Mom Forced to Wait 2-Plus Years for 'Urgent' Ovarian Cyst Surgery, Says There's 'No End Point'
Tracy Meechan, a 41-year-old Scottish woman, said she has now waited over two years for surgery to have a large ovarian cyst removed
Meechan told the BBC that her cyst causes her so much pain that she cannot fully bend over and needs help from her children just to put on her socks and shoes
She said she feels "forgotten" after spending 100 weeks on a waiting listA woman says she has now waited 100 weeks for ovarian cyst surgery, although she was placed on an "urgent" list for the procedure.
Tracey Meechan told the BBC that she feels "forgotten" after spending two years on a waiting list for NHS, the United Kingdom's publicly-funded healthcare system. The cyst pain is so intense that she is unable to fully bend over, and needs her children to help her put on her socks and shoes, and has her husband take care of household tasks.
The 41-year-old, who is from West Dunbartonshire, Scotland, worked as a home carer before she "signed off work" in January because of the pain. She told the BBC she feels the effects of her cyst every day that she spends on the wait list.
"I can't live my life to the fullest. I can't do the activities I want to do with my kids," she said. "I can't do the job that I love."
Meechan first saw her doctor about the cyst in 2021. After the visit, she waited a year to see a gynecologist for the condition, and was put on the "urgent" list for surgery after the gynecologist found that the cyst had grown over the course of six months.
Although she initially assumed the surgery appointment would take place "relatively soon" because she was asked about any upcoming holiday plans, Meechan said she still has not been contacted about her cyst removal.
She told the BBC, "About a year ago I was advised by the GP to try to get in touch with the gynecology secretary myself and I have been doing that on a regular basis letting them know I am still here and still waiting."
Meechan also claimed that the NHS continues to move the timeline of her surgery whenever she calls. She said, "It's another couple of months, or they are working on the routine list, or working on the long waiters."
"I was told at week 92 that they were working on women round about week 98-99, so it should be another couple of months," Meechan told the BBC. "When I did get to week 99, I called up because I wanted to keep my employer up to date. I was told they couldn't give me a date and still nothing is fixed yet."
Meechan even considered getting the cyst removed through private health care, but the £8,000 price tag (which comes out to $10,806) made the option unaffordable.
While waiting for the surgery, she said her mental health has "declined," telling the BBC, "This has been years and the symptoms have worsened. It's impacted my life, my personal life and my family."
Meechan feels there is "no end point," telling the outlet, "It's a drudge," and adding, "there is only so much pain relief I can take and still try to be a mother to my children."
A spokesperson for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde told the BBC that they "apologize" to Meechan "and to anyone who has faced longer waiting times than expected."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
"We recognize the distress this can cause," they said, adding, "We are prioritizing patients based on clinical urgency to ensure those with the most serious conditions are seen as quickly as possible and are taking action to improve wait times."
The BBC reports that wait times as long as Meechan's were "rare" before the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, nearly 25% of the entire NHS non-urgent care inpatient wait list is made up of waits longer than one year. The outlet reports that the NHS's gynecology wait list had 324 waits of more than three years.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BBC Says IDF Detained Several Reporters at Gun Point and Strip-Searched Them
The BBC on Thursday said that Israel Defense Forces held several of its reporters at gunpoint, detained them for seven hours and strip searched them while they were filming a report in southern Syria. BBC correspondent Feras Kilani and two other BBC staffers, as well as three freelancers were involved in the incident, which the network said occurred on May 9 while they were reporting on the buffer zone in southwestern Syria. That's the region occupied by Israel since Dec. 8, the day dictator Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by rebel groups. According to BBC, the reporters 'were tied up, blindfolded, strip searched, interrogated and threatened. Their electronic devices were also taken from them and material was deleted.' Neither IDF nor the Israeli government have commented publicly on the matter. In a statement Friday, BBC said it has filed a formal complaint with IDF and said it 'strongly objects to the treatment of our staff and freelancers in this way. Read the full statement below: 'On Friday 9 May whilst filming in Southern Syria, BBC News Arabic correspondent Feras Kilani, along with two other BBC staff members and four freelance colleagues, were detained for seven hours and held at gunpoint by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The team have described how they were tied up, blindfolded, strip searched, interrogated and threatened. Their electronic devices were also taken from them and material was deleted. The BBC strongly objects to the treatment of our staff and freelancers in this way. Despite making clear to the soldiers on multiple occasions they were working for the BBC, the behaviour they were subjected to is wholly unacceptable. We have registered a complaint with the Israeli military but are yet to receive a response.' The post BBC Says IDF Detained Several Reporters at Gun Point and Strip-Searched Them appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Highland schools asked to discuss pupils' phone use
Highland Council has asked schools in its area to have discussions round pupils' use of mobile phones in classrooms. The local authority said excessive use of phones was a "significant issue". Bans are already in force at Nairn Academy and Grantown Grammar School. Last month, councillors unanimously backed a proposal from Labour's Michael Gregson and Conservative's Helen Crawford for a wider consultation to be held. More stories from the Highlands and Islands News from the Highlands and Islands on BBC Sounds Mr Gregson and Ms Crawford said phones were having a disruptive effect on children and their education. The proposal agreed by councillors included a commitment from the local authority to support schools that decided to ban the devices. Other Scottish schools have taken steps to limit access to phones in class time. Pupils at two high schools in Edinburgh are having to keep their mobiles in lockable pouches during the day under a new phone-free policy. Students at Portobello High School and Queensferry High School are being issued with special wallets which once sealed require a magnetic pad to unlock them. Pupils are allowed to keep their phones in their possession but will be expected to keep them in the pouches until the bell rings at the end of their final lesson. Moray councillors voted last month to bring in stricter guidelines limiting the use of mobiles in schools from August. Councillors hoped the move would reduce disruption in the classroom, as well as stop some incidents of bullying. Scottish government guidance allows head teachers to make their own decisions on mobile phone use but Moray Council has decided to introduce blanket guidance. Moray's new policy would have exemptions for medical use such as diabetes monitoring. In August, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said headteachers across Scotland were trusted to take the best decisions in the interests of their school communities. The Highland Council
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meghan Markle Is 'Very Business' About Royal Rift as Prince Harry is 'Left Out of the Details' in England (Exclusive)
Meghan Markle is looking ahead while Prince Harry remains emotionally tethered to his royal past, a source tells PEOPLE A source close to the couple says they're being left out of royal conversations entirely, despite being aware of what's happening in England Amid King Charles' cancer diagnosis and Harry's recent public plea, insiders say reconciliation remains stalled by a lack of trustMeghan Markle and Prince Harry are united in their support of each other, but they view the deep divide with the royal family from different perspectives. "They're aware of everything going on in England, but they're being left out of the details — there's clearly no trust," a source close to the couple tells PEOPLE in this week's exclusive cover story. Meghan, who is focused on the future, while Harry has one foot in the past, "is very business about it," the source says. Through it all, Meghan stands firmly by Harry's side — supporting him through his ongoing lawsuits and the painful rift with his family, but an insider says Meghan wishes her husband could feel less burdened by the past and more present in the life they've built together. The rift between Prince Harry and his father King Charles is five years deep and remains one of the most painful fractures in Charles' reign. Amid the King's cancer diagnosis and Harry's increasingly candid public pleas, the silence between them speaks volumes. "I don't know how much longer my father has," Harry told the BBC on May 2 after losing a legal appeal to restore his automatic police protection in the U.K. But it was a more personal admission that landed harder: "He won't speak to me." The father and son were briefly on the same continent in late May, when King Charles, 76, traveled to Canada to attend the State Opening of Parliament, but emotionally remain worlds apart. The man the King once called his "darling boy" was meant to be "one of his reliable lieutenants he could call on to support the monarchy" says royal historian Dr. Ed Owens, author of After Elizabeth: Can the Monarchy Save Itself?, but that vision never came to fruition. Harry and Meghan stepped back from royal duties and moved to Montecito, California in 2020 amid mounting tensions that became public. The rift deepened with bombshell interviews, their Netflix docuseries and Harry's best-selling memoir Spare, which alleged a physical altercation with his brother, Prince William. While William remains estranged from Harry and Meghan, some royal observers believe it's King Charles, as head of the Church of England and a longtime advocate for unity, who should make the first move. But inside palace walls, hesitation reigns. At times, there has been a desire to reconnect — but "the underlying issue is trust," says royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith. "The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders add that the King isn't surrounded by voices encouraging reconciliation. Prince William, 42, has shown no interest in extending an olive branch, while Queen Camilla — sharply criticized in Spare — "stays out of it," says a source. Even senior aides including Clive Alderton, who was also named in Harry's memoir, are unlikely to encourage outreach. "There is not a good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,' " says Valentine Low, author of the upcoming book Power and the Harry's plea for peace, his BBC comments were widely seen as another blow. "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," says Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." The King's weekly cancer treatments add further urgency to the idea of healing the relationship before it's too late. "It's been difficult for him to even get proper updates about his dad," the source says, underscoring just how deep the divide has become. "If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with," says Catherine Mayer, author of Charles: The Heart of a King. Even before recent events, Charles and Harry's bond was complicated. Harry, the son of a broken marriage, lost his mother, Princess Diana, in tragic and public circumstances when he was 12. Amid the rift with his father, Harry spoke with his uncle Charles Spencer about changing his family's last name to Princess Diana's surname, Spencer, but was told the legal challenges would be insurmountable. That decision would directly affect the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4. Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! "There is so much baggage there that the idea that one meeting would resolve everything is ridiculous," Mayer tells PEOPLE. "But having some contact would seem better than none." Read the original article on People