‘How's Imelda?': Trump's connection to Philippine leader may be through his mother
For Marcos, the connection may be his mother.
'How's Imelda?' Trump asked the Philippine leader when they first spoke in November, according to an official familiar with the call, sending his regards to the onetime first lady of the Philippines and a fellow cultural figurehead of the 1980s and 90s.
Trump has long placed a premium on family ties and genetics as a measure of people's value, including for foreign leaders and members of his staff. He appeared to be impressed in the lead-up to Tuesday's meeting with Marcos Jr.'s connections to an infamous period in Philippine history, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Trump and Imelda Marcos first crossed paths decades ago as members of the international jet set — he as a New York businessman and she as the wife of strongman leader Ferdinand Marcos, famous for her extravagant taste financed by public funds and amassing a massive collection of shoes while her husband imposed martial law.
The two attended parties together in New York, including during the period when Imelda Marcos and her husband were forced into exile in Hawaii after being unseated by a popular uprising. They fled the country with crates of gold and pesos.
Images show Trump seated alongside his second wife Marla Maples and the glamorous Imelda Marcos at a birthday party in New York in 1991 — ten months before she returned to the Philippines after six years to face graft charges.
She went on to have a successful political career herself, elected four times to the House of Representatives for the Philippines, and saw her family name restored to power when her son — known universally by his nickname Bongbong — was elected president in 2022.
It wasn't until 2018 that Imelda Marcos was finally convicted on graft charges and sentenced to 42 years in prison; she has remained free in her advanced age (she is 96).
For her son, the familial connection may prove useful as he seeks to avoid tariffs and deepen longstanding US-Philippines defense agreements. He will be the first southeast Asian leader to meet Trump since his second term began.
Marcos hopes to leverage deep historic ties with the Philippines — the oldest US alliance in the Pacific and a key counterweight to China — for an advantageous trade deal that would avoid the 20% tariff Trump has threatened.
Ahead of Tuesday's visit, Philippine officials voiced hope the family ties would translate into a positive meeting.
'That connection, that personal connection obviously is significant in the sense that we all know President Trump is very personal in his relationships with world leaders. And I think that that connection tells you how he values friendship and it is an advantage obviously for the Philippines that President Marcos has that personal connection with President Trump,' Philippine Ambassador to Washington Jose Manuel 'Babe' Romualdez said.
The White House said Trump is looking forward to Marcos' visit, 'where they will discuss cooperation in various areas such as our shared commitment to upholding a free, open, prosperous, and secure Indo-Pacific and advancing shared economic prosperity,' according to a White House official. 'The friendship between the United States and the Philippines is rooted in our long history, marked this year by the 80th anniversary of the shared sacrifice that led to victory in World War II.'
Marcos' accommodation for his stay in Washington will be the presidential guest quarters at Blair House, where his father and mother stayed during a visit to Ronald Reagan decades ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia says it no longer will abide by its self-imposed moratorium on intermediate-range missiles
MOSCOW (AP) — Russia has declared that it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles, a warning that potentially sets the stage for a new arms race as tensions between Moscow and Washington rise again over Ukraine. In a statement Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the U.S. and its allies to develop intermediate range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. It specifically cited U.S. plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. The ministry noted that such actions by the U.S. and its allies create 'destabilizing missile potentials" near Russia, creating a "direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers.' It didn't say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but President Vladimir Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbor and ally Belarus later this year. Asked where and when Russia could potentially deploy intermediate-range weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that it's not something to be announced in advance. 'Russia no longer has any limitations, Russia no longer considers itself to be constrained by anything,' Peskov told reporters. 'Therefore Russia believes it has the right to take respective steps if necessary.' 'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability,' the Foreign Ministry said. Russia's move follows Trump's nuclear messaging The Russian statement follows President Donald Trump's announcement Friday that he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev, who was president in 2008-12 to allow Putin, bound by term limits, to later return to the office. Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week. Trump said he was alarmed by Medvedev's attitude. Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Putin, has apparently sought to curry favor with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week. he responded to Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.' Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.' 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.' INF treaty abandoned in 2019 Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles). Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Washington and Moscow abandoned the pact in 2019, accusing each other of violations, but Moscow declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the U.S. makes such a move. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilizing because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. Putin has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
Chicago Tribune
3 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Smoky air should not become a permanent hallmark of Chicago summers
We're more than two-thirds of the way through Chicago's meteorological summer, and so far when the weather hasn't been suffocatingly hot and humid, it's featured air that's dangerous for too many of us to breathe. Sweltering conditions are a normal part of summer in Chicago — some years more so than others, of course — but when the winds blow from the north, Chicagoans are supposed to be able to breathe a sigh of relief and head for the tennis courts or the baseball/softball diamonds or the bike trails. Or, at the very least, their patios and porches. For the past three years, that temperature relief has been accompanied by plumes of smoke from wildfires raging all the summer long in Canada. The end of last week's heat wave brought daily warnings of poor air quality, with Chicago tabbed Thursday as having the worst air quality in the entire world. The warnings continued through most of the weekend. For many, the conditions made our eyes itchy and were just sort of bothersome. But for those who suffer from asthma and other pulmonary ailments, the air was downright hazardous. If this situation were a one-off — just a uniquely awful set of circumstances north of the border — we'd be inclined to give Canada a pass. But this is becoming a regular ordeal, and it's time people who can do something about it acknowledge the issue — and act. That means Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office earlier this year and will have no such excuses next summer. That also means President Donald Trump. We mention our president because he has spent much of his first six months in office bullying and trolling Canada over trade, national defense and whether that sovereign nation ought to become just another U.S. state. We've criticized Trump for treating one of this country's most stalwart friends on the world stage as an adversary. Among other things, the natural offense Canadians have taken to Trump's provocations and threats has led many to boycott travel to the U.S. One look at Las Vegas' underwhelming summer traffic suggests this needless antagonism with Canada is costing the U.S. directly. We'd love to see Trump abandon his self-defeating economic battle with Canada over products such as lumber and focus instead on a Canadian export that truly is damaging America — wildfire smoke. A large swath of the U.S. — essentially the entire Upper Midwest, including states such as Wisconsin and Michigan that were key to Trump's 2024 victory — is enduring unacceptable health and other risks because of these blazes. While wildfires are common in Canada given that vast geographic territory's abundance of unsettled areas, it's only been in recent years that the conflagrations have grown so large. Unlike the U.S., which long has supported a substantial force to fight wildfires, primarily in the West, Canada's firefighters are mainly focused on blazes in municipalities. Essentially, Canada has said it doesn't have the capacity to battle these wildfires before they get so out of control that they must burn themselves out or rage on for months until the seasons change. The U.S. has sent hundreds of firefighters to help in recent years, but the efforts haven't been sufficient. This is not a new summertime status quo to which Chicagoans and other Upper Midwesterners simply should be told to get accustomed. It's unacceptable and should be treated as such. We're not saying that solving a problem driven by large-scale climatic changes is simple — or cheap. There's a reason Canada isn't equipped like the U.S. to battle fires sparked in wilderness areas. Our neighbor to the north hasn't needed the capability in the past. It does now. To be fair, the United States has faced its own reckoning with increasingly destructive wildfires, especially in the West. But we've built up a robust federal firefighting infrastructure over decades in response — something Canada is only now beginning to consider on a national scale. What's needed is for leaders to make this scourge a priority. Where there's a will there's a way, especially given the wealth held in North America. Surely, in coming summers, the U.S. could contribute expertise and even personnel while Canada invests in early detection and extinguishment of these fires. In return, Trump could drop his trade-related threats and demands and focus on a U.S.-Canadian problem that directly affects millions of American lives. How about if both countries committed to action that truly would be beneficial on both sides of the border? A win-win. What a novel concept.
Chicago Tribune
3 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Daniel DePetris: Taiwan's president is not having an easy time of it at home or with the US
With the exception of Israel, no foreign entity elicits as much bipartisan support in Washington as Taiwan. The self-ruled democratic island is David to China's Goliath, a relatively small pseudo-country (the United States and much of the world don't recognize Taiwan as a state) under constant threat from the Chinese Communist Party that has long striven to reunify the island with mainland China. If anything, Chinese President Xi Jinping is even more intent on reunification than his predecessors, ordering the People's Liberation Army to have the military assets in place to invade Taiwan by 2027. But that's only the half of it for Taiwan's political leadership. While Taipei's relations with the United States remain strong at an institutional level, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te has faced multiple speed bumps, internally and externally, that have raised alarms among Taiwan experts back in Washington. A highly polarized Taiwanese political scene, coupled with an unpredictable Donald Trump administration, has led to the fundamental question: Can Taiwan afford a business-as-usual mentality? Internally, Taiwanese politicians are at one another's throats. Lai's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is at loggerheads with the main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the upstart Taiwan People's Party over everything from the defense budget to the basic functions of how the Taiwanese government should work. Despite Lai's support for a hefty increase in military spending, partly due to the urgings of the Trump administration, the Legislative Yuan, dominated by the opposition, has stonewalled the request and in fact voted in January to freeze the defense budget by billions of dollars. Lai has called the parliament's actions a deliberate attempt to block his agenda; the opposition says it's merely an exercise in oversight. The DPP's frustrations with the KMT have boiled over. Sympathizers of the party organized a recall vote on one-fifth of the KMT's lawmakers, hoping voters will kick them out of office and replace them with DPP representatives. But the effort failed. Every KMT lawmaker survived the recall effort, which means that Lai will either be forced to work with the opposition to get anything passed in the legislature or spend the remainder of his term as a lame-duck leader. Then there are Trump's tariffs. On July 31, the White House announced a 20% tariff on Taiwanese goods entering the United States, part of Trump's global tariff regime in a bid — so he says — to inject fairness into the global trading system. Although Lai's administration played down the tariffs and called them a temporary aberration on the way to a trade deal, the levies will have at least a short-term impact on the Taiwanese economy. The United States is Taiwan's largest buyer of goods, having imported more than $116 billion in Taiwanese products last year. While it's likely Washington and Taipei will eventually strike an agreement lessening the tariff rate, it's going to take significant concessions on the Taiwanese side to move past the finish line. Those concessions will include throwing tens of billions, if not hundreds of billions, of dollars into the United States over a long period of time in the form of investments. This is precisely what Japan and South Korea did to finalize their own trade deals with Washington, and it's something Taiwan will be hard-pressed to avoid. Even then, it might not mollify Trump; whenever he talks about Taiwan, Trump never ceases to remind people about how the island 'stole' America's chip-making business. Then there's the Trump administration decision to block Lai from traveling to the United States on his way to Central America. Such stops in the United States are quite common, with Lai's predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen, doing it multiple times. They've so common that Beijing isn't particularly shocked when they occur. Even so, stopovers in the United States by Taiwanese ministers, let alone presidents, always get China riled up because in Beijing's mind, they connote U.S. recognition of Taiwan as a sovereign state. Therefore, the White House's veto of Lai's travel schedule, in addition to the Pentagon's cancellation of defense talks with Taiwan's defense minister, will come as welcome signs to Xi. If Joe Biden as president had made a similar move, the Taiwanese political and security establishment would have rested easy, knowing that U.S. support was unquestionable. Can Taiwan assume this is the case now, particularly when Trump's priorities are finalizing a comprehensive trade accord with China and pushing U.S. allies around the world to do more for themselves on the defense front? Ultimately, the best policy for the United States is to drag out the status quo for as long as possible. This includes a number of key elements: China and Taiwan refrain from unilateral moves that could jeopardize the balance of power and heighten the odds of a cross-strait conflict; U.S. arms sales to Taiwan continue in keeping with U.S. law; Taipei stays away from declaring independence; and Washington makes it abundantly clear to Taiwan's political leadership that unhelpful actions breaking from the status quo could result in a change to U.S. policy. Regardless of what Washington does, it's on Taiwan — and Taiwan alone — to get its own house in order. The United States may be the best foreign friend it has, but not even a superpower can force Taiwan's politicians to pass legislation, ensure the defense budget is adequate for the times and get the machinery of government working again. Otherwise, nothing else that follows will matter.
