BMW Unveils M3 CS Touring, a Sporty Family Car
Read the full story on Modern Car Collector
BMW has officially unveiled the highly anticipated M3 CS Touring, a sportier, more powerful version of its popular M3 Touring estate. Ahead of the Bathurst 12 Hours race, the Bavarian automaker revealed the new model, which is set to be available in select markets, including Europe, Australia, Japan, and South Korea. With a starting price of approximately $150,000, the M3 CS Touring is expected to be a hit among driving enthusiasts, though unfortunately, it will not be sold in the U.S.
The M3 CS Touring offers a number of enhancements over the standard M3 Touring, giving it an aggressive edge that appeals to both performance and design aficionados. The estate car now features a carbon fiber hood, front splitter, air intakes, side mirrors, and a carbon diffuser, reducing the vehicle's weight by 15 kilograms. Additionally, the car sports a distinctive grille and yellow LED daytime running lights (DRLs), adding a unique touch to its already striking appearance.
Inside, the M3 CS Touring boasts M Carbon bucket seats, which are electronically adjustable and include a heating function, as well as a dual-screen setup and a flat-bottom steering wheel wrapped in Alcantara for a more immersive driving experience.
Under the hood, the M3 CS Touring is powered by a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged six-cylinder engine, producing 543 horsepower and 479 lb-ft of torque. Paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission, the engine sends power to all four wheels, allowing the car to accelerate from 0 to 62 mph in just 3.5 seconds. The M3 CS Touring can reach a top speed of 186 mph, ensuring it delivers both thrilling speed and handling.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jet-Set CEO's $3M Koenigsegg Jesko Ticketed in London While Dining Nearby
Read the full story on Modern Car Collector A £2.2 million Koenigsegg Jesko hypercar, owned by private jet mogul Ameerh Naran, was slapped with a parking ticket this week after being left on a Kensington street while its owner dined nearby. Naran, the CEO of luxury aviation brokerage Vimana Private Jets, parked the ultra-rare Swedish hypercar on Derry Street, just outside the trendy Dishoom restaurant in West London. Moments later, a Kensington and Chelsea traffic warden issued a bright yellow parking charge notice (PCN), placing it squarely on the carbon-fiber bonnet of the car—an image quickly shared online. With a fine of up to £160 (reduced to £80 if paid within two weeks), the penalty is a small price to pay compared to the Jesko's jaw-dropping $3 million valuation. Powered by a 5.0-liter twin-turbo V8, the Jesko produces 1,280 horsepower on standard fuel—or up to 1,600 hp on E85—and is capable of reaching 62 mph in under three seconds. According to his Instagram posts, Naran, 39, was enjoying lunch at the nearby Rooftop Gardens while the parking incident unfolded. Originally from Zimbabwe, the entrepreneur built his jet charter empire after studying automotive design, and later launched his own hypercar company, Naran Automotive. Despite his aviation focus, cars have remained central to Naran's identity. A former aspiring racing driver, he once told Forbes that he dreamed of building supercars since childhood. His clients—ranging from royals to ultra-high-net-worth individuals—spend up to $1 million a month on private travel, and often shop at elite brands like Harrods, Ferrara Diamonds, and Asprey London. This isn't the first luxury car to run afoul of Derry Street's strict parking rules. Comedian Michael McIntyre had his £195,000 Mercedes-AMG GT R towed from the same location in May after parking in a police-only zone. In a city where even multi-million-dollar cars can't escape traffic enforcement, it seems not even the most elite wheels are above the rules. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Phantom Ferrari: The Long-Lost Stallion of Imola
Read the full story on Modern Car Collector In the misty annals of motor racing lore, amid the roar of engines and the scent of scorched rubber, there lies a story that sounds more like a legend whispered in pit lanes than a tale etched in police records. It is the curious case of the missing stallion — a Ferrari F512M, once belonging to the Austrian Formula One driver Gerhard Berger — which vanished into shadow during the 1995 San Marino Grand Prix weekend. And for 28 years, it remained a ghost. The tale begins at Imola, in the spring of 1995. The world was still reeling from the grief of the previous year — a dark season that had seen the loss of Ayrton Senna and Roland Ratzenberger on that very circuit. That weekend, hope had returned, cloaked in red overalls, in the form of Ferrari's twin warriors: Gerhard Berger and Jean Alesi. But while fans focused on the drama unfolding on the tarmac, another story brewed behind the paddock. In the depths of the night, two rare Ferraris — road cars, not racers — were spirited away from their resting places, stolen cleanly, without a trace. One belonged to Alesi. The other, a gleaming scarlet F512M, was Berger's pride: a fire-breathing machine with a 12-cylinder heart, one of only 501 ever built. In a twist almost too perfect for fiction, the thief disappeared into the night, and the car was never seen again. At least, not by the public eye. The years passed. Berger moved on, retiring from racing after a celebrated career. The San Marino theft became a footnote, a quirky trivia item for F1 diehards and car enthusiasts who spoke of it in online forums and at classic car shows, more as myth than memory. How could a car of such rarity simply disappear? There were rumors — whispers of a shadowy collector in Eastern Europe, of a secret vault in Dubai, of a replica hiding in plain sight. Nothing was confirmed. But time has a way of unveiling secrets — especially when steel and engine numbers are involved. In early 2024, a quiet alarm bell rang in the offices of Ferrari in Maranello. A collector in the United States had initiated a purchase through a broker in the UK, seeking to add a rare Ferrari F512M to their stable. Routine checks followed — chassis number, engine codes, historical provenance. But something didn't add up. The car, glossy and well-preserved, bore the unmistakable signature of one that hadn't legally existed for decades. It was Berger's. The long-lost stallion had returned. Ferrari wasted no time. A tip-off was sent to the Metropolitan Police's Organised Vehicle Crime Unit, and what followed was a whirlwind of international coordination. PC Mike Pilbeam, who led the investigation, described it as 'painstaking,' involving a mosaic of authorities — the National Crime Agency, Interpol, international dealerships, and customs agents. And yet, despite nearly three decades of silence, the investigation cracked open in just four days. The car, as it turned out, had taken a journey worthy of a Bond film. Stolen in Italy, it had been swiftly shipped to Japan, where it likely changed hands under falsified documents. Decades passed, and as ownership records grew colder, the car quietly resurfaced in Europe. Someone — knowingly or not — put it on the market. And in that moment, Ferrari's meticulous record-keeping lit the path to the truth. Authorities moved swiftly to prevent its export, securing the Ferrari before it could vanish once more. Today, it rests under police custody in the UK, awaiting the next chapter in its extraordinary saga. The mystery, of course, is not fully solved. The second Ferrari — the one belonging to Jean Alesi — is still missing. Like its twin, it may be gathering dust in a hidden garage, or roaring anonymously along private roads, its past forgotten or deliberately obscured. As for Berger, the man at the center of the storm, he hasn't made a public comment. Perhaps it is shock. Or perhaps, like the rest of us, he thought this particular story had long faded into history. And yet, as with all good legends, the resurfacing of the F512M reminds us that some ghosts never sleep. They merely wait. Collectors and connoisseurs have long known that a car is more than metal and machinery. It carries stories, secrets — a spirit. And in the case of Berger's Ferrari, it also carried the burden of mystery, a kind of mechanical melancholy that seemed almost poetic. For 28 years, the Testarossa was a phantom, a name on a police blotter and a dream among gearheads. Today, it's real again. Red, rumbling, and resting under British skies. Who stole it? How many hands did it pass through? Who knew what and when? These are questions for another time — or for storytellers around the fire at the next vintage car gathering. Because this isn't just about a stolen car. It's about a myth reborn, a horse returned to the stable after a gallop through shadow, memory, and myth. And somewhere, perhaps, the other Ferrari is still out there. Waiting. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Motor 1
an hour ago
- Motor 1
Why Carbon-Ceramic Brakes Are Expensive. And Why They Might Be Worth It
A couple of years ago, a Brembo engineer told me something that stuck: If you buy a car with carbon-ceramic brakes, you'll likely never need to replace the rotors. I'd heard the benefits of carbon-ceramic brakes talked up before, but this particularly bold claim seemed wild, an answer to the ultimate question: Are these fancy brakes worth their huge price tag? On the Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing, the carbon-ceramics are a $9,000 option; BMW charges $8,500; Porsche charges more than $9,000. Carbon-ceramic brakes are routinely among the priciest options for cars that already have a lot of big-ticket extras. Is there any world in which they're worth it? Welcome to The Rabbit Hole, a bi-weekly column where Senior Editor Chris Perkins explores his latest obsession with automotive technology. He speaks to the best in the business to understand how cars work and what the future of the automobile looks like. Photo by: Brembo Cast iron is a wonderful material for making brake discs. It's relatively cheap, easy to cast and machine into shape, and crucially, it has higher thermal conductivity than, say, steel. To perhaps state the obvious here, brakes convert a car's kinetic energy (forward motion) into heat via friction between the pad and rotor when the two come together. So a brake disc's thermal properties are of key importance. "[Cast-iron discs] have a better ability of absorbing the heat," explains Emanuele Bruletti, senior engineering manager for Brembo North America. "They can absorb it at a lower rate [than other common materials], and therefore, they can help in taking some of that away from the pads." It's the same reason cast iron makes for a great skillet, but if you cook with one, you know just how heavy it is. Weight is a car's enemy. So too is the increased demand on braking systems as cars evolve. This story was available to our newsletter subscribers before it hit the website. Want early access? Sign up below. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . "What has been driving the size increase in braking systems in the last few years is basically the performance envelope increasing," Bruletti explains. Cars are simply more powerful and heavier. Tires also play a role. Bruletti says that modern developments in tires have allowed for far greater deceleration rates, further increasing the demand on a braking system. That increased demand translates to more heat. Upping the size of your cast-iron rotor helps deal with all that heat better and improves the brake's ability to effectively slow a car. For obvious reasons, though, you can only make rotors so big, both for packaging and weight. Brake rotors are unsprung, which means their mass has a disproportionately high effect on ride and handling relative to a car's sprung masses. They're also rotating masses, which have a big effect on a vehicle's ability to accelerate, brake, and turn. "If you can shave weight off your car and more importantly, unsprung weight and evenly more importantly unsprung rotating weight, which is what a rotor is, [there are] huge gains to be had in performance," says James Walker Jr., a racer, engineer, and author on a book about braking systems. Chasing lightness, Dunlop developed the first carbon-fiber reinforced carbon brakes for the Concorde in the 1960s, and by the 1980s, these became common in Formula 1. However, these carbon-carbon brakes, still in use at the top levels of motorsport, are entirely unsuitable for road use, as they don't work well at cold temperatures. They're also extremely expensive and time-consuming to make, even now. A carbon-reinforced silicon-carbide matrix brings some of the weight-saving benefits of carbon-carbon brakes, but in a package that actually works at cold temperatures. And while still expensive and time-consuming to make, a carbon-ceramic brake disc is a lot easier and cheaper to manufacture than a carbon-carbon disc. We're talking a production time of around a couple days vs four months here. (That said, Brembo can make a cast-iron disc in about two hours.) Photo by: Porsche Photo by: Ferrari German company SGL Carbon introduced carbon-ceramic brakes in a road car, with the 2001 Porsche 911 GT2. Brembo's first carbon-ceramic brakes arrived a year later, with the Ferrari Enzo. In 2009, SGL and Brembo formed a joint venture for the development and manufacture of carbon-ceramic brakes, and today, it's one of, if not the largest, suppliers of brakes of this type. Bruletti says the carbon-ceramic matrix it uses has about a third the density of its cast iron. In terms of actual weight savings, you see all sorts of numbers thrown out. A good example is the brake discs in the previous-generation M3 and M4. In a technical document, BMW quotes a 30.6-pound weight for the car's standard front rotors and 17.1 pounds for the carbon-ceramics. So nearly half. The proportional weight savings for the carbon-ceramic rear rotors on the old M3 and M4 are similar, and that's despite the fact that BMW's carbon discs were slightly larger than their cast-iron counterparts. So great! But, we also need to talk about what carbon-ceramic brakes don't do. As Walker explains, a brake system is, essentially, a series of hydraulic levers that turn the relatively light force the driver applies to the brake pedal into a huge force at the road that slows the car down. In a road car, a 20 to 30 pound pedal input can translate to 1G of deceleration. This is called gain. Here, carbon-ceramic brakes don't have an advantage. "There's nothing that's done with a carbon-ceramic system compared to a cast-iron system that increases the mechanical output of the brake system," Walker explains. "So there's no real advantage to them in that space. The only reason people say, 'Oh, they feel better, they stop better,' is not because it's carbon ceramic, it's because [the automaker has] tuned that carbon-ceramic system to have a higher gain." Taking things a step further, Walker also points out that the braking system is only as good as the tire you have attached to it. Imagine you could have two identical cars, on the same model tires, the only difference being that one has cast-iron brakes, the other has a carbon-ceramic brake package. The brakes don't change the level of grip the tire is capable of. On the flipside, and to Bruletti's earlier point, the tire has a profound effect on the energy that goes into the braking system. Photo by: Ferrari As we've established, a carbon-ceramic disc is materially very different from a cast-iron disc. Carbon-ceramic has a much lower level of thermal conductivity than iron, but also far less mass and heat capacity. Which is a good and bad thing. Good because the brake disc can withstand the higher temperatures that today's faster/heavier/grippier vehicles generate in extreme braking events, courtesy of that ceramic chemistry. Brembo says carbon-ceramic discs can comfortably operate between 1,000 and 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit and can even withstand temperatures beyond 1,800 degrees. That's why carbon-ceramic brakes are frequently praised for their resistance to fade on track. But since the lighter and less-dense carbon-ceramic rotors gain and lose temperature quickly, that leads to huge thermal stresses on the rest of the braking components as they heat and cool in rapid succession. A cast-iron rotor better contains its heat, which keeps everything else cool. "You need to find a way of dissipating that heat away from the pads in some other way, and this is where it becomes very important to provide the necessary cooling at the brake system," Bruletti says. Photo by: Porsche Photo by: Porsche Beyond carefully designed cooling from both external components and internal rotor ducting, the fact that carbon-ceramic rotors aren't made from a homogenous material also has implications . The length, diameter, and orientation of the individual carbon fibers all have an effect on the material's thermal capacity. Adding additional layers and coatings also improves thermal capacity, which is why Brembo and SGL offer CCB brakes with additional ceramic friction layers on both sides, and CCW brakes, which use five carbon-ceramic layers. These options allow automakers to size down components, further saving weight, but their manufacturing processes are more time-consuming and thus, expensive. That's helpful because generally, carbon-ceramic rotors are larger than their cast-iron equivalents, in cars where both are optional. This is a direct result of the heat a carbon-ceramic rotor reflects into the pad during large braking events. 'In order to guarantee a stability of the friction material, you need to go larger with the pad,' Bruletti explains. And when you make the pad larger, you make the caliper larger, and the rotor larger. It's all cyclical. Yet, there's also a virtuous cycle here. Reducing unsprung, rotational mass means there's less weight to control. In theory, an automaker can use the weight reduction from carbon-ceramic brakes to employ smaller tires, lower spring and damper rates, smaller anti-roll bars, and so on. Photo by: McLaren All because of the outsize effect that a brake rotor's weight has on the rest of the car. That's a big part of why Ferrari and McLaren only use carbon-ceramic brakes, beyond the simple need for a brake system that can handle the huge stresses these fast cars generate. And now, we get to the original claim, the thing that started me down this path. Does a carbon-ceramic rotor last the life of the car? Yes. In some cases. 'The wear of the components really depends on usage, how you use them,' Bruletti says. 'If we assume that the usage, the cycles will be the same, yes, it is fair to say that in normal driving and non-track usage, just everyday driving, a carbon ceramic rotor will last in my opinion almost the entire life of your vehicle.' It's not just the guy from Brembo saying that too. Walker agrees that in normal street use, a carbon-ceramic rotor will last a very long time. Obviously you'll need to replace pads, but the rotors could have incredible longevity. But add track use into the mix, and the calculus becomes very different. With lots of heavy braking events, the carbon fibers in a carbon-ceramic rotor will eventually burn out. They'll lose thermal capacity. At road speeds, this won't happen much, if at all, but depending on what sort of car you drive on track, what sort of tracks you go to, and how you drive it, the carbon fibers can burn out very quickly. Photo by: BMW Let's say you're running your new, 5,300-pound BMW M5 at Road America, where you'll regularly blow past 150 mph on the track's long straights. Let's also say you're one of the last of the late brakers, pushing your brake zones as deep into the corner as you dare, hitting the pedal as hard as you can. If you've got carbon brakes on, you shouldn't expect those rotors to last very long at all. But say you've got a Porsche 911 GT3, which weighs in around 3,330 pounds, and you're at Lime Rock Park, which has only one heavy braking zone. And let's also say that you're a bit more measured. Rather than braking hard and late, you brake a little lighter, a little earlier. In that case, you can reasonably expect a more life out of your carbon-ceramic rotors. That difference, though, is why Porsche still offers cast-iron rotors on its GT cars, even the mighty GT3 RS. It knows that some customers will use up their brakes tracking their cars often, and in that instance, it makes sense to go for cast-iron discs, which are much cheaper to replace. Some other things to consider: With usage, a carbon-ceramic rotor doesn't lose thickness like a cast-iron rotor, but when those carbon fibers burn out, they do decrease in weight. This means a carbon-ceramic rotor won't develop cracks or warp like a cast-iron rotor would on track, so there's another point in favor. It's also why the hats on many carbon-ceramic rotors list a minimum weight. Once the rotor goes below that weight, it's time for a replacement. So, there isn't a simple answer to whether carbon-ceramic brakes are 'worth it.' But given what we all now know, their high upfront cost can be offset by rotor longevity, and the myriad other benefits the technology brings. It becomes a question of you, the customer. How are you going to use your car, and what do you value at the end of the day? More Deep Dives Brake Dust Is a Problem. Brembo Has a Solution Why BMW's B58 Is a True Successor to the Toyota 2JZ Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
