Manitoba's public auto insurer restarting much-maligned technology overhaul after pausing it
CEO Satvir Jatana told a legislative committee hearing Thursday the Crown corporation needed to take stock of Project Nova, an IT renewal project launched in 2019 that's intended to let customers and brokers complete more of their auto insurance business online.
"We took a pause. We didn't want to continue because we have not been successful, I'll say, thus far," she said.
"We did not want to blindly spend additional funds without truly understanding what it is that we're building, what are the needs and how are we going to deliver this."
Project Nova has faced major cost overruns, with a budget that rose from $86 million to nearly $290 million over a few years.
MPI has spent $162 million on Project Nova so far, Jatana said.
"I can't sit here and say that we have realized the full value of that [money], so hence why we needed to pause," she said, in response to questioning from MLA Wayne Balcaen, the Progressive Conservative critic for MPI.
"We needed, with this board, with this leadership team, to ensure that we don't just continue to spend ratepayer dollars without delivering value, and that's what we've been focused on."
'Lots of defects': CEO
The replacement of the public insurer's outdated information technology systems was supposed to be completed this spring, but only two of the four phases are finished, and one of those phases had "lots of defects," Jatana said.
She didn't reveal a timeline or cost estimate for the remaining two phases, which consists of "the majority of the delivery," Jatana said.
An MPI spokesperson said Project Nova is in the midst of "a detailed planning phase that will help us understand the requirements that must be in place before we move forward with implementing any further changes."
She promised MPI will reveal more details in the coming months.
Asked Friday when the pause took effect, MPI wouldn't give an answer, but Jatana said at a committee hearing last March the corporation needed to "rethink [and] re-plan" the IT overhaul. She also said Project Nova's next steps would be released that spring, but that didn't happen.
The first phase of the project involved shifting trucking and commercial insurance customers to an online-based platform, but it's been dogged by problems since its 2023 release.
Jatana said MPI stopped migrating customers over to the new system several months later to address defects. With half of commercial customers currently using the new system and the rest continuing to use the old system, all customers are continuing to be served properly, she said.
The second phase of Project Nova, which shifted the vehicle registration system for trucks and buses travelling outside Canada online, was released last summer.
After the pause to Project Nova, work to fix the bugs plaguing its first phase has continued, and Jatana said significant progress has been made in the last five to six months.
Frustration with lack of progress
The limited progress on Project Nova stems from the corporation enduring a 10-week strike in late 2023, the subsequent work to clear the backlog, and multiple leadership changes, said Jatana, who was named CEO early last year.
She said there's frustration internally, especially among staff who have worked diligently on the project.
"I can never say enough to them, 'This is not you. This is the situation we put you in.'"
Balcaen, the Tory MPI critic, told the committee he's glad to hear Jatana say she doesn't want to "overcommit and under-deliver."
That's a trend "I've seen with this [NDP] government," he said.
However, he wasn't happy Jatana said she couldn't speak further about Project Nova's future steps without permission from MPI's board, whose chairperson, Carmen Nedohin, told the committee the plan for the project still needs to be finalized.
Matt Wiebe, the NDP minister in charge of the MPI file, used part of his final address to the committee to allege Balcaen was "really starting to acknowledge the mess that was left by the previous government."
The sharp jump in costs for Project Nova and the corporation's attempt to hire a few hundred more staff were among the reasons the former Progressive Conservative government ordered an external review of the corporation in 2023.
That audit found the insurer was top heavy and contending with instability from various leadership changes, and that Project Nova "dominates and consumes" discretionary resources.
Jatana has previously said Project Nova cannot be abandoned because MPI must upgrade its outdated technologies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
4 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
Article content The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. Article content O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' Article content In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Article content Article content Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' Article content The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. — Jamie Sarkonak (@sarkonakj) August 13, 2025 Article content Article content Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Article content Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.'
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
When Parliament resumes this fall, a Conservative MP says her party will introduce legislation to end consideration of immigration status when a judge is sentencing a convicted criminal who is not a citizen. Michelle Rempel Garner, MP for Calgary Nose Hill and shadow minister for Immigration, said the practice has essentially resulted in a two-tier justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians convicted of the same crime. 'This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system,' Rempel Garner said at a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday. She pointed to a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada decision that she says has permitted judges to consider immigration status at the sentencing stage of a case. In that case, R. v. Pham , the accused was a non‑citizen, convicted of two drug‑related offences. The trial judge imposed a sentence of two years' imprisonment. However, the Supreme Court noted that under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a non‑citizen sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least two years loses the right to appeal a removal order against him or her. In reducing Pham's sentence, the Supreme Court ruled that 'collateral immigration consequences' are relevant factors that a sentencing judge may take into account in determining an appropriate sentence, but added that those consequences should not influence whether or not deportation occurs. Rempel Garner cited a few recent cases that relied on the Pham ruling in handing down a sentence. In the first example, a permanent resident was convicted of trying to buy sex from a police officer posing as a 15-year-old in an online sting operation. The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
National Post
4 hours ago
- National Post
Conservatives aiming to amend Criminal Code so immigration status won't be a factor in sentencing
Article content The Crown sought a 90-day jail sentence. Ontario Court judge Paul O'Marra wrote that a criminal record would likely prevent the offender from sponsoring his wife to also become a permanent resident, as well as delay the offender's eligibility for Canadian citizenship and jeopardize his ability to become a licensed engineer. Article content O'Marra concluded that 'a custodial sentence would be unduly harsh' and instead handed down a conditional discharge with 12 months of probation, which included three months of house arrest. In establishing the basis for his reasoning, he wrote: 'The Pham decision stands for the principle that collateral consequences, while not determinative, can justify a lower sentence within the legal range to avoid disproportionate hardship,' Article content In an Alberta case cited by Rempel Garner, a man in Canada on a visitor's permit was accused of groping an 18-year-old woman in a nightclub twice. The judge ruled that 'in consideration of the devastating collateral immigration consequences to recording a conviction, I conclude that the appropriate sentence for Mr. Singh is a conditional discharge with a probation order of maximum duration, 3 years.' Article content Article content Rempel Garner insists that when 'it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a system of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non-citizens.' Article content The Conservatives are proposing a bill that would prohibit immigration discounts in sentencing. Great news! Courts have been more lenient on non-citizens since 2013, at times going light on sex offenders to help them remain in Canada. That can change if Parliament wills it. — Jamie Sarkonak (@sarkonakj) August 13, 2025 Article content Article content Rempel Garner said the Conservatives intend to introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code. 'Our bill will add a section after Section 718.202 … which will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or … their family members, should not be taken into consideration by a judge when issuing a sentence.' Article content Acknowledging that the vast majority of immigrants and temporary residents in Canada abide by the law, she said 'removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer. Conservatives will always fight to protect Canadians, the value of our citizenship and the safety of every person who lives here. Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right.'
