&w=3840&q=100)
India, Croatia vow zero tolerance for terrorism, call for swift justice for perpetrators
India and Croatia have strongly condemned terrorism in all its forms and called for urgent global efforts to dismantle terrorist networks and eliminate their safe havens, during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's landmark visit to the Balkan nation, the first ever by an Indian prime minister.
In a joint statement issued on June 18, a day after PM Modi's talks with his Croatian counterpart Andrej Plenković, both countries reaffirmed their commitment to a 'zero-tolerance' policy against terrorism, including transnational and cross-border threats. They also highlighted the importance of swift justice for perpetrators and the need to disrupt financing channels through multilateral frameworks like the UN and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The leaders also condemned the use of terrorism as a state proxy and urged concerted action against all UN- and EU-designated individuals and entities, including those listed under the UNSC 1267 sanctions regime.
Expressing concern over the 'deteriorating security situation' in West Asia, the joint statement called for de-escalation between Israel and Iran. PM Modi thanked Croatia for its solidarity following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir.
Prime Minister Modi thanked Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and Croatia for the support and solidarity extended in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir on April 22, it said.
'Both sides condemned terrorism and violent extremism in all its forms and manifestations, including transnational and cross-border terrorism. They reiterated their zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, rejecting any justification for such acts, under any circumstances,' said the joint statement issued by the Ministry of External Affairs.
They emphasised that those responsible for the attacks should be 'held accountable' and 'condemned the use of terrorists as proxies', it added.
'They expressed their consistent position of supporting the full implementation of the UN Global Counterterrorism Strategy, key international conventions and protocols in this field, and relevant resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'They called for the disruption of terrorism financing networks, including through the UN, FATF and regional mechanisms, elimination of safe havens, dismantling of terrorist infrastructure, and bringing perpetrators of terrorism to justice swiftly,' the statement said.
The two leaders also urged for 'concerted actions against all UN- and EU-designated terrorists and terrorist entities', associated proxy groups, facilitators and sponsors, including terrorists under 1267 UNSC Sanctions Committee.
The two leaders noted the importance of improving connectivity, including through the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEEC) initiative.
They agreed to 'expand cooperation' in ports and shipping domains given the long maritime traditions of both countries. Both sides agreed to further explore the potential of Croatia serving as a Mediterranean gateway to Central Europe, it said.
In this context, they also reaffirmed full respect for international law of the sea as reflected in UNCLOS, and for the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and freedom of navigation, to the benefit of maritime security and international peace and stability, the joint statement said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The two Prime Ministers exchanged views on regional and global issues of mutual interest, including war in Ukraine.
They expressed support for a 'just and lasting peace in Ukraine based on respect for international law, principles of the UN Charter and territorial integrity and sovereignty,' it said.
The two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to promote a free, open, peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific built on international law and mutual respect for sovereignty and peaceful resolution of disputes underpinned by effective regional institutions.
The two sides reaffirmed their strong commitment to multilateralism and support for a rules-based international order.
'They emphasised the urgent need for reforms in the UN system, particularly the UN Security Council, including its expansion in both permanent and non-permanent categories, to make it more inclusive, transparent, effective, accountable, efficient and better aligned with contemporary geopolitical realities,' it added.
The two prime ministers expressed satisfaction at the outcomes of the visit, and 'reaffirmed their commitment to expanding the partnership' between India and Croatia.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Raghuram Rajan reacts to Donald Trump's 50% tariffs on India: ‘It's hard to negotiate with a gun to your head…'
Renowned economist Raghuram Rajan has called out United States President Donald Trump's 'pressure tactics' in imposing 50 per cent tariffs on India and Brazil, in an interview with Brazilian economic and financial publication, Valor. Speaking on Donald Trump's apparent 'shift in mood' against India, Raghuram Rajan said that while trade with Russia could be 'reconsidered', its is 'hard to negotiate with a gun to your head', and that this seems like an 'exercise in power' from the US. Donald Trump last week said the US would impose 50 per cent tariffs on India as 'punishment' for buying oil from Russia. He has in the past also criticised India and Brazil for being part of what he dubbed 'anti-American' BRICS bloc. Brazil has also been slapped with similar 50 per cent duties. According to the professor of finance at the University of Chicago, former Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor, and a former International Monetary Fund (IMF), chief economist, the time for a joint global response to US tariffs has 'past'. 'It's hard to negotiate with a gun to your head. And that's basically what's happening right now. I hope sanity will prevail in US relations with India,' he said. The public, threatening aspect has made negotiations difficult, according to Raghuram Rajan. 'Lowering tariffs can help our economy. But again, it's hard to negotiate with a gun to your head. I hope that tempers cool and talks resume, because a 50 per cent tariff is unsustainable—not just for India, but also for the US, which risks alienating a country it hopes will be a strategic partner. People remember these things for a long time, and turning them away is rarely smart geopolitics,' he cautioned. Raghuram Rajan noted that India may have expected trade talks to extend till October-November, and so held firm on some areas while negotiating. 'But that's not how it's worked for countries that have already reached agreements. This isn't about a balanced trade deal; it's an exercise of power.' He added that India could give in on trade with Russia, since current prices are not much different across markets. 'If Russian oil were cut off entirely, prices would rise, but India could handle that. The bigger issue is political: an overt public decision to stop buying from Russia would be seen domestically as bowing to US pressure, which plays badly in any democracy. If Washington had quietly asked India to phase out Russian oil, it might have been acceptable,' he added. On the impact of the tariffs, Raghuram Rajan noted that $80 billion of Indian exports to the US would become 'unviable', and in return some $40 billion of US imports into India, including Apple products, could 'hurt America to some degree'. On Donald Trump's opposition to BRICS, Raguram Rajan noted that as a group of emerging economies, the interests of BRICS nations has 'diverged over time'. He added, 'India is not anti-US, and neither is Brazil in its current government. Being pulled into a bloc seen as anti-American is problematic for both.' 'If tariffs stabilise, even at high levels, the world will adapt. It won't be as efficient as the low-tariff era, but supply chains will adjust over time. The bigger problem is volatility. If today it's 50 per cent tariffs on one set of countries and tomorrow another, uncertainty will keep disrupting trade and investment. Stability is essential, and that's what's in the shortest supply right now,' he added. 'It would have been useful to form a broad coalition early on, before individual countries struck their own deals with Washington. That would have increased bargaining power. But now, with Japan, the EU, and the UK satisfied with their arrangements, it's harder—especially if China is excluded, since both Beijing and Washington may prefer separate dealings,' according to Raghuram Rajan. 'It's good for Brazil and India to talk about boosting trade and investment, but a united global front is probably too late at this stage. Still, maintaining dialogue is important, because this may not be the last disruption—more could come if the U.S. administration targets other countries,' he added.
The Wire
8 minutes ago
- The Wire
'An Arbitrary and Brute Exercise of Power': PUCL Slams J&K Book Ban
The PUCL said that Section 152 of the BNS which is the so called decolonial law, strikingly goes even further than Section 124-A (sedition) of the IPC in its criminalisation of speech. New Delhi: The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has expressed outrage over the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir Government's home department headed by lieutenant governor Manoj Sinha to forfeit 25 book titles in an omnibus order under Section 98 of the BNSS, for 'promoting secessionism' and 'inciting violence against [the] Indian state' in the Union territory. In a statement issued by its national president Kavita Srivastava and general secretary V. Suresh, the PUCL termed the notification 'an arbitrary and brute exercise of power by the state uncanalised by the discipline of the Constitution'. 'What the state is seeking to tell the citizens is that any opinion which is not the opinion of the state cannot be tolerated. This is a form of totalitarian thinking which is unacceptable in a constitutional democracy,' said the PUCL statement. 'By the mass forfeiting of books, the Jammu and Kashmir government is utilising a colonial, British-era law (Section 95 of the colonial, British era, CrPC finds its Bharatiya or so-called decolonial avatar, as Section 98 of the BNSS) which was designed to suppress demands for Indian independence. This law has been used by the British to ban canonical texts like Hind Swaraj by Mahatma Gandhi,' the statement added. PUCL said that among the 25 books forfeited are books by Anuradha Bhasin, Sumantra Bose, Tariq Ali, A.G. Noorani, Arundhati Roy, Ather Zia and a host of others, books that give a flavour of the realms traversed covering history, memory, poetry and politics. 'These books represent a vibrant intellectual culture of thinking and writing about Kashmir. These viewpoints may be deemed unacceptable by the Indian establishment, but they are viewpoints which are protected speech under the Indian Constitution. The forfeiture notice is an attempt at stifling collective memory and preventing thought in Kashmir,' said the PUCL statement. 'By clamping down on these books, the attempt to stifle the very heart of intellectual life: which is to seek knowledge and form opinion by gathering thought from all, including contrarian, sources,' it added. 'The forfeiture notification is illegal and unconstitutional' The PUCL said that the Jammu and Kashmir government must appreciate that there may be viewpoints they disagree with, but a constitutional democracy is based on the fact that dissenting opinions exist and should be respected. 'What is not apparent from a reading of the Government notification is a reasoning as to the grounds for forfeiture. What the notification has is a bald, bare and sweeping assertion with no reference to how any of the twenty-five books have contributed to 'radicalisation of youth in J&K include distortion of historical facts, glorification of terrorists, vilification of security forces, religious radicalisation, promotion of alienation, pathway to violence and terrorism etc,'' said the PUCL statement. 'When there is an omnibus forfeiture order of 25 books, without any specific reference to the content of any of the books, prima facie it appears that the exercise of the power of forfeiture is not a justified exercise of power under Section 98 of the BNSS and will not come within the reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution,' it added. The PUCL said that Section 152 of the BNS which is the so called decolonial law, strikingly goes even further than Section 124-A (sedition) of the IPC in its criminalisation of speech. It demanded an immediate withdrawal of the forfeiture notice of 25 books by the Jammu and Kashmir government and also called for the repealing of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
NDTV
8 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Bihar Voter Roll Revision Can Be Set Aside If...": Supreme Court
The results of the ongoing 'special intensive revision' of the Bihar voter list can be set aside - as late as September - if illegality is proven, the Supreme Court said Tuesday afternoon. The court was hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission's voter re-verification exercise, which is taking place just months before the Assembly election in Bihar. During the hearing petitioners questioned the constitutional premise of the exercise, pointing out the Election Commission - which had demanded documents (excluding the Aadhaar and its own ID card) proving citizenship - does not have the authority to decide on that matter. Citizenship, the petitioners argued, was the jurisdiction of the Indian government, specifically the Union Home Ministry. "They (i.e., the Election Commission) say Adhaar is not enough to determine citizenship... but they don't have the authority to decide citizenship. The court had said they only need to ascertain identity of voters..."
