My top tip for how YOU can become a billionaire: Serial entrepreneur RICHARD HARPIN reveals the key secret to business success (and it even saved his local pub)
'I'm a great believer that you should share secrets,' says the self-styled angel investor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Shoppers spot new Marmite flavour back on shelves months after it was axed as discontinued spread returns
SHOPPERS have spotted a new Marmite flavour back on the shelves just months after it was axed. Unilever, which makes Marmite, discontinued the popular cupboard staple last year leaving shoppers very unhappy. 2 But now Marmite Peanut Butter has made a stunning return to the shelves and it's here to stay. The nutty and yeasty breakfast spread first appeared on shelves in 2019 causing a stir, but was discontinued nine months ago. However, The Sun reported last month that Unilever has reintroduced it to shelves with shoppers able to pick it up from Tesco, Sainsbury's and Ocado. We've also spotted the 225g tub on sale at Co-op too. Alongside Tesco, they're selling it for £3 while Ocado is stocking it for £3.50 and Sainsbury's for £3.35. And fans have already starting clocking the returning favourite on supermarket shelves. One eagle-eyed shopper shared their find on Facebook group Food Finds UK. Excited customers flocked to the comments to express their excitement at the beloved spread's return. One said: "Oh yes, it's back! "I was gutted when they stopped making it and tried several ways to make my own but it never tasted the same." "Wow it's back, I heard it wasn't getting made anymore," exclaimed another. "Fantastic it's back as I love it!" A third customer added: "My favourite snack, it's perfect for a quick snack or adding some crunch to your meals. We've outdone ourselves with this one' say Cadbury Ireland as they reveal new limited edition bar 'coming soon "The price seems really reasonable too." Unilever confirmed it had axed Marmite Peanut Butter last September with a spokesperson adding: "We're always reviewing our ranges to make sure our products reflect shopper preferences, whilst also focusing on new innovations." "Whilst we will no longer be making Marmite peanut butter, we are working on some new and exciting launches within our licensing range to bring our iconic Marmite flavour to shoppers in new ways and formats." Retailers and manufacturers regularly discontinue products and items based on customer sales and trends. Marmite Peanut Butter is not the only comeback we've seen recently either. From an iconic retro sweet to a nostalgic noughties chocolate bar, a whole host of discontinued snacks and drinks are returning to UK shelves this month. Why are products axed or recipes changed? ANALYSIS by chief consumer reporter James Flanders. Food and drinks makers have been known to tweak their recipes or axe items altogether. They often say that this is down to the changing tastes of customers. There are several reasons why this could be done. For example, government regulation, like the "sugar tax," forces firms to change their recipes. Some manufacturers might choose to tweak ingredients to cut costs. They may opt for a cheaper alternative, especially when costs are rising to keep prices stable. For example, Tango Cherry disappeared from shelves in 2018. It has recently returned after six years away but as a sugar-free version. Fanta removed sweetener from its sugar-free alternative earlier this year. Suntory tweaked the flavour of its flagship Lucozade Original and Orange energy drinks. While the amount of sugar in every bottle remains unchanged, the supplier swapped out the sweetener aspartame for sucralose.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Will Keir Starmer cave to pressure on the two-child benefit cap?
K's first big showdown with the Labour left in government came as a group of rebels voted for a King's Speech amendment calling for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. The ruthless prime minister, with the confidence of a man who had just led Labour to a landslide election win, suspended seven of his own MPs. Starmer wanted to instil fear in those who might not be on board with his agenda in the future that rebellion would have consequences. But a year on, Starmer is weakened. Labour MPs are emboldened after forcing their leader's hand over his controversial welfare cuts, and the two-child cap on benefits is likely to be next. Implemented by austerity architect George Osborne, the limit, which restricts parents from claiming certain benefits for more than two of their children, is hated across the Labour Party. Critics say the cap punishes children, with experts predicting 470,000 could be lifted from poverty if Starmer scrapped it. But how likely is it that the prime minister will give in to pressure and axe the cap? Bridget Phillipson on Sunday warned that future spending commitments – including on Labour's child poverty plans – had been made harder by the £5bn U-turn on welfare. The education secretary said ministers are 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. But, pushed on whether a change to the two-child cap was now less likely, Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder.' Alternatives to scrapping the cap entirely, such as lifting it to a three-child cap, are also believed to have been floated in government. The Resolution Foundation has said increasing the two-child cap to three children could reduce child poverty by 320,000 by the next general election, costing £3.2bn per year by 2030. It said this would be 'preferable' to the current system, but that benefits should be allocated in line with need, which would require fully scrapping the two-child limit at a cost of around £4.5bn. The chancellor is already braced for tax hikes in the autumn Budget, having warned the cabinet last week they could be more painful than last year's punishing increases. And any move to scrap or alter the two-child limit would need to be paid for by more tax increases or spending cuts elsewhere. Downing Street figures have been pointing rebels demanding a change to the welfare U-turn they forced, arguing the £5bn cost of that has derailed any plans to scrap the benefit cap. But the argument has already sparked anger among left-wing MPs, with Labour's Jon Trickett saying: 'The suggestion that the Labour government will leave children in poverty because they couldn't take welfare benefits from the disabled is truly shocking.' Phillipson and work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall are currently leading a Child Poverty Taskforce, which was due to report in the spring, but has been delayed to this autumn to coincide with the Budget. The taskforce is looking at 'all the available levers we have across government' to deliver the 'ambitious' child poverty strategy promised in Labour's manifesto. Senior Labour figures have also reportedly warned that tax hikes are on the horizon after the benefits climbdown, with the chance of a change in the controversial cap looking increasingly remote. 'My assessment is that is now dead in the water,' a No 10 source told The Sunday Times. Even Starmer, who previously let it be known that he wanted to scrap the cap, ordering the Treasury to find a way to fund the plan, dampened expectations of a change last week. He said: 'I personally don't think there is a silver bullet… we have got to look at a range of things.' As long as Starmer is prime minister, he will face round after round of calls for the two-child cap to be scrapped. The question is, will he give in?
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill
The Conservatives will try to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten up access to personal independence payments (Pip) and universal credit. Kemi Badenoch will pledge that the Tories are 'now the only party committed to serious welfare reform' after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer shelved plans to restrict eligibility for Pip in the face of a backbench revolt this week. Ministers have warned there will be costs to their backtracking on the plans, as Downing Street and the Treasury will be looking to cover the spending shortfall left by the decision. The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday. Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually. As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit. Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money. Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens. In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels. On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget. It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter. In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be 'irresponsible' to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill. The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
