
63 Opposition MPs submit notice in Rajya Sabha for removal of Justice Varma
Congress MP Syed Naseer Hussain said the notice has been submitted to Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar.
A similar notice for moving a motion to remove Justice Varma has been submitted by ruling BJP and Opposition members in the Lok Sabha.
Also Read | Over 100 MPs have signed impeachment motion against Justice Yaswant Varma, says Kiren Rijiju
Mr. Hussain said, '63 opposition MPs, including those from AAP and INDIA bloc parties, have given a notice to the Rajya Sabha Chairman for removal of Justice Varma.'
Although Trinamool Congress members were not present on the day, they are on board on the issue and will submit their signatures later, he said.
A motion for the removal of a judge has to be signed by not less than 100 MPs in the Lok Sabha and 50 in the Rajya Sabha.
The motion can either be accepted or rejected by the Speaker/Chairman of the House.
If the motion is admitted, the Speaker or the Chairman of the House forms a three-member committee in accordance with the Judges Inquiry Act.
Also Read | Supreme Court's in-house inquiry usurps Parliament's authority, erodes judicial independence: Justice Varma
The committee comprising a senior judge of the Supreme Court, a sitting Chief Justice of a High Court and a distinguished jurist will then probe the charges levelled against Justice Varma and come out with a report in three months.
The inquiry report will be tabled in Parliament followed by a discussion in both Houses, after which there will be voting on the motion for removal of Justice Varma.
Though Justice Varma has denied any wrongdoing, a Supreme Court-appointed in-house inquiry panel has concluded that the judge and his family members had covert or active control over the storeroom, where the cash was found, proving his misconduct serious enough to seek his removal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Economic blackmail': Rahul Gandhi slams Trump's 50 per cent tariff on India
NEW DELHI: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said US President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods is "economic blackmail" to bully India into an unfair trade deal. Soon after Trump announced a penalty of another 25 per cent on India for buying Russian oil, the former Congress president said Prime Minister Narendra Modi should not let Indian interests be overridden. "Trump's 50% tariff is economic blackmail - an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal. "PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people," Gandhi said in a post on X.


India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
Revanth Reddy takes backward classes quota battle to Delhi, Vijay Deverakonda questioned by ED
This episode of Super 6 covers the Telangana government's push for a 42% reservation for backward classes, led by Chief Minister Revanth Reddy, who protested at Delhi's Jantar Mantar to demand presidential approval for bills passed by the state assembly in March 2025. The proposed legislation aims to increase the reservation quota to 67%, surpassing the Supreme Court's 50% cap, and faces opposition from the BJP over the inclusion of a Muslim quota and criticism from the BRS regarding the protest strategy. A controversy erupted after the Chief Minister warned that opposing Rahul Gandhi's stance would lead to political consequences in Telangana. Additionally, the bulletin highlights an investigation in Dharamsthala, Karnataka, where poisonous substances were found in skeletal remains from two sites, actor Vijay Deverakonda's questioning by the ED in online betting app case and much more.


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC refuses to grant relief to IAS officer in graft case
Cuttack: The Supreme Court refused to grant relief to senior IAS officer Bishnupada Sethi in a corruption case, dismissing his plea challenging an order by Orissa high court that had denied him anticipatory bail. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih in its order on Aug 4 said it was 'not inclined to interfere' with the high court's July 28 ruling. However, the court allowed Sethi the liberty to surrender and apply for regular bail, saying it would be considered 'on its own merits'. The case stems from the arrest of a group general manager of a public sector unit on Dec 8, 2024, for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 10 lakh from a Bhubaneswar-based real estate firm. During interrogation of the manager, Sethi's name reportedly emerged, following which CBI raided the senior bureaucrat's residence on Feb 18 this year. Sethi had earlier approached the high court for anticipatory bail after his petition seeking to quash the CBI probe was dismissed on June 20. The high court termed his plea 'premature' as the investigation was still at an early stage.