logo
Syrian leader must rein in jihadis or lose support. ‘There is no blank check', was told

Syrian leader must rein in jihadis or lose support. ‘There is no blank check', was told

Ya Libnan26-03-2025

Ahmed al Sharaa, better known as Abu Mohammad al-Golani leader of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) told CNN on December 5: 'These sects ( Alwawites, Christians and Druze) have coexisted in this region for hundreds of years, and no one has the right to eliminate them.' So far Golani has been saying the right things. The problem is he didn't keep his word. The massacre of hundreds of Alawites and the attacks against the Druze community prove that his words were hollow and just to appease The last thing the Syrians want to see is another dictator like Bashar al-Assad
By Samia Nakhoul and Timour Azhari
Highlights Foreign ultimatum: Sharaa must curb jihadis or lose support
Western-Arab backing tied to protecting minorities
Sanctions persist as instability deepens post-Assad
Competing foreign powers limit Sharaa's control
DAMASCUS – Syria's President Ahmed al-Sharaa has a lot to prove to win over Western powers. If the first few weeks of his rule are anything to go by, he may be heading in the wrong direction.
The West is watching Syria's leaders closely to ensure they rein in the Islamist jihadis who killed hundreds of Alawites, create an inclusive government with effective institutions, maintain order in a country fractured by years of civil war and prevent a resurgence of Islamic State or al Qaeda.
To hammer home the message, three European envoys made clear in a March 11 meeting with Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani in Damascus that cracking down on the jihadi fighters was their top priority and that international support for the nascent administration could evaporate unless it took decisive action.
The meeting has not previously been reported.
'The abuses that have taken place in recent days are truly intolerable, and those responsible must be identified and condemned,' said French Foreign Ministry spokesman Christophe Lemoine, when asked about the message delivered in Damascus.
'There is no blank check for the new authorities.'
Reuters spoke to the three European envoys as well as four regional officials during a trip to Damascus. They all stressed that the authorities must get a grip on security across the country and prevent any repeat killings.
'We asked for accountability. The punishment should go on those who committed the massacres. The security forces need to be cleaned up,' said one European envoy, who was among the group of officials who delivered the message.
Washington has also called on Syria's leaders to hold the perpetrators of the attacks to account. U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said they were monitoring the interim authority's actions to determine U.S. policy for Syria.
The problem for Sharaa, however, is that his Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group only comprises around 20,000 fighters, according to two assessments by Western governments.
That makes him reliant on the tens of thousands of fighters from other groups — including the very hardline jihadist factions he is being asked to combat – and moving against them could plunge Syria back into war, five diplomats and three analysts said.
Thousands of Sunni Muslim foreigners, from countries including China, Albania, Russia and Pakistan, joined Syria's rebels early in the civil war to fight against the rule of Bashar al-Assad and the Iran-backed Shi'ite militias who supported him, giving the conflict a sectarian overtone.
One of the reasons Sharaa now depends on a relatively small force of some 20,000 fighters from several disparate groups, including the foreign jihadis, is that he dissolved the national army soon after taking power
While the step was meant to draw a line under five decades of autocratic Assad family rule, diplomats and analysts said it echoed Washington's decision to disband the Iraqi army after the fall of Saddam Hussein – and could lead to similar chaos.
Sharaa's move, along with mass dismissals of public sector workers, has deepened divisions in Syria and left hundreds of thousands without income, potentially pushing trained soldiers into insurgent groups or unemployment, worsening Syria's instability, according to five European and Arab officials.
Neither Sharaa's office nor the Syrian foreign ministry responded to requests for comment for this story.
STUCK IN A PARADOX
In addition to the challenge of quelling sectarian violence, Sharaa must also contend with a host of foreign powers from the United States to Russia, Israel, Turkey and Iran – all turning Syria's territory into a geopolitical chessboard.
Turkey holds the north, backing opposition forces while suppressing Kurdish ambitions. U.S.-backed Kurdish-led forces control the east with its vital oil fields, while Israel capitalised on Assad's fall to bolster its military foothold. It now controls a 400-square-km demilitarised buffer zone, supports the Druze minority and is opposed to the Syrian leadership.
In response to the massacres of civilians, Sharaa has established an investigation committee and promised to punish those responsible, even those close to him.
But any action against the jihadis who carried out the killings could ignite factional infighting, purges and power struggles – leaving the new government stuck in a paradox, the diplomats and analysts said.
'Obviously Sharaa doesn't control the foreign jihadis and does not call all the shots,' said Marwan Muasher, vice president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'What is clear is that the massacres were carried out by people who are Salafi jihadists, and are not listening to what he's saying.'
While diplomats recognise that the inquiry is a step in the right direction, they said its credibility would have been far stronger with U.N. and international observers.
Ultimately, they said, the true test of Sharaa's leadership lies not just in the commission's findings but in how he deals with the fighters responsible for the atrocities.
The massacres were, however, a stark reminder of the forces at play in post-Assad Syria, signalling a brutal reality that toppling a dictator is the beginning of a larger, more perilous battle to shape the country's future.
Abdulaziz Sager, founder of the Saudi-based Gulf Research Center, said the presence of 'rogue groups' – the foreign jihadis – operating outside the law would lead to a collapse in security and undermine the state's authority.
'Therefore, the new leadership has no choice but to take firm action against such violations,' he said.
An Arab diplomat said political support from Arab states was also not unlimited, and would need to be matched by concrete steps, including inclusive governance, protection of minorities and real progress on the ground.
That means genuine power-sharing with Alawites, Christians, Kurds and other minorities – and only then can the new leadership stabilise Syria and garner U.S. and European support, the Arab diplomat said.
Washington and European states have tied the lifting of sanctions, imposed under Assad, to the new authorities proving their commitment to inclusive governance and the protection of minorities. Removing these sanctions is crucial to reviving Syria's shattered economy, Sharaa's most pressing challenge.
SAME PLAYBOOK?
But despite promises of reform, the five-year constitution Sharaa unveiled this month gave him absolute power as president, prime minister, head of the armed forces and chief of national security, as well as granting him the authority to appoint judges, ministers and a third of parliament – dashing hopes for democratic reforms.
The constitution also enshrines Islamic law as 'the main source' of legislation.
Critics argue that the constitution swaps autocracy for Islamist theocracy, deepening fears over Sharaa's roots as the leader of a hardline Islamist faction once allied with al Qaeda.
Kurds, who control northeastern Syria and recently agreed to integrate with the new government, criticised the temporary constitution for 'reproducing authoritarianism in a new form'.
Syria's dilemma, analysts say, mirrors the trials faced by Arab states a decade ago when, in 2011, a wave of uprisings ousted dictators in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and Yemen.
The 'Arab Spring' upheavals promised democratic revival, but takeovers by Islamists, military coups, and violent fragmentation turned these hopes into setbacks. The victories were short-lived, with states such as Yemen and Libya descending into violence and chaos.
Syria, having endured a far longer and bloodier conflict, now stands at a similar crossroad.
Analysts say if Syria's rulers adopt exclusionary policies that ignore the cultural, religious, ethnic diversity of its citizens, they are bound to fail – just as late Islamist President Mohammed Mursi did in Egypt after the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak.
In Mursi's case, his divisive constitution failed to meet the people's diverse demands and led to his toppling by the army. Such a policy in Syria, the analysts add, would fuel domestic resistance, antagonise neighbours, and prompt foreign intervention.
'Some internal and external forces wanted a secular state, while the constitutional declaration reaffirmed the state's religious-Islamic identity, stating that Islamic law (Sharia) would be the primary source of legislation,' said Sager. 'A possible compromise could have been a model similar to Turkey's – a secular state governed by an Islamic party.'
Muasher at the Carnegie Endowment said Assad's fall should serve as a warning to those who replaced him in Syria.
He said Sharaa must decide whether to adopt the same playbook that made Assad vulnerable and led to the mass Sunni uprising that eventually ousted him – or adopt a different course.
'Syria's new rulers must recognise that the brutal authoritarian model of the regime they replaced was ultimately unsustainable, as is any political system based on exclusion and iron-fisted rule,' Muasher said.
'If they fall back on repression, they will subject Syria to a grim fate.'
(Reuters)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza-bound activist convoy enters Libya from Tunisia
Gaza-bound activist convoy enters Libya from Tunisia

Nahar Net

time7 hours ago

  • Nahar Net

Gaza-bound activist convoy enters Libya from Tunisia

by Naharnet Newsdesk 10 June 2025, 15:07 Hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists taking part in a convoy crossed the Tunisian border on Tuesday into Libya, aiming to keep heading eastwards until they break Israel's blockade on the Palestinian territory, organizers said. This comes after Israel intercepted an aid ship attempting to breach its blockade on Gaza, which was carrying 12 people, including campaigner Greta Thunberg and European parliament member Franco-Palestinian Rima Hassan. The "Soumoud" convoy, meaning "steadfastness" in Arabic, set off from Tunis on Monday morning, spokesman Ghassen Henchiri told Tunisian radio station Mosaique FM. He said it includes 14 buses and around 100 other vehicles, carrying hundreds of people. Convoy members were heard chanting "Resistance, resistance" and "To Gaza we go by the millions" in a video posted on the organizing group's official Facebook page. Henchiri also told Jawhara FM radio channel the convoy plans to remain in Libya for "three or four days at most" before crossing into Egypt and continuing on to Rafah. Organizers have said Egyptian authorities have not yet provided passage to enter the country, but Henchiri said the convoy received "reassuring" information. Organizers said the convoy was not bringing aid into Gaza, but rather aimed at carrying out a "symbolic act" by breaking the blockade on the territory described by the United Nations as "the hungriest place on Earth". Algerian, Mauritanian, Moroccan and Libyan activists were also among the group, which is set to travel along the Libyan coast. After 21 months of war, Israel is facing mounting international pressure to allow more aid into Gaza to alleviate widespread shortages of food and basic supplies. The Madleen aid boat, which set sail for Gaza from Italy on June 1, was halted by Israeli forces on Monday and towed to the port of Ashdod. The 12 people on board were then transferred to Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv, the foreign ministry said, adding that Thunberg had been deported. Five French activists were taken into custody after they refused to leave Israel voluntarily.

Western, UN and Lebanese officials dismiss reports on ending UNIFIL mission
Western, UN and Lebanese officials dismiss reports on ending UNIFIL mission

Nahar Net

time7 hours ago

  • Nahar Net

Western, UN and Lebanese officials dismiss reports on ending UNIFIL mission

by Naharnet Newsdesk 10 June 2025, 14:21 Western and United Nations diplomats dismissed as rumors claims that the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was pulling out of the country, Saudi Arabia's Asharq al-Awsat newspaper has reported. The Lebanese government is expected to request the extension of the peacekeeping forces' mandate that expires in August. A U.S. State Department spokesperson told Asharq Al-Awsat that the reports about the withdrawal are 'inaccurate'. He did not elaborate further. UNIFIL has been deployed in southern Lebanon since March 1978. Some amendments to its mandate were introduced after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and again after the July 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah. Debate rages every year over its duties as the deadline for renewing its mission approaches. Some countries have sought to grant the force more powers, which would put it at odds with Hezbollah that holds sway in the areas of its deployment. Hezbollah was severely weakened after last year's war with Israel and the ensuing ceasefire agreement had demanded that the Iran-backed party remove its weapons from the South. UNIFIL forces are deployed south of the Litani River and along the border with Israel. It boasts over 10,000 soldiers from some 50 countries, as well as 800 civilian employees. UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti told Asharq al-Awsat that the forces' greatest challenge is the lack of a long-term political solution between Lebanon and Israel. UNIFIL continues to encourage the parties to renew their commitment to fully implementing U.N. Security Council resolution 1701 and taking tangible steps to address pending issues related to it, including steps that would lead to a permanent ceasefire, he added. It is too soon to tell what UNIFIL's mandate will be like after next August, he went on to say, stressing that changing its mission is up to the Security Council. Israeli media had reported that the United States wanted to end UNIFIL's mission. Speaking to Asharq al-Awsat, a diplomat dismissed the report as 'usual fear-mongering aimed at influencing Lebanon and other parties interested in extending UNIFIL's mandate and its role in preserving stability in the South and along the Blue Line between Lebanon and Israel.' The Security Council is currently awaiting Lebanon's request to extend the mandate for another year, said Western diplomats. The letter will include Lebanon's clear demand for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all occupied Lebanese territories, including the five hilltops it seized during last year's war. The ceasefire agreement demanded that Israel pull out from those areas within 60 days. Lebanon has been seeking to resolve this issue through the quintet committee tasked with monitoring the ceasefire and through intense contacts with the U.S. U.S. officials are considering pulling American support from UNIFIL in a bid to cut costs associated with its operations, the Israel Hayom newspaper reported Sunday evening. U.S. sources later confirmed to The Times of Israel that the option was on the table. Any discussion about the future of UNIFIL falls solely under the authority of the U.N. Security Council, the spokesperson for UNIFIL clarified to Al-Mayadeen TV, noting that the force remains committed to coordinating with the Lebanese Army and insists on the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. Tenenti told Al-Mayadeen that "there are currently no talks about UNIFIL's future," adding that "any such discussion would take place within the U.N. Security Council." Meanwhile, a U.S. State Department spokesperson told Al- Mayadeen in a short briefing that the recent reports claiming the United States intends to end the UNIFIL peacekeeping mission in southern Lebanon are inaccurate. Tenenti stated that UNIFIL continues its operations in southern Lebanon in full cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces. He emphasized that Israeli forces should withdraw from their occupied positions in the area, noting that the U.N. Security Council alone holds the authority to assess whether UNIFIL's ongoing presence remains necessary and effective. Tenenti also affirmed that the Lebanese Army remains committed to implementing U.N. Resolution 1701, deploying to required areas in close coordination with UNIFIL forces. When asked about French troops, he responded: "I don't distinguish between the role of French forces and UNIFIL, all are fulfilling their duties under Resolution 1701." A Lebanese official also denied the reports, in remarks to UAE's The National newspaper. 'This is not serious. We have sources in Washington who completely denied it,' the official told The National. A U.S. State Department spokesman told The National in New York the reports were "not accurate". 'I don't know where these reports are coming from, but they won't lead anywhere. The presence of UNIFIL is a necessity for everyone,' the Lebanese source added. The official said the renewal process had already begun at the request of Lebanese authorities and was expected to proceed smoothly. The decision to extend UNIFIL's mandate, which is taken annually, is made by the U.N. Security Council rather than individual countries. The council consists of 15 members; five permanent – the U.S., UK, France, China and Russia – and 10 rotating. U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said the mandate was in the hands of the Security Council. But he praised the work that UNIFIL has done since the 1970s as "speaking for itself". The force "has been a very crucial component to the safety and the stability of southern Lebanon", he said. "The unrest and activity across the Blue Line continues even now, so the situation has not returned to a position of stability." UNIFIL's annual budget is around $500 million, which is provided by contributions from U.N. member states. Contributions to U.N. peacekeeping missions are based on a formula, which takes into account 'relative economic wealth of member states, with the five permanent members of the Security Council required to pay a larger share because of their special responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security,' according to the U.N. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has openly criticized UNIFIL in several instances, calling on the U.N. to withdraw its peacekeepers from Lebanon and accusing the mission of serving as human shields for Hezbollah during the recent conflict in Lebanon. UNIFIL has reported numerous breaches of the U.S.-brokered truce deal between Israel and Hezbollah that took effect in November, ending 14 months of conflict, including two months of intense Israeli bombardment. These include nearly 2,200 Israeli airspace incursions, more than 40 airstrikes, and close to 1,300 Israeli ground activities in southern Lebanon, a spokesman for the peacekeeping force told The National in April. The peacekeeping force holds regular meetings with the ceasefire monitoring committee established under the latest truce, which is led by the United States and includes France, the Israeli military and the Lebanese army. Despite this, Israel has continued to strike Lebanon, including the capital's suburbs, claiming that it is striking Hezbollah military sites that violate the agreement.

E3, US Misusing I.A.E.A. to Achieve Own Political Objectives: Iran
E3, US Misusing I.A.E.A. to Achieve Own Political Objectives: Iran

Al Manar

timea day ago

  • Al Manar

E3, US Misusing I.A.E.A. to Achieve Own Political Objectives: Iran

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei has criticized the United States and three European countries – namely France, Britain, and Germany – for misusing the International Atomic Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) for their own political gains. During his weekly press briefing on Monday, Baqaei responded to a question raised about the West's push for an anti-Iran resolution at the I.A.E.A.'s Board of Governors meeting in Vienna this week. He said that the Islamic Republic had taken steps in the past one or two years in cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog but the three European countries and the United States often abused the agency for their own political purposes. According to the spokesperson, the I.A.E.A. decided to first prepare a report under the political pressure and influence from the Western countries, and subsequently the same countries abused that report. He underlined that Iran's interactions with the agency, from the very beginning, had been based on its commitments arising from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. France, Britain, and Germany, and the United States are reportedly seeking a draft resolution that accuses Iran of 'non-compliance' with safeguards obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, an issue that was declared closed within the framework of the 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Tehran has already warned that any such move will be met with a serious and decisive response. Enrichment a non-negotiable issue Regarding the issue of Iran's continued uranium enrichment, Baqaei said that the Islamic Republic did not need licenses in this regard and would not allow others to impose their will on Iran's right to enrichment. He pointed that enriching uranium does not necessarily mean having a weapons program, arguing that many countries, including some close allies of the United States, are enriching without having a weapons program. Enrichment is an integral part of the nuclear fuel cycle, which has been developed after decades of effort and dedication of Iranian scientists, he said, adding that 'This right is explicitly recognized for member states and is non-negotiable under Article 4 of the NPT.' Iran's nuclear program is peaceful Referring to a recent I.A.E.A. report, Baqaei said that the agency did not mention any non-compliance or deviation in Iran's nuclear program from the peaceful path. He stated that the report itself has several problems as it was drafted with political goals and in order to make excuses for Iran's nuclear program, but there is no mention of Iran's program being non-peaceful. The spokesperson said the position of the Islamic Republic is quite clear that the country, as a responsible member of the NPT, remains committed to continuing the peaceful path. He also touched on Israeli propaganda against Iran's nuclear program, saying that the issue has been affected by the hype created by the regime. He said that Iran's nuclear program has been under the most stringent monitoring mechanisms of the I.A.E.A. Baqaei accused European countries of piling up pressure under the pretext of lack of transparency simply following Israeli narratives. 'If you look at the history of the issue, as I mentioned before, the Zionist regime first claimed in 1984 that Iran was seeking to produce nuclear weapons. Now 40 years have passed since then and the status of the JCPOA is also clear to everyone.' U.S. proposal for Iran Addressing a question related to the U.S. proposal that was conveyed to Iran by Oman on May 31, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson did not give the details but said the proposal neither had the characteristics of active and bilateral negotiations nor was it the outcome of the indirect Iran-U.S. talks held so far. Baqaei emphasized that any plan that does not take into account the rights and interests of the Iranian nation, whether in the field of nuclear energy or with regard to ensuring the effective lifting of oppressive sanctions, is unacceptable to the country and shows a lack of seriousness in the negotiations. He noted that Iran will present its own reasonable, logical, and balanced proposal to the other side through Oman once it is finalized. Europe deviated from diplomatic path Referring to anti-Iran stance and rhetoric by some European countries, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson said that 'the confrontation with European countries cannot in any way create an incentive for cooperation.' He underlined that Iran had clearly stated from the beginning that it is ready to resolve outstanding issues through talks but the European parties not only failed to present constructive proposals, but also withdrew from the diplomatic process for other reasons. According to the spokesperson, a destructive and unconstructive approach was seen when European countries called for the I.A.E.A. report and then drafted a resolution to push during the agency's Board of Governors this week. He warned that the Western countries would be responsible for the consequences of their actions as Iran would take proportionate and reciprocal steps. Referring to activating the 'snapback' mechanism, Baqaei said that the issue should not be exaggerated too much as Iran's nuclear program is completely peaceful and there is no excuse or legal basis to put the Iranian nuclear issue on the Security Council's agenda. Slamming ban on Iranians entering the U.S. Addressing President Donald Trump's executive order to ban citizens of certain countries, including Iran, from entering the U.S., Baqaei said that the move is discriminatory and racist and is completely condemnable both from the perspective of human rights and moral obligations. He said that since the majority of the population affected by this regulation is Muslim, Trump's decision is based on the nationality and religion of individuals. 'Countries and governments are not allowed to enact laws based on the nationality, race, religion or ethnicity of individuals as such policies violate the fundamental principles of equality and justice and represent an inhumane and illegal approach,' he added. Genocide amid international silence The Foreign Ministry spokesperson, once gain deplored the ongoing Israeli genocide against Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip. Unfortunately, the silence and inaction of international institutions, including the United Nations Security Council (U.N.S.C.), has emboldened the regime to continue massacring people in Gaza and the West Bank, he said. Referring to the U.S. veto of a U.N.S.C. resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza last week, Baqaei pointed that Washington's stance once again proved its backing for Israel and granting its officials impunity for gross human rights violations. He called on the international community to take serious and urgent action to stop the sad and horrific situation the Palestinians are going through for the past two years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store