
PRATIBHA Setu – Bridging merit and opportunity
Kudos to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for launching the aptly titled initiative 'PRATIBHA Setu'; i.e. Professional Resource And Talent Integration – Bridge for Hiring Aspirants, formerly known as Public Disclosure Scheme (PDS). As per the UPSC, this strategic initiative will enable verified employers—including ministries, PSUs, autonomous bodies, and private organisations—to access details of non-recommended willing candidates who cleared all stages of the eight prestigious direct recruitment UPSC examinations but were not included in the final
merit list. This will bring together the prospective employers and the meritorious job seekers who have already proved their worth by succeeding in preliminary and main examinations and reached the interview stage but could not get into the final list just for lack of a few marks.
Now it is up to the government departments and public/private sector organizations to offer employment to these industrious and assiduous young ones who have already developed a certain level of understanding as evinced by passing two stringent filters namely the preliminary and main examination stages of Civil Services Examination and other examinations for Indian Forest Service, Central Armed Police Forces, Engineering Service, Geo-Scientist, CDS, Indian Economic Service/Statistical Service, and Medical Services. This cohort widely takes care of candidates possessing almost all diverse educational backgrounds.
This admirable initiative is at a time, when the selection cycles for jobs are not only too long but also uncertain due to various structural, procedural, and cultural issues leading to unforeseen circumstances like paper leakage, question paper defects, breach of examination at pre or post examination stages, etc. These factors
eventually yield mental fatigue, career uncertainties, missing opportunities, financial burden, and on top of all the loss of trust in the system prevailing in the country.
A look at the performance of the job recruitment agencies at the state and central level, the job recruitment processes carried out by UPSC are still considered to be sacrosanct barring a few aberrations which are attributed to the part of candidates. Undeniably, the Civil Services Examination (CSE) conducted by the Union Public
Service Commission is one of the most prestigious and elaborate examinations in the country which is full of uncertainties for candidates due to three discrete stages collectively deciding the final outcome. Besides, the exam cycle of nearly one year leads to loss of year on year for any UPSC aspirant who is unable to succeed and
thus the continued pursuit to try up to the last attempt is eventually a loss as the society is unable to reap the potential of such youth.
To appreciate the relevance of PRATIBHA – SETU, let us delve into the detailed statistics of CSE – 2024 which shows that in this year 5,83,213 out of 9,92,599 enrolled candidates actually appeared in the Preliminary examination. Out of these total of 14,627 candidates qualified for appearance in the Written (Main) Examination, and from these, 2,845 candidates qualified for the Personality Test (PT) of the examination. Finally, 1009 candidates (725 men and 284 women) have been recommended by the Commission for appointment to various Services. Thus, out of all those who appeared in the interview, 1836 candidates who appeared in the
interview have been left out, however, some of them have done fairly well in the Mains Examination and some have done well in the Personality Test. Indisputably, all these meritorious candidates who have reached the last stage will be either reappearing or quitting their aspiration to serve the country through Civil Services or
similar other services.
Undoubtedly, these are brilliant minds having a reasonably good understanding of the country and performed well in 9 distinct papers of the Mains Examination. It is worth mentioning that those whose names are in the list of 1009 and those whose names could not find a place in the final list do not have many variations. At times it is so painful that at the same cut-off marks, some are in and some are out. The cut- off for CSE 2024 was 947 and there are many candidates who have secured above 900 who are worthy in all respects, but it is the sheer chance that has played the role and they are out.
If the country is unable to utilize its potential for the good of the other departments/organizations/ Public Service Undertakings of Govt of India /state, then it is a loss of opportunity to the nation. Also, the timing of using their capabilities at appropriate time is very critical and should be done at the earliest in the interest of the nation
which has already invested so much in their upbringing and assessing their potential in different stages.
Thus, the prudence lies in considering all interested candidates for direct recruitment to all government services and others, other than those covered under the Civil Services Examination and other 07 Examinations for which UPSC acts as a recruiter and all other public sector and private sector organizations.
Thus, it is a welcoming move by the UPSC to maximize the yield of its efforts and expedite the process of recruitment for all the interested other government departments, organizations, Public Sector Undertakings, etc. who wish to quickly employ these readily available candidates who have marginally lost.
With, the initiative of inviting prospective employers to select suitable human resources amongst those who have marginally lost, not only the candidates will get employed early but also the recruitment cycles of such employers will be shortened. This yields a happy situation of earliest engagement of youth use in the service of the nation and ensures that they do not waste their time merely preparing and trying their luck.
Going by the expected outcome of PRATIBHA Setu, it appears that this practice of maximising the utility of the efforts put in any recruitment cycle should be adopted by all state public service commissions and agencies carrying out recruitments fairly and with integrity. This will not only eliminate the multiplicity of recruitment processes but also help in eliminating long recruitment cycles and quicker employment of youth and usher in the realm of one recruitment process for maximum jobs.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How to write effective answers for UPSC Mains Exam : 3 steps and FAQs
Mains Answer Writing in UPSC is one of the trickiest parts of the preparation. With UPSC Mains 2025 scheduled for August 2025, aspirants are shifting focus to the most challenging aspect of the exam. Since UPSC has never released an official Mains answer format, aspirants often find themselves in a state of confusion about what constitutes a 'perfect answer.' In the process of decoding the art of answer writing for Mains, let's learn how to break down a question into smaller parts and then frame answers to each of the parts to write a decent and scoring answer. Let us consider a previous year question (PYQ) of the UPSC Mains Examination: The growth of the cabinet system has practically resulted in the marginalisation of parliamentary supremacy. Elucidate. (Answer in 150 words) – GS II, UPSC CSE Main Exam, 2024. As a beginner, when one looks at this question for the first time, their task is to break down the entire question into the following 3 steps: are the most important keywords in the questions around which our answer should revolve? 2. Out of the total of 150 words, how many are to be devoted to the introduction, the body, and the conclusion? (Important: Within the body, how many words should be allocated in favour of the argument and how many words are to be devoted against the statement?) 3. Are there any thematic diagrams that can be drawn? Once one has answers to these three questions, they have a very clear understanding of the question and can begin writing. Let us break down the question in consideration into the 3 steps mentioned above. 2. Marginalisation of Parliamentary Supremacy 3. Elucidate Identification of keywords tells us that our answer should incorporate the following dimensions: 1. How has the Cabinet System grown in India over the past few years? Since the directive word is Elaborate, we have to give certain examples to corroborate our arguments, depicting the rising strength of the Cabinet. 2. Alongside, we also have to depict using examples as to how the strength of the Parliament has been overpowered by the Cabinet in recent times and how the Parliamentary agenda is controlled by the rising power of the Cabinet. 3. Whenever the directive word is 'Elucidate', we have to write 75% of the answer in favour of the argument and 25% of the answer depicting the other side of the coin. 4. So, once we have written about the rising power of the Cabinet and the marginalization of the Parliament, we need to use the 25% of the word limit to depict as to how the power of the Cabinet in India is not absolute and still there are Parliamentary checks over it in the spirit of 'Separation of Power' and the overall 'Basic Structure of the Constitution'. Usually, in questions with the Directive Word 'Elucidate', maximum content is to be written in the Body with almost equal proportion of words for introduction and the conclusion. In this 150-word answer, we can do the rationing in the following manner: Introduction – 20-25 Words Body – 100 Words Conclusion – 20-25 Words It is always a good idea to supplement your Mains answer with relevant diagrams, wherever and whenever possible. In the question under consideration, we can try and depict our thought process with the help of a diagram like: In the above diagram, keeping in mind the requirement of the question, I have depicted the areas where the rise of the power of the Cabinet is reducing the power of the Parliament ranging from the Parliamentary Sessions to the legislative business to the budgetary allocation to the Ministries to the announcement of major policy decisions by the Government without discussing them in the Parliament. Such thematic diagrams give a bird's eye view of the answer to the examiner, evoking the interest and the curiosity of the copy evaluator, forcing them to read the entire answer and giving your answer an edge over the others. Once you are ready with the framework in mind and ready to write the answer, make sure you write sub-headings in the answer copy and underline them. This would make your answer more readable and give an evaluator an idea about the clarity of thought with which you have written the answer. With regards to the question under consideration, we can depict the sub-headings in the following manner: Question: What pen should be used while writing an answer? Answer: Pilot pens, which write smoothly on paper, are the best choice for Mains answer writing and are among the most commonly used pens. Question: What should you do when you don't know the answer to a question? Answer: Don't beat around the bush. Answer only the parts of the question that you know. Making up stories or giving vague replies won't fetch you marks. Filling up the answer sheet with irrelevant content is not what UPSC expects. Move on to questions—or parts of questions—that you are more confident about. Question: How can one improve answer-writing speed and quality under exam conditions? Answer: Practice as many questions as possible every day in an exam-simulated environment. Use a stopwatch to ensure you don't exceed 5–7 minutes for a 10-marker and 10–11 minutes for a 15-marker question. Question: How important is the handwriting and presentation in the final evaluation? Answer: Aspirants initially start writing answers at a slow pace. Eventually, due to the paucity of time, they begin to scribble and spoil their handwriting as the exam time runs out. It is important to realise that, from an evaluator's perspective, good handwriting is a very important aspect of answer writing. Good handwriting here means a legible, neat, and clean script. Complement a well-structured answer with good presentation and relevant diagrams to gain an extra edge in the exam. Question: Should answers be written in paragraph form or bullet/point format? Answer: Writing in paragraphs or points depends on the demand of the question. Points or bullet form are preferred by many when the answer is straightforward and needs to be easily readable. However, answers or essays that require a strong introduction and conclusion can have a mix of bullet points (in the body) and paragraph form. (About our Expert: Mudit Gupta has been a mentor and faculty for the UPSC Civil Services exam for 8 years with expertise in CSAT, Polity, International Relations, and Current Affairs.) For any queries and feedback, contact Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at


Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
UPSC aspirant caught using unfair means during govt job exam, barred for 3 years
A civil services aspirant has been barred for three years over the alleged use of unfair means during a government job recruitment exam. Besides, her candidature for the current year's examination also stands cancelled, the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) announced on Friday. UPSC Aspirants seen outside an examination centre in Delhi. (Image for representation)(Hindustan Times) The commission said the woman was found in possession of incriminating material that qualified as the use of unfair means during an exam. "As the candidate has violated the rules of the Examination and is found to be guilty under the rule of the Examination - 12(1)(h) 'being in possession of or using unfair means during the examination'," the UPSC said in a post on Linkedin. The commissions announced the cancellation of the aspirant's candidature for this year, and said she was debarred from appearing in all future examinations conducted by the UPSC for a period of 3 years. The UPSC said that the decision was in line with standardisation of penalties, and also shared a document outlining how violation of rules is dealt with. "Any candidate found guilty of indulging in unfair means or misconduct during examinations faces strict disciplinary action as per rules, including debarment from future examinations, as the strictest action," UPSC Chairman Ajay Kumar was quoted as saying by news agency PTI. The official termed UPSC 'an epitome of merit and fair system' and said that the commission ensures that candidates get selected purely on merit basis. The action against the UPSC aspirant comes over an year after the commission cancelled former IAS probationer Puja Khedkar's provisional candidature. Puja allegedly misrepresented her identity and used forged documents to clear the 2022 civil services examination. She submitted fake Other Backward Class (OBC) and disability certificates, and claimed that her family income was ₹6 lakh per annum, to qualify for the OBC non-creamy layer category. A detailed probe later revealed that her father had declared assets of ₹40 crore when he contested general elections as an Independent, and her family owned several immovable properties and vehicles. (With PTI inputs)


The Print
11 hours ago
- The Print
UPSC candidate caught cheating, barred from future exams for 3 years
UPSC conducts one of the country's most competitive examinations. The UPSC has released details of this case and cancelled the candidature of the candidate. 'The Union Public Service Commission is firmly committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and fairness in its examination processes. Any candidate found guilty of indulging in unfair means or misconduct during examinations faces strict disciplinary action as per rules, including debarment from future examinations, as the strictest action. Such measures are essential to preserve the sanctity of the selection process and to ensure that merit remains the sole criterion for recruitment to the Government services,' said Ajay Kumar, Chairman, UPSC. Rule 12(1)(h)—being in possession of or using unfair means during the examination—is part of a comprehensive code of conduct of UPSC's examination process that aims to ensure a level playing field for everyone. New Delhi: A UPSC candidate has been barred for three years after being caught cheating in the exam. They were caught with incriminating material, violating Rule 12(1)(h) on the use of unfair means. The UPSC has issued a statement. Accordingly, the UPSC has taken stringent disciplinary action in line with standardisation of penalties by cancelling their candidature for the current year's examination and barring the individual from appearing in all future examination(s)/selection(s) to be conducted by the Commission for a period of three years. 'This is the sole reason why UPSC, for the last 100 years, has been the epitome of merit and a fair system, and candidates from any background can get selected purely on merit, as per the selection process,' he added. This incident has come at a time when concerns over the examination process and its integrity have been widely discussed on social media. UPSC is often held as the gold standard for its strict protocol and transparency. After the Pooja Khedkar fake certificate case, a lot of questions were raised on UPSC's certificate verification process. Every year, lakhs of students across the country spend years preparing for various exams conducted by the UPSC. Last week, UPSC conducted the Combined Medical Services Examination. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Puja Khedkar's case only 'tip of iceberg' — why UPSC, DoPT need to improve their verification process