Misleading advertisements: CCP imposes Rs150m penalty on housing society
ISLAMABAD: In a significant move to curb deceptive marketing practices, the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed a penalty of Rs150 million on Kingdom Valley (Pvt) Limited for misleading advertisements concerning its housing project.
Acting on a suo motu notice, CCP's Office of Fair Trade initiated an investigation and found that the company:
1- Falsely advertised its project as 'Kingdom Valley Islamabad', despite it being located in Mouza Choora, Tehsil & District Rawalpindi;
2- Misrepresented affiliations with the Naya Pakistan Housing Program (NPHP) and Naya Pakistan Housing and Development Authority (NAPHDA);
3- Publicized the project as 'NOC Approved' without accurate or complete disclosure regarding its approval status.
The Commission bench, comprising Saeed Ahmed Nawaz and Abdul Rashid Sheikh, concluded that the company had violated Sections 10(2)(a) and 10(2)(b) of the Competition Act, 2010, which prohibit dissemination of false or misleading information to consumers. Consequently, Rs75 million was levied for each violation, amounting to a total fine of Rs150 million.
In addition, the Commission noted serious non-compliance, including the company's failure to submit audited financial statements and non-compliance with CCP's directives. The company has also not filed financials with the SECP for several years, raising concerns about its governance and transparency.
The CCP reiterates its commitment to protecting consumers from deceptive marketing practices and ensuring fair competition in the housing and real estate sector.
Consumers and stakeholders are encouraged to report deceptive advertisements or anti-competitive behaviour to CCP via WhatsApp at 0304-0875255 or email at [email protected].
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
CCP approves foreign acquisition in advertising and media firms
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) in Wednesday granted approval for three separate merger transactions, allowing M/s. Berkeley Square Holding BV to acquire 50 percent shareholding of Ogilvy & Mather Pakistan (Private) Limited, Mindshare Pakistan (Private) Limited, and Soho Square Pakistan (Private) Limited from Taher Anwar Khan. According to a statement, the acquisition in the case of Mindshare also involved M/s. Interflow Communications (Private) Limited as a seller. The acquirer, Berkeley Square Holding BV, is a Netherlands-based holding company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WPP plc, one of the world's largest communications and advertising conglomerates headquartered in London, UK. WPP provides creative transformation services globally, including Pakistan through its local subsidiaries. Following these approvals, WPP plc will attain controlling interest in the three companies, enhancing its strategic presence in Pakistan's media and advertising services sector. Restrictive trade practices may attract Rs75 million fine, says CCP The relevant markets identified during the reviews were 'Advertising Services' and 'Media Services' within the geographic boundary of Pakistan. After evaluating each case, the Commission concluded that the proposed acquisitions would not result in the creation or strengthening of a dominant position in the relevant markets, nor would they substantially lessen competition in Pakistan. The Commission, while approving the transactions, ensured that there are no significant entry barriers or risks of market concentration that could harm competitive dynamics. All approvals were granted under Section 31(1)(d)(i) of the Competition Act, 2010.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Fertiliser firms fined for price fixing
Listen to article The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has cracked down on alleged collusion in the fertiliser sector, imposing Rs375 million in penalties for creating a monopoly and extracting billions from farmers. In response, the Fertiliser Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC) has announced it will challenge the CCP order in court. Interestingly, these fertiliser barons had previously refused to pay multi-billion rupee dues on account of the Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC), instead obtaining stay orders from the courts. They had collected billions from farmers but failed to deposit these funds in the national exchequer — a matter that remains unresolved. The CCP, a watchdog for anti-competitive practices, launched a suo motu inquiry and imposed a penalty of Rs50 million on each of the six major urea manufacturers, along with a Rs75 million fine on FMPAC, totalling Rs375 million. The penalised companies include Fatima Fertiliser Limited, Fauji Fertiliser Company Limited, Fauji Fertiliser Bin Qasim Limited, Fatima Fertiliser Company Limited, Engro Fertiliser Company Limited, and Agritech Limited. According to the CCP's findings, these firms, in coordination with their trade association FMPAC, ran an 'awareness campaign' that effectively amounted to fixing urea prices nationwide. The Bench, comprising Dr Kabir Ahmed Sidhu and Salam Amin, concluded that this activity violated Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010. While the manufacturers claimed to be setting prices independently, they failed to justify the remarkably synchronised pricing strategy. The CCP investigation revealed that the practice distorted competition and harmed farmers — particularly during the critical Rabi and Kharif seasons — by artificially inflating fertiliser prices and limiting market choices. The companies' attempt to shield themselves under the 'state action doctrine' was also dismissed. The CCP Bench found no formal government directive, or compulsion, to justify their collusive behaviour. Instead, the firms exploited a government instruction about raising awareness among farmers regarding urea prices. They used this as cover to jointly announce uniform urea prices across the country. The bench held that such "actions, taken under the pretext of complying with government instructions, effectively undermined market dynamics and distorted competitive pricing mechanisms." The CCP expressed concern that despite differences in input costs, economies of scale, market size, and gas prices, all six companies were selling a urea bag for the identical price of Rs1,768. The bench remarked that in a market where each company's production capacity and market share are publicly known, such coordinated disclosures cannot be viewed as incidental or competitively benign. Rather, the joint announcement amounted to overt collusion. Repeated directives from the Fertiliser Review Committee (FRC) also went unheeded, with companies failing to address supply imbalances. Notably, the CCP had earlier warned fertiliser manufacturers and FMPAC in 2010, 2012, and 2014warnings that did not lead to lasting change. The CCP chairman reiterated that trade associations should not serve as platforms for sharing price-sensitive information or coordinating pricing strategies. The Commission reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring competitive markets, protecting consumer welfare, and holding violators accountable. In response to the CCP's order, FMPAC issued a statement asserting it had no role in pricing decisions. It clarified that it does not determine or coordinate the pricing of urea or any other fertiliser product. As a non-commercial advisory body, FMPAC claimed it has never engaged in price-setting activities, and any implication otherwise is factually incorrect. FMPAC stated that the controversial advertisement was published under a formal directive from the federal government, communicated via the Fertiliser Review Committee (FRC). During the FRC's meeting on November 25, 2021 — held amid concerns about urea hoarding and market manipulation — it was resolved to initiate a public awareness campaign. FMPAC was directed to publicise the prevailing market price, which had already been acknowledged during the proceedings. FMPAC insisted that it acted in good faith to implement the government's directive, without involvement in setting or proposing the published price. The intent, it said, was to ensure transparency and protect farmers from exploitative practices — not to distort market dynamics. FMPAC plans to contest the CCP's interpretation and pursue legal remedy through the appropriate appellate forum. The Council expressed confidence that a fair and comprehensive review would confirm its actions were lawful and transparent.
Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Two witnesses record testimonies in gifts case
The Toshakhana is a repository which stores precious gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats and other officials by heads of other governments and foreign dignitaries. PHOTO: FILE Two more prosecution witnesses on Tuesday gave their testimonies in a case related to alleged misuse of the official gift repository rules by PTI founder Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi during the former's term as the prime minister. Special Judge Central Shahrukh Arjumand conducted the hearing of the case in a courtroom inside Rawalpindi's Central Prison popularly known as Adiala Jail. Both Imran and Bushrawho are detained in the prison facility — attended the hearing. After the testimonies, the counsel for Imran, Arshad Tabriz, cross-examined both the witnesses. Lawyer of Bushra Bibi, Qosain Faisal Mufti, will cross examine the witnesses at the next hearing. Bushra Bibi had refused to attend the last hearing of the case — also called the Toshakhana II casedespite repeated summonses by the court. The judge had later warned of cancelling her bail in the case. The court will resume hearing on June 11. According to the charge-sheet, Imran misused his position to acquire a Bulgari jewelry set that the Saudi crown prince presented as a gift during the couple's visit to Saudi Arabia between May 7 and 10, 2021. The set included a ring, bracelet, necklace, and a pair of earrings. According to the evidence gathered during the investigation, Imran and Bushra unlawfully retained the set. On May 18, 2021, the deputy military secretary informed the section officer of Toshakhana about the need to assess and declare the price of the gift, but it was not deposited. Bulgari sold the necklace for 300,000 euros and the earrings for 80,000 euros to a Saudi franchise on May 25, 2018. However, the price of the bracelet and ring could not be determined. As of May 28, 2021, the total estimated value of the Bulgari jewelry set was approximately Rs75,661,600. The necklace alone was valued at Rs56,496,000, and the earrings at Rs15,065,600.
