Wrexham councillors vow to fight Cefn Road 900 homes plan
An outline planning application has been submitted for up to 900 new homes on land off Cefn Road.
It has been lodged by Harworth Group for a development named Erlas Park - located close to the Erlas Victorian Walled Garden and Wrexham Rugby Club. The proposed development site is mainly made up of open grassland and a smaller area of woodland.
The proposed development site layout. (Image: Planning documents) The land had been earmarked as part of Wrexham's Local Development Plan (LDP). Last year, Cllr Marc Jones won a landmark Court of Appeal case over the controversial LDP.
The Court of Appeal ruling quashed the High Court judgment of Mr Justice Eyre made in December 2023 and dismissed the controversial judicial review brought by developers seeking to force through a local plan rejected in April and June 2023 by a cross-party majority of Wrexham councillors.
The Welsh Government then lost its appeal against the decision at the Supreme Court earlier this year.
Cllr Andy Gallanders, representing the Rhosnesni ward, said: 'I was disappointed to learn today that a fresh application has been submitted to the authority for up to 900 dwellings off Cefn Road.
Cllr Andy Gallanders (Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service) 'I urge all residents to submit comments to the consultation. The site has been on the cards with the now failed LDP and we'd hoped the developers would have heard the voices of the people of Wrexham.
'If this site is allowed to be developed on it would cause a huge disruption for residents of Rhosnesni with a decade of building works and loss of valuable green space."
He added: 'This isn't a case of nimbyism but an honest look at the infrastructure we have in the area. For example, The Greyhound roundabout has been declared 'at capacity' by highways with very minor changes proposed. This is just one example but look at the GPs and schools - all struggling for a multitude of reasons.
'We need homes, of course we do, but they have to come with the infrastructure, be affordable for our residents and not at the cost of green land.'
What the Erlas Park development would look like. (Image: Planning documents) Cllr Carrie Harper, whose Caia ward is adjacent to the proposed site, said: 'The majority of councillors voted against adopting the LDP precisely because of development proposals like this. This scale of development will damage Wrexham.
'There is undoubtedly no need for it, especially with over 3,000 houses locally already having planning permission and not yet built. These houses won't be affordable for the vast majority and development on this scale will put huge pressure on local services and infrastructure."
Cllr Carrie Harper (Image: Newsquest) She continued: 'It's important to remember that councillors were threatened with jail for refusing to adopt the plan which included this site. Some faced a six-month police investigation by North Wales Police and other complaints against councillors are still ongoing.
'Despite everything thrown at us, we won the argument at the Court of Appeal and ultimately the Supreme Court. They backed the local democratic process and our right not to accept this plan.
"This was no easy victory, we had to crowd fund to finance lawyers to take on the Welsh Government, Wrexham Council and a series of developers who were all determined to force this plan on us."
MORE NEWS:
Cllr Harper added: 'Following the court case, there is no planning framework to support this application, the LDP has been legally quashed.
"The likely situation is that Wrexham will now revert the previous Unitary Development Plan and its policies, which set out that this development site is outside of settlement and should not be granted planning permission.
"Campaigners will fight this development all the way, it's not morally or legally acceptable to try and force these developments on our city following the court case.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
14 hours ago
- Leader Live
300-home Ash Lane, Hawarden development backed for approval
The controversial application is for land to the west of Gladstone Way and west of Ash Lane in Hawarden. The site, which is within Flintshire's Local Development Plan (LDP) is approximately 27.33 acres (11.06 hectares) and consists of a number of agricultural fields bound by existing residential properties on its northern, eastern and western boundaries. Land beyond the site's southern boundary is open countryside currently in use for agricultural purposes. The layout of the proposed development. (Image: Planning documents) Of the 300 homes proposed - 105 would be designated afforable housing. Castle Green Homes submitted the planning application last year - and it is set to be decided on by Flintshire Council's planning committee next week. And planning officials have recommended the scheme for approval. An officer's report states: "The site is an allocated housing site in the LDP. The development is acceptable in principle and meets the requirements of the housing allocation in accordance with the LDP. "The layout, public open space provision, biodiversity enhancements and other detailed technical considerations are considered to be acceptable and in accordance with policy. As such it is recommended that the application is approved subject to the commuted sums and conditions." MORE NEWS: Both Hawarden and Queensferry community councils have objected to the scheme, and there have been 2,500 objections from local residents. The site has been subject to a "Stop the Gladstone Estate Build" campaign, fronted by Hawarden councillor, Sam Swash. There are grave concerns over the impact on flooding, the loss of green space and inadequate local infrastructure to meet the need of extra population.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Our two-tier justice system is turning Lucy Connolly into a martyr
Court of Appeal judges may believe that they were right to deny early release to Lucy Connolly, the 42-year-old Northamptonshire childminder who is serving 31 months in prison for an offensive tweet about asylum seekers. But even if they maintain that her sentence was just, I think they would have been wise to let her out anyway – for a simple and pragmatic reason. Keeping her locked up is eroding public faith in the justice system. Because, almost every single day now, we read of criminals being convicted of what seem like far worse crimes than hers – and yet somehow avoiding jail. Indeed, some of them manage to avoid it more than once. In 2022, a paedophile in South Shields admitted three charges of 'making indecent images of children' (as the law calls it), as well as one charge of possessing extreme pornography (which involved bestiality). As the judge at the time noted, however, 'You identify as transgender and that has caused issues for you and anxiety for you in how you would cope with that if you were sent immediately to prison.' Well, I suppose it would, although why we're meant to worry about prison being unpleasant for paedophiles, I'm not sure. But at any rate, he wasn't sent to prison. And nor was he sent there this week, when he was hauled back to court after breaching a sexual harm prevention order. On this occasion, the judge (a different one this time) said: 'You would undoubtedly be at risk of physical or sexual assault in custody because of your presentation in a male prison.' These words are of course wonderfully kind and compassionate. But, just for a moment, let's set aside questions of 'identity', and ask: which do we think is the worse crime? Writing something horrible on the internet about asylum hotels? Or downloading images of children being sexually abused – thus boosting the market for such images, and ensuring that more children will be sexually abused in future? Now, I haven't conducted a nationwide opinion poll on the above question. But I'm fairly confident that I can guess what the result would be. And I'm equally confident that I'm not alone in remembering the name 'Lucy Connolly' every time I read about some thug or pervert sauntering off with a suspended sentence. I don't for a moment deny that what Mrs Connolly wrote was awful. Nor do I deny that she broke the law. Yet our two-tier justice system is contriving to turn her into a martyr. So, even if the powers that be have no sympathy for her, they should at least look after their own interests. Which means letting her out.
Leader Live
2 days ago
- Leader Live
Wrexham councillors vow to fight Cefn Road 900 homes plan
An outline planning application has been submitted for up to 900 new homes on land off Cefn Road. It has been lodged by Harworth Group for a development named Erlas Park - located close to the Erlas Victorian Walled Garden and Wrexham Rugby Club. The proposed development site is mainly made up of open grassland and a smaller area of woodland. The proposed development site layout. (Image: Planning documents) The land had been earmarked as part of Wrexham's Local Development Plan (LDP). Last year, Cllr Marc Jones won a landmark Court of Appeal case over the controversial LDP. The Court of Appeal ruling quashed the High Court judgment of Mr Justice Eyre made in December 2023 and dismissed the controversial judicial review brought by developers seeking to force through a local plan rejected in April and June 2023 by a cross-party majority of Wrexham councillors. The Welsh Government then lost its appeal against the decision at the Supreme Court earlier this year. Cllr Andy Gallanders, representing the Rhosnesni ward, said: 'I was disappointed to learn today that a fresh application has been submitted to the authority for up to 900 dwellings off Cefn Road. Cllr Andy Gallanders (Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service) 'I urge all residents to submit comments to the consultation. The site has been on the cards with the now failed LDP and we'd hoped the developers would have heard the voices of the people of Wrexham. 'If this site is allowed to be developed on it would cause a huge disruption for residents of Rhosnesni with a decade of building works and loss of valuable green space." He added: 'This isn't a case of nimbyism but an honest look at the infrastructure we have in the area. For example, The Greyhound roundabout has been declared 'at capacity' by highways with very minor changes proposed. This is just one example but look at the GPs and schools - all struggling for a multitude of reasons. 'We need homes, of course we do, but they have to come with the infrastructure, be affordable for our residents and not at the cost of green land.' What the Erlas Park development would look like. (Image: Planning documents) Cllr Carrie Harper, whose Caia ward is adjacent to the proposed site, said: 'The majority of councillors voted against adopting the LDP precisely because of development proposals like this. This scale of development will damage Wrexham. 'There is undoubtedly no need for it, especially with over 3,000 houses locally already having planning permission and not yet built. These houses won't be affordable for the vast majority and development on this scale will put huge pressure on local services and infrastructure." Cllr Carrie Harper (Image: Newsquest) She continued: 'It's important to remember that councillors were threatened with jail for refusing to adopt the plan which included this site. Some faced a six-month police investigation by North Wales Police and other complaints against councillors are still ongoing. 'Despite everything thrown at us, we won the argument at the Court of Appeal and ultimately the Supreme Court. They backed the local democratic process and our right not to accept this plan. "This was no easy victory, we had to crowd fund to finance lawyers to take on the Welsh Government, Wrexham Council and a series of developers who were all determined to force this plan on us." MORE NEWS: Cllr Harper added: 'Following the court case, there is no planning framework to support this application, the LDP has been legally quashed. "The likely situation is that Wrexham will now revert the previous Unitary Development Plan and its policies, which set out that this development site is outside of settlement and should not be granted planning permission. "Campaigners will fight this development all the way, it's not morally or legally acceptable to try and force these developments on our city following the court case.'
