Audi e-tron GT gets huge £20k price cut as new entry-level quattro joins range
Priced from £89,505, the e-tron GT quattro costs £19,215 less than the next cheapest edition in the range, the S. It's also only £1,305 more than the cheapest Porsche Taycan, with which the e-tron GT shares its architecture.
Despite being comfortably the cheapest variant by some margin, the e-tron GT quattro uses the same 97kWh battery as the rest of the range - all of which we tested in late 2024. There's no option of the smaller 82kWh battery that was offered in the Taycan until this year. The e-tron GT quattro comes with a dual-motor layout with a total of 496bhp (576bhp with overboost) - some way off the 669bhp e-tron GT S. Advertisement - Article continues below
Full technical details haven't been released, although having the lowest power output in the range will surely mean the quattro edition is the slowest e-tron GT to 62mph. More importantly, however, it'll offer the longest range in the line-up – 386 miles compared to the S's 374 miles – thanks in part to weighing 30kg less than the S. As with the other e-tron GTs, it also has the faster 320kW charging that was introduced during the facelift (up from 270kW), meaning 177 miles of range can be added in 10 minutes.
The e-tron GT quattro retains the same exterior design as the S with identical 20-inch wheels as standard, along with a body-coloured front grille and rear diffuser. Inside you'll find a 10.1-inch display in the centre of the dashboard and Audi's 12.3-inch 'Virtual Cockpit', just as in other e-tron GTs.
While pricing and preliminary information have been revealed, Audi hasn't started taking orders for the new entry-level e-tron GT just yet. However, we expect the new quattro variant to arrive before the summer.
Did you know you can sell your car through Auto Express ? We'll help you get a great price and find a great deal on a new car, too .
Find a car with the experts EV affordability alarm! Running costs are £6k higher than for petrol cars, say car clubs
EV affordability alarm! Running costs are £6k higher than for petrol cars, say car clubs
Running costs for car share club EVs are £6k higher than ICE equivalents according to new data Not bothered by MoT advisories? That may be about to change
Not bothered by MoT advisories? That may be about to change
The number of MoT failures caused by worn tyres is on the rise, and experts are calling for mandatory follow-ups on advisories Mazda MX-5 goes electric: the iconic roadster's radical future
Mazda MX-5 goes electric: the iconic roadster's radical future
The next Mazda MX-5 roadster is set to be offered as a pure EV, and our exclusive images preview how it could look
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Husband ordered to tear up £5,000 front garden drive he built to help his illness-stricken wife by jobsworth council
A devoted husband who spent thousands converting his front garden into a drive to help his sick wife has been ordered to rip it up by the council. Stephen Price, 65, said on-street parking was so bad on his road he laid the drive to help his wife Kim, 67, whose several health struggles means it is difficult for her to get in and out of the house. But the plumber was later told he did not have planning permission for the work - and has been ordered to revert back to his original garden. He said: 'I dug it all out and then the council got in touch and said I might need to put it all back. 'At the moment I'm £5,000 into this build. To put it all back - we haven't got the money to do it anyway.' The couple have lived in their semi-detached home for 44 years and say when they first moved in they could always get a spot outside the house. But over the years families have added more cars to their homes and parking has become a 'nightmare', as the fight for spots has led to 'arguments and disputes' between neighbours. His wife suffers from a long list of serious health problems including heart failure, two types of achalasia, diverticulitis, pernicious anaemia, osteoarthritis and low blood pressure. Due to her complex issues, the great-grandmother often has to attend appointments at hospital or her GPs - but says she struggles to get in and out of the house due to the parking. Mrs Price said: 'Due to the low blood pressure sometimes my head is just spinning and I sometimes fall. If my husband has to park up on the hill it makes it very difficult for me. 'I hardly leave the house unless I have to. I have lived here [in Hengoed] all my life and I don't want to move.' Mr Price said parking issues on his street in Hengoed, Caerphilly had made it very difficult for his wife to get in and out of their home and so he planned to make the sloping drive leading to his front door. 'There are only 12 houses on our street and when we first moved in there were only about five cars. Now if everybody is in or people have visitors over there can be 25-30 cars, it's a nightmare,' he said. 'We have to park out of the street, we desperately need extra parking.' He said he paid £300 to have a drop kerb installed outside their home 20 years ago after ringing the council to say he planned on installing a drive. He said: 'They never told me then I needed planning permission. They just told me I needed to pay this £300 - which is about £600 in today's money - that's all they said. 'I had the kerb installed and now I want to know if I was miss-sold this. They were happy enough to take my money.' The plumber believes the work required to ditch his driveway plan and rebuild his garden will cost him a further £11,000-£13,000 that he doesn't have. Planning officers recommended refusal of the application for retrospective permission saying there had been 'extensive excavation and loss of the raised front garden. Cllr Nigel Dix urged fellow councillors to 'show a bit of compassion' and overrule the planning officer to allow the drive but others disagreed. Chairman Cllr Roy Saralis said he had a 'tremendous amount of sympathy' for Mr Price and that he had the right to appeal. He added: 'Obviously it's a sad situation, but planning is planning.' The outraged husband said he will appeal the decision.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype
There was a time when Britain aspired to be a leader in technology. These days, it seems content to be a willing supplicant – handing over its data, infrastructure and public services to US tech giants in exchange for the promise of a few percentage points of efficiency gains. Worryingly, the artificial intelligence strategy of Sir Keir Starmer's government appears long on rhetoric, short on sovereignty and built on techno-utopian assumptions. Last week Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was promoting the use of AI-generated discharge letters in the NHS. The tech, he said, will process complex conversations between doctors and patients, slashing paperwork and streamlining services. Ministers say that by applying AI across the public sector, the government can save £45bn. But step back and a more familiar pattern emerges. As Cecilia Rikap, a researcher at University College London, told the Politics Theory Other podcast, Britain risks becoming a satellite of the US tech industry – a nation whose public infrastructure serves primarily as a testing ground and data source for American AI models hosted on US-owned cloud computing networks. She warned that the UK should not become a site of 'extractivism', in which value – whether in the form of knowledge, labour or electricity – is supplied by Britain but monetised in the US. It's not just that the UK lacks a domestic cloud ecosystem. It's that the government's strategy does nothing to build one. The concern is that public data, much of it drawn from the NHS and local authorities, will be shovelled into models built and trained abroad. The value captured from that data – whether in the form of model refinement or product development – will accrue not to the British public, but to US shareholders. Even the promise of job creation appears shaky. Datacentres, the physical backbone of AI, are capital-intensive, energy-hungry, and each one employs only about 50 people. Meanwhile, Daron Acemoglu, the MIT economist and Nobel laureate, offers a still more sobering view: far from ushering in a golden age of labour augmentation, today's AI rollout is geared almost entirely toward labour displacement. Prof Acemoglu sees a fork: AI can empower workers – or replace them. Right now, it is doing the latter. Ministerial pledges of productivity gains may just mean fewer jobs – not better services. The deeper problem is one of imagination. A government serious about digital sovereignty might build a public cloud, fund open-source AI models and create institutions capable of steering technological development toward social ends. Instead, we are offered efficiency-by-outsourcing – an AI strategy where Britain provides the inputs and America reaps the returns. In a 2024 paper, Prof Acemoglu challenged Goldman Sachs' 10-year forecast that AI would lead to global growth of 7% – about $7tn – and estimated instead under $1tn in gains. Much of this would be captured by US big tech. There's nothing wrong with harnessing new technologies. But their deployment must not be structured in a way that entrenches dependency and hollows out public capacity. The Online Safety Act shows digital sovereignty can enforce national rules on global platforms, notably on porn sites. But current turmoil at the Alan Turing Institute suggests a deeper truth: the UK government is dazzled by American AI and has no clear plan of its own. Britain risks becoming not a tech pioneer, but a well-governed client state in someone else's digital empire. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
Archax and Stellar collaborate on tokenised RWAs
Archax, the UK regulated digital asset exchange, broker and custodian, today announced a strategic partnership with the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF), that supports the layer-one blockchain network Stellar. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. Under the terms of this partnership, SDF has made a direct investment into Archax Group to support Archax's mission to bridge traditional finance and blockchain. Archax has recently completed a series of milestones on the Stellar network; including tokenising an Aberdeen Money Market Fund and integrating Stellar into Archax's tokenisation engine and platform. Archax's extensive network of financial institutions will be able to bring more tokenised real-world assets (RWAs) to the Stellar network. The strategic rationale is the rapid scaling of the tokenisation market, as TradFi organisations see the benefits of adopting blockchain technology, tokenisation and moving assets 'onchain.' RWA tokenisation growth has been little short of explosive; expanding from $15.2 billion in December 2024 to over $24 billion by June 2025, representing an 85% year-on-year increase**. Archax is at the forefront of this growth, with its unique and expanding international regulatory moat, as well as its focus on bridging traditional markets into the digital/crypto/DeFi space. Graham Rodford, CEO and co-founder of Archax, comments: 'The Archax vison has always been that all financial instruments will move onchain, and we find ourselves at a pivotal point right now, because institutional adoption of digital assets is vastly accelerating. 86%* of institutions now have digital assets allocations or are planning to by the end of 2025. That's huge. Having established, credible partners and investors from the crypto world is a fundamental part of our strategy, and we are excited to welcome Stellar into that family. We look forward to bringing even more institutions and real-world assets onto the platform too.' Raja Chakravorti, Chief Business Officer at the Stellar Development Foundation comments: "Real-world assets are moving onchain because costs are lower and transactions can move anywhere around the globe in seconds. The Stellar network was purpose built to enable fast settlement times, low costs, and the tokenisation of real-world assets that is the future of finance. The Stellar Development Foundation is proud to have invested in Archax and excited about where this collaboration can go from here." Archax also recently announced working with Lloyds Bank and Aberdeen Asset Management to use tokenised money-market funds as an acceptable form of collateral, to post as margin across the Archax Nest collateral transfer network, for FX trades. 'The project with Lloyds Bank and Aberdeen is the perfect example of the innovation and benefits that can come from tokenising RWAs - as a result of this new partnership, this could now be done using the Stellar blockchain', adds Rodford. 'We have over 100 funds now available in token form from many leading asset managers. These are all available on Stellar now too.'
