Trump says dealing 'nicely' with China as tariff deadline looms
While the United States and China slapped escalating tariffs on each other's products this year, reaching prohibitive triple-digit levels and snarling trade, both countries in May agreed to temporarily lower them.
But their 90-day halt in steeper levies is due to expire Tuesday, and all eyes are now on a path forward.
Asked about the deadline on Monday, Trump said: "We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi (Jinping) and myself."
Trump also touted the tariff revenue his country has collected this year, saying "we've been dealing very nicely with China."
"We hope that the US will work with China to follow the important consensus reached during the phone call between the two heads of state," said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian in a statement.
He added that Beijing also hopes Washington will "strive for positive outcomes on the basis of equality, respect and mutual benefit."
Shaky truce
Although both sides reached a pact to de-escalate tensions after high level talks in Geneva in May, their truce has been shaky.
In June, key economic officials convened in London as disagreements emerged and US officials accused their counterparts of violating the pact. Policymakers again met in Stockholm last month.
Even as both countries appeared to be seeking to push back the reinstatement of duties, US trade envoy Jamieson Greer said last month that Trump will have the "final call" on any such extension.
Last week, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview that it is likely Trump will further the pause by another 90 days.
The White House did not respond to queries about the matter on Monday.
Trump said in a social media post late Sunday that he hoped China will "quickly quadruple its soybean orders," adding that this would be a way to balance trade with the United States.
For now, fresh US tariffs on Chinese goods this year stand at 30 percent, while Beijing's corresponding levy on US products is at 10 percent.
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has slapped a 10-percent "reciprocal" tariff on almost all trading partners, aimed at addressing trade practices Washington deemed unfair.
This surged to varying, steeper levels last Thursday for dozens of economies.
Major partners like the European Union, Japan and South Korea now see a 15-percent US duty on many products, while the level went as high as 41 percent for Syria.
The "reciprocal" tariffs exclude sectors that have been separately targeted, such as steel and aluminum, and those that are being investigated like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
Trump has also taken separate aim at individual countries such as Brazil over the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of planning a coup, and India over its purchase of Russian oil.
Canada and Mexico come under a different tariff regime.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
US inflation shows limited tariff impact, but prices still rise
US consumer prices rose 0.2% in July and 2.7% over the past year, coming in slightly below the expected tariff-induced spike. Core inflation hit 3.1% — its highest level since February — as shelter and service costs edged higher but tariff impacts remained modest. The figures suggest that slowing rent increases and cheaper gas are offsetting some impacts of US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Still, stubbornly high inflation puts the Federal Reserve in a difficult spot. Hiring slowed sharply in the spring, after Trump announced tariffs in April. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has warned that worsening inflation could pause rate cuts — a stance that has enraged Trump, who has defied traditional norms of central bank independence and demanded that the Federal Reserve lower borrowing costs. Gas prices fell 2.2% from June to July and have plunged 9.5% from a year earlier, the government's report said. Grocery prices slipped 0.1% last month, though they are still 2.2% higher than a year ago. Restaurant meals continued to get more expensive, however, rising 0.3% in July and 3.9% from a year earlier. Tariffs appeared to raise the cost of some imported items. Shoe prices jumped 1.4% from June to July, though they are still just 0.9% more expensive than a year ago. The cost of furniture leapt 0.9% in July and is 3.2% higher than a year earlier. Clothing prices ticked up 0.1% in July, after a larger rise in June, though they are still slightly cheaper than a year ago. Trouble for the government's chief inflation tracker Tuesday's data arrives at a highly-charged moment for the Labour Department's Bureau of Labour Statistics, which collects and publishes the inflation data. Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, then the head of BLS, after the 1 August jobs report also showed sharply lower hiring for May and June than had previously been reported. The president posted on social media Monday that he has picked E.J. Antoni, an economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a frequent critic of the jobs report, to replace McEntarfer. 'E.J. will ensure that the numbers released are honest and accurate,' Trump said on Truth Social. Adding to the BLS's turmoil is a government-wide hiring freeze that has forced it to cut back on the amount of data it collects for each inflation report, the agency has said. UBS economist Alan Detmeister estimates that BLS is now collecting about 18% fewer price quotes for the inflation report than it did a few months ago. He thinks the report will produce more volatile results, though averaged out over time, still reliable. Prices likely to rise later in the year as tariffs set in Americans are likely to absorb more trade-war costs in the coming months as Trump begins to finalise tariffs. Once businesses know what they will be paying, they are more likely to pass those costs to customers, economists say. Trump has insisted that overseas manufacturers will pay the tariffs by reducing their prices to offset the duties. Yet the pre-tariff prices of imports haven't fallen much since the levies were put in place. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that foreign manufacturers have absorbed just 14% of the duties through June, while 22% has been paid by consumers and 64% by US companies. Based on previous patterns, however — such as Trump's 2018 duties on washing machines — the economists expect that by this fall consumers will bear 67% of the burden, while foreign exporters pay 25% and US companies handle just 8%. Many large US companies are raising prices in response to the tariffs, including apparel makers Ralph Lauren and Under Armour, and eyewear company Warby Parker. Consumer products giant Procter & Gamble, maker of Crest toothpaste, Tide detergent and Charmin toilet paper, said late last month that it would lift prices on about a quarter of its products by mid-single-digit percentages. And cosmetics maker e.l.f. Beauty, which makes a majority of its products in China, said on Wednesday that it had raised prices by a dollar on its entire product assortment as of 1 August because of tariff costs, the third price hike in its 21-year history. 'We tend to lead and then we will see how many more kind of follow us,' CEO Tarang Amin said on an earnings call Wednesday. Matt Pavich, senior director of strategy and innovation at Revionics, a company that provides AI tools to large retailers to help them evaluate pricing decisions, says many companies are raising prices selectively to offset tariffs, rather than across the board. 'Up until now we haven't seen a massive hit to consumers in retail prices,' Pavich said. 'Now, they are going up, we've seen that.'
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
US consumer inflation holds steady but tariff worries persist
Consumer inflation in the United States held steady in July, data showed on Tuesday, August 12, but underlying price increases picked up as President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs ripple through the world's biggest economy. The consumer price index (CPI) rose 2.7% from a year ago in July, the same rate as in June, said the Department of Labor. But, excluding the volatile food and energy segments, "core" CPI accelerated to 0.3% on a month-on-month basis last month, up from a 0.2% rise before, the CPI report said. From a year ago, underlying inflation rose 3.1%, picking up pace too. Analysts are closely watching CPI amid increasing fears over the reliability of economic data from the Trump administration, which fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics recently after a jobs report showed significantly lower hiring numbers. They are also watching closely for weakening amid Trump's trade war, as he tries to reshape the global economy. He has ordered a 10% tariff on goods from almost all trading partners. For dozens of economies, including Japan, South Korea and the European Union, this level rose to various higher rates last Thursday. Sectors that have been targeted individually – or are under investigation by officials – have been spared from these countrywide levies so far. But Trump has been progressively imposing steep duties on different sectors. The headline CPI figure was a touch lower than the 2.8% rate expected in a median forecast of analysts surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires and the Wall Street Journal. But experts have warned that a cooler figure could also point to a slowing economy. Some say that even a slight acceleration in inflation would not deter the Federal Reserve from cutting interest rates soon to boost the economy. But policymakers are trying to balance between supporting the economy and keeping cost increases under control. They are monitoring for signs that goods prices in particular have risen due to tariffs. While businesses have stocked up in anticipation of Trump's tariff hikes this year and may not have raised consumer costs directly, economists warn that companies will not be able to do so indefinitely as narrower margins bite. While the indexes for energy and gasoline dropped in the month, shelter costs rose in July. Indexes that rose over the month included medical care, airline fares and household furnishings, the Labor Department report showed. "With activity growth below potential and job growth below its breakeven pace, the case for [rate] cuts has become much clearer," Goldman Sachs analysts said in a recent note.
AFP
3 hours ago
- AFP
Posts falsely claim Toyota has unveiled a water-powered engine
'In a move that will shake up the global auto industry, Toyota has just unveiled a water-powered engine powered by hydrogen created through electrolysis, emitting only water vapor! No lithium. No charging stations…With this bold move, Toyota isn't just competing with EVs — they're declaring the end of the battery era,' reads a Facebook post shared more than 250 times since it was published on June 28, 2025. The post contains a collage of two photos, one showing a man in a suit appearing to present the water engine and the other of a Toyota-branded engine, with a photo of Chinese president Xi Jinping superimposed. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post, taken on August 11, 2025 AFP Fact Check debunked similar claims in French and Bulgarian. In the race for zero-emission vehicles — particularly between electric and hydrogen cars — the hope that water could one day replace fuel is a popular idea that has resurfaced in recent years. But this hypothesis has never been supported by solid scientific evidence, as AFP Fact Check previously explained in this debunk. The claim that Toyota is developing a water-powered engine is false. Hydrogen vehicles Toyota has not made any public announcements "unveiling" a water engine, as the post claimed. "We are not developing anything that could be described as a 'water engine'," Jean-Yves Jault, a representative of the Toyota Motor Corporation, said in an email to AFP on July 23. Jault called the claims circulating online "false information" and referred to a Forbes article that refutes the rumor (archived here). Toyota produces vehicles that use hydrogen as fuel. These cars, like the Mirai model, are fueled at specialised stations and equipped with lithium-ion batteries to store and manage energy (archived here). Robert Rapier, a chemical engineer and the author of the Forbes article, explained that "water as the power source for a vehicle is nonsense'. 'Although water can be an energy source, it is not a fuel. Water is actually the combustion product of hydrogen, which is a fuel. Water is produced when hydrogen is burned. Water can function as an energy source in some situations,' he added. Electrolysis process Electrolysis is a process where an electric current is passed through a substance to trigger a chemical reaction, splitting water molecules (H₂O) into hydrogen (H₂) and oxygen (O₂). The process requires a significant amount of electricity and is only effective when there is a stable energy source (archived here). Electrolysis does not produce energy; it consumes it to produce hydrogen, which is then used to power fuel-cell vehicles. Therefore, there must be a source of electricity, such as a battery, for electrolysis to work inside a car engine. 'But such a scenario would be inefficient, because each energy conversion stage involves efficiency losses. That's basic thermodynamics. Rather than use a battery to produce hydrogen via electrolysis, which then has to be converted into energy to power a car, it would be far more efficient (and practical) just to use the initial electricity directly without the conversion steps,' Rapier wrote in his article. Image Graphic explaining the steps necessary to produce green hydrogen, a source of energy seen as an option to decarbonize some heavy-polluting industries (AFP / Tatiana MAGARINOS, Gustavo IZUS) Several experts also confirmed this process to AFP Fact Check. Professor Plamen Punov of Sofia Technical University, who supervises student projects on hydrogen fuel cells, noted that the hydrogen used as fuel is not produced directly inside the vehicle (archived here). 'All these cars produce electricity in fuel cells that use pure hydrogen, pre-charged in bottles. I am not aware of such a vehicle existing, and theoretically it would be extremely inefficient and impractical," he wrote in an email to AFP Fact Check on July 7, 2025. Professor Boriana Tsaneva, a PhD in chemistry at the same university, also confirmed to AFP Fact Check via email that 'it is technically possible to use electrolysis to harness the residual energy of a moving vehicle', but this option is 'economically unreasonable'. Aside from the high costs and additional weight from installing an electrolysis cell and other components on board, Tsaneva added that the explosive gas mixture produced would be incredibly dangerous. This mixture cannot be stored safely and needs to be added immediately after production, she noted. Furthermore, the usable energy produced from burning the gas mixture is negligible. Water as coolant, not fuel The confusion likely stems from a patent filed by Toyota in 2023 for a hydrogen engine with a water-cooled system. In this design, water is used as a coolant instead of the traditionally used air, not as a fuel (archived here). This system better controls the high temperatures created by hydrogen combustion. By lowering temperatures, manufacturers can use lighter materials in the combustion chambers and cylinders, thus improving engine efficiency and reducing weight. The Toyota Mirai follows the manufacturer's current technology: a hydrogen fuel cell that generates electricity to power an electric motor (archived here). Hydrogen is stored in reservoirs under high pressure, and the vehicle is recharged at specialised stations. The only byproduct of converting hydrogen into electricity is water vapour. The car does not have an electrolysis system to produce hydrogen from water. It is equipped with a lithium-ion battery. Toyota also uses electrolysis to produce hydrogen at some of its facilities, but this process takes place outside the vehicles, not inside them (archived here). As part of a long-term strategy toward carbon-neutral vehicles, Toyota is taking a multi-pronged approach. This includes the development of hydrogen fuel cells, hydrogen-powered combustion engines, and solid-state batteries, which could offer better performance for safety, range and power (archived here). Battery-powered electric vehicles dominate the zero-emission transport market, due to their affordability, higher fuel efficiency, and growing charging infrastructure (archived here). However, some automakers, including Toyota, are considering hydrogen-powered cars as a complementary solution for heavy-duty transportation and long-distance travel. Their large-scale development remains limited by high production costs and a still-underdeveloped refuelling network. Most analysts agree that the future of zero-emission mobility will rely on a mix of technologies: Batteries will remain the preferred option for passenger cars, while hydrogen could play a strategic role in specific sectors, such as long-haul trucks, heavy-duty vehicles and certain industrial uses (archived here). AFP has debunked other claims about the existence of water-powered cars here and here.
