Google Pixel Watch 4 may skip the price hike many were expecting
While there's no confirmation yet on US pricing, history suggests parity. Last year's Pixel Watch 3 started at $349 for the 41mm Wi-Fi model, going up to $399 for LTE. The 45mm model was $399 for Wi-Fi and $449 for LTE. With minimal hardware changes this year, it would not be surprising if Google decided to keep prices unchanged.
Leaked CAD render of the Pixel Watch 4. | Image credit — @Onleaks/@91Mobiles
Rumors suggest the Pixel Watch 4 will retain the same Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor used in the previous generation. This suggests that the internal upgrades are more modest than transformative. However, leaked specs suggest larger battery capacities, potentially faster charging, and a new co-processor designed to help with AI-powered tasks. One practical improvement may come in the form of better repairability. While Google has not officially confirmed this, reports hint at a slightly more modular design. Safety also appears to be a theme, with possible additions like Breathing Emergency alerts and support for satellite-based connectivity in case of poor network coverage.Still, there are lingering questions about external factors that could impact final pricing. Some Pixel devices are still assembled in China, and recent shifts in US trade policy could introduce tariffs or added costs for Google. While this remains speculative, it is something to watch ahead of the official launch.
Google is expected to announce the Pixel Watch 4 at its Made by Google event on August 20. Until then, the pricing leak at least offers some reassurance for fans hoping that Google's next wearable won't carry a steeper price tag.
I think keeping prices steady in a year of modest upgrades could be a smart move. It signals stability while giving Google time to prepare for a more substantial update in future models. Still, whether that's enough to compete with Samsung's Watch 8 or Apple's expected Series 10 redesign remains to be seen.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE in for review
This is the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE. It's on sale (ours shipped a few days earlier than the projected July 25th date), starting from €999, and you have a choice of Black and White. The Flip7 FE is nearly identical to the Galaxy Z Flip6, only it runs an in-house 4nm Exynos 2400 with 8GB of RAM. The older Flip6 packs a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 with 12GB of RAM. We'll run our own tests, but the Snapdragon will likely be a bit faster than the new Exynos. On the surface, the Flip7 FE doesn't seem like much of an upgrade, especially considering that you can find the Galaxy Z Flip6 with twice the base storage (256GB) of the Flip7 FE, for less. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and Z Flip7 FE You get a USB-C cable with the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE. Having identical hardware to last year's Galaxy Z Flip6, the Flip7 FE has an outdated cover screen (especially compared to the Flip7). It's only 60Hz and it doesn't stretch to the entire available panel. On the surface at least, the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE doesn't look like a very compelling proposition. If you look over at Motorola's Razr 60 series, you'll get a bigger, more functioning cover display, a bigger battery with slightly faster charging for less money. Still, the Galaxy Z Flip7 FE may not be all bad. We'll need to do our full review treatment on it to see what's what so stay tuned! Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
Phone Arena
9 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Google reminds Pixel users of this key benefit they have which they may not be fully using
Receive the latest Google news Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Pixel 9 Pro Google has posted a new video reminding Pixel users of a benefit that may have been overlooked during this month's feature drop. While most of the attention on July 9 went to the Gemini smartwatch update, another perk quietly launched at the same time. Pixel 9 Pro owners now get a free one-year subscription to Google AI Pro. This unlocks access to premium Gemini features, including the new Veo 3 video tool. With Veo 3, users can describe an idea to Gemini and receive a high-quality video in return, complete with natural sound and smooth video shows how users can start by uploading an image from their photo gallery and entering a prompt like "a child running through a sunflower field." Gemini uses that input to generate a short video that brings the scene to life. The results are meant to showcase what's possible with creative AI on mobile. Gemini AI Pro is Google's top-tier AI subscription. It includes tools powered by Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is more capable than the free version. Veo 3 is one of the newest tools in this bundle. It stands out because it can generate realistic motion and audio, rather than just still move continues Google's pattern of adding exclusive AI features to its high-end Pixel devices. In 2023, Pixel 8 Pro was the first to get Gemini Nano. Now,users are the first to try Veo 3 through the Gemini app, thanks to this free latest update also shows how AI is playing a bigger role in Google's feature drop strategy. For Pixel users, Veo 3 offers a new kind of creative tool that goes beyond editing photos or writing text. The tool has received attention for its ability to produce video content that appears surprisingly realistic, with natural motion, coherent scenes, and believable soundscapes.
Phone Arena
9 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Looking to save oodles of money, Apple awaits major decision from EC
Looking to save itself from getting hit with a huge fine by the European Union (EU), Apple made some changes to the App Store last month that need final approval from the European Commission (EC). Apple revised the controversial fees it charges developers to process in-app payments and subscriptions. In June, the iPhone maker said that with the changes, developers will pay it a 20% processing fee for App Store transactions. The fee could drop to as low as 13% for developers connected with Apple's small-business program. App developers wanted the freedom to send customers to third-party processing platforms One of the main conditions that developers wanted was the freedom to redirect their customers looking to make a payment for an App Store purchase to a third-party processing platform, bypassing Apple's fees. Under the new fee structure, developers who send customers to a third party to process an App Store transaction will pay a fee between 5% and 15%. There will also be no limits on the number of links developers can send their customers that will take them to a non-Apple processing platform. Back in April, Apple was fined €500 million ($587 million) for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The latter is the groundbreaking EU legislation designed to keep competition among tech firms fair in the union of 27 European states. After the fine was announced, Apple blamed the issue on technical problems that it said prevented app developers from sending customers to cheaper prices outside of the App Store. As a result, Apple had committed a DMA violation despite the excuses mentioned by the tech giant. Receive the latest iOS news Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Should the EU approve the App Store changes? Yes. The changes are fair to app developers. No. Apple is still ripping off app developers. I really don't care either way. Yes. The changes are fair to app developers. 0% No. Apple is still ripping off app developers. 0% I really don't care either way. 0% Apple appealed the fine this month, but at the same time, it said that the changes to the App Store's processing fees it announced in June were done to prevent the tech giant from getting hit with punitive daily fines. After Apple was fined in April, the EC, charged with enforcing EU law, gave Apple 60 days to comply with the DMA or face daily fines of up to five per cent of its global revenue, which is equivalent to approximately €50 million per day ($58.5 million). A report published today says that the EC is expected to approve the changes , although it might be several weeks before this approval becomes official and is announced. Meanwhile, the EC said, "All options remain on the table. We are still assessing Apple's proposed changes." Spotify's CEO Daniel Ek was one of the App Store's loudest critics in the EU Many iOS app developers protested the fees over the years, which became known as the "Apple Tax." One CEO who might have had the loudest voice complaining about the fees was Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek, who filed a complaint with the EC back in 2019. Ek complained that Apple Music had an unfair advantage over Spotify in the EU due to what was then a 30% fee Apple charged to developers for processing in-app subscriptions. The fight between Apple and Spotify continued even after the DMA was passed. Last year, the music streamer accused Apple of not allowing physical iPhone buttons to control the volume on Spotify Connect . The latter is a feature that allows iOS users to control the playback of music streamed by Spotify across compatible devices while using the Spotify app as a remote. Other firms fighting back against the Apple Tax included Netflix. In 2018, the video streamer stopped allowing new or re-joining subscribers to open their Netflix accounts via the App Store. In 2024, Netflix stopped allowing grandfathered subscribers to pay their monthly subscription charge through the App Store. Instead, Netflix subscribers had to agree to make direct payments to Netflix to keep their subscriptions. Netflix was trying to eliminate any subscribers who were still making their subscription payments through Apple. While you can say that the force of legislation and the possibility of huge fines led Apple to make changes to how and how much developers are charged to process App Store purchases and subscriptions, companies like Spotify and Netflix were also instrumental in forcing Apple to make some of the changes they wanted.
