McDermott unanimously elected chair of Bi-County Airport Board
McDermott replaces former Lackawanna County Commissioner Matt McGloin, who resigned earlier this month. McDermott had been serving as vice chair.
McGloin resigned as a Lackawanna County commissioner to accept an assistant coaching position at Boston College football job that he quickly quit.
McGloin, a former NFL and Penn State quarterback had agreed to join the staff of his former head coach, Bill O'Brien, at Boston College.
McGloin abruptly decided to not take the Boston College job and he also decided to not return to his county commissioner's position.
McGloin and fellow Democrat Bill Gaughan were elected in 2023 and took office as the county's majority commissioners in January 2024.
Lackawanna County has not named a replacement for McGloin on the Board of Commissioners.
McDermott thanked her fellow board members and immediately began the board meeting. A vice chair was not elected on Thursday.
In other business:
—Carl Beardsley, Jr., the airport's executive director, announced increased flights to Washington-Dulles International Airport. Effective March 31, there will be three daily departures and arrivals between Wilkes-Barre/Scranton and Washington-Dulles — departures at 6 a.m., 10:05 a.m. and 2:50 p.m.; arrivals at 9:42 a.m., 2:02 p.m. and 11:30 p.m.
Beardsley said the 10:05 a.m. departure and the 9:42 a.m. arrival are new flights that will be offered beginning March 31.
—Accepted the resignation of Eric McKitish, Pittston, director of marketing, communications and air service development, effective April 7.
—Appointed Mark C. Bailer, Scranton, as director of public safety, effective March 21.
—McKitish reported that the deadline for Real ID is May 7.
—Beardsley reported passenger activity increased in January and February. He said passenger enplanements for the month of January 2025 increased 47.6% to 20,444 from 13,849 in the month of January 2024.
In January 2025, 11 departing flights were cancelled, all for weather. This accounts for 702 (2.6%) out of a total of 27,208 departure seats. Also, 11 arriving flights were cancelled, all for weather.
Passenger enplanements for the month of February 2025 increased 32.8% to 19,962, up from 15,027 in the month of February 2024.
In February 2025, 7 departing flights were cancelled, all for weather. This accounts for 379 (1.5%) out of a total of 25,714 departure seats. Also, 7 arriving flights were cancelled, all for weather.
—The board approved a HVAC maintenance agreement extension with Scranton Electric Heating & Cooling Service Inc., Throop, for professional services until current HVAC project is completed.
The total monthly cost is not to exceed $2,974.17.
—The board welcomed Betty J. Teichman, Bloomsburg, as assistant airport director, who began working on Feb. 24.
Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Mayes hints at possible legal action if Corporation Commission repeals renewable energy mandate
Attorney General Kris Mayes signaled she might take the Corporation Commission to court if it dismantles renewable energy standards she helped create nearly 20 years ago. Why it matters: The future of Arizona's renewable energy mandate is on the line. The big picture: The commission last year instructed staff to draft rules that would repeal its renewable energy standards, saying they're unnecessary and appear to drive up costs. The Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff (REST) Rules require affected utilities to get 15% of the electricity they provide from renewable sources. Staff in late July issued a formal proposal to repeal the standards. Driving the news: Mayes on Monday sent a letter to the commission warning that repealing REST "isn't just nonsensical; it's unlawful." REST isn't perfect, the AG concedes, and she would "wholeheartedly support" efforts to modernize the rules, but she opposes outright repeal. A spokesperson for Mayes declined to comment on whether she'll sue the commission if it votes to repeal the standards. Flashback: Mayes was a Republican member of the commission — she's now a Democrat — when it passed the REST rules in 2006. She was part of the 4-1 majority that voted for the standards. Zoom in: A third-party economic analysis performed for the commission found that REST repeal "could marginally reduce monthly residential electric bills" by $1-$2 and result in minor administrative cost savings for utilities. But renewable energy-related costs for some utility customers would continue due to long-term financial obligations. And repeal would have indirect costs including "reduced transparency, regulatory certainty and potentially slower renewable energy adoption," the analysis said. Between the lines: Mayes argued in her letter that REST helps keep customer rates lower for millions of Arizonans and creates jobs in the renewable energy sector. She said rate-making decisions must legally be based on "high-quality evidence, not speculation and conjecture." "In addition to being bad policy, repealing the REST Rules as proposed here is an unlawful abdication of the Commission's duty to set just and reasonable rates," she wrote. The other side: Commission chair Kevin Thompson told Axios he's not surprised Mayes is "rattling her saber, considering she played a pivotal part in implementing this gravy train that has cost ratepayers billions of dollars." He said his focus is on protecting ratepayers and not pushing "costly ideological mandates." Commission vice chair Nick Myers said he's unconcerned about a lawsuit if the commission repeals REST. "We'll let her do what she thinks she needs to do, and if she has legal grounds, bring them up," he said. Reality check: Renewable energy accounts for about 19% of the energy that Arizona Public Service, the state's largest utility, provides its electric retail customers, the company tells Axios. What's next: The commission will vote at a Thursday meeting on whether to instruct staff to begin the repeal process.
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's China deal on AI chips prompts significant security concerns
President Trump's reversal on previously blocked chip sales to China has sparked cries that the White House is selling out America's security concerns in a bid to raise revenue. Trump on Monday agreed to allow tech giants Nvidia and AMD to secure export licenses to sell their advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China in exchange for a 15 percent cut of the profits. The White House said Tuesday that more such deals could be on the table. The unusual deal doesn't just raise legal questions. Experts say the U.S. should be wary of turning over American-made technology that could boost its adversary's AI capabilities, at a time when the two countries are fiercely competing for dominance. The security concerns appear to be a two-way street. China urged tech companies there to avoid any purchase of the chip, citing security issues. The move once again has Trump at odds with Congress's China hawks, who argue the administration is shortchanging America's national security interests to make a buck. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (Ill.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in a statement said the most troubling part of the deal was a contradiction at the heart of the policy. 'The administration cannot simultaneously treat semiconductor exports as both a national security threat and a revenue opportunity,' he said. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' The same panel's GOP chair, Rep. John Moolenaar (Mich.), said there are 'questions about the legal basis' for such a deal. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' he said in a statement. Greenlighting the sales marks a reversal for the Trump administration, which in April initially imposed restrictions on Nvidia's H20 chip and AMD's MI308 chip, effectively blocking shipments to China. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has argued China is only receiving Nvidia's 'fourth best' chip, but this has done little to assuage concerns. The administration has increasingly taken up the mantle, supported by the semiconductor industry, that the U.S. should focus on boosting the adoption of U.S. technology abroad rather than imposing more stringent export restrictions. The reasoning follows that the best way to win the AI race is to keep China dependent on American-made chips and prevent Huawei from gaining ground both inside and outside of China. Others contend this will simply boost Beijing's capabilities in a way that would be impossible without the U.S. technology. 'We've got to realize we're in an intellectual war, a technology war with China, and we're in an AI competition. Having Nvidia providing this technology to China is a mistake,' Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) said during an appearance on 'The Hill' on NewsNation. 'China getting our chips is not a good deal.' National security experts say the risks are manifold. Not only do the sales boost China in what many see as a technological cold war, it also opens the door to the risk the communist government could use chips for military technology or other uses that directly threaten the U.S. Liza Tobin, who served as China director at the National Security Council under the first Trump and Biden administrations, said chip producers only have so much capacity, so shipping them to China shortchanges others. 'It's putting a priority on China's AI development at the expense of American or other countries' AI development,' she told The Hill. She also expressed concern over chips being used for 'malign purposes that potentially harm and kill American men and women in uniform.' 'These chips themselves are inherently dual use. It's not like these are just made for the military or have some limit on them to only be allowed for cat food apps. That's just not how it works.' Nvidia on Tuesday argued the sales will help the U.S. become a technology leader with little risk to either party. 'As both governments recognize, the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure,' the company said in a statement. 'China has ample supply of domestic chips to meet its needs. It won't and never has relied on American chips for government operations, just like the U.S. government would not rely on chips from China. Banning the sale of H20 in China would only harm U.S. economic and technology leadership with zero national security benefit.' Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the export control licenses Trump is now negotiating with companies were expressly designed to weigh those types of national security risks. 'It's a very troubling precedent because historically when we've been looking at export control licenses, it's been strictly speaking a national security review,' Harrell said. 'Does the export of this widget threaten U.S. national security? Whereas now, there's also going to be this factor of, 'Well maybe it does threaten U.S. national security … but hey, we got some money from it.'' 'I think it would be quite negative for us if we get in the business of 'We're happy to arm our adversaries as long as they pay us a bit of money to do so.' I hope that's not where we are. I do worry that this could become a broader precedent.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that the administration would consider other similar arrangements in spite of legal concerns. 'Right now, it stands with these two companies. Perhaps it could expand in the future to other companies,' Leavitt said. 'I think it's a creative idea and solution. The legality of it, the mechanics of it is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce.' 'This was another idea of the president and his brain trust on his trade team to try to get good deals for the American people and the American taxpayer,' she added. It's not clear such deals would be legal. Export taxes are barred by the Constitution, while fees for export licenses are prohibited under federal law. However, it's unclear whether the 15 percent cut from Nvidia and AMD's chip sales would count as a formal tax or fee, as well as whether anyone would bring such a challenge. Still, several raised concerns about the precedent set by the deal, noting there are many other American-made products China would be interested in purchasing that could be detrimental to U.S. interests. 'Are we now going to see the Commerce Department shaking down high-tech exporters generally for a 15 percent cut? Are we going to see the State Department, which regulates exports of defense weaponry, start shaking down defense exporters for a 15 percent cut?' Harrell asked. 'I have to assume that there would be some lines, maybe it is F-35s. Would he sell nuclear weapons? You have to think there are some lines that Trump wouldn't cross. But this is blowing past a bunch of past precedent, and I think suggests that whatever lines he does have that he would not be willing to cross are very, very different from the lines any previous president would have had.' Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.) noted that Trump has also sought to bypass a law passed by Congress and signed by former President Biden that would block the popular app TikTok unless the China-based ByteDance sells the company. Born out of fears that Chinese law could require the app to hand over data on Americans, Trump has punted enforcement, signing three separate extensions. 'So now the US government is financially motivated to sell AI to China?' Auchincloss wrote on the social platform X. 'Makes me shudder to think what a TikTok deal might look like.' Tobin, however, said China is likely to set their sights on securing more advanced chips than the H20, including the Blackwell, which is still under development. Trump suggested Monday that he would consider making a deal on a reduced-capacity version of the Blackwell. Trump's dealmaking, Tobin said, will suggest to the Chinese that such things are now open to negotiation, a dynamic she warns the government is also using with Nvidia. China's warning not to immediately order Nvidia's chips serves a twofold purpose, she said, one that allows them to exert some control over the company while opening the door to demanding information about the chips that could aid in their replication. 'They know there are technical means that could potentially be weaponized,' she said, adding that while China has 'rational' security concerns, the move is also 'a pretext for squeezing out more from Nvidia' by a country that has previously required companies to share their intellectual property. 'The Chinese government has already been calling Nvidia in to explain whether its chips are secure, and that's a way to put Nvidia on notice and say, 'Hey, you better be behaving the way we want you to, or else we're going to make it very painful for you to stay in the China market.'' Nvidia has previously said it would not send 'any [graphics processing unit] designs to China to be modified to comply with export controls.' 'Our products are extraordinarily complex and take tens of thousands of engineering years to create, and by the time an NVIDIA product is available in the market, we are already far along in our design of the next one,' a spokesperson said Tuesday. Any Chinese advances may mean the deal may only be of short-term value to Nvidia, Tobin argued, but it's one she said the government should shield against. 'The role of government is to put the guardrails on so that private interests don't control our national security,' Tobin said.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senators Worried About Losing Republican Seat in Texas: What Polls Show
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republicans are reportedly planning to spend millions of dollars to boost Senator John Cornyn in Texas to avoid a more competitive—and expensive—general election next November, as polls suggest GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton could be more vulnerable against Democrat Colin Allred. Cornyn campaign senior adviser Matt Mackowiak told Newsweek that it would be "political malpractice" for Republicans to have to invest more than $200 million in the general election because Paxton wins the nomination, and that Cornyn has a "plan to win this race." Newsweek reached out to the Paxton campaign for comment via email. Why It Matters Texas is among the states that Democrats are hoping to make competitive in next year's midterms. President Donald Trump carried it by double digits last November. Democrats must win at least two Senate races in double-digit Trump states to win back control of the Senate. Maine, which backed former Vice President Kamala Harris by seven points, and North Carolina, which voted for Trump by only three points, are viewed as Democrats' top targets. However, no other Harris or single-digit Trump states are up for grabs, so they are looking at races in states like Alaska, Iowa, Ohio and Texas as potential opportunities. The outcome of the GOP primary between Cornyn and Paxton could have key implications for how competitive the race is. Cornyn leads Allred, a former congressman, by a more comfortable margin in polling than Paxton. But Paxton is favored by many of the state's more conservative voters and has built an early primary polling lead. Senator John Cornyn attends a meeting in Washington, D.C., on April 7, 2025. Senator John Cornyn attends a meeting in Washington, D.C., on April 7, To Know The Senate Leadership Fund (SLF), the GOP's principal Senate super PAC, urged donors to invest in Paxton during the primary to avoid a more expensive general election, according to a presentation obtained and reported by Punchbowl News. Helping Cornyn win the GOP nomination would cost up to $70 million, but it could cost up to $250 million to help Paxton win the general election, according to the report. The presentation also included a slide showing Cornyn leading Allred by about six points, while Paxton trails by about one point. A poll from YouGov and Texas Southern University, which surveyed 1,200 registered voters from May 9 to May 19, 2025, showed Cornyn led Allred by four percentage points (48 percent to 44 percent), while Paxton led by only two points (48 percent to 46 percent). It had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. Meanwhile, a survey conducted by GOP pollster Brad Parscale showed Paxton trailing Allred in a hypothetical matchup. It found that 52 percent of voters would likely vote for Allred, while 37 percent would vote for Paxton. It surveyed 1,000 likely voters in mid-April. Mark Jones, fellow in political science at the Baker Institute and political science professor at Rice University, told Newsweek that while Paxton would still likely be favored in a general election because Texas remains reliably red, he would be more vulnerable than Cornyn due to having a "considerable amount of political, ethical and legal baggage." A "perfect storm" for Democrats could brew if Paxton becomes the nominee, the economy struggles, and Trump's approval rating continues to dwindle, Jones said. The overall national environment could be a critical question in determining how competitive the race becomes, he said. "If it's a good election year for Republicans, say like 2024 or even 2022, then even Paxton should be able to win under that scenario," Jones said. "I think the fear that Republicans have is, what if 2026 is more like 2018 than 2024. If it's like 2018, when they were within three points of defeating [Texas Senator] Ted Cruz, that's where having a flawed candidate like Ken Paxton could be a real liability." The latest polls also show Paxton leading Cornyn in the primary. A University of Tyler poll, which surveyed 538 registered voters from May 28 to June 7, showed Paxton leading by about 10 points (44 percent to 34 percent). It had a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. The YouGov/Texas Southern University survey also showed Paxton leading by about nine points (43 percent to 34 percent). Cornyn, for his part, is already doing two things he should do to win back support in the primary by working to boost his image among GOP primary voters, while also using resources to tarnish Paxton's image, Jones said. Despite these polls, winning Texas would be a major uphill challenge for Allred or another Democrat. Texas has not voted Democratic on the presidential level since 1976, and has not voted for a Democratic senator since 1988. The state last elected a Democratic governor in 1990. Trump won Texas by more than 13 points last November, performing stronger in suburban areas while also making inroads in Southern Texas, a heavily Hispanic area that shifted rightward. Allred, however, lost by a smaller 8.5 margin against Cruz. Trump has declined to endorse in the race so far. What People Are Saying Senator John Cornyn's campaign senior adviser, Matt Mackowiak, told Newsweek: "It would be political malpractice for the GOP to have to invest $200+ million to hold a safe Senate seat if Crooked Ken Paxton is the nominee. John Cornyn hasn't been on the ballot in five years. Educating voters about his actual record is job #1 — especially his 99.2% record voting with Trump while President. All public polling shows Cornyn's image with Republican voters is solid and it will continue to grow as voters learn about his actual record. We have a plan to win this race and we are executing it." President Donald Trump told reporters in April: "I like Paxton, I like Cornyn, they're both good people. So, I'll make a decision somewhere along the line. But you have two very good men." Colin Allred, on July 1 in a post to X: "Washington is broken and the system is rigged – and Texas families are paying the price. Today I'm announcing I'm running for the U.S. Senate because Texans deserve someone who will fight for them. From working to lower costs to taking on corruption, I'm ready to be the fighter Texans deserve." What Happens Next The Cook Political Report classifies the race as Likely Republican, meaning it is "not considered competitive at this point" but has "the potential to become engaged." Sabato's Crystal Ball also lists the Texas Senate race as Likely Republican. The primary will be held on March 3, 2026.
