
Minneapolis Democrats Follow Mamdani Trend With Left-Wing Pick
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Minnesota state Senator Omar Fateh has won the endorsement of the Minneapolis Democratic Party for the city's upcoming mayoral election, becoming the latest progressive candidate to gain traction within the party.
Fateh has drawn comparisons to New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist who won the party's nomination for New York City mayor last month.
Newsweek contacted Fateh's campaign for comment via email on Monday.
Why It Matters
Fateh has become the latest candidate to the left of the Democratic Party's mainstream to rise within the party's ranks, which could be seen as a growing willingness among Democrats to support more progressive viewpoints.
What To Know
Fateh won the endorsement for the mayoral election from the Minneapolis Democratic–Farmer–Labor (DFL) Party—a branch of the statewide Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic Party—at the group's convention on Saturday.
The result was a surprise upset over two-term incumbent Mayor Jacob Frey, and it marked the first time in 16 years that the Minneapolis DFL backed a candidate in a mayoral race.
Fateh, a self-described democratic socialist and the son of Somali immigrants, is running on a platform that includes introducing rent control, raising minimum wage and combating police violence.
Omar Fateh, then a member-elect of the Minnesota Senate, speaking at a vigil for Dolal Idd, who was shot and killed by Minneapolis Police, in Minneapolis on December 31, 2020.
Omar Fateh, then a member-elect of the Minnesota Senate, speaking at a vigil for Dolal Idd, who was shot and killed by Minneapolis Police, in Minneapolis on December 31, 2020.The lawmaker's policies have sparked criticism from conservatives and moderates, including former New York Giants player Carter Coughlin, who wrote on X: "In a city that has experienced unimaginable destruction and racial tension, these policies would send the city another 10 steps back. MPLS needs to be rebuilt, this will do the opposite."
Fateh's platform is considered left of the party's mainstream, similarly to Mamdani's. The latter won the New York mayoral primary in a decisive win over former Governor Andrew Cuomo.
Mamdani's success, which has been powered by grassroots organizing and youth support, suggests that voters are increasingly willing to back progressive candidates.
It is unusual for candidates on the party's left wing to secure institutional backing, and internal dynamics could have played a role in Fateh's endorsement victory, which followed a chaotic DFL convention marked by internal disputes.
The ascent of these candidates suggests the Democratic Party is grappling with the growing power of its left flank.
Young progressives such as David Hogg, who recently criticized Democratic leadership for being "asleep at the wheel," have expressed growing frustration with the party and have called for primarying incumbents to reshape its direction.
What People Are Saying
Minnesota state Senator Omar Fateh wrote on X: "I am incredibly honored to be the DFL endorsed candidate for Minneapolis Mayor. This endorsement is a message that Minneapolis residents are done with broken promises, vetoes, and politics as usual. It's a mandate to build a city that works for all of us."
Incumbent Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey wrote on X: "I want to thank everyone who showed up to support my campaign. This election should be decided by our entire city, not by a handful of delegates. I look forward to a full debate with Sen. Fateh about our records and visions for our Minneapolis's future."
What Happens Next
The mayoral election is scheduled for November 4. While Fateh's winning of the Minneapolis DFL's endorsement does not guarantee his victory, support from the party infrastructure could give him a significant boost.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Lindsey Graham sees Israel taking Gaza by force to wrap up war
Graham's comments come as the humanitarian situation in Gaza has reached crisis levels. Roughly a quarter of the exclave's population is facing famine-like conditions, a U.N. World Food Programme official said last Monday. Democrats, international partners and even podcaster and comedian Theo Von are imploring both the U.S. and Israel to substantially increase the flow of aid into Gaza. Israel's military on Sunday paused fighting in three major population centers inside Gaza to increase the delivery of humanitarian aid. Airdrops of aid have also resumed in the area. 'Israel is going to work with the U.N., the World Food Programme, to get some food into these people, who need it,' Graham told Welker. But even against that backdrop, the likelihood of a negotiated peace appears murky. The White House exited diplomatic talks with Hamas last week, with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff concluding that the U.S.-designated terrorist group 'does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith.' 'I think they want to die,' Trump told reporters outside the White House on Friday. Israel occupied Gaza, which had been an Egyptian territory, in the 6-Day War of 1967, and it had retained forces there until June 2005; since then it has periodically sent forces into the territory in response to incursions from Hamas or to prevent them. Graham said he agreed with the president that talks with the militant group Hamas were futile. 'I think President Trump has come to believe, and I've certainly come to believe, there's no way you're going to negotiate an end of this war with Hamas. Hamas is a terrorist organization who is chartered to destroy the state of Israel,' he told Welker. 'They're religious Nazis.'


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democratic senator laments party has 'messaging problem' when pressed on low favorability rating
Sen. Mark Kelly acknowledged on Sunday that the Democratic Party had a messaging problem after being pressed on the party's low favorability ratings during a CNN interview.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Some Republicans aren't backing down from Epstein transparency push
Amid bipartisan calls for transparency and a cascade of Epstein-related headlines, some GOP lawmakers are holding the line — while others are urging more sunlight from the Trump administration. The big picture: The case of the disgraced financier, who died in 2019, has taken on new life under the second Trump administration, creating splinters in the president's base and dominating conversations on Capitol Hill. While some Republicans are falling in line with President Trump and making calls to move on, others are defying leadership and joining in with Democrats by continuing to criticize the administration's handling of the case. Driving the news: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who are leading a bipartisan charge to force a House vote on releasing files related to Epstein, were optimistic on Sunday's political talk shows that their measure would succeed. "It will pass," Khanna said on NBC's "Meet the Press." Massie warned on ABC's "This Week" that if a vote doesn't come to the floor, the GOP could feel political punishment in 2026, cautioning voters could "check out" because "Republicans didn't keep their promise." And with the House breaking for its weeks-long recess, Massie predicts the pressure will only build: "I don't think it's going to dissipate like the speaker hopes that it will." Yes, but: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) argued in a Sunday interview with NBC's Kristen Welker that the lawmakers' discharge petition is "not the right approach," contending it doesn't build in "adequate protections" for victims. "House Republicans insist upon the release of all credible evidence and information related to Epstein in any way, but we are also insisting upon the protection of innocent victims," he said. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), echoed Johnson on "Meet the Press," saying he's "on board" to "release as much as you can, protecting victims the best you can." The other side: Massie, responding to the DOJ's conclusion that releasing further materials could hurt victims, told Welker, "That's a straw man." He continued, "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted and that no child pornography will be released, so they're hiding behind that." Catch up quick: Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval" earlier this month. But a federal judge on Wednesday struck down the administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts in connection with an investigation into Epstein, writing that the court's "hands were tied." And while Trump has said Bondi should release"credible" information, he's repeatedly bashed what he has dubbed the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and blamed his political rivals for "making up" the files. Zoom out: While some Republicans and MAGA-friendly figures have turned up the heat on the administration, other Trump allies have echoed the president's targeting of his predecessors. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) sparred with CNN's Jake Tapper Sunday over Epstein's controversial plea deal with federal prosecutors in Florida, arguing the agreement was struck under the Obama administration.