6 Ways Your Social Security Benefit Can Be Garnished -- Including 2 Directly Impacted by the Trump Administration
President Donald Trump's administration is reinstating and/or adjusting monthly Social Security garnishment rates for delinquent federal student loan borrowers and beneficiaries who were overpaid.
Additionally, unpaid federal tax and various court orders can result in Social Security benefits being garnished.
The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›
For most retirees, Social Security is an indispensable income source. Although the average retired-worker benefit is fairly modest, tallying just over $2,000 for the first time in the program's 90-year history as of May, this monthly payout was responsible for pulling 16.3 million adults aged 65 and over above the federal poverty line in 2023.
Most beneficiaries would struggle, to some varied degree, to make ends meet if Social Security didn't exist. But for millions of Americans, this foundational monthly payout isn't as guaranteed as you might think.
Although Social Security benefits can't be garnished or withheld to satisfy credit card debt, personal loans, or medical bills, there are six ways -- two of which are directly influenced by President Donald Trump's administration -- that your monthly Social Security benefit can be garnished by up to 65%.
One of the more publicized ways Social Security benefits can be clawed back is in the event of an overpayment. Sometimes these overpayments are the fault of the Social Security Administration (SSA), while other instances may stem from a beneficiary not updating their income with the SSA.
In fiscal year 2023 (the federal government's fiscal year ends on Sept. 30), the SSA attempted to recover overpayments from roughly 2 million beneficiaries, per KFF and Cox Media Group. The recovery rate under the Joe Biden administration in 2023 was a mere 10% of monthly benefits. In March, the SSA announced plans to return the clawback rate on overpayments to 100%, which is where it stood during Trump's first term and President Barack Obama's eight years in office. But due to public backlash, the SSA pared this garnishment rate down to 50% in April.
Based on communication from the SSA on April 25, overpaid beneficiaries (which include retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and workers with disabilities) can expect this 50% monthly garnishment to kick in on or after July 24 -- in other words, a 90-day grace period following a written letter requesting repayment.
The silver lining for these more than 1 million overpaid beneficiaries is that there are options available that can potentially waive their repayment liability, reduce the amount they owe, or lower their monthly garnishment amount if it would result in a financial hardship (based on qualifying expenses).
A second way the Trump administration is influencing garnishments is through delinquent federal student loans.
Based on data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the number of federal student loan borrowers aged 62 and above jumped by 59% to 2.7 million between 2017 and 2023. More importantly, an estimated 452,000 of these senior borrowers are currently delinquent on their federal student loans and receiving a Social Security benefit. This leaves these individuals open to a 15% monthly garnishment rate until the loan is no longer delinquent.
The caveat is that the collection of federal student loan repayments was halted during the COVID-19 pandemic and never lifted. The Trump administration, via the SSA, intends to restart collections "sometime this summer."
Similar to the clawback of overpayments, delinquent federal student loan borrowers receiving Social Security benefits often have options. Some may be able to qualify for the Total and Permanent Disability discharge program, which would cancel their federal student loan debt. There's also the possibility of being granted a financial hardship exemption from the U.S. Department of Education if your qualifying expenses are larger than your documented income.
Up to 15% of your monthly Social Security check can be garnished if you have unpaid federal tax obligations. The Federal Payment Levy Program allows the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to collect certain benefits paid by the Treasury Department to delinquent taxpayers.
Most forms of Social Security income can qualify for this 15% garnishment rate by the IRS. This includes payouts to retired workers, survivor beneficiaries, and workers with disabilities, but excludes survivor benefits paid to a child and lump sum death benefits.
Keep in mind that delinquent taxpayers receiving Social Security benefits must be left with at least $750 per month after garnishment -- this is true for federal student loan borrowers, too. This means that lifetime low earners who are delinquent on their federal taxes might not be garnished at the full 15% rate.
A fourth way the SSA can garnish Social Security benefits is through a court order, such as a child support order. According to the SSA, the Court Order Garnishment System (COGS) rate is based on a handful of scenarios:
50% if the beneficiary is supporting a child, other than the child whose support has been ordered by the court
60% if the beneficiary isn't supporting another child
55% if the court-ordered child support is 12 or more weeks delinquent and the beneficiary is supporting a child, other than the child whose support is ordered by the court
65% if in arrears by at least 12 weeks and not supporting another child
The Social Security garnishment rates associated with court-ordered alimony for a current or former spouse mirror those associated with child support.
COGS calculates the monthly garnishment rate, which ranges from 50% to 65%, based on whether another spouse is being supported, other than the spouse whose support was ordered by the court, and whether the garnished beneficiary is 12 or more weeks in arrears on their payments.
Unlike unpaid federal debts, there's no requirement for the SSA to leave you a minimum of $750 in benefits after garnishment for child support and/or alimony.
The sixth and final way the SSA can legally garnish your Social Security benefit is due to court-ordered victim restitution. Based on certain crimes, the SSA can garnish up to 25% of your monthly benefit amount through COGS to repay a victim.
Similar to court-ordered child support and alimony, all appeals for court-based garnishments have to be taken up with the individual court and not the SSA. Only issuing courts have the ability to dismiss or modify a child support, alimony, or victim restitution garnishment order.
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
6 Ways Your Social Security Benefit Can Be Garnished -- Including 2 Directly Impacted by the Trump Administration was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Cedar Falls Class of 1995 reunion showed me how Iowa helped us succeed
Every time my plane circles for a landing at an Iowa airport, my shoulders start to slump, and part of my mind reverts to my snotty, distant teenage self. The flat farmland views reminded me of insurmountable academic obstacles and tense and frustrated social interactions of the first 17 years of my life. So why was I attending my 30th high school reunion? As I ascended the steps to the event, I realized I didn't have a good answer to that question, and I mentally prepared myself for the typical negative reception and resurgent feelings of inadequacy. Not only were my expectations completely false, but every person in my class, regardless of where they currently resided, embodied the best values and attributes that are so unique to Iowa. The most noticeable Iowan personality trait was that everyone maintained a quiet, modest leadership presence in their professional and personal lives. From local business owners to health care providers to social workers to public school teachers to community organizers to stay at home parents, all my classmates sought leadership roles that benefitted their families and communities in Iowa and across the globe. Like many Iowans, my peers and I possessed an innate desire to serve a larger purpose beyond ourselves while being unaware of our generosity and selflessness. More: I'm about to become a doctor. Here's why I won't be staying in Iowa. | Opinion Another prominent characteristic of my classmates was evidence of a high-quality Iowa public education. While Iowa had and still has its fair share of systematic struggles, every reunion attendee humbly demonstrated the rich knowledge base that we gained throughout our public school experience, specifically science, math, economics, accounting, history and art. Although some of us, myself included, struggled more than others in school, I couldn't help noticing that each of us was very well-spoken, intellectually curious, and very engaged in current events. Many of the men at our reunion were very inquisitive and well-informed about the #MeToo movement, and they patiently listened and genuinely empathized with the experiences of female students during the 1990s. Although the current political landscape in Iowa is unpredictable and chaotic, I noticed that all my classmates had a strong sense of resilience going back to childhood. Our generation, Gen X, is known as the latchkey generation for a reason: we weathered traumatic events as kids and navigated adolescence without much support or intervention. Each of us had a story about a horrifying experience that we endured growing up without any mental health guidance, e.g. watching the Challenger explode live on television, witnessing an elementary school teacher have a mental breakdown in class, quietly suffering the brunt of generational trauma and a parent's mental health challenges, staying silent while enduring harsh criticism from adults for undiagnosed learning disabilities, and so on. Even the unpredictable Iowa weather made us resilient, confident drivers who can safely navigate strong winds, tornadoes, flooding, thunderstorms, white-out blizzards, freezing rain, and hail. More: Opinion: Getting an ADHD diagnosis as an adult helped my Iowa schooling make sense The specific combination of all these character traits fuels all Iowans' attributes. Ironically, the intellect, drive, and determination of my peers that intimidated me and made me withdraw in high school are the same qualities that make me proud to call them classmates today. Thanks to our upbringing in Iowa, every one of my classmates overcame significant obstacles to achieve a tremendous amount of success and individual accomplishments. Because of our backgrounds and experiences, our contributions will benefit our communities in Iowa and everywhere else we live. We did it because Iowa made us who we are today. Maria Reppas lives with her family on the East Coast. She lived in Iowa from 1978 to 1999. Visit her at This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Our Iowa experiences growing up set us up to succeed in life | Opinion

Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I saw Iran praise an Iowa hero. Can Norman Borlaug's legacy foster peace today?
With President Donald Trump set to visit Iowa tonight, July 3, to launch the year-long celebration of America's 250th birthday, he might be surprised to learn that there is a unique Iowa-Iran connection, one that could provide an unparalleled opportunity to build a lasting peace process in the Middle East. This connection with Iran is based on the legacy of America's greatest agricultural scientist in its 250-year history: Iowa native and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution, whose statue in the U.S. Capitol has inscribed on its base "The Man Who Saved a Billion Lives." I learned of this Iowa-Iran connection when serving as chairman of the Borlaug Statue Committee appointed by Gov. Terry Branstad. My role was to lead the process to select the artist to create the statue and raise all of the private funds needed to complete the project. To give an idea about how esteemed Borlaug is in Iowa, I raised all $550,000 in three conversations lasting a total of seven minutes. On March 25, 2014, the exact 100th anniversary of Norman Borlaug's birth on a farm in Howard County near the Minnesota border, his statue (created by Benjamin Victor, the only living artist with four statues in the U.S. Capitol) was unveiled in Statuary Hall. Both Branstad and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, a former governor, gave meaningful remarks, as did Sens. Chuck Grassley and Tom Harkin of Iowa. It was one of the greatest days in Iowa history. Three months later I received an email from a university expressing the hope that they could purchase a copy of our statue in the U.S. Capitol to install on their campus. This was not unusual given how Borlaug is held in highest regard around the globe, from Mexico to India (where statues of him already exist) and across the Middle East where his 'Miracle Wheat' saved hundreds of millions from famine, starvation and death in the late 1960s. But, I was stunned that the university involved was the Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII). Reflecting the fact that Borlaug's wheat had also saved millions of lives in Iran, the Tehran government had presented a gold medal to him in 2000. Now, to commemorate the centennial of Borlaug's birth, ABRII was holding a conference in August of 2014 to honor his legacy. The message concluded with an invitation for me to deliver the keynote address. With a sense of curiosity tempered by considerable trepidation, I accepted their invitation. While the U.S. sanctions on Iran ultimately did not allow ABRII to purchase a copy of our Iowa statue, my wife, Le Son, and I nonetheless arrived in Tehran just past midnight on Aug. 26. Eight hours later, I was on the stage looking out at a standing-room-only auditorium, filled with Iranian scientists and government officials, including the minister of agriculture and a stern-faced mullah representing the Grand Ayotallah, who glared menacingly at me. Considering that no other former senior American official had ever been invited to speak in Iran, I was wondering if I had made a serious mistake in being there. I began by describing Borlaug as part of Iowa's rich legacy of agricultural citizen diplomacy to build relationships with former adversaries, such as: Herbert Hoover taking food to feed children in the Soviet Union at the end of World War I; the Yamanashi Hog Lift, which took Iowa animals to Japan following a devastating typhoon not long after World War II; George Washington Carver's advice to Mahatma Gandhi during India's struggle to throw off British colonial rule; and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev's visit to an Iowa farm in 1959 at the height of the Cold War. I said that I was continuing this approach of peace through agriculture that underscored Borlaug's life, through the World Food Prize he had founded and I was now leading. In making that point, I showed a slide of Daniel Hillel, the Israeli irrigation pioneer receiving the World Food Prize in 2012 in Des Moines with U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon joining in making the presentation. More: Iowa 'Citizen Diplomacy' can promote peace through agriculture in Africa I noted that Hillel, a Jew, had been nominated by three Muslim scientists, and that in the audience among the people from 70 countries who were standing and applauding him were the daughter of King Hussein of Jordan, an Arab sheikh from Qatar, and an Israeli diplomat, who said to me that 'maybe we should hold all of our Middle East negotiations in Iowa.' Stressing to that Iranian audience that our planet is not on course to meet the greatest challenge in human history — whether we can sustainably feed the 10 billion people who will inhabit our planet by the year 2050 — I noted that Borlaug's unfulfilled dream was that wheat rust disease could be eradicated using biotechnology, dramatically increasing the food supply. I invited the Iranian minister of agriculture to send his top scientist working on biotechnology to Des Moines to take part in a special panel on combatting wheat rust disease at our World Food Prize Borlaug Dialogue International Symposium in October, which he did. Then, I recalled the 100th anniversary of the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, I said I'd heard Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel say that people who can stand and sing or cheer together can live in peace together. I painted a verbal picture of two scientists — one from Iran and one from the United States — who, having fulfilled Borlaug's dream of eradicating wheat rust disease through biotechnology, were walking into the Iowa State Capitol together to receive the World Food Prize, just as Daniel Hillel had done. I concluded saying that 'we could then all stand together and cheer together for this great Iranian-American achievement, and live in peace together.' I stepped back from the podium uncertain of and unprepared for the reaction that followed. Led by the minister and the mullah, the audience sprang to their feet in unison and gave me a prolonged standing ovation. Many in the audience surged to congratulate me on my remarks as I walked off the stage. The cleric representing the Grand Ayatollah was particularly animated, almost running to congratulate me, and effusively pumping my hand while praising my statement. Norman Borlaug is perhaps the only individual on our planet who is revered in Tehran and Texas, where Borlaug taught for over 30 years and where his statue stands on the campus of Texas A&M University. More: An 'Iowa Outreach Corps' could, and should, change the world Given the critical importance of bringing a lasting peace to the Middle East, and the extraordinary global agricultural challenge facing our planet, the state of Iowa, the home of the first mosque in America, and Norman Borlaug's legacy with Iran combined provide a unique opportunity for American diplomacy and Iowa citizen diplomacy to successfully address both existential challenges. Wouldn't it be amazing if, five decades after Iowa's greatest hero and America's greatest agricultural scientist received the Nobel Peace Prize, his legacy could inspire an American led process to achieve 'Peace Through Agriculture' between Iran and Israel and across the Middle East, as a capstone to our country's 250th anniversary celebration? We could then commission Benjamin Victor to create another statue of Borlaug to present to Iran to be put up on the ABRII campus. Kenneth Quinn grew up in Dubuque. He served for 32 years as a Foreign Service Officer culminating with his assignment as U.S. ambassador to Cambodia. During that career, he received the State Department Award for Heroism for five life saving rescues he carried out in Vietnam. He was president of the World Food Prize from 2000 to 2020. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Unique Iowa-Iran connection gives hope for Middle East peace | Opinion
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses
Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot feature issued an apology after it made several antisemitic posts on the social media site X this week. In a statement posted to X on July 12, xAI, the artificial intelligence company that makes the chatbot program, apologized for "horrific behavior" on the platform. Users reported receiving responses that praised Adolf Hitler, used antisemitic phrases and attacked users with traditionally Jewish surnames. More: Grok coming to Tesla vehicles 'next week at the latest,' Musk says "We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced," the company's statement said. "Our intent for @grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users. After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot." The company, founded by Musk in 2023 as a challenger to Microsoft-backed OpenAI and Alphabet's Google, said the update to the program resulted in a deviation in the AI chatbot's behavior. It was operational for 16 hours before it was removed as a result of the reported extremist language. Users on X shared multiple posts July 8 in which Grok repeated antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people, among various other antisemitic comments. It's not the first time xAI's chatbot has raised alarm for its language. In May, the chatbot mentioned "white genocide" in South Africa in unrelated conversations. At the time, xAI said the incident was the result of an 'unauthorized modification' to its online code. A day after the alarming posts last week, Musk unveiled a new version of the chatbot, Grok 4, on July 9. The Tesla billionaire and former adviser to President Donald Trump said in June he would retrain the AI platform after expressing frustration with the way Grok answered questions. Musk said the tweaks his xAI company had made to Grok made the chatbot too susceptible to being manipulated by users' questions. AI News: MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's lawyers fined for AI-generated court filing More: 'MechaHitler': Elon Musk AI firm scrubs chatbot Grok's antisemitic rants 'Grok was too compliant to user prompts,' Musk wrote in a post on X after announcing the new version. 'Too eager to please and be manipulated, essentially. That is being addressed.' Grok 3, which was released in February, is available for free, while the new versions Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy, go for $30 and $300 a month, respectively. Contributing: Jessica Guynn, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses