Jagoda Rubaszko handed suspended sentence for Covid loan fraud
A Northolt woman who invented a business to get a £50,000 Covid Bounce Back Loan backed by the government has been sentenced for fraud.Jagoda Rubaszko made up administrative service company which she falsely claimed had a turnover of £210,000.She then paid the loan into five separate bank accounts in Poland over a two-month period.Rubaszko was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment, suspended for 21 months, for fraud by misrepresentation at Isleworth Crown Court on 5 June.
Fraudulently obtained funds
She will be tagged and under curfew between 19:30 and 06:00 every day for six months and must complete 175 hours of unpaid work.Rubaszko was investigated by The Insolvency Service, a government agency that administers compulsory company liquidations and personal bankruptcies.The service said it is seeking to recover the fraudulently obtained money.The Bounce Back Loan Scheme was designed to enable businesses to access finance more quickly during the coronavirus outbreak.Rubaszko applied to a bank for a loan on 26 April 2021, which was approved on 28 April 2021 and paid into her bank account.In the application, she claimed she had been operating a business since 1 March 2020 and had a turnover of £210,000. But investigations into Rubaszko's finances showed her tax returns were no higher than £15,100 each year between 2019 and 2021.
'£17,500 commission'
In a prepared statement, Rubaszko claimed to have been contacted by a man called Daniel, who told her how to apply for the loan, and to declare herself bankrupt to avoid repaying it.But Rubaszko admitted she had never met Daniel, even though she said she paid him a £17,500 commission for his "help" after receiving the £50,000.Her bank records showed no such payment was made – instead, 22 smaller payments up to £11,690 were made to five individual bank accounts in Poland.After declaring herself bankrupt, Rubaszko was subject to a 10-year Bankruptcy Restrictions Undertaking (BRU) on 12 May 2023. The BRU prevents her from managing a limited company until 2033.
'Staggering cost to taxpayers'
Chief investigator at the Insolvency Service, Mark Stephens, said Rubaszko claimed to be a business director, but she had no business at all, and now reality has "caught up with her".He added: "She invented a man called Daniel, who she has blamed for her actions, claiming he had told her to apply for the loan, and she believed she'd get away with this by declaring herself bankrupt."What is definitely real, is that she took money which was meant to help businesses during a difficult period, and sent that funding off to the bank accounts of five men in Poland."The bounce back scheme provided a total of £47bn in loans of which an estimated £4.9bn was lost to fraud.The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said in 2022 that the focus on delivery of the bounce back loans meant lenders were not required to do credit or affordability checks - or even verify application information.To offset this risk to lenders the government guaranteed the loans 100% - meaning that if the borrower did not repay the loan, the taxpayer will.The committee concluded that the scheme came at a "staggering" cost to the taxpayer and money that "could have been spent on improving existing public services, reducing taxes or to reduce government borrowing".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
16 minutes ago
- Daily Record
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Poundland faces restructure after being sold for ‘nominal' fee
High street discount chain Poundland is set for a 'restructuring' process after it was sold to investment firm Gordon Brothers. The parent firm, Pepco Group, which has owned the brand since 2016, said it has completed the sale of the business for a 'nominal' fee. It comes after an auction by Poland -based Pepco to sell Poundland after a sharp downturn in trading over the past year. Poundland's more than 800 stores and roughly 16,000 employees will be transferred to the ownership of Gordon Brothers, which owns brands including Laura Ashley, as a result. However, as part of the deal, Poundland is set to undergo a restructuring plan. Poundland said the details will be communicated 'in due course'. Stephan Borchert, Pepco Group chief executive, said: 'This transaction will strongly support our accelerated value creation programme by simplifying the group and focusing on our successful Pepco business.' The company had previously said it is looking to offload the brand amid a wider shift away from food and drinks, with a deal expected before the end of its financial year in September. A number of investment firms and private equity groups were understood to be among those to have tabled proposals to buy the business since it was put on the market earlier this year.
The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Cannabis-smoking nursery worker who ‘punched, grabbed & pinched 23 crying babies' moans ‘I'd moody if I couldn't vape'
A NURSERY worker who allegedly punched, grabbed and pinched 23 babies would get "moody" if she couldn't vape at work, a court heard. Roksana Lecka allegedly left the children with scratches to their faces and necks and pinch marks on their inner legs and stomachs. 4 The 22-year-old is accused of "badly harming" the tots over a six month period while working at the Riverside Nursery in Twickenham, South West London. The nursery, which charges up to £1,900 a month to look after children aged between 18 months and two years, follows the Montessori method of teaching. Lecka told Kingston Crown Court how she would "smoke cannabis quite regularly with my boyfriend", Mail Online reports. She said: "At that time I was really addicted to vapes, I would smoke two little crystal disposables a day. "I was vaping in nursery. Because if I did not smoke I would get agitated and fed up. I couldn't keep asking to go to the toilet. Any opportunity I would take. I would be really moody and fed up. 'It would be a couple of puffs and then I'd put it away… I would put it in my bra." She also told the court how she was "so tired" at the time and was not getting any sleep. Lecka claimed she was "addicted" to her boyfriend so was "over-prioritising" him. Her lawyer also claimed she was "worn out, had bad period pains, was short of energy, she was not her normally bubbly self". But prosecutor Tracy Ayling KC told jurors that smoking cannabis and not being able to vape were "excuses" for the alleged offences. She added: "It is clear her actions are deliberate or at the very last careless, but on most occasions we say deliberate. "There are, of course, some clips where Ms Lecka - as we put it - keeps going back for more." Jurors have been told 23 of the children were harmed at the nursery, while a 24th count of child cruelty refers to an offence that allegedly took place before Lecka started. The court also heard how there were no apparent safeguarding issues when Lecka was hired. But last summer, CCTV of the baby room appeared to show the worker pinch a child - leaving them with red marks, it was said. In footage played to the court, Lecka can also apparently be seen pinching the legs, back and under arm of a girl who can be seen crying. Further footage allegedly showed her pinching the side of a girl's face and grabbing her hair. Lecka can be seen vaping in another clip before she took a baby from a crib and pinched and punched her side, jurors heard. One alleged victim was sat at a table when Lecka repeatedly pinched her - causing the girl to cry, it was said. She then allegedly grabbed the girl by the arm and pulled her hair so her head made contact with the table. The court heard Lecka was "looking around" at other members of staff to see who was "watching when these assaults occur". One colleague reported seeing the worker assault a boy by pinching his legs - leading the headteacher to check CCTV. Jurors were told the footage showed Lecka also pinching his nose, body, wrist, and mouth. Police trawled through a month's worth of CCTV and discovered 23 babies had been "badly treated in some way", it was said. Lecka was arrested on July 5 last year and said in a prepared statement: "I deny assaulting any children at the Riverside Nursery…I went into work that day and had a normal day. There were no accidents where any child seemed hurt. "We have procedures for the handling of the children, which I adhered to. I am unaware how any injury to these children were caused." Lecka has admitted two charges of child cruelty but denies 21 further offences. The trial continues. 4 4
