Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump's national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' compared with its predecessors.
'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. 'In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous.
'I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn't make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.'
Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought.
'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told this masthead. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.'
Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending.
'That's the concern in the US – that you're spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you're not talking about how you might use it,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Some Russians are signalling a claim to Alaska ahead of Trump and Putin's visit
As United States President Donald Trump prepares to hold a meeting on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin, old historical ties are re-emerging. Trump has previously said both Russia and Ukraine will have to swap land to end the fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. While the US bought the state from the Russians over 150 years ago, some are hailing the choice of venue as a victory for Russia, and perhaps a step towards it reclaiming Alaska. 'Alaska is ours' Alaska, which was once a Russian colony, was bought by the US in 1867 for US$7.2 million ($11 million), or roughly 2 US cents per acre. It's of strategic importance to the US, as it provides a large coastline across the Pacific and Arctic oceans with several military bases and commercial harbours. "I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia, on Friday," the US president said mistakenly, ahead of the much-anticipated summit. On the streets and airwaves of Russia, the idea that Alaska rightfully belongs to Russia remains alive, often in satirical or provocative forms. A billboard proclaiming "Alaska is ours" briefly appeared in a Siberian region in 2022, stirring political concern before being revealed as a commercial advertisement. Now, as this territory becomes the backdrop for a high-stakes diplomatic meeting, it's a strong reminder of Alaska's Russian roots. Russia's special envoy on international economic cooperation, Kirill Dmitriev, said the decision to hold the summit in Alaska was symbolically important for the US-Russian partnership. "Born as Russian America — Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade — Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation," Dmitriev wrote on X. Last year, Russian state TV presenter Olga Skabeyeva referred to the US territory as "our Alaska". Kremlin-aligned media outlets are reportedly gushing over their country's links to the region. A Russian billboard that appeared in Siberia in 2022, which read "Alaska nasha", which translates to "Alaska is ours", sparked concern among some US politicians. Credit: Michael McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia during the Obama administration, said the meeting venue is a reminder to Russian nationalists of a "raw deal". "Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian empire," he wrote on X. "Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected." Following the 2022 billboard incident, Alaska's governor, Mike Dunleavy, weighed in with a "good luck" post on social media. "To the Russian politicians who believe they can take back Alaska: Good luck," he wrote on X. 'Alaska is the most strategic location in the world' In his latest tweet, Dunleavy described the state as a "bridge between nations", welcoming the upcoming meeting between the two leaders. "Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south," he wrote on X last week. "With a mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defence, energy security, and Arctic leadership. He said what happens in the Arctic and the Pacific impacts Alaska before the rest of the country, "so it's fitting that discussions of global importance take place there". "For centuries, Alaska has been a bridge between nations, and today, we remain a gateway for diplomacy, commerce, and security in one of the most critical regions on earth. The world will be watching, and Alaska stands ready to host this historic meeting."
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Anthony Albanese deflects criticism over Palestinian recognition move, says media and Ley fed Hamas propaganda
Anthony Albanese has deflected criticism he has emboldened terrorists by advancing Australia's recognition of Palestinian statehood, and blamed others for the political storm it evoked. The Prime Minister instead pointed the finger at the Australian media and the Opposition for feeding into 'Hamas propaganda' after the terrorist group issued contradictory statements about his decision. Despite the confusion, Opposition leader Sussan Ley intensified her criticism of the PM saying he was 'making a real mess of this' and called for him to 'get back to domestic matters'. 'The Prime Minister has said he's not a cheerleader for Hamas. The problem is, that Hamas is a cheerleader for him,' she told reporters in Adelaide on Thursday. 'They're calling our Prime Minister a man of courage on a day when a terrorist organisation calls our Prime Minister a hero, surely he has to think about reversing the decision that led to that. 'It is time for the Prime Minister to get back to important domestic matters.' Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef had lauded Australia on the move in a statement to Sydney Morning Herald on Wednesday, saying the PM displayed 'political courage'. The comments unleashed a wave of criticism borne out of the idea that Australia's foreign policy was being praised by terrorists. Hamas disowned the statement by Thursday morning, posting on its Telegram channel the group 'denies the issuance of any statement'. But in a twist, the terrorist group had reverted their stance by the afternoon. Jumping on the confusion in a defensive morning press conference, Mr Albanese hit out at the media for what he claimed was 'publishing propaganda'. 'They say that the alleged statement from the person yesterday was someone who's been in prison in Israel … since October 2023 and has no means of communication,' Mr Albanese said. The SMH later clarified that quotes from the senior Hamas official were supplied by 'Yousef's political office in Beituina, a town near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, which issues statements on his behalf'. Reporter Matthew Knott also confirmed again on Thursday Yousef's office had released the statement and that he would soon be released from jail. The paper's stablemate the Australian Financial Review published the statement from Hamas denying the comments, saying Yousef had been in jail since October 2023 with 'no means of communication with any local or international press outlets'. However, late on Thursday Hamas issued another statement to the ABC, this time from media director Ismail Al-Thawabta lauding Labor's call. 'Such a move reflects a growing global awareness of the necessity to end the injustice suffered by our people for decades,' the terror group's spokesman told the public broadcaster on Wednesday. 'We call on the Australian government to translate this recognition into concrete actions – by exerting diplomatic pressure to end the Israeli occupation.' Earlier in the day, Mr Albanese cautioned the media against disseminating propaganda before moving on to attack the Opposition for being critical of his call to recognise statehood at UN leaders meeting next month. He even came prepared to his defensive press conference with a list of pro-Palestione quotes his political rival Ms Ley made in 2011. The Coalition have long supported the two-state solution with Israel and Palestine but has criticised the PM for declaring he would recognise Palestinian statehood in September when listed terrorist organisation Hamas is still in control of the region. 'We do support a two-state solution, but we don't support it outside of a proper peace process and a proper two-state process,' Ms Ley said. Ms Ley's criticisms were not just for the pathway for lasting peace in the Middle East but also putting Australia's relationship with our closest ally, the US, in jeopardy. She called the PM a 'bystander' in the alliance. 'It's vital that the Prime Minister addresses this issue because right now the relationship between Australia and the US feels as if it is drifting,' she said. The Coalition also called on Mr Albanese to 'urgently explain' why he refused a US request to sign a joint-nation statement condemning anti-Semitism in the wake of the terror attack on October 7, 2023.
Mercury
2 hours ago
- Mercury
Map shows Australia's new place in the world after bold call on Palestine
Don't miss out on the headlines from Business. Followed categories will be added to My News. A striking map shows Australia's new place in the world after Anthony Albanese made the call to join nearly 150 countries in recognising Palestinian statehood. Australia will formally recognise Palestine when the United Nations General Assembly meets in New York next month. The move is seen as symbolic because Palestinians are living under military occupation and do not have control over their territory or settled borders. The country will join a majority of UN member states – 147 out of 193 – which already recognise Palestine, including most countries in Asia, South America and Africa. In all, those nations make up 75 per cent of the countries in the world. Historically, Western countries have held back from recognising Palestine – but reports of a new Israeli military push in Gaza and famine among Palestinians, coupled with domestic pressure on leaders like Mr Albanese, have resulted in a surge of support. It began when France announced it would recognise Palestine at the UN meeting – the first G7 country to do so. The UK, Canada, and now Australia have followed suit. But there remain some key holdouts. The United States, Israel's biggest ally, does not recognise Palestine and has vetoed past attempts by the Palestinian Authority to join the UN, arguing statehood should come about through negotiations with Israel. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week blasted the gesture by Australia and other Western countries as 'largely meaningless'. 'It's symbolic, and they're doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,' Mr Rubio said. 'The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. 'It's not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country. It's going to be decided on the ground.' Anthony Albanese's announcement on Monday was welcomed by some, but it has also received criticism from both sides of the current conflict. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman Mr Albanese's announcement on Monday was welcomed by some, but it has also received criticism from both sides of the current conflict. Jewish leaders argue it lends legitimacy to terrorist group Hamas, while pro-Palestinian voices claim it does not go far enough and Australia should cut all ties with Israel. Middle East analyst Professor Amin Saikal said the recognition of Palestine 'in itself is not necessarily going to make much of a difference on the ground, because the Palestinian territories are still occupied'. 'It is a symbolic act, basically to send a very, very strong message to the Israeli leadership,' Professor Saikal told 'There are ways of enforcing the recognition of the state of Palestine with some practical measures, otherwise it will remain hollow.' Disturbing reports from Gaza and domestic pressure have led to a surge in support for Palestine from Western countries. Picture: NewsWire/Valeriu Campan The practical steps might include boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel. Prof Saikal said public opinion was increasingly siding with Palestinians in the conflict. 'Now I think it is very widely recognised what Israel is engaging in is a genocide – this is not just journalists or politicians saying it, it's been confirmed by two humanitarian organisations within Israel,' he said. '(Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu has remained completely defiant of calls for a ceasefire and more humanitarian aid in Gaza.' He said as the conflict dragged on, pressure might build on Donald Trump to change his stance. 'Although Trump is absolutely committed to Israel and it's very unlikely he will cut off arms supply, at the same time public opinion is very much turning against Israel,' Prof Saikal said. 'With Trump his base is very important. If this sort of criticism increases, he may finally decide that look, it's no longer in the interests of the US to continue the level of support for Israel.' Professor Amin Saikal said the gesture would remain hollow if it wasn't backed by practical measures. Picture: Supplied Across the ditch, New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said this week that the government would make a decision on Palestinian statehood next month. That places New Zealand in the diminishing group of countries that have yet to recognise Palestine, including G7 members Germany, Japan and Italy. 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Mr Albanese said on Monday. He said the decision was made after he received assurances from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that Hamas would play no role in any future state. The Palestinian Authority controls parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and lost control of the Gaza Strip to Hamas in 2007. Originally published as Map shows Australia's new place in the world after bold call on Palestine
