
How Trump's visa crackdown is pushing 16 US colleges toward financial collapse
Why 16 US colleges could collapse under Trump's foreign student visa crackdown
As the Trump administration intensifies restrictions on international student visas, a growing number of financially vulnerable US colleges are facing a dire threat to their survival.
The new policy measures, framed as a response to campus antisemitism and national security concerns, have halted key visa appointments and blocked access for students from more than ten countries, placing colleges heavily reliant on foreign tuition in an existential crisis.
According to Forbes, 16 private nonprofit US colleges are particularly exposed. Each of these institutions enrolls at least one-third of their students from overseas and derives over half of their operating revenue from tuition and fees.
Many already scored C+ or lower on Forbes' most recent financial health rankings, a signal that they were struggling even before the visa policy changes.
Foreign students as a financial lifeline
Colleges such as St. Francis in Brooklyn have turned to international enrollment as a revenue strategy. After years of deficits, St. Francis closed fiscal 2023 with $66 million in net income, largely from the $160 million sale of its main campus and deep budget cuts—including scrapping its Division I athletics program and laying off staff.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness
Luxeartisanship
Shop Now
Undo
Still, auditors remain skeptical about its long-term viability, with an endowment of only $46 million, or $16,409 per full-time student, Forbes reported.
In just one year, St. Francis nearly tripled its international student headcount—from 465 to 1,289—mainly through graduate programs. In a June 2024 audit, university officials stated that international enrollment had become 'a significant source of revenue growth," as quoted by Forbes.
But with student visas now under strict federal control, this key strategy is in jeopardy.
Colleges caught in a tightening policy vise
The Trump administration's new executive order bans visa issuance to individuals from 11 countries including Iran, Libya, and Yemen. This comes alongside the State Department's recent pause in F-1 and J-1 visa appointments. The consequences could be catastrophic for institutions like Harrisburg University and Hult International Business School, where more than 75% of students are international.
Both schools received a D in Forbes' 2025 Financial Grades.
Other colleges like Manhattan School of Music and California College of the Arts, where over 40% of students are foreign, also risk severe enrollment shortfalls. At Campbellsville University, 83% of operational revenue comes from tuition, and nearly half of students are international.
National impact and muted college response
Foreign students contribute billions to the US economy and often remain in the country after graduation.
Forbes cited a 2022 study by the National Foundation for American Policy showing that one-quarter of billion-dollar US startups were founded by international alumni. Despite this, all 16 colleges declined to comment, fearing retaliation. As Forbes noted, institutions that speak out risk being singled out by the Trump administration, as happened with Harvard University's Student Visitor Exchange Program, which was suspended before a court order intervened.
For many of these schools, international students are not just an asset—they are a necessity. Without them, the lights may soon go out.
1. St. Francis College (Brooklyn, NY): A small private college with financial challenges, previously noted for budget deficits and layoffs. International students likely bolster its revenue, and visa restrictions could exacerbate existing issues.
2. Harrisburg University of Science and Technology (PA): Known for attracting international students, particularly in STEM fields.
A significant portion of its revenue comes from international tuition, making it sensitive to visa crackdowns.
3. Hult International Business School (Boston, MA): A global business school with a large international student body (over 80% in some programs). Its business model heavily depends on foreign students, and visa restrictions could severely impact enrollment.
4. Manhattan School of Music (NYC, NY): A specialized institution with a notable international student population.
Arts schools often rely on international talent, and visa limitations could reduce enrollment and revenue.
5. California College of the Arts (CA): Another arts-focused institution with financial dependence on international students. Its small size and high tuition costs make it vulnerable to enrollment drops.
6. Campbellsville University (KY): A private Christian university with a significant international student population, particularly in graduate programs.
Visa restrictions could strain its budget.
7. University of Bridgeport (CT): A private university with a history of financial struggles, recently acquired by Goodwin University. International students are a key revenue source, and visa policies could threaten stability.
8. New York University (NYU): With one of the highest international student populations (over 20% of enrollment), NYU was mentioned as vulnerable to visa crackdowns due to its reliance on international tuition.
9. Columbia University (NY): Also noted for a large international student share (around 30%) and targeted visa revocations, such as the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate student arrested for pro-Palestinian protests.
10. Johns Hopkins University (MD): Has a significant international student population (around 25%) and relies on their tuition and research contributions. Visa restrictions could disrupt its financial model.
11. Carnegie Mellon University (PA): Known for a high proportion of international students (over 20%), particularly in STEM fields, making it susceptible to visa policy changes.
12. Northeastern University (MA): Frequently cited for its large international student body and reliance on their tuition. Visa crackdowns could impact its financial stability.
13. Boston University (MA): Another institution with a high international student share, noted as potentially affected by tightened visa controls.
14. University of Southern California (USC): A major destination for international students, particularly from China (over 15% of enrollment). Visa revocations targeting Chinese students could hit USC hard.
15. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (IL): A public university with significant international enrollment (over $500 million in tuition revenue from foreign students in 2023-2024).
16. Arizona State University (AZ): Another public institution generating substantial revenue ($545 million in 2023-2024) from international students, making it vulnerable to enrollment declines.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Houthis warn of Red Sea attacks if US backs Israel in war against Iran
Saturday's threat came in a prerecorded video statement by Houthi military spokesman Brig Gen Yahya Saree AP Tel Aviv The Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen have threatened to resume attacks on US vessels and warships in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joins Israel's military campaign against Iran. Saturday's threat came in a prerecorded video statement by Houthi military spokesman Brig Gen Yahya Saree. In the event of the American involvement in the attack and aggression against Iran with the Israeli enemy, the armed forces will target its ships and warships in the Red Sea, Saree said. US President Donald Trump is weighing active US military involvement in the war. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Pakistan's Defence Minister Admits ‘Hybrid Rule', Says Army Too Holds Power In Civil-Military Setup
This marks the second time in a week that Asif, currently serving in Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's cabinet, has acknowledged the presence of a hybrid arrangement. Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, a senior leader of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and a close aide of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, has openly stated that the country is operating under a 'hybrid model" of governance in which the military holds a fair share of power. This marks the second time in a week that Asif, currently serving in Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's cabinet, has acknowledged the presence of a hybrid arrangement. Analysts have long criticised this setup as a 'fixed government to serve subsidiary interests," rather than a genuine power-sharing model. Asif's remarks came during an interview with Arab News aired on Friday evening and are being widely interpreted as confirmation that the Sharifs' PML-N is functioning with the endorsement of Pakistan's powerful military establishment. Describing the hybrid civil-military structure as a shared arrangement, Asif said: 'This is a hybrid model. It's not an ideal democratic government. So, this hybrid arrangement, I think it is doing wonders. This system is a practical necessity until Pakistan is out of the woods as far as economic and governance problems are concerned." He further argued that if such a model had been implemented in the 1990s, when Nawaz Sharif was twice elected prime minister, Pakistan might have avoided prolonged friction between civilian and military leadership. 'The confrontation between the military establishment and the political government would retard the progress of democracy," he added. The defence minister's statement has reignited debate over the PML-N's political trajectory and its now-contradictory past slogan of 'vote ko izzat do" (give respect to the ballot). Critics argue that Asif's frank admission cements the perception that the PML-N has aligned itself firmly under the military's umbrella, abandoning its previous anti-establishment stance. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a long-time rival of the Sharifs, has repeatedly claimed that the general elections held on February 8 were the 'Mother of All Rigging" and accused the PML-N and its coalition partner—the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari—of being 'mandate thieves." Following Asif's admission, political observers say the future of Pakistan's democratic institutions remains precarious. 'This (Trump-Munir) meeting has lifted the thin, see-through veneer of 'elected'. What the world has known for quite a while is now in the open… where is the centre of power in Pakistan and who is in control of real state powers? The political allies (military) in power have presented themselves as the 'government' now," remarked political analyst Dr Rasul Bakhsh Rais, reported news agency PTI. He further noted: 'Khawaja Asif and others now have to seek some legitimacy to praise the merits of the hybrid model, which actually doesn't mean a mixed but a fixed government to serve subsidiary interests." Dr Rais described the current political system as the third iteration of a hybrid regime since Imran Khan's ouster in 2022. Unlike previous periods under General Ziaul Haq and General Pervez Musharraf, both of whom built new political alliances, this time, he said, major parties like the PML-N and PPP have willingly assumed the role of 'political facade." He concluded that the military's orchestration of electoral victories for the PML-N and PPP has reduced them to mere appendages of the establishment. 'Now, the priority of the Sharifs and Zardaris as well as the military establishment is to neutralise the third force — Imran Khan's PTI — which is perceived as a danger for all of them," he said. Senior journalist Matiullah Jan also weighed in with sharp criticism on X: 'What a fall from grace for a politician. This defence minister takes oath to defend the constitution which makes no mention of the so-called hybrid form of government." He added, 'The fact is that this system is not even a hybrid system but a pure and simple dictatorship with political pygmies at the heels of affairs." Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 21, 2025, 21:38 IST News world Pakistan's Defence Minister Admits 'Hybrid Rule', Says Army Too Holds Power In Civil-Military Setup

The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. VP Vance says troops still 'necessary' in Los Angeles
U.S. Vice President JD Vance said on Friday (June 20, 2025) that the thousands of troops deployed to Los Angeles this month were still needed despite a week of relative calm in the protest-hit city. U.S. President Donald Trump has sent roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines, purportedly to protect federal property and personnel, after demonstrations over immigration raids. "Unfortunately, the soldiers and Marines are still very much a necessary part of what's going on here because they're worried that it's going to flare back up," Vance told reporters in Los Angeles. He was speaking the day after an appeals court ruled that Trump could continue to control the California National Guard, which would normally fall under Governor Gavin Newsom's authority. California officials have heavily criticised Trump over his use of the military, saying it escalated protests that local law enforcement could have handled. The demonstrations were largely peaceful and mostly contained to a small part of Los Angeles, the second-largest US city, although there were instances of violence and vandalism. "If you let violent rioters burn Great American Cities to the ground, then, of course, we're going to send federal law enforcement in to protect the people the president was elected to protect," Vance said, adding that Trump would deploy them again if needed. The Republican further accused Mr. Newsom -- a possible contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 -- and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of encouraging protesters. Mr. Newsom and Ms. Bass have both condemned rioting and violence towards law enforcement while accusing the Trump administration of manufacturing a crisis in the city. Ms. Bass hit back at Mr. Vance during a news conference on Friday, accusing him of openly lying and saying that local law enforcement agencies handled crowd control. "How dare you say that city officials encourage violence. We kept the peace. You know that the federal officials that were here protected a federal building -- they were not involved in crowd control," she said. Ms. Bass said that even when there was vandalism, at its height, "you are talking about a couple of hundred people who are not necessarily associated with any of the peaceful protests." "Los Angeles is a city that is 500 square miles and any of the disruption that took place took place at about 2 square miles in our city," she said, accusing Mr. Vance of adding to "provocation" and sowing "division." 'Jose Padilla' Many in Los Angeles are angry about immigration raids carried out as part of Mr. Trump's ambition to deport vast numbers of undocumented migrants around the country. Outrage at the use of masked, armed immigration agents also sparked protests in other cities, including San Francisco, New York, Chicago and San Antonio, Texas. Tensions spiked when California Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, was handcuffed and forcibly removed last week when attempting to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem questions during her news conference. Mr. Vance misnamed the senator when referring to the incident, saying: "I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question but unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater." Ms. Bass reacted to the comment with outrage. "How dare you disrespect him and call him Jose. But I guess he just looked like anybody to you," she said. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had said Padilla's treatment "reeks of totalitarianism," while the White House claimed -- despite video evidence to the contrary -- that Padilla had "lunged toward Secretary Noem."