Where do atoms come from? A physicist explains.
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you'd like an expert to answer, send it to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com.
How do atoms form? —Joshua, age 7, Shoreview, Minnesota
Richard Feynman, a famous theoretical physicist who won the Nobel Prize, said that if he could pass on only one piece of scientific information to future generations, it would be that all things are made of atoms.
Understanding how atoms form is a fundamental and important question, since they make up everything with mass.
The question of where atoms comes from requires a lot of physics to be answered completely — and even then, physicists only have good guesses to explain how some atoms are formed.
An atom consists of a heavy center, called the nucleus, made of particles called protons and neutrons. An atom has lighter particles called electrons that you can think of as orbiting around the nucleus.
The electrons each carry one unit of negative charge, the protons each carry one unit of positive charge, and the neutrons have no charge. An atom has the same number of protons as electrons, so it is neutral − it has no overall charge.
Now, most of the atoms in the universe are the two simplest kinds: hydrogen, which has one proton, zero neutrons and one electron; and helium, which has two protons, two neutrons and two electrons. Of course, on Earth there are lots of atoms besides these that are just as common, such as carbon and oxygen, but I'll talk about those soon.
An element is what scientists call a group of atoms that are all the same, because they all have the same number of protons.
Most of the universe's hydrogen and helium atoms formed around 400,000 years after the Big Bang, which is the name for when scientists think the universe began, about 14 billion years ago.
Why did they form at that time? Astronomers know from observing distant exploding stars that the size of the universe has been getting bigger since the Big Bang. When the hydrogen and helium atoms first formed, the universe was about 1,000 times smaller than it is now.
And based on their understanding of physics, scientists believe that the universe was much hotter when it was smaller.
Before this time, the electrons had too much energy to settle into orbits around the hydrogen and helium nuclei. So, the hydrogen and helium atoms could form only once the universe cooled down to something like 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (2,760 degrees Celsius). For historical reasons, this process is misleadingly called recombination − combination would be more descriptive.
The helium and deuterium — a heavier form of hydrogen — nuclei formed even earlier, just a few minutes after the Big Bang, when the temperature was above 1 billion F (556 million C). Protons and neutrons can collide and form nuclei like these only at very high temperatures.
Scientists believe that almost all the ordinary matter in the universe is made of about 90% hydrogen atoms and 8% helium atoms.
So, the hydrogen and helium atoms formed during recombination, when the cooler temperature allowed electrons to fall into orbits. But you, I and almost everything on Earth is made of many more massive atoms than just hydrogen and helium. How were these atoms made?
The surprising answer is that more massive atoms are made in stars. To make atoms with several protons and neutrons stuck together in the nucleus requires the type of high-energy collisions that occur in very hot places. The energy needed to form a heavier nucleus needs to be large enough to overcome the repulsive electric force that positive charges, like two protons, feel with each other.
Protons and neutrons also have another property — kind of like a different type of charge — that is strong enough to bind them together once they are able to get very close together. This property is called the strong force, and the process that sticks these particles together is called fusion.
Scientists believe that most of the elements from carbon up to iron are fused in stars heavier than our Sun, where the temperature can exceed 1 billion F (556 million C) — the same temperature that the universe was when it was just a few minutes old.
But even in hot stars, elements heavier than iron and nickel won't form. These require extra energy, because the heavier elements can more easily break into pieces.
In a dramatic event called a supernova, the inner core of a heavy star suddenly collapses after it runs out of fuel to burn. During the powerful explosion this collapse triggers, elements that are heavier than iron can form and get ejected out into the universe.
Astronomers are still figuring out the details of other fantastic stellar events that form larger atoms. For example, colliding neutron stars can release enormous amounts of energy — and elements such as gold — on their way to forming black holes.
Understanding how atoms are made just requires learning a little general relativity, plus some nuclear, particle and atomic physics. But to complicate matters, there is other stuff in the universe that doesn't appear to be made from normal atoms at all, called dark matter. Scientists are investigating what dark matter is and how it might form.
This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jurassic World: Rebirth Director Reveals Ridley Scott Movie That Inspired The Sequel (And It's Not Alien)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Ridley Scott's fingerprint can be seen on pretty much every great sci-fi movie that has come out since his 1979 space horror film Alien changed the game. Many filmmakers have been influenced by his movies over the years, including Gareth Edwards, whose upcoming Jurassic World: Rebirth is about to make another addition to the Jurassic Park franchise. However, it wasn't Alien that inspired the new sequel. Ahead of the premiere of one of the biggest releases on the 2025 movie schedule, Edwards sat down for a chat with SFX Magazine (via to discuss his upcoming sci-fi thriller and where he took inspiration from to bring the dinosaur blockbuster to the big screen. During that conversation, the Godzilla and Rogue One director revealed that it was Scott's 2005 historical drama, Kingdom of Heaven, that inspired him greatly, specifically when it came to the director of photography: John Mathieson was the director of photography, and the more and more I looked at it, the more I was like, 'This is perfection.' There's not a bad frame in this movie. I've always had this love for his work. Mahieson, who first worked with Scott on the 2000 Best Picture winner Gladiator, has collaborated with the famed filmmaker multiple times over the years, including most recently with Gladiator II. His work on Kingdom of Heaven, a great movie that somehow flopped at the box office, is honestly some of his best work. Based on Edwards' comments, he really wanted to work with the man who gave Kingdom of Heaven such a captivating look and feel, but he had to work with Universal to get the ball rolling, as he revealed: When you start a film like this, you have a group of names you'd like to work with, and the studio have a group of names they would trust. Then there's Steven [Spielberg] as well in the middle of that. There was this one little overlap where they all intersected, and everyone agreed on Mathieson. Luckily, everyone agreed on bringing in Mathieson to serve as the director of photography for Jurassic World: Rebirth. Though it's unlikely there will be any flashbacks to the new mutated Distortus Rex (which was inspired by Alien) fighting off waves of Crusaders, it will be interesting to see how the two-time Academy Award nominee and prolific music video cinematographer handles the latest dinosaur movie. With the release of Jurassic World: Rebirth right around the corner in theaters on July 2, 2025, it will be interesting to see what other tidbits of information about the movie and its influences Gareth Edwards and others share with us all. If anything, I'm curious to see what those claims that the movie will honor the series' canon mean for the big blockbuster. In the meantime, all six previous Jurassic Park/World movies are streaming with a Peacock subscription. And while Kingdom of Heaven isn't currently streaming anywhere, it's worth seeking it out for the epic's 20th anniversary.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mysterious 'rogue' objects discovered by James Webb telescope may not actually exist, new simulations hint
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Mysterious "rogue" pairs of Jupiter-size objects spotted by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) are a tiny fraction of those that originally formed, a new study suggests. The finding hints that these enigmatic entities, dubbed "JuMBOs," are even rarer than previously thought — and casts doubt on their very existence. JuMBOs, short for "Jupiter-mass binary objects," are pairs of planet-like, Jupiter-size objects that JWST spotted in the trapezoid region of the Orion Nebula Cluster in 2023. Each JuMBO comprises two gas giants between 0.7 and 30 times Jupiter's mass. The members of a JuMBO don't orbit stars; instead, they twirl around each other at distances of approximately 25 to 400 astronomical units, making them free-floating or "rogue." (One astronomical unit is approximately 93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers, the average distance between Earth and the sun.) The objects' paired status and their apparent lack of tethering to any star have challenged existing notions of how planets are born. That hasn't stopped scientists from floating several ideas about JuMBO formation, including that they formed around a star, just like the solar system's planets, but were jointly lured away by another star. An alternate hypothesis is that JuMBOs are the eroded cores of embryonic stars, suggesting they formed like stars. However, some researchers are skeptical that JUMBOs even exist. For instance, in 2024, Kevin Luhman, a professor in the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics at Penn State, reanalyzed the JWST observations and suggested that the purported pairs aren't planets after all. Instead, he proposed that they're distant background objects that had been serendipitously captured in JWST's snapshots of the Orion Nebula Cluster. In fact, Richard Parker, a senior lecturer in astrophysics at the University of Sheffield in the U.K. and the lead author of the new study, told Live Science via email that it was a discussion about Luhman's work that prompted the new study. During this group meeting, Simon Goodwin, a professor of theoretical astrophysics at the University of Sheffield and the new study's second author, suggested that simulations could help identify how susceptible JUMBOs are to destruction. Indeed, no previous research had examined how long these planetary pairs persist in interstellar space. Such environments are packed with growing stars that could fragment the duos via their powerful gravitational pulls. Related: Not 'Little Red Dots' or roaring quasars: James Webb telescope uncovers new kind of 'hidden' black hole never seen before To figure out how effectively JuMBOs tolerated the turbulence of their birth environment, Parker, Goodwin and Jessica Diamond, an integrated Masters student at the University of Sheffield, created a computer model of a nebula containing a mixture of stars and JuMBOs that totaled 1,500 components, in an arrangement that likely mimicked the Orion Nebula Cloud's original composition, Parker explained. The researchers then generated five copies of this model that differed in various internal parameters, such as the distance between members of a given planetary duo and how crowded the nebula was overall. For each model copy, the team conducted 10 rounds of N-body simulations. "These computer simulations calculate the force due to gravity on each object from all of the other objects,' Parker said, adding that such calculations, performed repeatedly, can reveal how different components of the model nebula interact over time. The researchers found that the simulated JuMBOs were extremely ephemeral. In a dense nebula, for instance, nearly 90% of the planet pairs were destroyed by neighboring stars within a million years. Even in the best-case scenario — when there were fewer stars overall in the nebula and the JuMBOs waltzed in tighter orbits — only half of the planet pairs resisted any disruption. The analyses also revealed that the more widely separated a planet pair was, the more likely it would get disrupted. RELATED STORIES —James Webb telescope spots 'groundbreaking' molecule in scorching clouds of giant 'hell planet' —JWST spies frigid alien world on bizarre orbit: 'One of the coldest, oldest and faintest planets that we've imaged to date' —'We know so little': Bizarre 'runaway' planets discovered by James Webb telescope may be failed stars in disguise Parker said that since he and his colleagues had previously found that star-planet systems are very fragile in environments chock-full of stars, he wasn't particularly surprised by the findings, noting that "[b]ecause the planet-planet binaries are less massive, they have a lower energy and are even more susceptible to destruction." The results, published May 2 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, show that the observed JuMBOs are extremely rare. But Parker said this hints at the same disturbing possibility proposed by Luhman: that they don't really exist. That's because, to explain the JWST-detected JuMBO numbers, the planet pairs would have had to have been produced in much larger numbers than currently thought. According to Parker, this result likely adds support to the interpretation of JuMBOs as background noise. "I think the next steps are for someone else to take the original JWST data and to analyse it again," he added.


National Geographic
16 hours ago
- National Geographic
When is it too dangerous to be outside? New wearable tech could tell you.
Illnesses caused by heat—dehydration, cramps, and even strokes—can come on quickly and quietly. New, wearable technology could help alert wearers to lurking danger. Two people pick grapes in a vineyard near Fresno, California. Outdoor farm workers are on average 35 times more likely to experience heat-related illnesses than the general population. Photograph by Karla Gachet, Nat Geo Image Collection Globally, health experts anticipate a 370 percent rise in yearly heat-related deaths and a 50 percent increase in hours of labor lost due to heat exposure. Heat is one of the most dangerous forms of extreme weather, but symptoms can develop slowly, leading to delays in recognizing the signs of a more serious illness. That's why scientists are also developing technologies that could help save lives by telling device wearers precisely when they're overheating. Some of these same technologies are also being developed for the public, in the form of wearable watches or sweat patches that warn when dangerous outdoor conditions are present. A worker on a farm looks out at the hot summer sun from a tractor. Greenhouse gas emissions have made extremely hot days more common. Photograph by Brian L. Frank, Nat Geo Image Collection Farm laborers are facing record high temperatures while working in unshaded fields. Above, an unplanted cotton field in Brownfield, Texas, is damaged by erosion during a heat wave. Photograph by Robb Kendrick, Nat Geo Image Collection Long before recent heatwaves, scientists have been researching ways to measure heat stress in the body, without relying on an individual's perception of their own risk. What you put in your body can have a big impact on what you keep in your head. The U.S. military uses an algorithm developed by scientists in 2013 that estimates the chances of heat stroke, heat exhaustion, and debilitating heat cramps by measuring changes in heart rate, skin temperature, and gait. "This is the future," said Emma Atkinson, a biomedical researcher for the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, in a 2024 press release announcing a device worn around the chest that resulted from testing the algorithms on 14,000 soldiers. "This is a life-saving device." The army's core body temperature algorithm is the most advanced to date and is being integrated into products for the general public, said Zachary Schlader , a University of Iowa Bloomington associate professor who studies the implications of heat stress. He acknowledges there is 'no gold standard' technology for combating heat stress in work settings, but says the most promising are algorithms to estimate internal body temperature. A construction worker covered up from the sun as morning temperatures reached 92 degrees Fahrenheit at a housing development in Marana, Arizona on Friday, July 12, 2024. Photograph by Cassidy Araiza, The New York Times/Redux 'In a clinical setting or lab, to measure the internal temperature of the body requires the measurement of rectal temperature or esophageal temperature, or different blood temperatures,' he said. 'Those aren't feasible in a work setting and in a bigger population setting. But how hot you get it, hot the inside of the body gets, is largely what determines the health risks of heat, as well as the productivity risk.' For the public, Apple Watch, Galaxy Watch 5, and the Garmin watch can all detect skin temperature, primarily to track menstrual cycles. But to determine if someone is at risk of heat stress, wearable devices need to measure core body temperature, a capability they lack. Core body temperature measures the temperature of internal organs — like your heart, liver and brain, whereas skin temperature only captures your temperature on the surface. Epicore , a digital health company, has created sweat-sensing patches that let wearers see their electrolyte loss, body temperature, and body movement to inform how much they need to drink to prevent dehydration. Sony released the REON Pocket Pro , a wearable that sits between your shoulder blades and cools your body via a metal plate, in June . A separate sensor clips to your shirt to measure temperature and humidity. Testing new devices In real-world work settings, it's unclear how effectively these devices prevent serious heat-related illnesses, according to a 2024 review of research studies of devices . Early tests have shown some promise. In May, a startup called VigiLife released a heat stress sensor, costing between $100 and $300, that attaches to a bicep or forearm. It measures heart rate, along with core body and skin temperatures. It then gathers information from the wearable and environmental sensors to formulate health and safety insights. For now, the technology is only available to commercial entities. Texas-based construction firm Rogers-O'Brien adopted VigiLife's technology across its sites in mid-June. The firm saw zero heat-related illnesses and over $200,000 in savings when it piloted VigiLife's technology from May to September 2023. During a typical summer like 2023, the company might see five or six heat-related incidents that require basic on-site first aid, according to a spokesperson. Yet, for now, most smartwatches also can't run core body temperature software without draining their batteries, CEO Zachary Kiehl noted. To reduce exposure during the hottest parts of the day, many farms hire harvesters to work overnight or in the early morning hours. Left: Workers pick tomatoes in a field in the early morning in Los Baños, California. Right: Laborers in the Western Cape province of South Africa harvest Pinot Noir wine grapes overnight. Photograph by Karla Gachet, Nat Geo Image Collection (Top) (Left) and Photograph by David Silverman, Getty Images (Bottom) (Right) Some aren't sold on a wearable-only solution. One skeptic is Jason Glaser, the CEO of La Isla Network , a company that advocates for worker safety. The network pairs weather and health data to model heat strain on workers and recommend the best hours for avoiding outside work. 'A wearable is only an alarm system,' he said, adding that most farm workers can't afford it. It's also unclear if, given access to wearable technology, workers would be incentivized to listen to its alerts. Intense manual labor and piece-rate payment systems, based on the quantity of produce they harvest, encourage workers to work beyond their limits without adequate access to water, shade, and breaks. One preliminary study looking at the link between high temperatures and chronic kidney disease also found that implementing a heat safety program—added rest periods, improved access to shade and fluids, placing bathroom facilities nearby and more, at a sugar mill in Nicaragua, decreased kidney injury in workers. Some argue these company-mandated solutions might be more effective than using wearable technology. Glaser would like to integrate wearables into his research, but that is on hold until the nonprofit receives more funding. To save money and avoid pushback from workers who don't want to wear devices to avoid lost wages if the device indicates they need to be pulled off the job, Schlader of University of Iowa Bloomington recommends, based on his research , that only the highest risk workers wear devices. Traffic warden Rai Rogers mans his street corner during an 8-hour shift under the hot sun in Las Vegas, Nevada on July 12, 2023, where temperatures reached 106 degrees Fahrenheit amid an ongoing heatwave. Photograph by Frederic J. Brown, AFP/Getty Images In addition to telling individuals about their own heat risk, wearable technology can also help scientists create algorithms that model the risk of working outside on a given day. One ongoing project provides wearable biosensors that collect vital signs, measure skin hydration, and analyzes movement data from farm workers in Florida. Researchers from Emory University in Atlanta and Georgia Tech, using a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant, feed this information to an AI algorithm that may someday accurately predict when a worker could be struck by heat illness. Experts like Schlader say it's hard to know when these heat-stress technologies will have a true impact on working conditions. It's also difficult to predict when core body temperature measurements will be easily integrated into your Apple Watch or Garmin watch by default, he said. 'To my knowledge, this is a ways off,' he said. For now, those interested in monitoring their health during periods of intense heat can look for well-documented symptoms, such as cramps, dizziness, nausea, or headaches. Go to the CDC's website for more information on staying safe.