
Default bail not an option in drug cases: Calcutta HC
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
However, the division bench of justices Debangsu Basak and Md Shabbar Rashidi held that, as of today, the law is that a charge sheet is complete if the materials and evidence are before the court along with the charge sheet for the court to take cognisance. Filing a supplementary charge sheet to bring on the record the forensic laboratory test report is also permissible."Bombay and Guwahati HCs have held that a charge sheet without the chemical examination report does not entitle the accused to default bail. On the strength of the authorities presently subsisting, we are not in a position to return a finding that the charge sheet without the chemical examination report makes the investigation incomplete," the HC held. The four accused had applied for bail on March 26. The police had filed a charge sheet, and subsequently a supplementary charge sheet along with a chemical report. A commercial quantity of brown sugar was seized from the accused.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Quota anomalies' in 69K teachers' recruitment in UP: Candidates protest outside minister's place
Alleging reservation scam in 19,000 posts in 69,000 assistant teacher recruitment, a large number of candidates from reserved categories staged a protest outside basic education minister Sandeep Singh's residence at Mall Avenue here on Monday. Policemen taking away one of the protestors in Lucknow on August 18. (HT photo) From there, police sent them to Eco Garden in vehicles. The education directorate at Nishatganj was turned into a fortress in the wake of the protest. 'We have not yet got justice in this recruitment,' the protesters claimed. They said if the government does not take the initiative for hearing in the Supreme Court and keeps getting dates after dates from the apex court, they will stage sit-in protests every day in Lucknow and also gherao the residences of BJP leaders. Talks were held with additional chief secretary, basic education, Deepak Kumar, on the issue but nothing came out of it, said one of the protesters Dhananjay Gupta. On the call of Pichda Dalit Samyukta Morcha's state president Sushil Kashyap and state patron Bhaskar Singh, the 'aggrieved' candidates claimed to have sent hundreds of letters to the Chief Justice of India in which it was, as per the protestors, clearly stated that for the last 12 months the plaint of the candidates was not being heard in the Supreme Court and dates were being given one after the other due to which they were very upset. The protesters said in such a situation, the apex court should start hearing their case so that they can get justice. Sushil Kashyap and Bhaskar Singh alleged that in the said recruitment, OBC category has been given only 3.86% reservation instead of 27%, SC category has been given only 16.2% reservation instead of 21% and thus in this recruitment, Basic Education Rules 1981 and Reservation Rules 1994 have been violated. They also alleged that the original selection of this recruitment was not being made public for the last 5 years despite the order of a division bench of the Allahabad high court issued on August 13. 2024, 'which shows that there has been a huge reservation scam in the said recruitment'. Basic education department officials said the matter was pending in the court and they will abide by the order of the Supreme Court.

The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
Assam Police Invoke Sedition Law in Second Case Against The Wire, Naming Varadarajan, Karan Thapar
Law The summons was issued on the very day the Supreme Court granted protection to The Wire's journalists from any coercive action in relation to an FIR filed in the state on July 11 and issued notice on the news platform's writ challenging the vires of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (R-L) Siddharth Varadarajan, Karan Thapar and Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. Photos: File/PTI New Delhi: On August 12, 2025 – the day the Supreme Court issued notice on The Wire 's petition challenging the constitutionality of the new sedition law and protected its journalists, including founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan from any 'coercive action' by Assam Police in a case filed in Morigaon in July – the Guwahati Crime Branch summoned Varadarajan and senior journalist Karan Thapar in a fresh 'sedition' FIR filed by the state police. The summons for Varadarajan, issued by police inspector Soumarjyoti Ray under section S.35(3), BNSS, referred to an FIR (03/2025) registered at the Crime Branch, Panganj, Guwahati, under sections 152, 196, 197(1)(D)/3(6), 353, 45 and 61. However, the FIR date was not mentioned, no details of the alleged offence were provided and a copy of the FIR was not included – as the police are legally obliged to do while serving a summons under this section of the BNSS. The summons was received at The Wire 's office here on August 14. Today (August 18), an identical summons was received in the name of Thapar, for the same FIR. Claiming that 'it is revealed that there are reasonable grounds to question you to ascertain the facts and circumstances from you, in relation to the present investigation,' both Varadarajan and Thapar have been directed to appear at the Crime Branch office in Panbazaar, Guwahati on Friday, August 22. 'Failure to attend/ comply with the terms of this Notice can render you liable for arrest', the summons adds. While the FIR registered against Varadarajan in Morigaon on July 11, 2025, pertains to a complaint filed by a BJP officeholder over a story published in The Wire on June 28, 2025 (IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache), it is not apparent what article or video the Crime Branch FIR relates to. Even in the Morigaon case, as The Wire 's counsel Nitya Ramakrishan informed the Supreme Court, the FIR was kept a secret and it was only through well-placed sources that it became possible to learn of the complaint, the date of the FIR, and the criminal sections invoked. It was on this basis that The Wire approached the court to challenge the vires of Section 152 of BNS and the bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice. Section 152 of BNS ('Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India') is the rebranded version of India's earlier sedition provision (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, Section) that the apex court stayed in 2022. Varadarajan and Thapar have responded to the summons by drawing attention to the requirement – laid down by the Supreme Court – for FIRs to be made public and copies given to the accused. They have also noted a Karnataka high court judgment which says that a police summons without a copy of the FIR accompanying it is invalid. The Wire 's legal representatives in Guwahati say there is no trace of the FIR in the magistrate's court. Reporters in Assam have also failed to get the police in Guwahati to provide any details about the new case. In their response to the summons, both Varadarajan and Thapar have said they are ready and willing to cooperate with any investigation, but the preconditions laid down by India's constitutional courts have to be fulfilled in any case. Please note, their reply says, that they "cannot be conceivably summoned and expected to answer questions on a matter, to ascertain the 'facts and circumstances in relation to the present investigation', without being supplied with the contents of the FIR to which your investigation pertains." The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Cash-for-jobs case: SC grants bail to ex-WB minister Partha Chatterjee with rider
The Supreme Court on Monday granted bail to former West Bengal Education Minister and Trinamool Congress Secretary General Partha Chatterjee in a corruption case linked to the alleged multi-crore cash-for-school job scam. The Supreme Court has granted bail to Partha Chatterjee in the teacher recruitment case. However, his release is contingent on the trial court recording statements from key witnesses. The court has also granted bail to Subires Bhattacharya and Shantiprasad Sinha. Chatterjee, a former West Bengal minister, has been in jail for nearly three years. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Supreme Court on Monday granted bail to former West Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee in teacher recruitment case investigated by the CBI but said he would be released after the trial court records statements of material witnesses.A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh noted Chatterjee spent nearly three years in jail and his continued incarceration would be a "travesty of justice".The top court directed the charges to be framed within four weeks under the Prevention of Corruption Act against public servants with the statements being recorded within two also granted bail to Subires Bhattacharya and Shantiprasad Sinha in the has been an MLA since 2001 and was a minister in West Bengal from 2011 to 2022 holding the education portfolio in the state since was accused of being involved in a racket effecting illegal appointments of unmerited candidates to the posts of primary school teachers, assistant school teachers and other posts in the education several unsuccessful candidates in the teachers eligibility test conducted by the West Bengal Board of Primary Education moved the Calcutta High Court, the latter ordered a CBI probe into the allegations on June 8, CBI registered an FIR the next day and the ED lodged a case on June 24, 2022 against several office-bearers of the state education agencies conducted a raid at Chatterjee's premises on July 22, 2022 and claimed to have seized incriminating documents relating to 12 immovable properties in the name of Chatterjee's close associates and documents showing the appointment of Group D conducted in the residential premises of a close aide of Chatterjee further led to the seizure of Rs 21.9 crore in cash and gold jewellery worth over Rs 76 trial court rejected Chatterjee's bail application on August 3, 2023, and the high court turned down his plea for relief on April 30.