logo
Intel Wins Lawsuit Dismissal Over $32 Billion Stock Crash

Intel Wins Lawsuit Dismissal Over $32 Billion Stock Crash

Economic Times25-07-2025
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value.While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value.While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value.While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business.Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including Amazon.com and Qualcomm, while still making chips and wafers for internal use.In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading.Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again.Intel had been accused of inflating its stock price from January 25 to August 1, 2024.Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC . and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation , U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics and Taiwan's TSMC, and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986.The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Is it even legal': Indian techie claims Hyderabad firm ‘won't give exit documents' if quit within a year, sparks debate
‘Is it even legal': Indian techie claims Hyderabad firm ‘won't give exit documents' if quit within a year, sparks debate

Mint

time25 minutes ago

  • Mint

‘Is it even legal': Indian techie claims Hyderabad firm ‘won't give exit documents' if quit within a year, sparks debate

A post by a software engineer on Reddit has gone viral and sparked intense debate across India's tech circles, after revealing a startling clause in his new company's HR policy: no exit documents unless you complete a full year. Posted on the subreddit r/developersIndia, the user Royal-Airline9579 shared their shock after discovering this condition buried in their offer letter. 'Just joined a new company recently and found out something pretty shocking in the HR policy. If you leave the company within 12 months, they won't give you any exit documents — no experience letter, no relieving letter, nothing,' the Redditor wrote. 'Basically, it's like your time there 'didn't exist' if you quit early.' The Reddit user said they understood companies wanting to control high attrition, but called the policy 'super unfair.' 'Especially if someone leaves due to a toxic work environment, better opportunities, health reasons, or literally anything valid.' The Reddit user added that the policy was clearly mentioned in the offer letter, and the company in question is a small, Hyderabad-based service firm with around 100 employees. The post quickly caught fire, with hundreds of comments pouring in. 'A shady organisation's offer letter cannot override the labour laws created to protect us from this alleged mischief. If anything goes south tomorrow, you will always have respective state' labour laws in your favour to fight against it,' one Redditor commented. Another wrote: 'All paper contracts are worth nothing. Not enforceable. Unless it's exactly abiding by laws mentioned. Also, offer letters aren't done on Bond Papers, there's nothing.' Many said the clause was being used to trap employees who might otherwise switch jobs for better offers or a healthier work-life balance. 'This is not "kinda shady". This is extremely shady. Run from such places. Not worth your time at all,' the third user wrote. 'Brother I have multiple short tenures in my CV (6 years, 7 companies) so you get the gist. While I do get asked a lot about it by HRs and some companies definitely must be rejecting me, I'm on my 8th company currently and 7th year of work experience. Might've been a red flag few years back, not so much now. Also, name and shame the company,' the fourth shared. 'All such things in the offer letter tell you that the company has a toxic work culture,' the fifth user remarked.

Prestige Estates Q1FY26 results: Profit up 1.46%, revenue grows 21.94%
Prestige Estates Q1FY26 results: Profit up 1.46%, revenue grows 21.94%

Business Standard

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Prestige Estates Q1FY26 results: Profit up 1.46%, revenue grows 21.94%

Bengaluru-based real estate developer Prestige Estates Projects on Tuesday reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 311.5 crore for the first quarter of financial year 2025–26 (Q1FY26), ended 30 June 2025, marking a 1.46 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y) increase. The company posted revenue of Rs 2,468.7 crore during the period, up 21.94 per cent from Rs 2,024.5 crore in the same quarter last year. In a recent development, Prestige Estates Projects — directly and through its wholly owned subsidiary — acquired an additional 40 per cent partnership interest in Apex Realty Ventures LLP. Following this acquisition, Apex Realty Ventures LLP has become a wholly owned subsidiary, the company said in a filing to the BSE. Prior to this transaction, Prestige held a 60 per cent stake in Apex Realty Ventures. On the expansion front, Prestige Estates Projects plans to invest around Rs 10,000 crore over the next six years to develop a 62.5-acre township in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. This project marks its entry into the Delhi–NCR housing market and was announced in April this year. The company is also developing a commercial project in Delhi's Aerocity, which includes hotels and office spaces. In June, the company announced its intention to launch multiple residential projects across major cities in the current fiscal year, targeting an estimated revenue of over Rs 42,000 crore. The expansion aims to capitalise on strong consumer demand in the housing sector. The upcoming projects are planned for key markets including Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Delhi–NCR, and Goa. The company announced its results post market hours on Tuesday. At the time, Prestige Estates Projects shares were trading at Rs 1,608.05 apiece, up 0.13 per cent on the BSE.

Legal tech startup August raises $7 million from New Enterprise Associates, Pear VC
Legal tech startup August raises $7 million from New Enterprise Associates, Pear VC

Economic Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Legal tech startup August raises $7 million from New Enterprise Associates, Pear VC

Legal tech startup August has raised $7 million in a funding round led by New Enterprise Associates (NEA) and Pear VC. The company is building artificial intelligence (AI) tools specifically for midsize law firms. ADVERTISEMENT The round also saw participation from Afore Capital, several law schools, and angel investors, including Gokul Rajaram, and senior executives from companies like Ramp, OpenAI, and Bain Capital Ventures. Founded in 2023 by Rutvik Rau, Thomas Bueler-Faudree, and Joseph Parker, August offers modular AI agents designed to automate document-heavy legal work like contract reviews, due diligence, and discovery preparation. The platform caters specifically to midsize law firms, a segment the company estimates includes over 50,000 firms globally employing more than half a million lawyers. The New York-based company, previously known as Vecflow, has also been expanding into the Indian market. It is working with law firm Economic Laws Practice (ELP), where it claims to have helped cut due diligence time by 60%. August's tools are also being piloted by other law firms in the generic legal AI tools aimed at large global firms, August said its software is tailored to local legal environments, and its modular AI agents are designed to align with regional laws, disclosure norms, and document standards.'We realised that these midsize firms are actually extremely innovative, because they're trying to provide the best client services. Their clients are extremely cost-sensitive, and that creates the right environment to use AI and really reap the benefits. But at the same time, we saw that most existing players are focussed only on the big law segment,' CEO Rau told ET. ADVERTISEMENT August said its platform can be deployed securely within a firm's internal network to comply with data residency the new funding, August plans to expand its engineering, product, legal, and sales teams. It also aims to deepen its presence in markets like India, where midsize firms are looking to improve efficiency and manage costs through automation. ADVERTISEMENT 'We see tremendous potential in the midsize legal market, where firms are eager for innovation that drives meaningful ROI,' said Tiffany Luck, partner at NEA. 'August's AI platform and custom agents enable midsize firms to deliver exceptional client value and drive significant growth.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store