Moving nuclear subs isn't something you announce on social media
Image: AFP
James Stavridis
Over the last week, two political leaders have exchanged barbs underlining the powerful nuclear arsenals of their respective nations. It was not just a pointless demonstration of bravado - it also showed that careless words and vague military threats can move the world closer to a disastrous conflict.
The first to lash out was Dimitry Medvedev, a former president and prime minister of Russia, who now serves as deputy chair of President Vladimir Putin's security council. In a social media post on July 28, he said a US ultimatum for Moscow to come to the negotiating table over Ukraine was a 'threat and a step towards war.' Later, he alluded to Russia's 'dead hand' nuclear launch system, which automatically fires a nuclear strike if the nation is attacked with such weapons.
President Donald Trump responded to Medvedev's comments by saying he had ordered two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions.' He concluded by saying, correctly, that 'words are very important and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' (On Monday, a Kremlin spokesman warned against 'nuclear rhetoric.')
Between them, the US and Russia have more than 10,000 nuclear weapons. How dangerous is this war of words between the Kremlin and the White House? And what is the significance of Trump claiming to have moved nuclear submarines to new stations?
I'm not a submariner - or a 'bubblehead,' as they are known (more-or-less affectionately) in the Navy. But I've commanded them in combat as a commodore and a rear admiral, directed the launch of their conventional Tomahawk missiles at terrorist targets in Africa and Asia, and sailed in them from time to time. I like to say these formidable warships are the apex predators of the ocean. And their locations are always kept secret.
Former Russian president Dimitry Medvedev has been trolling Trump on US nuclear issues.
Image: AFP
As an anti-submarine-warfare officer for three years on a destroyer early in my career, I hunted both Soviet and Chinese subs and, in exercises, American boats. ('Boats' is the colloquial term for submarines, whereas surface combatants are 'ships.') We like to think of our destroyers as the greyhounds of the sea, and lethal to submarines; but truth be told, more often than not we ended up the target rather than the hunter in those drills against US boats.
The US operates three types of nuclear-powered submarines, each posing a different level of threat to Russia. It is unclear which of the three types Trump claimed to have moved around; all US nuclear subs are capable of clandestine operations throughout the world's oceans.
First, and by far the deadliest, are huge ballistic-missile boats: Ohio class SSBNs, which displace 20,000 tons when fully submerged. The Navy has 14 of these killer whales, each capable of carrying 24 Trident II nuclear-tipped missiles with ranges exceeding 4,000 miles. The missiles are in vertical tubes at the center of the boat, and the crew of 150 officers and enlisted men and women call that part of the warship 'Sherwood Forest' - a stand of lethal tree trunks. While more than half the Ohio class are usually on patrol, it seems unlikely that Trump would have ordered changes to their movements given the extraordinary range of their missiles.
US president Donald Trump should no better than to brag about the position of the country's nuclear submarines on social media.
Image: AFP
The second big group of nuclear-powered submarines is the attack boats, or SSNs. The US currently operates three classes - Los Angeles, Seawolf and Virginia - totaling just over 50 warships. These are multi-mission platforms: they can hunt enemy submarines; launch long-range Tomahawk missiles at land targets with pinpoint accuracy; gather intelligence covertly; and sink enemy military and civilian surface ships. The three classes vary in size from 7,000 to 9,000 tons and their weapons and sensors vary - but all are deadly and very difficult to find through acoustic surveillance. I was glad to have two of them loosely assigned to my strike group in the early 2000s.
Finally, four Ohio-class behemoths have been converted to carry more than 150 Tomahawk land-attack missiles in the tubes that formerly held ballistic missiles. These are favored by combatant commanders because of the big load of missiles, which constitute a strike group's main battery. Since the Tomahawk's range is about 1,500 miles, these would probably be the boats Trump moved, presumably closer to Russia. He may have designated the commander of US European Command, my old position, as the operational commander. These missiles could hold at risk Russian command-and-control nodes, supply routes and military targets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
11 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump says Armenia, Azerbaijan commit to end fighting 'forever'
Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed to a lasting peace after decades of conflict, US President Donald Trump said after the South Caucasus rivals signed a deal welcomed on Saturday by Iran and Western nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan's long-time President Ilham Aliyev said Trump's mediation should earn him a Nobel Peace Prize -- an award the US leader has been vocal about seeking. The two former Soviet republics "are committing to stop all fighting forever, open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity," Trump said at a White House signing event on Friday. However, the fine print and binding nature of the deal between the long-time foes remained unclear. The two leaders would have a "great relationship," Trump said. "But if there's conflict... they're going to call me and we're going to get it straightened out," he said. AFP | ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have feuded for decades over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. They went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. - 'Historic signature' - The Azerbaijan and Armenian leaders shook hands under the satisfied gaze of Trump before all three signed a document the White House called a "joint declaration." Aliyev hailed the "historic signature" between two "countries which were at war for more than three decades." "We are today establishing peace in the Caucasus," he said. Aliyev offered to send a joint appeal, along with Pashinyan, to the Nobel committee recommending Trump receive the Peace Prize. "Who, if not President Trump, deserves a Nobel Peace Prize?" he said. Aliyev also thanked Trump for lifting restrictions on US military cooperation with Azerbaijan, which was announced on Friday. Pashinyan said the "initialing of (the) peace agreement will pave the way to end decades of conflict between our countries and open a new era." The Armenian leader said the "breakthrough" would not have been possible without "peacemaker" Trump. "Today, we can say that peace has been achieved," Pashinyan told a news conference after signing the deal. The agreement includes establishing a transit corridor passing through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States will have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. Iran, which has long opposed the corridor over fears it would cut the country off from the Caucasus, welcomed the deal on Saturday. However, it also expressed "concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders." The foreign ministry in Turkey, a longtime supporter of Azerbaijan, hailed the "progress achieved towards establishing a lasting peace". UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy congratulated the two countries "on the bold steps taken in Washington." European Union chiefs said it would pave the way to "lasting, sustainable peace for both countries and across the entire region." - 'Strategic' partner - Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. However, Azerbaijan later outlined a host of demands -- including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh -- before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians. Asked what Armenia stood to gain from Friday's deal, a White House official said it was "an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world: the United States of America." "The losers here are China, Russia, and Iran," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The disputed mountainous enclave of Karabakh is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but was controlled by pro-Armenian separatists for nearly three decades after a war following the break-up of the Soviet Union. DC POOL/AFP |
eNCA
11 hours ago
- eNCA
Inside an infamous Nigerian bandit's most recent 'peace' accords
A notorious criminal kingpin has entered into another truce with Nigerian authorities in Zamfara state, wracked by years of deadly violence and kidnappings -- yet doubts remain about whether it will lead to lasting peace. Gangs locally known as "bandits" have for years been terrorising communities in northwest and central Nigeria, raiding villages, kidnapping residents for ransom and burning homes after looting them. Bello Turji, a 31-year-old former herder, has made a name as one of the country's most gruesome bandit leaders through his indiscriminate killings and threatening videos, though last month he reached a deal with Nigeria's federal authorities to stop attacks in Shinkafi district. The gangs have turned cattle theft, kidnapping and imposing taxes on farmers into huge moneymakers across the impoverished countryside, where state presence has long been nearly non-existent. Unable to defeat the bandits militarily, authorities at the state, local and federal level have at times turned to peace deals, although they have often collapsed and the violence has restarted. The truce with Turji was reached after three separate meetings between Muslim clerics and the kingpin in his Fakai village stronghold, according to an August 5 conflict monitoring report produced for the United Nations and seen by AFP. In a video posted online, Musa Yusuf Asadus-Sunnah, a renowned Salafi cleric based in the northern city of Kaduna, confirmed leading the delegation. Turji led four other bandit leaders in the deal, the report said. He agreed to end deadly raids on communities, kidnapping and cattle theft in exchange for cessation of attacks by local vigilantes on his Fulani kinsmen. The origins of Nigeria's banditry crisis lie in farmer-herder conflicts over dwindling land, an issue exacerbated by climate change. As violence escalated and gangs formed, many bandits heavily drew ranks from Fulani herders. Fulani civilians have been both the victims of cattle rustling from bandits and retaliation from other banditry victims, meted out across ethnic lines. Turji also released 32 captives to the clerics and "surrendered some weapons" during the negotiations, the report said. Shinkafi district residents have "resumed farming activities in farms located in forests near Turji's hideouts", following the peace deal, it said. "Since our last talks the area has not recorded any attacks," said Asadus-Sunnah, who was involved in similar peace talks in his native Kaduna state in November. The Nigerian government was involved in the negotiations, he said. A spokesman for the office of the National Security Adviser did not respond to a request for comment. - Peace deals as 'survival strategy' - Turji has made several peace agreements with Zamfara state authorities only to renege and resume attacks. Other peace deals struck between state governments and bandits have fallen apart when authorities fail to uphold their end of the bargain, or when bandits simply strike a truce in one state and then start launching attacks in another, analysts say. The latest deal came after several of Turji's men were killed in an offensive last month by local vigilantes and anti-jihadist militia brought in by the Zamfara government as reinforcements for the military. Additionally, Turji was recently forced to flee to Jigawa state to avoid capture after a raid on his Fakai stronghold, an intelligence source told AFP. "He is only using peace deals as a survival strategy, staying quiet until after the heat subsides," Mannir Fura-Girke, a security analyst with deep knowledge of bandit groups, told AFP. While the resumption of farming is good news in a region where bandit violence has put pressure on an ongoing malnutrition crisis, not all Shinkafi residents support the truce. "Only military force can stop them," said Hamisu Aliyu, adding attacks have continued despite the deal. - Underlying tensions unresolved - Bandits who sign peace deals typically keep most of their weapons and have in the past used truces to create safe havens in the area under an agreement while continuing to strike elsewhere. A November accord in Kaduna state's Binin Gwari district has been followed by improved security in the area -- and increased bandit attacks in another part of the state as well as neighbouring Katsina and Niger states. Neither peace deals nor military campaigns have solved underlying tensions such as widespread poverty, conflict between herders and farmers, poor government services or criminal impunity. "Banditry has become a huge moneymaker for these criminal gangs. It is too lucrative for them to stop no matter how many peace deals they sign," Fura-Girke said. By Aminu Abubakar
eNCA
12 hours ago
- eNCA
UN plastic pollution treaty talks floundering
Talks on forging a groundbreaking treaty to combat the scourge of plastic pollution were floundering Saturday, with progress slow and countries wildly at odds on what the proposed agreement should cover. The negotiations, which opened on Tuesday, have four working days left to strike a legally-binding instrument that would tackle the growing problem choking the environment. But in a blunt mid-way assessment, the talks chair warned the 184 countries gathered at the United Nations in Geneva that progress so far was well off track. Some countries called for areas where countries are far from agreement to ditched completely for the sake of expediency. Others slammed the brinkmanship and said insistence on consensus could not be used as justification for sinking the more ambitious elements of the treaty. "Progress made has not been sufficient," Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told delegates in a frank summary as country delegations gathered in the assembly hall to take stock. "We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed. "August 14 is not just a deadline for our work: it is a date by which we must deliver." - 'Little progress' - Countries have reconvened at the UN in Geneva after the failure of the supposedly fifth and final round of talks in Busan, South Korea in 2024. After four days of talks, the draft text has ballooned from 22 to 35 pages -- with the number of brackets in the text going up near five-fold to almost 1,500 as countries insert conflicting ideas. Vayas Valdivieso said states had had two and a half years to make such proposals. "Some articles still have unresolved issues and show little progress towards reaching a common understanding," he lamented. AFP | Fabrice COFFRINI Kuwait spoke up for the so-called Like-Minded Group -- a nebulous cluster of mostly oil-producing nations which rejects production limits and wants to focus on treating waste. Kuwait said the scope of the treaty had not been given "an equal and fair chance for discussion". "Let us agree on what we can agree... consensus must be the basis of all our decisions." But Uruguay insisted that doggedly clinging to consensus "cannot be used as a justification to not achieve our objectives". The talks process is mandated to look at the full life cycle of plastic, from production to pollution. Eirik Lindebjerg, global plastics adviser for the World Wide Fund for Nature, told AFP that Kuwait's proposal was "another attempt to make it a waste management agreement", and to stifle talks reducing the amount of plastic and phasing out the most harmful elements. Saudi Arabia, speaking for the Arab Group, said the responsible way ahead was to start considering what bits of the text "may not make it to the final outcome due to irreconcilable divergence" "We cannot do everything everywhere all at once," Riyadh said, adding: "Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good." - 'Profits from poisoning' - Panama's negotiator Juan Monterrey Gomez slammed those countries wanting to stop the treaty from encompassing the entire life cycle of plastic. AFP | LAKRUWAN WANNIARACHCHI He said microplastics "are in our blood, in our lungs and in the first cry of a new-born child. Our bodies of living proof of a system that profits from poisoning us". He said it was a lie that "recycling alone will save us... we cannot recycle our way out of this crisis... when the poison is inside us". Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items. Plastic production is set to triple by 2060.
