What led Chandigarh-based author Khushwant Singh to turn his book ‘Maharaja in Denims' into ‘India's first AI feature film'
Iconic villain Ranjeet was the first to bid for its rights around 2016, presumably to launch his son.
Soon after, producer Guneet Monga showed interest.
And why not? Maharaja in Denims has all the makings of a larger-than-life feature film — a work of fiction that follows the journey of a young boy who believes he is the reincarnation of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, founder of the Sikh Empire.
Through regression therapy, he finds himself transported into key moments in history, including the Partition of 1947, the anti-Sikh riots of 1984, and eventually the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.
But when no deal materialised and the book was no longer tied up in any rights agreements, Singh's cousin — tech guru Gurdeep Singh Pall — offered an alternative.
Pall, known for his long tenure at Microsoft, most recently as corporate vice-president overseeing business AI projects, suggested they stop pitching the book and instead spend two years turning it into India's first full-length AI-generated feature film.
'It's a period drama. The biggest hurdle was the budget — it would have required hundreds of crores. And post-pandemic, it has become increasingly difficult to draw enough people to theatres to justify such an expense,' Singh, who is based in Chandigarh, told The Indian Express during his visit to Mumbai for the debut edition of the World Audio Visual Entertainment (WAVES) Summit.
'Gurdeep suggested we make it as an AI film, which meant we no longer needed to spend crores on elaborate sets or casting an A-lister as the lead.'
In 2023, Pall and Singh co-founded Intelliflicks and set up a team in Chandigarh.
'There are seven of us, including Balpreet Kaur, who translated the novel into a script and is also leading the screenplay and direction. The rest are experts in software engineering and AI,' said Singh.
Using tools such as Runway, Midjourney, and Clink, the team generated the visuals and video content through a combination of prompts and software. Singh played us nearly 10 minutes of footage — the environments and characters, barring a few inconsistencies, looked surprisingly lifelike.
He says the film is close to completion.
'We have already stitched together about 30 minutes of footage. We are targeting a total runtime of around 100 minutes,' he said.
Initial challenges, he noted, were lip-syncing and continuity.
'We had dubbing artists lend their voices, but cutting-edge lip-sync technology was not publicly available until after the US elections — likely due to concerns over deepfake manipulation. Continuity was also tricky because the same prompt can yield different results each time. But we have figured out ways to manage that, and when the film releases, you will see how the visuals are hyper-realistic.'
Now, the team is focusing on marketing — an area outside their expertise.
Another challenge, Singh admitted, is knowing when to stop.
'Technology evolves so fast that every week brings new improvements. At some point, we have to accept that the film is done.'
They are aiming for a release by August or September this year.
Is Singh worried, given that he has invested his own money? He quoted his cousin Pall: 'Even if it's not the most entertaining or gripping film, it will still be a breakthrough — India's first AI feature.'
He added, 'Someday, if the Cannes Film Festival introduces a category for AI films, we want India to have a nomination in it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Digital independence is the next step for the India story
Yesterday we celebrated freedom. The speeches were stirring, indicating India's time had come. And yet, in the real world where our economy now lives, inside racks of servers, lines of code, and foreign-owned systems, the picture is less about sovereignty and more about how easily the rules can be changed on us. Illustration of social media concept Two weeks in this space, I wrote about Microsoft pulling the plug on Nayara Energy. A decision taken in another country, quietly yanked control away from a major Indian company. No troops crossed borders. No sanctions were announced. Just a click somewhere far away, and the lights went out here. If that sounded like an isolated incident, it wasn't. In India's data centres, a friend in the software business pointed to a software from VMware that has been quietly running the show for years. It lets one physical server behave like many smaller ones, squeezing far more work out of the same machine. Operators bought it on perpetual licences. Pay once and run it as long as the hardware lived. Budgets were planned on that certainty. Then VMware got acquired. The new owner announced the old licences would no longer get support. From now on, you had to renew every year. The machines hadn't changed. The work hadn't changed. Only the rules had. 'It's like paying off on your house and being told one morning you now have to rent it from someone else,' said the aforementioned friend. You can't move house. You can't build a new one overnight. You just start paying. These are the visible dependencies, the ones that show up as invoices, blocked accounts, higher bills. But there's a quieter layer that's harder to see. Artificial intelligence, now woven into banking, farming, retail, and governance, arrives with the cultural DNA of where it was built. On paper, the top AI models can speak in dozens of languages. In practice, they think in one. That's not a conspiracy theory. It's how systems are trained. The logic, the assumptions, the frames of reference are imported along with the code. And here's the kicker: India generates nearly 20 per cent of the world's data but has the capacity to store just three per cent. Imagine a dam filled to the brim but with a release pipe barely wide enough for a garden hose. The overflow is simply routed elsewhere. In tech speak, to servers we don't own. None of this would matter if the global game was balanced. It isn't. Interdependence works only when both sides need each other equally. In our case, the dependency is often one-way. Tariffs on goods might sound irrelevant to IT, but they ripple outwards. Inflation rises, American clients trim budgets. In certain industries like textiles, gems and jewellery, orders from India are being shifted to Bangladesh and Vietnam to dodge duties. In tech, the shift is quieter: contracts are being rewritten, compliance costs are climbing, margins are getting squeezed. Yet, on Independence Day, we tell ourselves the digital powerhouse story. But power is not the same as independence. Kavi Arasu, a colleague who has spent years thinking deeply about this, described this imbalance using the lens of Indian languages. Imagine if your education system taught you to speak a language fluently, but never to think in it. You'd always be translating in your head, bending your thoughts to fit someone else's grammar. You could function, even excel. But your mind would be living in borrowed space. That's what happens when your digital infrastructure, your data, and your tools are designed elsewhere. His point is, it's time we start building our infrastructure and tools to work on our data. This is why the day after Independence Day matters. It's the day we remember that political freedom was just the first step. Economic liberalisation was another. Now we need digital sovereignty—the ability to keep working even if decisions in a faraway boardroom turn against us. That means storing far more of what we generate. Building AI that don't just speak Indian languages, but also thinks in them. These can negotiate contracts with the expectation that rules will change; and create back-ups for when the plug is pulled. The next VMware-style shift or Microsoft-Nayara moment won't come with warning. And when it does, there won't be flag-hoisting ceremonies or speeches to rally us. Just the quiet sound of systems stopping, and the sudden knowledge that somewhere, far away, someone else just decided how free we really are. This is why it is time to get past the notion that Independence Day is a date. It is a discipline we apply in the digital world with the same seriousness that we use to guard borders. Else, we risk turning the 15th into mere theatre.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Microsoft sued for killing Windows 10 — could this lawsuit force a shocking U-turn?
Many people are getting ready for change because Windows 10 's official support ends in October 2025, but not everyone is ready to move on. A California resident has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, claiming that the company's decision will unfairly force millions of people to buy expensive upgrades. The case raises important issues concerning fairness, e-waste, and consumer rights. A California man, Lawrence Klein , is suing Microsoft over its plan to phase out Windows 10 support in October 2025, citing high user numbers, stringent Windows 11 hardware requirements , and potential e-waste, as per a report by TechRadar. What is the big deal about this lawsuit? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remember Him? Sit Down Before You See What He Looks Like Now 33 Bridges Undo Klein says that Microsoft's plan to stop support is against consumer and business codes because almost half of all Windows users still depend on the OS. The lawsuit cites recent numbers that show Windows 10 has a market share of about 43%, which is much higher than that of earlier OS versions at the same stage. ALSO READ : Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe The lawsuit demands that Microsoft provide free updates until adoption rates drop significantly, arguing that current policies unfairly force costly and unnecessary upgrades, as per a report by TechRadar. Live Events Are Windows 11's hardware rules too harsh? Klein's strongest point is that Microsoft made the hardware requirements for Windows 11 too high. About 240 million devices can't upgrade without being replaced because they don't have TPM 2.0 security chips or some modern CPUs. Some people say that this could lead to millions of still-working PCs being thrown away, which would cause a huge e-waste crisis . Some people think that Microsoft's push for "Copilot+ PCs" is just a thinly veiled way to get people to buy new computers, as per a report by TechRadar. ALSO READ: Betrayal? Outrage erupts as Trump reportedly makes secret Alaska natural resource offer to Putin Is it possible for Microsoft to change its mind? Even if Klein's lawsuit doesn't win, it could put enough public pressure on Microsoft to change its mind. The company has already given in once by offering a free year of extended support if users sync certain settings to OneDrive instead of charging $30, as per a report by TechRadar. But for a lot of people, that's not enough. The lawsuit suggests linking the end of support to adoption rates instead of set deadlines. This could make the transition easier and cut down on upgrades that aren't needed. ALSO READ: Microsoft eyes remote work crackdown, office return could be imminent - here's what it means for staff The Big Picture This case isn't just about keeping an old operating system alive; it's also about finding a balance between being responsible and being creative. If Microsoft sticks to its current plan, millions of people may have to buy expensive new hardware or use systems that aren't safe. If it changes, it could set a standard for how tech companies deal with changes in the future. The lawsuit is already getting people talking more about corporate responsibility, sustainable tech policies, and how much control users should have over their devices, no matter what the court decides. FAQs When will Windows 10 support officially end? Microsoft plans to discontinue support on October 14, 2025. Why is Microsoft being sued? The lawsuit claims that ending support too soon will harm consumers and generate massive e-waste due to strict Windows 11 hardware requirements.
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Microsoft sued for killing Windows 10 — could this lawsuit force a shocking U-turn?
Many people are getting ready for change because Windows 10's official support ends in October 2025, but not everyone is ready to move on. A California resident has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, claiming that the company's decision will unfairly force millions of people to buy expensive upgrades. The case raises important issues concerning fairness, e-waste, and consumer rights. A California man, Lawrence Klein, is suing Microsoft over its plan to phase out Windows 10 support in October 2025, citing high user numbers, stringent Windows 11 hardware requirements, and potential e-waste, as per a report by TechRadar. Klein says that Microsoft's plan to stop support is against consumer and business codes because almost half of all Windows users still depend on the OS. The lawsuit cites recent numbers that show Windows 10 has a market share of about 43%, which is much higher than that of earlier OS versions at the same stage. ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe The lawsuit demands that Microsoft provide free updates until adoption rates drop significantly, arguing that current policies unfairly force costly and unnecessary upgrades, as per a report by TechRadar. Klein's strongest point is that Microsoft made the hardware requirements for Windows 11 too high. About 240 million devices can't upgrade without being replaced because they don't have TPM 2.0 security chips or some modern CPUs. Some people say that this could lead to millions of still-working PCs being thrown away, which would cause a huge e-waste crisis. Some people think that Microsoft's push for "Copilot+ PCs" is just a thinly veiled way to get people to buy new computers, as per a report by TechRadar. ALSO READ: Betrayal? Outrage erupts as Trump reportedly makes secret Alaska natural resource offer to Putin Even if Klein's lawsuit doesn't win, it could put enough public pressure on Microsoft to change its mind. The company has already given in once by offering a free year of extended support if users sync certain settings to OneDrive instead of charging $30, as per a report by for a lot of people, that's not enough. The lawsuit suggests linking the end of support to adoption rates instead of set deadlines. This could make the transition easier and cut down on upgrades that aren't needed. ALSO READ: Microsoft eyes remote work crackdown, office return could be imminent - here's what it means for staff This case isn't just about keeping an old operating system alive; it's also about finding a balance between being responsible and being creative. If Microsoft sticks to its current plan, millions of people may have to buy expensive new hardware or use systems that aren't safe. If it changes, it could set a standard for how tech companies deal with changes in the lawsuit is already getting people talking more about corporate responsibility, sustainable tech policies, and how much control users should have over their devices, no matter what the court will Windows 10 support officially end?Microsoft plans to discontinue support on October 14, 2025. Why is Microsoft being sued? The lawsuit claims that ending support too soon will harm consumers and generate massive e-waste due to strict Windows 11 hardware requirements.
