My friend was assassinated. In a world of shrinking political ideals, she was a beacon
Like my classmates around the world, I'm heartbroken by the killing of Melissa and her husband Mark. She was widely loved and admired by friends, colleagues and constituents. We're now trying to work out the best ways to honour her legacy.
Melissa's political prowess has been rightly lauded in recent days. She was a leading architect of what has been labelled the ' Minnesota Miracle ', her tenure as Minnesota House speaker ushering in major reforms on everything from free school lunches to action on climate change. Governor Tim Walz has called her 'the most consequential speaker in state history' – a sentiment echoed by some Republican colleagues, too.
The human loss is magnified by the rare kind of person and leader Melissa was. Deeply authentic and humble, she was distinguished by her curiosity about the world and how to improve it. Though politically formidable, she had an insatiable appetite to learn. Somehow, she managed to retain these virtues in the most combative arena of public life.
Loading
The Melissa Miracle, we might say, was her ability to combine deep progressive convictions with a pragmatist's instinct to get things done, including by working constructively with her political opponents. She was a natural collaborator.
Hers was a civility without illusions. Clear-eyed about moral and political differences – with her own robust commitments to the public good – without letting those differences fuel animosity for others or a desire to suppress disagreement.
'We are not here to avoid conflict. We are here precisely to have conflict. It's an important part of the democratic process,' Melissa insisted when she became speaker. 'But if we can have that conflict with good humour and humility, we'll be better off, and Minnesota will be better off.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
16 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Trump seeks extension of federal takeover of DC police
US President Donald Trump says he will ask congressional Republicans to extend federal control of Washington DC's city police force beyond 30 days, escalating his campaign to exert presidential power over the capital. Trump also asserted that any congressional action could serve as a model for other US cities. It was not clear how Trump's takeover of Washington DC's Metropolitan Police Department could be replicated elsewhere. In seizing control on Monday, Trump took advantage of a federal law, the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, that permits the president to do so under emergency circumstances for up to 30 days. REPORTER: Your federalization of the police has a 30 day limit unless Congress acts to extend it...@POTUS: "We expect to be before Congress very quickly... We're going to need a crime bill... We're going to be asking for extensions on that—long-term extensions." Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 13, 2025 Trump also announced on Monday that he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to the city, a tactic he employed in Los Angeles in June when he mobilised thousands of Guard soldiers and hundreds of US Marines in response to unrest over his administration's immigration raids. Separately, hundreds of federal officers and agents from more than a dozen agencies have fanned out across Washington DC in recent days. In one neighbourhood, officers from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the FBI could be seen along with the US Park Police searching the car of a motorist parked just outside a legal parking area to eat take out and drop off a friend. Two blocks away, US Customs and Border Protection officers gathered in a parking lot before driving off on patrol. The Republican president argues the moves are needed because the US capital is gripped by a wave of violent crime and pervasive homelessness although federal and city crime statistics suggest violent crime has declined since a spike in 2023. The office of Washington DC mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, declined to respond on Trump's latest comments. Bowser has sought to strike a diplomatic tone, even as she has cited statistics showing the city's violent crime rate hit a 30-year low last year. More than 1450 law enforcement personnel were on patrol in Washington DC on Tuesday night, a White House official said, including 30 National Guard troops and 750 city police officers assigned to the "anti-crime" operation. The official said the White House expects a "significantly higher" presence of Guard soldiers on Wednesday night. The effort has resulted in 103 arrests since August 7, which includes 43 on Tuesday, the official said. The charges include one homicide charge, 33 firearms charges and 23 immigration charges, the official said, and have led to 24 seized firearms. During the same period in 2024, the Metropolitan Police Department arrested 364 people in total, police data shows, including traffic and liquor law violations as well as murder, prostitution, carjacking, assault, theft, burglary and robbery. The MPD data shows that police made 20,386 adult arrests in 2024, an average of 56 arrests a day. As of Tuesday, city officials said they were still in command of the department and had received no new orders from the administration, the Washington Post reported. The Metropolitan Police Department on Wednesday referred all questions about arrests involving federal agents to the White House. Asked for comment on Trump's call for congressional action, House Speaker Mike Johnson's office pointed to his social media response to the president's action on Monday: "President Trump is RIGHT. We can't allow crime to destroy our Nation's Capital." However, any legislation to extend Trump's control over the police department would likely fail in the Senate, where Democrats can use procedural rules to block most bills. Trump told reporters on Wednesday that if Congress fails to act, he can declare a "national emergency" to extend the 30-day limit although legal experts expressed skepticism about that claim. "There's nothing about the president extending past 30 days unilaterally," Claire Finkelstein, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, said of the Home Rule Act. "If the 30 days are up, that's that." with AP
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning. John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump's national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' compared with its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. 'In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous. 'I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn't make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.' Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought. 'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told this masthead. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.' Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending. 'That's the concern in the US – that you're spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you're not talking about how you might use it,' he said.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning. John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump's national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' compared with its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. 'In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous. 'I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn't make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.' Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought. 'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told this masthead. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.' Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending. 'That's the concern in the US – that you're spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you're not talking about how you might use it,' he said.
