logo
Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill

Senate struggle over Medicaid cuts threatens progress on Trump's big bill

Washington Post15 hours ago

WASHINGTON — One key unsettled issue stalling progress on President Donald Trump's big bill in Congress is particularly daunting: How to cut billions from health care without harming Americans or the hospitals and others who provide care?
Republicans are struggling to devise a solution to the health care problem their package has created. Already, estimates say 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage under the House-passed version of the bill. GOP senators have proposed steeper reductions , which some say go too far.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Mulls Challenge Against Lindsey Graham: 'Lost His Way'
Republican Mulls Challenge Against Lindsey Graham: 'Lost His Way'

Newsweek

time9 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Republican Mulls Challenge Against Lindsey Graham: 'Lost His Way'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Andre Bauer, the former lieutenant governor of South Carolina, said he is seriously considering challenging Senator Lindsey Graham in the 2026 Republican Senate primary. Bauer told the Washington Examiner that Graham has "lost his way" as he accused him of abandoning President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda over the senator's push for the U.S. to go "all in" on backing Israel against Iran. Abby Zilch, a spokesperson for Graham's campaign, told Newsweek that the senator is "focused on helping Trump enact his America First agenda" and is proud to have his "complete and total endorsement." Newsweek reached out to Bauer via social media for comment. Why It Matters Graham has repeatedly fended off primary challengers during his four terms in the Senate, but Bauer's entry into the race could be the biggest test of his grip on Republican voters. Graham split with others in the MAGA movement over U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, and, in recent days, he made a rare break with Trump as he called for regime change in Iran. Bauer, who was South Carolina's lieutenant governor from 2003 to 2011, told the Examiner that Graham is out of step with voters for calling for regime change in Iran, and he believes Graham could turn MAGA voters away from Graham if he entered the race. Senator Lindsey Graham speaks at a Senate subcommittee meeting in Washington, D.C., on May 20, 2025. Senator Lindsey Graham speaks at a Senate subcommittee meeting in Washington, D.C., on May 20, 2025. Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Bauer told the Examiner that he is carefully considering whether to run for office. "I am calling people that I trust, and overwhelmingly, I've never seen anything like it—people feel like it's time for a change," he said. "They feel like Lindsey does not represent South Carolina." Graham's approval numbers suggest he could be vulnerable as he runs for a fifth term, with a recent poll showing his rating is significantly lower than that of other Republicans. About 34 percent of South Carolinians approve of how he is handling his duties, while 40 percent disapprove, according to a Winthrop University poll conducted in May. However, Graham does have a sizable war chest and Trump's endorsement. Bauer told the Examiner that while he has not discussed his possible Senate run with Trump, he president has long urged him to get back into politics in private. "He's expressed confidence in me four or five times in a row that I've seen him," Bauer said. Graham is already facing a primary challenge from businessman Mark Lynch, who has pledged $5 million of his own money into the race. What People Are Saying Andre Bauer told the Washington Examiner: "He's lost his more foreign wars. It's not supporting an America First agenda." Abby Zilch, a spokesperson for Graham's campaign, told Newsweek: "Senator Graham is focused on helping Trump enact his America First agenda - cutting taxes, eliminating waste, funding border security, and standing with Israel against religious Nazis who want to wipe them off the map." Alex Latcham, the executive director of the Senate Leadership Fund and a former Trump campaign staffer, wrote on X (formerly Twitter) in response to Bauer's claim of having Trump's support: "This is bulls***. I oversaw President Trump's South Carolina campaign and Andre was a massive pain in the a**." What Happens Next Bauer said he will announce his decision on whether to launch a Senate bid "in the near future." The State newspaper reported earlier this week that an "Andre Bauer for U.S. Senate" fundraising page has already been set up through WinRed, the Republican Party's online campaign donation processing site, though he has not yet filed fundraising paperwork with the Federal Elections Commission.

Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding
Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding

USA Today

time13 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding

lk WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on June 26 sided with South Carolina in its effort to deprive Planned Parenthood of public funding, a decision that is likely to prompt other GOP-led states to take similar action against a health care organization under attack for providing abortion services. The court's ruling -- over the dissent of the three liberal justices -- that Medicaid patients can't sue over their right to choose their doctor could also limit care options beyond the controversial realm of reproductive care. The Trump administration had backed South Carolina, after the Justice Department reevaluated its position following the change in administrations. And anti-abortion groups are pushing Trump and the GOP-controlled Congress to impose a national ban on Planned Parenthood's participation in Medicaid. The organization has said that would have "catastrophic consequences," potentially causing the closure of nearly 200 health centers in 24 states including half the centers that provide abortions. One third of Planned Parenthood's revenue comes from state and federal government funding, including Medicaid, to provide health services, according to the nonpartisan health research organization KFF. Defunding Planned Parenthood is longtime GOP goal Republicans have long sought to defund Planned Parenthood because it performs abortions. Medicaid, which is funded primarily through federal dollars and operated by states to provide health carefor low-income residents, already prohibits coverage of abortion in most cases. But South Carolina argues that the money Planned Parenthood gets from the government for providing birth control, cancer screenings, physical exams, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases and other health services 'frees up their other funds to provide more abortions.' The state's Republican governor, Henry McMaster, signed an executive order in 2018 to cut off Medicaid funding. His order was blocked in court. That was before the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion in 2022, prompting South Carolina to ban abortions after the fetus reachesaround six weeks' gestation. Lower court blocked South Carolina from defunding Planned Parenthood Nearly half of Planned Parenthood patients nationwide get their health care through Medicaid, although that share is lower in South Carolina, which has tighter eligibility rules than most states, according to the organization. The federal Medicaid Act says eligible people may receive health care 'from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or person, qualified to perform the service or services required.' The Supreme Court was asked to review a lower court's decision that the language clearly allows a Medicaid patient to sue if a state blocks a qualified provider from the program. In this case, the patient was Julie Edwards, a Medicaid recipient whoprefers to go to Planned Parenthood for her reproductive health care because they treat her 'without judgment.' Edwards also said she's had trouble finding doctors willing to see Medicaid recipients. South Carolina says Medicaid patients have many other options, including 140 federally qualified health clinics and pregnancy centers. But the American Public Health Association and other health groups told the court more than half of South Carolina's counties don't have enough health services to meet demand and nearly 2 in 5 are considered 'contraceptive deserts.' Planned Parenthood 'fills the gaps where South Carolina's providers are scarcest ‒ women's health and preventative care ‒ lessening the burden on other parts of the state's healthcare system,' various health care policy experts, advocates and providers in South Carolina told the Supreme Court. Without Medicaid reimbursements, the organization maynot be able to continuedelivering services 'in the same manner we have been' and may need to reduce hours at its South Carolina clinics, the organization said in a filing. But Dr. Katherine Farris, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said before Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic was argued that, regardless of the outcome, their 'doors will stay open.'

Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul
Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul

USA Today

time13 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul

Republican provisions to cut Medicaid spending have been a key battleground as the Senate prepares to debate the bill as soon as Friday. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's major tax, spending and policy legislative package suffered a blow on June 26 when the Senate's parliamentarian ruled that several key Medicaid provisions designed to help cajole nervous Republicans into voting yes can't be included in the bill. The decision from the chamber's leading rules expert strikes a blow against proposed Republican changes to Medicaid, the federal health insurance for lower-income families, which has been one of the main battlegrounds in debate over the legislation. Trump and fellow Republicans, who aim to pass the bill without counting on any Democratic support, aim to reduce Medicaid spending by requiring work by able-bodied adults and denying access to non-citizens. But under Senate rules allowing a simple majority approve the bill, all the provisions must directly impact the federal budget. Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled several Medicaid provisions are subject to filibuster, which would require 60 votes to overcome. The decision is a potential death-knell in a chamber where Republicans outnumber the Democratic caucus 53 to 47. 'Democrats are fighting back against Republicans' plans to gut Medicaid, dismantle the Affordable Care Act, and kick kids, veterans, seniors, and folks with disabilities off of their health insurance – all to fund tax breaks for billionaires," Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee, said in a statement. "Republicans are scrambling to rewrite parts of this bill to continue advancing their families-lose, and billionaires-win agenda, but Democrats stand ready to fully scrutinize any changes.' The provisions at stake aimed to: Republicans criticized the parliamentarian's decision. "The Senate Parliamentarian is not elected," Rep. Greg Steube, R-Florida, wrote on social media. "She is not accountable to the American people. Yet she holds veto power over legislation supported by millions of voters."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store