
Residential plots in Karachi: Notification legalising commercial activities withdrawn by SBCA
Sindh High Court (SHC) heard a petition filed by Jamaat-e-Islami Karachi challenging the Sindh government's move to legalize the commercial use of residential plots.
During the proceedings, Director-General of SBCA, Ishaq Khoro, submitted a response in court stating that the notification issued on March 13 has been withdrawn.
Following this, the SHC issued a brief order and disposed-off the petition.
The petition was filed by opposition leader of the City Council, Saifuddin Advocate, along with nine town chairmen.
Saifuddin Advocate hailed the development as a victory for the public of Karachi, describing the move to allow commercial use of residential plots as part of a conspiracy to damage the city.
He noted that Jamaat-e-Islami's constitutional struggle had been successful, emphasizing that the city's layout should not be distorted.
He also pledged to continue the fight against illegal commercial activities, demanding accountability for those responsible for the plot to alter the city's master plan.
He added that the decision to legalize commercial use of residential areas was driven by the personal interests of a few, to the detriment of the city's future.
Earlier, the SHC had clubbed petitions of Jamaat Islami and Pasban challenging amendments to the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 with a previous petition under hearing of the court.
Jamaat Islami's lawyer argued before the court that a residential plot could not be used for commercial activities. 'There is a procedure to convert the residential plot into commercial,' JI lawyer argued.
'It required an NOC from the Master Plan, KDA and other concerned departments as well as meeting necessary preconditions,' the lawyer said.
'After the amendment in regulations, only the SBCA's NOC required to convert the residential plot into commercial,' JI lawyer said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Lahore set to launch Pakistan's first electric tram
Listen to article Lahore is set to see electric trams on its roads, marking a new milestone following the Metro Bus, Orange Line Metro Train, Speedo feeder buses, and Electro Green buses. The first electric tram, imported from China, has arrived in the city and is currently being assembled at the Ali Town Depot. Officials said the tram, designed to operate without a conventional rail track, will initially run as a pilot project along the Canal Road. A demonstration for senior government officials and transport specialists is expected in the first or second week of August at the Lahore Expo Centre. The state-of-the-art tram consists of three interconnected compartments and can carry more than 200 passengers. Fully electric, it can travel up to 27 kilometres on a 10-minute charge. Although capable of autonomous operation through a digital navigation system, it will be manually operated by drivers in Pakistan due to safety considerations. The vehicle is equipped with steering controls and is designed to operate alongside regular traffic without requiring significant infrastructure changes. 'This is the latest technology, recently introduced in cities like Abu Dhabi and two Chinese urban centres, and soon to begin operations in Budapest,' said Punjab Transport Minister Bilal Akbar Khan. 'We are optimistic that Lahore and Gujranwala will see this service before Budapest.' Also Read: Eight SBCA officers get bail in building collapse case The minister added that the tram would operate along the Canal Road corridor, from Thokar Niaz Baig to Harbanspura, during the trial phase. Authorities will monitor the tram's interaction with existing traffic and assess whether a dedicated lane is necessary. However, constructing such a lane could involve cutting trees and road expansion — options the government aims to avoid to keep project costs under control. A test run is also proposed for Main Boulevard, Gulberg. If successful, the tram system may be expanded to other cities, including Faisalabad and Gujranwala, during the current fiscal year. The initiative is part of Punjab's five-year transport modernisation strategy approved earlier this year. At a February meeting chaired by Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, officials outlined plans for an Automated Rapid Transit (ART) system, a cutting-edge, trackless electric bus network modelled after systems already operational in Abu Dhabi, Malaysia, and Qatar. Read More: Commercial waste pollutes water bodies in K-P The ART vehicles will feature three coaches, accommodating up to 300 passengers, with onboard Wi-Fi, CCTV surveillance, and rapid charging capabilities at solar-powered smart stations. The system is designed to reduce the need for specialised tracks, making it cost-efficient and space-saving. 'The goal is to introduce modern public transportation not just in major urban centres, but also in smaller cities across Punjab,' said the CM. 'This initiative will improve quality of life and reduce disparities across the province.' The ART system is expected to be rolled out in 10 cities over three phases, beginning with Lahore, Faisalabad, and Gujranwala.


Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
JI moves SHC against commercialisation of parks by KMC
KARACHI: Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Karachi has approached the Sindh High Court (SHC) to challenge the alleged commercialization of public parks by the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) under the guise of public-private partnerships. The constitutional petition, submitted on Monday, was filed by Saifuddin Advocate, the opposition leader in the city council, along with several JI-affiliated town chairmen. The petition names the KMC and Karachi's mayor as respondents, accusing them of unlawfully handing over public amenity spaces to private parties. Speaking to media outside the SHC, Saifuddin Advocate said that the city's already limited public spaces were shrinking further due to such actions. 'The mayor and KMC are following in the footsteps of the MQM, which introduced the concept of 'china cutting'; a term for illegally converting amenity plots, including parks, into commercial or residential spaces,' he alleged. Saifuddin Advocate added that the Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP), now in control of the city government, was continuing the same exploitative approach. 'This regime is trying to make money by handing over parks to private companies, violating the spirit of public amenities,' he said. Citing the Constitution and existing court rulings, he emphasized that amenity plots, including parks, are not to be used for commercial purposes under any circumstances. Despite this, he noted, the PPP-led administration had recently leased a nursing hostel belonging to the Karachi Institute of Heart Diseases (KIHD) to a private party for just 250 thousand rupees per month, without even tabling the deal before the city council. He stressed that such decisions are not only unlawful but also deprive citizens of essential public spaces. Saifuddin Advocate vowed that the JI would continue to resist these measures, both in the council and the courts, to protect the rights of Karachi residents. The petition reflects growing political friction over the management of the city's public assets, particularly as accusations mount against the current municipal leadership for lacking transparency and undermining community welfare. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Express Tribune
18-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Top court orders fresh review of promotion case
In an interesting development, the apex court has remanded back to the High-Powered Selection Board (HPSB) the case of a retired civil servant for him for proforma promotion "de novo". A proforma promotion is a type of promotion given to an employee without a change in the current post, pay, or responsibilities, but with the intent to maintain parity with a junior or peer who may have been promoted due to structural or administrative reasons. The court has noted that the promotion should be considered in accordance with the exactitudes of Fundamental Rule 17 (FR 17) — with fair, impartial and meaningful consideration and deliberation of all Performance Evaluation Reports (PERs) of the petitioner. "The entire exercise should be completed within a period of two months from receiving the copy of this judgment," said an order issued by a three-member bench led by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar. The petitioner, Ghulam Qadir Thebo, was promoted to BS-21 on April 3, 2013. He was, however, superseded thrice from consideration for promotion to BS-22 without assigning any reason. In the second meeting of the HPSB convened on October 5, 2017, the petitioner's name appeared at Sr No 07 in the seniority list of BS-21 officers. However, officers who were junior to the petitioner were promoted. In the third meeting, his name was at Sr No 04, yet once again, his case was not considered by the HPSB, and two more officers junior to him were promoted. The petitioner submitted departmental representations to the Prime Minister of Pakistan and Secretary Establishment Division. However, no response was received. ' According to the petitioner, the denial of promotion by the HPSB was in utter disregard of his fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 4, 9, 10-A, 18 and 25 of the Constitution. He later filed a constitutional petition in the Sindh High Court (SHC) in 2018. During the pendency of the petition, the HPSB again considered the petitioner's case and in the comments submitted by the respondents, certain allegations regarding his performance and integrity were levelled, which were entirely outside the dossier. The SHC later dismissed his petition on January 27, 2022. The SC noted that the question of eligibility correlates to the terms and conditions of service, whereas fitness for promotion is a subjective evaluation based on an objective criterion. "Though consideration for promotion is a right, the promotion itself cannot be claimed as a right. There is no vested right in promotion or rules determining the eligibility for promotion. "However, it cannot be lost sight of that an employee may, under the relevant law/rules, claim to be considered for promotion within the prescribed law, rules, regulations and policies providing criteria for promotion." It said the SC has ruled that if a person is not considered due to any administrative slip-up, error, or delay when the right to be considered for promotion has matured, and without such consideration, he reaches the age of superannuation, then obviously the avenue of proforma promotion comes into play for his rescue. "If he lost his promotion on account of any administrative oversight or delay in the meeting of DPC or Selection Board, despite having fitness, eligibility, and seniority, then in all fairness, he has a legitimate expectation for proforma promotion with consequential benefits. "The provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in the FR 17."