed the lower court's decision that struck down a provision of the law. Among the plaintiffs are families who in 2015 won a $655 million judgment in a civil case alleging that the Palestinian organizations were responsible for a series of shootings and bombings around Jerusalem from 2002 to 2004. They also include relatives of Ari Fuld, a Jewish settler in the Israel-occupied West Bank who was fatally stabbed by a Palestinian in 2018. The ongoing violence involving Israel and the Palestinians served as a backdrop to the case. U.S. courts for years have grappled over whether they have jurisdiction in cases involving the Palestinian Authority and PLO for actions taken abroad. Under the language at issue in the 2019 law, the PLO and Palestinian Authority automatically "consent" to jurisdiction if they conduct certain activities in the United States or make payments to people who attack Americans. New York-based U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ruled in 2022 that the law violated the due process rights of the PLO and Palestinian Authority guaranteed under the Constitution. The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling. President Joe Biden's administration initiated the government's appeal, which subsequently was taken up by President Donald Trump's administration. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on April 1.
Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Eight men arrested near Iranian embassy in London after 'altercation at protest'
Eight men have been arrested near the Iranian embassy in London after a protest turned violent, police have said. Seven men were detained on suspicion of grievous bodily harm just before 10am on Friday. Separately, a man has been arrested on suspicion of breaching an order imposed by police to prevent serious disorder. "Two men were treated for injuries at the scene and have been taken to hospital for further treatment by the London Ambulance Service," said the Metropolitan Police. The Met Police also confirmed their injuries are not believed to be life-threatening. In a statement, police added: "Conditions have since been put in place to prevent serious disorder. This stops protestors from gathering in the area until 13:00pm on Sunday 22 June. "One man has been taken into police custody after he was arrested on suspicion of breaching the above conditions. "Seven other men remain in police custody after being arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm." The Met Police, who were called to the incident at 09.53am, confirmed the altercation took place on Prince's Gate, which is where the embassy is located. No further details have been released about the injured men, although the London Ambulance Service (LAS) said they were treated at the scene before one was taken to a major trauma centre and the other to hospital. An LAS spokesperson said: "We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our Tactical Response Unit." It is not clear how the violence developed or what the demonstration was about, but initial reports suggested it centred around a protest against the Iranian leadership. The Iranian embassy has previously been the target of protests which have turned violent. In September 2022, demonstrators and police clashed outside the building in Knightsbridge. The protest was focused against the Iranian regime after the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in police custody. The Met Police said five officers were seriously injured and 12 people were arrested in those scuffles. A year later, in September 2023, another rally was held in the same area to mark the first anniversary of Ms Amini's death. A number of national embassies are located on or near Prince's Gate, including those for the UAE, Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Tunisia. Separately, the UK said on Friday it was temporarily withdrawing UK staff from its embassy in Iran due to the ongoing security situation there.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge rules Trump administration can't require states to help on immigration to get transport money
A federal judge on Thursday blocked the Trump administration from withholding billions of dollars in transportation funds from states that don't agree to participate in some immigration enforcement actions. Twenty states sued after they said Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy threatened to cut off funding to states that refused to comply with President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. barred federal transportation officials from carrying out that threat before the lawsuit is fully resolved. 'The Court finds that the States have demonstrated they will face irreparable and continuing harm if forced to agree to Defendants' unlawful and unconstitutional immigration conditions imposed in order to receive federal transportation grant funds,' wrote McConnell, the chief judge for the federal district of Rhode island. 'The States face losing billions of dollars in federal funding, are being put in a position of relinquishing their sovereign right to decide how to use their own police officers, are at risk of losing the trust built between local law enforcement and immigrant communities, and will have to scale back, reconsider, or cancel ongoing transportation projects.' On April 24, states received letters from the Department of Transportation stating that they must cooperate on immigration efforts or risk losing the congressionally appropriated funds. No funding was immediately withheld, but some of the states feared the move was imminent. Attorneys general from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin and Vermont filed the lawsuit in May, saying the new so-called 'Duffy Directive' put them in an impossible position. 'The States can either attempt to comply with an unlawful and unconstitutional condition that would surrender their sovereign control over their own law enforcement officers and reduce immigrants' willingness to report crimes and participate in public health programs — or they can forfeit tens of billions of dollars of funds they rely on regularly to support the roads, highways, railways, airways, ferries, and bridges that connect their communities and homes,' the attorneys general wrote in court documents. But acting Rhode Island U.S. Attorney Sara Miron Bloom told the judge that Congress has given the Department of Transportation the legal right to set conditions for the grant money it administers to states, and that requiring compliance and cooperation with federal law enforcement is a reasonable exercise of that discretion. Allowing the federal government to withhold the funds while the lawsuit moves forward doesn't cause any lasting harm, Bloom wrote in court documents, because that money can always be disbursed later if needed. But requiring the federal government to release the money to uncooperative states will likely make it impossible to recoup later, if the Department of Transportation wins the case, Bloom said.
