Proposed online gaming bill could wipe out India's real money gaming sector, push users offshore, warn industry leaders
Financial institutions would be barred from processing related payments, while authorities would be empowered to block content, investigate violations, and seize property.
Industry concerns
Stakeholders warned that outright prohibition could backfire, pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated platforms.'A restriction will push millions of Indian users toward offshore betting websites, matka operators, and unregulated platforms, exposing them to fraud, addiction risks, and zero consumer protection,' said Rameesh Kailasam, president and CEO of IndiaTech.org, an industry group representing internet startups. 'The bill seems aimed at offshore gambling and betting apps but ends up targeting law-abiding, tax-paying Indian startups.'
Economic fallout
The online gaming sector employs more than 200,000 professionals across 400+ startups and has drawn Rs 25,000 crore in FDI. Industry leaders warned that the ban could erode investor confidence, choke FDI inflows, and cost the exchequer an estimated Rs 20,000 crore in lost taxes. An allied ecosystem that spends nearly Rs 6,000 crore annually on advertising, technology, and infrastructure could also take a hit.
Calls for regulation, not prohibition
Industry representatives are urging the government to pursue 'smart regulation' that distinguishes games of skill from games of chance, ensures user safety and responsible gaming, enforces grievance redressal, and clarifies taxation policies.
Constitutional challenges
Legal experts have flagged constitutional concerns, noting that courts have previously ruled skill-based games are not gambling.'The Bill is extremely problematic, prima facie unconstitutional and not sustainable in law. 'Betting and gambling' as well as 'amusements and entertainments' are squarely state subjects,' said gaming lawyer Jay Sayta, who represents several gaming firms. 'Parliament lacks legislative competence here, except under Article 252 if states pass resolutions. The Centre should wait until the Supreme Court delivers its verdict in the Gameskraft case before proceeding.'
Also Read: Government proposes dedicated regulator for online gaming under new law
Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Hacking, ransom, lawsuits: Why social engineering is TCS, Cognizant's latest headache
Govt easing policies to boost growth; when will industry play ball?
Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy?
How IDBI banker landed plush Delhi properties in Amtek's INR33k crore skimming
Stock Radar: M&M hits fresh record high in August 2025; time to buy or book profits?
Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Spread in Nifty to play index reversal
Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 20% in 1 year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
RS passes Bill to boost exploration and supply of critical and deep-seated minerals
Rajya Sabha Tuesday passed The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 which seeks to boost the supply of critical and deep-seated minerals, and relax the regime for mineral conservation, zero waste management and extraction of strategic minerals. The Bill was passed through voice vote as almost all Opposition members had walked out early over their demand for a discussion on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. No Opposition member participated in the two-hour discussion during which 19 MPs spoke in support of the Bill. Lok Sabha passed the Bill on August 12. One of the key provisions of the Bill amending the original 1957 Act is to enable inclusion of new minerals in a mining lease. Minister of Mines G Kishan Reddy said about the government's work on critical minerals: 'Today in each sector, from automobile to defence, we need critical minerals such as beryllium, cobalt, gallium. We have identified 24 critical minerals and `32,000 crore set aside for the critical mineral mission.' He said critical mineral exploration will happen outside India in Zambia, Australia and Argentina. 'India's public sector company KABIL has begun exploration in five blocks in Argentina and production on lithium will start from next year,' he said. The government launched the National Critical Mineral Mission in January. Critical minerals are used in solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles and in energy storage. Earlier, CPI (M) John Brittas raised a point of order under Rule 67 and said that the Bill trampled on the rights of states, usurping powers of state governments. He said that the Bill should be sent to the select committee as it has far-reaching impacts. However, Ghanshyam Tiwari, who was in the chair, did not accept his demand.
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
6-lane ring road in Odisha for Rs 8,307 crore gets Cabinet nod
The Union Cabinet Tuesday approved the construction of a 6-lane 111-km access-controlled ring road, also called Bhubaneswar Bypass, in Odisha. The project will be implemented on Hybrid Annuity Mode (HAM), a variant of Public-Private partnership, at a cost of `8,307 crore. The 6-lane ring road will start from Tangi and end at Rameshwar on NH-16. It will bypass cities like Khordha, Bhubaneswar and Cuttack, which see heavy traffic. NH-16 is part of the Golden Quadrilateral project and runs along the eastern coast connecting Kolkata and Chennai. Officials said since the NH passes through congested cities like Cuttack and Bhubaneswar, the ring road project was conceived to divert heavy commercial traffic away from these cities and enhance the efficiency of freight movement.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Breaking down the Chinese wall
As India and China commemorate 75 years of diplomatic engagement this year, strong signs of a diplomatic thaw have emerged. The meeting between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Dong Jun, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Defence Ministers' meeting in January; resumption of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra in June; and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's two-day visit to India this week all offer glimpses of warmth. A meeting point for two worlds Long before modern diplomacy took shape, and borders were established and redrawn, the relationship between India and China was nurtured by something more enduring: the shared pursuit of knowledge. As early as the first millennium CE, Chinese monks such as Faxian, Xuanzang, and Yijing journeyed across treacherous landscapes to reach Indian centres of learning. At the heart of this exchange stood Nalanda, where ideas flowed more freely than goods, and religious belief and secular inquiry coexisted in harmony. Nalanda was a meeting point of the two worlds, where cultural and intellectual connections flourished far beyond the concerns of modern statehood. In the quest to revive Nalanda today, there is more than nostalgia; there is hope to rebuild the kind of meaningful, respectful engagement that once defined our ties. Nalanda, both as an institution and as a philosophy, has long embodied a commitment to peace, dialogue, and intellectual diplomacy. It's enduring spirit lives on in its motto — 'Aa no bhadra kratavo yantu viśvata (let noble thoughts come to us from all directions).' This same spirit lives on in the idea of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world as one family). This way of thinking has, for centuries, held together the threads of exchange between India and China. Since the time of Xuanzang, scholars, teachers, and students from both nations have engaged in meaningful interaction, unimpeded by the boundaries that define the modern state. Today, the space for such academic and cultural exchange seems to be narrowed. Should contemporary political complexities necessarily limit the flow of ideas between two ancient civilisations? Stalling of trade, recurring military confrontations, and hundreds of academic or people-to-people connections awaiting bureaucratic clearance have created a kind of stillness, one that feels far removed from the natural flow of exchange that once defined our ties. Why must scholars on either side require permission to engage in dialogue, or students hesitate before considering an academic exchange with institutions of global standing across the border? There is immense potential for mutual learning. India can look to China's initiatives in areas such as food security, local infrastructure development, or grassroots entrepreneurship. And China's academic and policy community may find value in studying India's democratic decentralisation, open civil society engagement, or digital public goods framework. These are not points of comparison, but possible pathways of collaborative learning. In this light, one wonders: why does India's engagement with China remain so carefully limited? Why does strategic ambiguity continue to define a relationship rooted in shared intellectual history? How can we move from reactive diplomacy towards a more confident, future-facing framework that honours the depth of our civilisational ties, while meeting the complexities of the present? How do we deal with the emergence of 'the gatekeeper states,' limiting the range of possibilities? The Nalanda way Just as Nalanda once created space for dialogue and learning between civilisations, perhaps today too, we can draw from that spirit to shape how we engage with China. There will always be areas where our paths differ: on the border, in trade, or in the way we see the region around us. But Nalanda reminds us that disagreement does not have to mean disengagement. It is possible to hold firm where we must, and still stay open to conversations where they matter. This approach also calls for some reflection on how we prepare ourselves. We don't need to change our principles, but we may need to adapt how we practice them. Investing in stronger academic and policy research on China, allowing smoother academic exchanges in areas such as environment, health, and culture, and building long-term people-to-people connections are quiet but important steps. Nalanda drew its strength from more than just being a beacon of knowledge. At the heart of Nalanda's tradition were values that still feel close to us: curiosity, compassion, and the transformative power of knowledge. Scholars such as Śīlabhadra, who taught the Chinese monk Xuanzang, showed that learning could also be a form of diplomacy. Nalanda wasn't just India's; it was also a place of deep importance to generations of Chinese scholars who carried its teachings home and helped shape the intellectual and spiritual fabric of East Asia. Today, perhaps these principles matter even more. If India and China can draw from this shared legacy with genuine intention, they may find a way to engage with each other more thoughtfully. Curiosity without fear, dialogue without suspicion, and clarity without aggression could be the beginning of a steadier path built on understanding and mutual respect. We need to break down our Chinese wall to move beyond the paranoia that sustains our China policy. Rajeev Ranjan Chaturvedy, Associate Professor heading the School of International Relations and Peace Studies, and founding coordinator of the Centre for Bay of Bengal Studies; Anushka Padmanabh Antrolikar, Postgraduate scholar at Nalanda University, Rajgir
