logo
Kemi Badenoch says she does not feel Nigerian and no longer has passport

Kemi Badenoch says she does not feel Nigerian and no longer has passport

Yahoo01-08-2025
Kemi Badenoch has said she does not see herself as Nigerian and no longer has a passport for the country.
The Conservative Party leader was born in the UK but grew up in Nigeria.
When the country's economy collapsed in the 1990s, her parents took advantage of her British passport to get her out, sending her at the age of 16 to live with a family friend in south London to continue her education.
She said she had not renewed her Nigerian passport in two decades in an interview with the Rosebud podcast.
'I have not renewed my Nigerian passport, I think, not since the early 2000s.
'I don't identify with it any more, most of my life has been in the UK and I've just never felt the need to.'
She said she had to get a visa to visit the country when her father died, which she described as a 'big fandango'.
'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents… but by identity I'm not really.
'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I'm very interested in what happens there.
'But home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws. The Conservative party is very much part of my family – my extended family, I call it,' she said.
The North West Essex MP said her early experiences in Nigeria shaped her political outlook, including 'why I don't like socialism'.
'And I remember never quite feeling that I belonged there,' she added.
The Tory leader said the reason she returned to the UK as a teenager was a 'a very sad one'.
'It was that my parents thought: 'There is no future for you in this country'.'
She has not experienced racial prejudice in Britain 'in any meaningful form', she said.
'I knew I was going to a place where I would look different to everybody, and I didn't think that that was odd,' she said.
'What I found actually quite interesting was that people didn't treat me differently, and it's why I'm so quick to defend the UK whenever there are accusations of racism.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warning Labour ‘won't be trusted on renters' rights' as landlord MPs rake in £830k in a year
Warning Labour ‘won't be trusted on renters' rights' as landlord MPs rake in £830k in a year

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Warning Labour ‘won't be trusted on renters' rights' as landlord MPs rake in £830k in a year

Labour has been warned the government won't be trusted on renters' rights after it emerged that MPs rake in at least £830,000 a year in rent. Some 83 members of parliament earn a minimum of £10,000 from renting properties, according to the latest register of interests, with Sir Keir Starmer's party leading the pack of mostly residential landlords. The true figure which MPs earn from rent is unknown, but is likely to be higher than £830,000, as 170 registered properties have received rental income in the past year. Campaigners said the number of landlords in parliament was 'shocking' and called for greater scrutiny over what they described as a 'blatant conflict of interest' when voting on legislation that would directly affect them. High-profile ministerial landlords include chancellor Rachel Reeves and foreign secretary David Lammy. Ms Reeves moved to Downing Street following her new role in government. It comes as the government reels from the resignation of homelessness minister Rushanara Ali, who quit over claims she evicted tenants from a property she owns and then increased the rent by several hundred pounds. She was accused of 'staggering hypocrisy' as her department is bringing in legislation to ban landlords who evict tenants in order to sell their property from relisting it for rent for six months. Ms Ali is not Labour's only landlord, nor its most profitable. In fact, many of the most property-rich MPs are members of Sir Keir's party, data from the parliamentary register of interests shows. Tulip Siddiq, Labour's anti-corruption minister who stepped down amid investigations she was gifted a flat by an ally of her aunt Sheikh Hasina, also declares rental income from two properties. MPs have registered income from 170 properties across the UK, with at least £10,000 generated in yearly profits per landlord. But this is probably higher in some cases, considering that average monthly rents are £1,399 in the UK. The majority of these (86 per cent) are residential properties, meaning they are being leased out to private renters, not businesses. Eight MPs have declared that they have stopped receiving rental income at some point in the past year. The figure does not include properties rented by some MPs who charge less than £10,000 a year, such as Sir Keir, who has previously revealed he rents to his sister. The highest concentration of properties rented out are in London, Edinburgh, Guildford and Oxford, with Lib Dem MP Charlie Maynard declaring rent for a house in upstate New York. Some 82 of these are rented out by Labour MPs. Ilford Labour MP Jas Athwal is the most prominent landlord in the Commons, renting 15 residential properties and three commercial, including a private care home. Mr Athwal's rental earnings come alongside his MP salary of £93,904. Mr Athwal came under fire soon after being elected, as his tenants claimed their flats were filled with black mould and ant infestations. He has since stood down from his role as a councillor in Redbridge. The register also shows that one in five Tory MPs – 27 out of 121 – are also landlords, down from 83 in the previous parliament. Former chancellor Jeremy Hunt is the Conservatives' biggest landlord, taking rent from eight residential properties and one office building, partly through his property holding company Mare Pond Properties. In 2023, flats owned by Mr Hunt in Southampton were reportedly rented out for £1,700 to £2,000 a month. Tory MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton Brown is also the landlord of five residential properties, and was among a group of backbench MPs who were accused last year of signing amendments to gut the now-scrapped Renters' Reform Bill. Jae Vail, spokesperson for the London Renters Union, said: "The sheer number of landlords in parliament is shocking. 'During an unprecedented housing crisis, it's a blatant conflict of interest that MPs are making millions from struggling renters – while some even use taxpayer money to cover their own personal rents. Tenants need a government that works for us, not one that profits from our hardship. Until parliament is free of landlord MPs, renters will not trust the government to deliver the bold action we need. It's time for the government to ban landlords from parliament and start working for ordinary people, investing in council housing and capping rents." Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said 'it probably doesn't reflect well on parliament' that so many MPs are landlords. 'In the longer term, renters risk losing confidence in a political system where those that extract rent from them are hugely overrepresented – and it certainly didn't help the last government's efforts to pass the Renters' [Reform] Bill," he said. A Labour spokesperson said: "There are rightly strict parliamentary rules that MPs must adhere to when renting property. 'Our Labour government is delivering landmark legislation transforming rights and security for renters across the country. Tory MPs opposed it every step of the way, Labour will deliver it." Rishi Sunak's government was accused of watering down planned protections for renters in England, after some Conservative MPs raised concerns they would be too burdensome on landlords. The Independent has also reached out to the Conservative Party and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government for comment.

Hundreds to face arrest at protest against Palestine Action terror ban
Hundreds to face arrest at protest against Palestine Action terror ban

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds to face arrest at protest against Palestine Action terror ban

Hundreds of people are expected to risk arrest as they descend on London to show support for Palestine Action in defiance of its ban as a terror group. The Metropolitan Police said it has drawn officers in from other forces to help form a 'significant policing presence' in the capital as it faces a busy weekend of protests. More than 500 people are expected to hold up placards supporting the proscribed group in Parliament Square, after organisers Defend Our Juries announced earlier this week the event would go ahead. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. It comes days after the first three people to be charged with supporting the group in England and Wales were named. Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, also 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, have all been charged with displaying an article in a public place, arousing reasonable suspicion that they are a supporter of a proscribed organisation after their attendance at a previous demonstration last month. More than 200 people have been arrested in the wave of Defend Our Juries protests across the UK since the ban was implemented by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper last month. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ade Adelekan said: 'The Met is very experienced at dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality, requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Anyone showing support for Palestine Action can expect to be arrested. I would once again urge people to consider the seriousness of that outcome. 'An arrest under the Terrorism Act can have very real long-term implications – from travel, to employment, to finances. Also, as we have seen this week, it is very likely an arrest in these circumstances will lead to a charge.' Two marches organised by the Palestine Coalition and pro-Israeli group Stop the Hate, respectively, will also be held on consecutive days in central London. The coalition's supporters will march from Russell Square to Whitehall followed by an assembly with speeches. Public order conditions have been imposed on the march which means it must not form or begin before noon, protesters must not deviate from or stop to form assemblies along the agreed route and the protest must end by 5.30pm, the Met said. Other major events in London this weekend include the Community Shield match between Liverpool and Crystal Palace at Wembley, which will require sizeable police resources. 'This is going to be a particularly busy few days in London with many simultaneous protests and events that will require a significant policing presence,' Mr Adelekan said. 'I'm grateful not just to the Met officers who will be working incredibly hard over the coming days but to those colleagues from other forces who have been deployed to London to support us.'

Starmer faces call to ‘sit this one out' on Gaza amid US-UK ‘disagreement'
Starmer faces call to ‘sit this one out' on Gaza amid US-UK ‘disagreement'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer faces call to ‘sit this one out' on Gaza amid US-UK ‘disagreement'

Sir Keir Starmer has faced a call to 'sit this one out' on Gaza, after the Prime Minister warned the Israeli government against pursuing its plan to take control of Gaza City. Washington's ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also suggested that Sir Keir would have lost Britain the Second World War, had he been in No 10 at the time. Earlier on Friday, US vice president JD Vance described a 'disagreement' about how the US and UK could achieve their 'common objectives' in the Middle East, and said Donald Trump's administration had 'no plans to recognise a Palestinian state'. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office has unveiled new principles for military action which include 'the demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip', 'Israeli security control in the Gaza Strip' and 'the establishment of an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority'. The Israel Defence Forces 'will prepare for taking control of Gaza City while distributing humanitarian assistance to the civilian population outside the combat zones'. After Sir Keir described the decision as being 'wrong' and called for a 'surge in humanitarian aid', Mr Huckabee wrote: 'So Israel is expected to surrender to Hamas and feed them even though Israeli hostages are being starved? 'Did UK surrender to Nazis and drop food to them? Ever heard of Dresden, PM Starmer? 'That wasn't food you dropped. If you had been PM then UK would be speaking German.' In a follow-up post, the ambassador suggested Sir Keir 'ought to sit this one out'. In a statement, Sir Keir had said: 'The Israeli government's decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong, and we urge it to reconsider immediately. 'This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed. 'Every day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens and hostages taken by Hamas are being held in appalling and inhuman conditions. 'What we need is a ceasefire, a surge in humanitarian aid, the release of all hostages by Hamas and a negotiated solution. 'Hamas can play no part in the future of Gaza and must leave as well as disarm. 'Together with our allies, we are working on a long-term plan to secure peace in the region as part of a two-state solution, and ultimately achieve a brighter future for Palestinians and Israelis. 'But without both sides engaging in good faith negotiations, that prospect is vanishing before our eyes.' Sir Keir has pledged to recognise a Palestinian state in September unless the Israeli government meets a series of conditions towards ending the war in Gaza. These include taking 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza', 'agreeing to a ceasefire, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank'. At Foreign Secretary David Lammy's grace-and-favour retreat in Kent, Mr Vance said the UK 'is going to make its decision' on Palestinian recognition. 'We have no plans to recognise a Palestinian state,' he said. 'I don't know what it would mean to really recognise a Palestinian state given the lack of functional government there.' Mr Vance added: 'There's a lot of common objectives here. There is some, I think, disagreement about how exactly to accomplish those common objectives, but look, it's a tough situation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store