US producer prices unchanged in June
The unchanged reading in the producer price index for final demand last month followed an upwardly revised 0.3% rise in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Wednesday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the PPI rising 0.2% after a previously reported 0.1% gain in May.
In the 12 months through June, the PPI increased 2.3% after advancing 2.7% in May. Data on Tuesday showed consumer prices picking up in June, with solid gains in tariff-exposed goods like household furnishings and supplies, appliances, sporting goods and toys as well as windows, floor coverings and linens.
Economists said June's Consumer Price Index report was likely the start of the tariff-induced increase in inflation from the import duties announced in April.
But some expected slower services price growth because of softening demand for travel and hotel accommodation to partially offset the boost to inflation from tariffs.
President Donald Trump last week announced higher duties would come into effect on August 1 for imports from a range of countries, including Mexico, Japan, Canada and Brazil, and the European Union. Economists expected these tariffs would keep goods prices elevated through the end of the year.
The Federal Reserve is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at a policy meeting later this month. Minutes of the central bank's June 17-18 meeting, which were published last week, showed only "a couple" of officials said they felt rates could fall as soon as the July 29-30 meeting.
Prior to the PPI report, economists estimated that the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increased 0.3% in June after rising 0.2% in May. The so-called core PCE inflation was forecast to have advanced 2.8% on a year-over-year basis last month after climbing 2.7% in May.
The core PCE price index is one of the inflation measures tracked by the U.S. central bank for its 2% target.
(Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pakistan says it held productive trade talks in Washington
By Asif Shahzad ISLAMABAD (Reuters) -Pakistan said it held productive trade talks with the U.S. in Washington on Friday to advance economic cooperation, according to a statement from the South Asian country's finance ministry. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer, the statement said. "Both sides expressed satisfaction with the progress in enhancing trade and economic ties, a cornerstone of Pakistan-U.S. bilateral relations," the statement added. It said Aurangzeb emphasized that the U.S. remained Pakistan's largest trading partner. Both sides expressed optimism that ongoing trade talks would yield positive outcomes, benefiting the economies of both countries, the finance ministry said. Pakistan was optimistic that the trade talks would conclude in a week's time after a virtual meeting between Aurangzeb and Lutnick late last month. The negotiations, focused on reciprocal tariffs, are part of a broader push to reset economic ties at a time of shifting geopolitical alignments and Pakistan's efforts to avoid steep U.S. duties on exports. Pakistan faces a 29% tariff on exports to the U.S. under President Donald Trump's measures to target countries with large trade surpluses with the U.S. Pakistan's surplus was around $3 billion in 2024. To offset the imbalance and ease tariff pressures, Islamabad has offered to import more U.S. goods, including crude oil, and to open up investment opportunities through concessions for U.S. firms in Pakistan's mining sector. U.S.-Pakistan relations saw a major boost when Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last month in an unprecedented meeting. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What retirees should know amid uncertainty: Ask Yahoo Finance
Yahoo Finance Senior Columnist Kerry Hannon joins Mind Your Money with Allie Canal to answer Yahoo Finance readers' top questions about retirement amid market volatility and trade uncertainty. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Mind Your Money here. Market volatility brought stocks to lows in April and back up to near record highs today amid uncertainty around President Trump's trade and tariff policies. The whiplash has left many in or near retirement with questions. And we want to give you answers. So joining me now is Yahoo Finances Carrie Hannon. Ask Yahoo Finance anything. So Carrie, some of your readers wrote in about this. One asks, quote, I am worried about inflation coming back with all this tariff talk. Given how crazy the stock market has seemed to be this year and the cuts at the Social Security Administration, should I be considering delaying my retirement? I had planned it for next year. Carrie, what do you think? Well, you know, this is this is such an individual decision. You know, I'm a big fan of working longer. The longer you can postpone retirement, the fewer years you need to support yourself from all your savings during retirement with longevity. The idea of you retire at 65, you could have three decades to support yourself. So I'm a real big fan of pushing it back. But you really need to look at your own situation. One guideline that Fidelity often uses is if you're 67 and you think you're retirement, you should have 10 times your pre-retirement income set aside. So that's just a way to look at it. But but there's so many individual caveats here. But what I'd like to say is really I encourage you, if you're healthy and you like what you're doing, by all means, if you can stretch it out a little bit more because what it allows you to do is continue to put into retirement accounts to sort of stave off dipping into them and and potentially to push back taking Social Security to age 70 from your full retirement age where you'll get the biggest check for the rest of your life. These are all things that are super positive. And if you're not 65 yet and you're with an employer with health insurance, boom, you've got your some health coverage until then. So again, it really gives you some time if you have a little leeway also. Look about, if you're worried about that volatility, can you adjust your portfolio a little bit? Can you make some rebalancing so you have a cash set aside enough cash to cover some living expenses through next year at least? Should the markets get a little volatile next year as well? Carrie, this next one definitely top of mind. Another reader asks, can AI help me figuring out if I have enough saved for retirement? So, can we trust AI with this, Carrie? AI is not really great with math to be honest with you. But but I do think it can be super helpful. And in fact, I played with it myself with ChatGPT. I looked at it to see what you ask some questions. It is wonderful to answer basic questions about retirement, and it's a great educational tool. I found the answers to be very clear, very direct, straightforward. They counseled me at the end to talk to a financial advisor and to think about my own health whether I might need to have more stocks set aside because investments and stocks so that I had more growth in my retirement savings in case I were to have a longevity and longer life. So I asked for example, what at my age, how much should I have of my portfolio and stocks? I asked what is a target date retirement fund. And I asked when should I start taking Social Security? And I would say it was super helpful what they told me, but again, they definitely covered the bases and said, go talk to a financial advisor for your situation. Carrie, you also got a question on Medicare coverage given some of the recent cuts and changes under the Trump administration. This reader says, I am flummoxed. I love that word flummoxed. When it comes to choosing the right Medicare coverage, who can I ask to help or can AI help? Another reader wondering if AI can help answer these difficult questions for us. I know, AI is just so buzzy right now. It's top of mind. Yeah, AI once again, like I said about the retirement planning idea, it can help you. It's a great way to compare what is Medicare, traditional Medicare, what is Medicare Advantage? What are the pros and cons of these things? It can give you some really good educational basics about Medicare. It's not going to tell you what the right plan is for you. This is a very personal decision, and all of these elements go into it. So I really do think yes, by all means you can check out there some good ones out there to ask some questions about what it is that Medicare can do for you and what things you need to be thinking about. But you might, if you're working with a financial advisor, they should be able to send you, they might recommend somebody who specializes in Medicare coverage to walk you through some of the possibilities for you. And you can also go, there's a couple of different places that can offer some free advice. The first one is the, and I'm going to look down to make sure I say it right, the State Health Insurance Assistance program. These are in all the states, and they're free right now. Medicare Rights Center also offers some help for you as well as going straight to Medicare. They have got some great resources there as well. But again, it's a big decision. Take your time. Yes, use AI to sort of get the nuts and bolts of it, but but you're going to need to talk to somebody one on one to decide what's best for you. We have a bonus question for you, Carrie. One of your readers says, I turned 65 later this year, and I'm still working. Do I need to apply for Medicare? What say you? Oh, here's that's a really great question because as I just said, work longer, work longer. So the point the point is, if you are employed at 65 and your employer provides health insurance, you should check with HR there, but yes, you should be perfectly fine staying on your employer plan. That said, you absolutely have to apply for Medicare. I think you have a three-month window before you turn 65 and that you need to apply for. Don't apply for Medicare B part B, but you need to enroll in part A. That's all you have to do. There's nothing beyond that, but you need to get started in the system that way. And then when you leave your employer, then you can step back in and do the other things. But again, you might call directly for your situation. But you you should be covered by your employer at that stage, but you do need to sign up. Related Videos How to save and pay for a last-minute summer vacation Tesla earnings: 3 things to watch for IBKR jumps, Amex earnings, Union Pacific reportedly in deal talks Why 'very solid' earnings results are getting muted reactions Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Waller says he's willing to lead Fed if Trump asks, but no contact so far
By Howard Schneider WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller, an advocate for an immediate interest rate cut, said on Friday he would accept the job as head of the U.S. central bank if asked by President Donald Trump, but so far Trump has not contacted him about it. "In 2019 the president contacted me and said, 'Would you serve?' And I said yes," Waller told Bloomberg Television, referring to Trump's appointment of him to the Fed's Board of Governors. "If the president contacted me and said, 'I want you to serve,' I would do it. But he has not contacted me." Trump has launched a barrage of nearly daily criticism at Fed Chair Jerome Powell over the central bank's reluctance to cut rates due to concern the administration's trade and tariff policies will increase inflation. Waller favors a rate cut at the Fed's upcoming July 29-30 meeting because he feels the tariffs are likely to have a limited impact on inflation, and he is concerned the economy and private-sector hiring are starting to slow. Though the unemployment rate is low, Waller said underlying data "are not indicating a super healthy private-sector labor market," and the Fed should "get ahead" of a possible hiring slowdown. The U.S. central bank is widely expected to keep its benchmark interest rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its upcoming meeting. Only Waller and another Trump appointee, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, favor a cut that soon, though eight of their colleagues have indicated a reduction in the policy rate could happen in September. Waller, who has said explicitly that his rate stance is "not political," has been credited by economists for making a cogent case for lower rates, even as administration officials have tried to amplify pressure on Powell over cost overruns in a renovation of the Fed's headquarters in Washington. Trump, who feels rates should be slashed to levels more aligned with a recession, has repeatedly said Powell should resign. Powell has vowed to remain Fed chief until his term expires in May. Waller "is not talking about cost overruns on the Eccles Building or lowering the cost of government finance or 'regime change,' but he is talking about the shifting balance of risks in the economy," Neil Dutta, head of economics at Renaissance Macro Research, wrote in an analysis that argued appointing Waller to succeed Powell was "the most obvious way" for Trump to boost his impact at the Fed. CASTING CALL As a sitting Fed governor, Waller would have an immediate vote and voice on policy if tapped to succeed Powell. Others mentioned as possible nominees include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, and Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor and perennial critic of the central bank since leaving its Board of Governors in 2011. In an extended television interview this week, Warsh said the Fed needed "regime change." As it stands, Bessent, Hassett or Warsh could not join the central bank's seven-member board until Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's seat expires in February. Bessent said this week a "formal process" was underway to choose a successor to Powell, who was elevated from governor to the Fed's top job by Trump in 2018 but quickly fell out with the president in a similar dispute over interest rates. While Waller, a former economics professor and research director at the St. Louis Fed, acknowledges that cutting rates in September rather than in two weeks wouldn't matter much to the economic outcome, the Fed's reluctance to reduce rates has stoked Trump's anger since he returned to office in January. The president seemed ready to try to fire Powell earlier this week. Though his ability to do so is legally doubtful, the lingering threat of a move against the Fed chief has made the economic logic for or against a rate cut seemingly secondary to the debate about the implications of Trump's actions for the Fed's independence in setting monetary policy. Central banks' ability to focus on inflation in setting rates and not, for example, to help finance government spending, as Trump says he wants, is widely accepted as a staple of sound economic management and the best way to keep inflation in check. Finance leaders from the Group of 20 countries, including a representative from the U.S. Treasury, issued on Friday a final communique stressing the importance of central bank independence following a two-day meeting in Durban, South Africa. "Central banks are strongly committed to ensuring price stability, consistent with their respective mandates, and will continue to adjust their policies in a data-dependent manner. Central bank independence is crucial to achieving this goal," the communique said. Key Republican members of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, which would have to confirm a new Fed chief or governor, also emphasized the point this week. Powell has made building strong ties in Congress a key aspect of his tenure as Fed chief. "It really is best for the economic conditions in our country that the markets understand that the Fed really is independent. And I think that will pay dividends for the administration," Republican Senator Mike Rounds told reporters this week. "I personally have a good working relationship with the chairman. I'm going to continue to have that. And I respect the independence that he is trying to maintain."
