Illegal miner shot and arrested during Operation Vala Umgodi
According to reports, members of the Combat Team in Sabie received a tip-off from a source about a group of Zama Zamas (foreign nationals) who were allegedly refining gold illegally and selling mercury at a specific address in the area.
Police acted on the information and proceeded to the location.
Upon arrival, the police ran into three suspects who, without hesitation, opened fire at the police and immediately fled the scene.
The police shot back at the suspects, injuring one in the right thigh.
The suspect was immediately arrested and admitted to Sabie Hospital under police guard and has since been discharged and placed in custody.
The two other suspects managed to escape.
The 30-year-old suspect, believed to be a Mozambican, faces charges of possession of gold-bearing material, possession of illicit mining equipment, attempted murder and being an illegal immigrant.
The suspect is expected to appear before the Sabie Magistrate's Court on Tuesday, 17 June 2025.
The Acting Provincial Commissioner of the South African Police Service (SAPS) in Mpumalanga, Major General (Dr) Zeph Mkhwanazi, welcomed the arrest and thanked the public for providing valuable information that led to the arrest of the suspect.
'Illegal mining continues to threaten our economy and public safety. We will ensure that those who engage in such activities face the full might of the law,' said Mkhwanazi.
The police in Tsineng have arrested two suspects in connection with an alleged shooting incident between Ganap and Laxey Village on Saturday, 14 June 2025, claiming two lives.
According to police, approximately six suspects allegedly attempted to break into a tuck shop in the area.
However, a group of community members reportedly approached the suspects, prompting them to flee the scene.
It is alleged that one of the suspects, trying to escape, stopped a vehicle near the scene and shot a 38-year-old driver and his passenger.
The passenger died on the scene and the driver succumbed to his injuries in the hospital.
An intensive search led to a residence in Mothibistad, where three men were arrested.
Investigations are currently ongoing.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
9 minutes ago
- The South African
Malusi Gigaba praises fiancée: 'My greatest love'
Malusi Gigaba has paid tribute to the new woman in his life, fiancée Nomfundo Fakudze. The former Minister of Finance and Home Affairs was previously married to IT businesswoman Norma Mngoma, who recently made headlines with a TV tell-all on their marriage and divorce. Before Norma, he was married to Thabong Nxumalo. In a recent Instagram post, Malusi Gigaba wished his fiancée Nomfundo Fakudze a happy birthday. The 53-year-old posted a video montage of his financial investor partner. He captioned the sentimental post: 'There are no words grand enough to truly express how much you mean to me, and how happy I wish you to be on your birthday. You are my best friend, my anchor, my greatest love, and my reason for smiling every day. 'I hope your birthday is filled with all the love and happiness you deserve, because you deserve the absolute world'. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Malusi Gigaba (@malusi_gigaba) In the comments section, Nomfundo thanked her partner, responding: 'The future looks too bright and it's definitely not an accident'. Before serenading his current partner, Malusi Gigaba was married to Norma Mngoma from 2014 to 2021. The IT businesswoman is the mother of his two sons. His first wife, Thabong Nxumalo -whom he divorced in 2014 – is the mother of his daughter. According to Norma – whose bombshell tell-all on Showmax's Untied had tongues wagging – Malusi Gigaba allegedly bedded several mistresses during their marriage. Norma Mngoma claims she caught her then-husband Malusi Gigaba in bed with another via Instagram: @ During her interview, Norma claimed she received countless messages from women who claimed that they had sexual relations with her then-husband. She brushed them off, as her then-husband contended that they were 'jealous' of their relationship. In 2020, Norma claims she caught Malusi in bed with another woman, who she claimed moved into their home several days later. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Competition Commission and international banks to square off in ConCourt over rand price-fixing accusations
The case stems from allegations that the banks were manipulating the foreign exchange rate between the US dollar and the rand over several years by sharing information on messaging platforms. The Constitutional Court is due to hear four days of legal argument in a matter involving the Competition Commission and more than two dozen banks from across the world, which the commission has accused of 'the most egregious form of anti-competitive conduct'. The case stems from allegations that the banks were manipulating the foreign exchange rate between the US dollar and the rand over several years by sharing information on messaging platforms. Three cases, one brought by the commission and the other two brought by the French bank BNP Paribas and US-based Credit Suisse Securities, have been combined into a single massive hearing at which the court will determine whether all or some of the banks should be held liable for colluding. Years of legal battles The case has its origin in a 2017 referral by the Competition Commission to the Competition Tribunal, in which the commission alleged that international traders were using the Bloomberg instant messaging service to discuss the pricing of the US dollar to rand exchange rate. The commission eventually included 28 banks in its case referral. 'The traders shared competitively sensitive information and made arrangements to assist each other by coordinating their trading activities. The traders would regularly agree on the bid-offer spread or spot rate for buying and selling of the USD/ZAR currency paid,' said the commission. The traders would also make arrangements to manipulate the bid-offer prices on the Reuters trading platform by agreeing on the order of transacting, withholding their trades, or posting 'fake bids and offers', said Makgale Mohlala, the manager of the cartels division of the Competition Commission, in an affidavit before the ConCourt. Various banks filed appeals and exceptions to the case, alleging that the commission did not have the jurisdiction to refer the case. The Competition Appeal Court heard the matters and found that the commission had no jurisdiction with regard to 17 of the international banks. Just four international banks were retained in the case: BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse Securities, JPMorgan Chase and Co, and HSBC Bank PLC. South African banks Standard Bank, Nedbank Limited and FirstRand Bank Limited had also appealed against the initial referral, but the court dismissed their cases. 'Single overarching conspiracy' Mohlala said the commission 'cannot accept this outcome in a case involving the most egregious form of anti-competitive conduct'. The commission had said that there was a 'single overarching conspiracy' among the banks. 'The manipulation impacted on the exchange rate of the South African rand, which in turn affected various parts of the South African economy — including imports and exports, foreign direct investment, public and private debt, companies' balance sheets, with the attendant implications for the prices of goods and services and financial assets,' said Mohlala. The commission also alleges that the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) erred in several conclusions of its judgment, saying it created new requirements for jurisdiction and contradicted itself. No constitutional issue Some of the banks that were listed in the initial complaint have opposed the commission's application, criticising the way the commission handled the initial complaint and subsequent litigation. Standard Bank of South Africa is among these, saying the commission ignored important information when formulating its complaint. In an affidavit, Ian Sinton, the former general counsel and current consultant for Standard Bank, said the bank was opposing the commission because 'there is no constitutional issue implicated' and 'it is not in the interests of justice' that leave to appeal be granted. He claimed that the bank had raised several factual issues during the Competition Tribunal phase that were ignored. 'Numerous opportunities have been afforded to the commission to plead a sustainable case against [Standard Bank], and it has failed to do so. Contrary to its obligation of impartiality imposed by section 20 of the Competition Act, the commission has shut its mind to relevant information furnished to it by Standard Bank, including easily verifiable facts which dispose of the case,' said Stinton in court papers. The bank also argues that the commission didn't have jurisdiction to prosecute it because the alleged misconduct did not take place in its local office. 'The commission made out no case at all linking the activities of the Johannesburg branch to any cause of action, and so the deficiencies in alleging subject matter jurisdiction remain exactly as before,' said the bank through its lawyer Martin Versfeld. The lawyer for Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Shawn van der Meulen, has criticised the commission for raising new legal issues that were not brought up during the initial appeal. JPMorgan Chase has also criticised the commission's decision to approach the ConCourt, saying the case 'does not legitimately raise a constitutional issue'. Banks appeal Two of the banks whose tribunal referral was ruled as valid, BNP Paribas and Credit Suisse Securities, have launched their own cases. BNP alleges that the commission has not properly pleaded its revised case. 'By failing to properly plead its case, the commission has fallen short of the requirements imposed on it by the CAC. This raises a constitutional issue in that this court is called on to decide whether the rule of law, enshrined in section 1 of the Constitution, can accommodate a situation in which the commission can exercise its prosecutorial powers in contravention of an order of the CAC, which binds the commission,' said Rudolph Labuschagne, BNP's attorney. Credit Suisse Securities has also taken issue with how the commission initiated its investigation. The commission 'exceeded [its] statutory power and thereby violated the principles of legality and the rule of law. These are quintessential constitutional matters,' said Paul Cleland, the attorney for Credit Suisse Securities. Credit Suisse also takes issue with the appeal decision, saying the CAC failed 'to treat like parties alike in the same proceedings — for no good reason whatsoever'. It believes it should have got an exception, like several other international banks. The bank says this action is 'patently arbitrary and irrational'. 'The CAC order violates the right to equal treatment before the law under section 9 (1) of the Constitution, which 'entitles everybody, at the very least, to equal treatment by our courts of law'.' Due to the similarity of issues being dealt with, the ConCourt has combined all three cases into one hearing. Argument will be heard from 19-22 August. DM
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
How illegal harvesting of vulnerable plants and animals strips the Cape's ecology
While it doesn't make it onto Narcos, the illegal trade of plants in South Africa is prolific and organised, feeding lucrative international markets. From vulnerable succulents to tortoises, this hidden biodiversity crime quietly strips the country's wild spaces, with ripple effects on ecosystems, communities and the economy. Many times a week, CapeNature compliance officers and SAPS units chase down plant poachers – some driven by economic hardship, others by profit – supplying a market for ornamental conversation pieces in homes around the world. Whether buyers realise it or not, the trade has cascading ecological impacts and undermines tourism livelihoods. Between April and June 2025, CapeNature – the public institution responsible for biodiversity conservation in the Western Cape – registered 12 biodiversity crime cases. Eight involved flora (plant life), while four related to fauna (animal life). Sixteen people were arrested. Alongside these investigations, officials issued 23 fines: four for contraventions of the Marine Living Resources Act (such as fishing without a licence or catching undersized fish) and 19 for offences under the Nature Conservation Ordinance, including the possession of wild animals or indigenous plants, and illegal snaring. 'These statistics reflect the seriousness of biodiversity crime in the province and our ongoing efforts to strengthen compliance and enforcement along with our partners,' said Anton Bredell, the MEC for local government, environmental affairs and development planning. Plants under siege Carl Brown, a compliance specialist in wildlife trade at CapeNature, says the main offences involve the possession of wild animals (mostly reptiles) and indigenous plants, including succulents. Three species are under particular pressure: Clivia mirabilis, elephant's foot (Dioscorea) and the succulent genus Conophytum. The disrupted rocks are visible signs of the illegal harvesting of Conophytum subterraneum, a rare succulent species found in rocky habitats. (Photo: CapeNature) The hardest hit is Clivia mirabilis, or the 'miracle clivia', which grows naturally in the remote mountains between Vanrhynsdorp and Nieuwoudtville, on the boundary of the Western and Northern Cape. 'What's unique about this one is that the closest relative is in the Eastern Cape around the Alexandria area… which is way out of distribution, that's why they call it the miracle clivia,' said Brown. Listed as vulnerable on Sanbi's Red List of South African Plants, it is targeted for ornamental horticulture, particularly by lucrative markets overseas. 'It's being targeted by illegal collectors and being sent out by the hundreds – and the species is at risk.' Brown explained that these plants are targeted to satisfy demand for ornamental displays. 'It's used to have an interesting plant, like a conversation piece or as a display piece,' he said. Collectors prefer large, wild specimens that flower and set seed faster than cultivated plants. 'Those that are collecting want a plant that looks wild… they don't want a nice nursery plant that's fat and pretty,' Brown said. Other recent cases involved about 100 illegally harvested elephant's foot plants and large-scale poaching of Conophytum succulents. 'Eleven of the Conophytum species are now considered to be functionally extinct in the wild,' said Brown, meaning they are so depleted that natural reproduction is unlikely. In a recent Red List update many Conophytum species have been moved from 'least concern' to 'critically endangered' or 'endangered' due to illegal harvesting. Organised crime Believe it or not, while it might not make it onto Narcos, the illegal harvesting and trade of plants in South Africa is highly organised, driven largely by international demand for ornamental species. 'The market for those plants is not really in South Africa… the primary market for Clivia mirabilis is actually the Far East,' Brown said. Brown said overseas traffickers often use social media platforms such as Facebook or TikTok to identify species and locations. They then contact local harvesters, sometimes supplying GPS coordinates or detailed descriptions of target areas. The plants are then smuggled out, often via courier companies. Enforcement involves CapeNature working with the South African Police Service (including the Hawks and Endangered Species Unit), landowners, tourism operators, freight companies and other partners. 'They are responding sometimes twice, three times a week… but they're not always catching people,' Brown said. One of the biggest challenges in tackling succulent poaching is the vast and remote terrain, which makes it difficult to spot and report illegal activity. 'They're quite isolated and remote, so actually seeing people doing the illegal activities and reporting them is difficult because… they will use back roads,' Brown said. Observation posts are sometimes set up in targeted areas, similar to anti-rhino-poaching operations, with landowners playing a key role. 'People are watching those areas… especially the landowners, because they want to protect the plants that they have on their properties,' he said. People and places behind the trade 'In a lot of the towns, especially in the Northern Cape, the old mining areas are no longer functional, so a lot of those people who were employed in the mines are now sitting without jobs,' Brown said. He noted that while some individuals exploit the trade for extra income, many harvest plants out of necessity. 'There are those people that are legitimately doing it because they don't have any other choice – there's no other functional economy where they can actually go and get jobs. So there's a socioeconomic challenge that needs to be addressed.' Legal alternatives, such as community-run nurseries selling indigenous plants, offered livelihoods without threatening wild populations. 'Tourists come from all over the world to see these plants. The key message we promote is 'take only photographs, leave only footprints'. There are managed nurseries that sell these plants legally and support local livelihoods.' Why it matters Biodiversity crime might not be as high-profile as violent crime, but its impacts go far beyond a few missing indigenous plants. It affects ecosystems, climate adaptation and local, ethical ecotourism. The Western Cape is home to the Cape Floristic Region, one of the world's six floral kingdoms and a Unesco World Heritage Site. Yet nearly 16% of the province's species and more than half of its ecosystems are considered threatened. Illegal harvesting damages more than just the targeted plants. Poachers often uproot hundreds of specimens at a time, disturbing soil and destroying habitats. 'Because rainfall in those areas is episodic… that can have impacts on soil erosion and other plants,' Brown explained. Some plants act as 'incubators' for other species, providing shade and shelter for germinating seeds. Removing them disrupts regeneration and the broader ecosystem. The region's biodiversity also plays a crucial role in water retention, particularly in mountain catchments. 'Healthy vegetation means water is retained and released slowly,' Brown said. When mountainsides are bare, water runs off quickly, eroding soils and degrading habitats. At a constitutional level, protecting biodiversity supports the right to a healthy environment. The South African Constitution guarantees this right, ensuring an environment that maintains ecosystem services, supports water security and sustains local economies. 'The framework of the Constitution actually thought that it's quite important to have an environment that works for us, that's healthy for us, that benefits us,' noted Brown, adding that this is especially true in the Western Cape, given the catchment areas that helped the region through the Day Zero drought period. What you should know While much of the problem is driven by organised crime, Brown said some illegal activity stems from ignorance – people simply don't know that they can't pick certain plants or take protected species. Of the 19 fines issued under the Nature Conservation Ordinance, 15 involved wild animals, mainly the possession of tortoises and the snaring, or attempted snaring, of bushbuck along the Garden Route. Some cases appear opportunistic, such as picking up a tortoise found on the roadside, while others are deliberate. Advice I'd give to my mother To make sure you aren't accidentally committing a biodiversity crime, here's a guide for you, or as Brown says, things he tells his mom: ''No, mother. you may not pick that flower. We're in a National Park.' This is a standing family joke that I have with my mom when we go to visit protected areas. 'My folks have always been supportive of my career in nature conservation, and we have had some interesting adventures and wildlife sightings since I made that career choice many years ago.' Brown's advice or the average protected area visitor Respect the land: All land belongs to someone – the government, companies or private owners. Always get permission before picking plants or interacting with wildlife; Follow the law: All indigenous wild animals and plants are protected. Legal permits or licences are required to pick, hunt or collect them; and Understand the consequences: 'Just like there are consequences for taking other people's stuff, there are consequences for picking plants or catching wild animals without permission or without permits,' says Brown. Common plants often taken unknowingly Arum lilies; Proteas (various species); Pincushions (Leucospermum); and Other flowering indigenous species. 'So, remember, don't pick the flower if it belongs to someone else, and don't take the lonely tortoise crossing the road home with you,' said Brown. 'It's just trying to get to the other side.' DM
